Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Localization of the M2-Brane

Friðrik Freyr Gautason1 and Jesse van Muiden2

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101601 – Published 2 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/67bh-xd42

Abstract

We study quantum M2-branes in holographic backgrounds and show that their moduli spaces of zero modes are localized according to an R-symmetry Killing vector. We discuss the relation with recent results in the context of equivariant localization in gauged supergravity and argue its origin within M-theory path integrals expanded in saddle points over M2-branes. We argue that the M2-brane partition function, including its nonperturbative corrections, should be compared to the field theory grand canonical partition function. Our results extend recent observations in the context of the giant graviton expansion of superconformal indices to generic supersymmetric anti–de Sitter boundary conditions. As a byproduct we predict nonperturbative corrections to a variety of supersymmetric observables of the Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. V. Pestun et al., Localization techniques in quantum field theories, J. Phys. A 50, 440301 (2017).
  2. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 091.
  3. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Effective field theory from quantized strings, Phys. Lett. B 158, 316 (1985).
  4. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Effective action approach to superstring theory, Phys. Lett. B 160, 69 (1985).
  5. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Quantum string theory effective action, Nucl. Phys. B261, 1 (1985); B269, 745(E) (1986).
  6. We emphasize that in this background field approach the target space is taken to be off-shell. This approach is not to be confused with the off-shell methods of string field theory.

  7. R. Arai, S. Fujiwara, Y. Imamura, T. Mori, and D. Yokoyama, Finite-N corrections to the M-brane indices, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 093.
  8. D. Gaiotto and J. H. Lee, The giant graviton expansion, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 025.
  9. M. Beccaria and A. A. Tseytlin, Large N expansion of superconformal index of k=1 ABJM theory and semiclassical M5 brane partition function, Nucl. Phys. B1001, 116507 (2024).
  10. N. Drukker, M. Marino, and P. Putrov, From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 306, 511 (2011).
  11. Y. Hatsuda, S. Moriyama, and K. Okuyama, Instanton effects in ABJM theory from Fermi gas approach, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 158.
  12. F. F. Gautason, V. G. M. Puletti, and J. van Muiden, Quantized strings and instantons in holography, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 218.
  13. M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. A. Tseytlin, Instanton contributions to the ABJM free energy from quantum M2 branes, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 029.
  14. In the case of giant graviton expansions one can understand the brane expansion to arise from trace relations in the dual quantum field theory. For generic boundary conditions there is, however, no radial quantization and as such one would have to understand the field theory origin of such an expansion from a Lagrangian point of view, similar to what was suggested in [15].

  15. J. H. Lee and D. Stanford, Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations, arXiv:2412.20769.
  16. P. Benetti Genolini, J. M. Perez Ipiña, and J. Sparks, Localization of the action in AdS/CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 252.
  17. P. B. Genolini, J. P. Gauntlett, and J. Sparks, Equivariant localization in supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 121602 (2023).
  18. F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden, Localization of instanton moduli spaces in M-theory (to be published).
  19. Throughout we will use the four-dimensional indices μ,ν=1,…,4, the seven-dimensional indices α,β=5,…,11, the eleven-dimensional indices M,N=1,…,11, and the M2-brane world volume indices a,b=1,…,3. Explicit numbered indices (appearing on gamma matrices and frames) are flat but when there is an ambiguity flat indices are hatted.

  20. J. P. Gauntlett and O. Varela, Consistent Kaluza-Klein reductions for general supersymmetric AdS solutions, Phys. Rev. D 76, 126007 (2007).
  21. G. Larios and O. Varela, Minimal D=4 N=2 supergravity from D=11: An M-theory free lunch, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 251.
  22. The eleven-dimensional Γ matrices are given as a direct product: Γμ^=(iγ(4)γμ^)⊗1, and Γα^=γ(4)⊗γα^.

  23. We are not being careful with boundary terms in this discussion and refer to [16, 17] for a more complete discussion.

  24. P. Benetti Genolini and P. Richmond, Supersymmetry of higher-derivative supergravity in AdS4 holography, Phys. Rev. D 104, L061902 (2021).
  25. N. Bobev, A. M. Charles, K. Hristov, and V. Reys, The unreasonable effectiveness of higher-derivative supergravity in AdS4 holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 131601 (2020).
  26. E. Bergshoeff, M. J. Duff, C. N. Pope, and E. Sezgin, Supersymmetric supermembrane vacua and singletons, Phys. Lett. B 199, 69 (1987).
  27. E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin, and P. K. Townsend, Supermembranes and eleven-dimensional supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 189, 75 (1987).
  28. F. F. Gautason and J. van Muiden, One-loop quantization of Euclidean D3-branes in holographic backgrounds, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 073.
  29. D. Astesiano, P. Bomans, F. F. Gautason, V. G. M. Puletti, and A. Nix, Wilson loops and spherical branes, SciPost Phys. 18, 050 (2025).
  30. J. A. Harvey and G. W. Moore, Superpotentials and membrane instantons, arXiv:hep-th/9907026.
  31. M. Beccaria, S. Giombi, and A. A. Tseytlin, (2,0) theory on S5×S1 and quantum M2 branes, Nucl. Phys. B998, 116400 (2024).
  32. Note that s(z) is nothing more than the standard 3D N=2 chiral multiplet contribution to supersymmetric S3 partition function.

  33. D. Martelli, A. Passias, and J. Sparks, The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a squashed three-sphere, Nucl. Phys. B864, 840 (2012).
  34. B. Carter, Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 10, 280 (1968).
  35. V. A. Kostelecky and M. J. Perry, Solitonic black holes in gauged N=2 supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 371, 191 (1996).
  36. M. M. Caldarelli and D. Klemm, Supersymmetry of anti-de Sitter black holes, Nucl. Phys. B545, 434 (1999).
  37. D. Cassani and L. Papini, The BPS limit of rotating AdS black hole thermodynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 079.
  38. J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla, and S. Raju, Indices for superconformal field theories in 3,5 and 6 dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 064.
  39. J. Bhattacharya and S. Minwalla, Superconformal indices for N=6 Chern Simons theories, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 014.
  40. L. J. Romans, Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory, Nucl. Phys. B383, 395 (1992).
  41. F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni, A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 127.
  42. F. Benini and A. Zaffaroni, Supersymmetric partition functions on Riemann surfaces, in Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics (2017), Vol. 96, 10.1090/pspum/096
  43. C. Closset and H. Kim, Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 059.
  44. S. Choi and C. Hwang, Universal 3d Cardy Block and black hole entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 068.
  45. N. Bobev, S. Choi, J. Hong, and V. Reys, Superconformal indices of 3d N=2 SCFTs and holography, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 121.
  46. N. Bobev, J. Hong, and V. Reys, Large N partition functions of the ABJM theory, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 020.
  47. This is in line with the localization in the moduli space of the pointlike brane, i.e., supergravity [17], and with the absence of additional zero modes, implying that no factors of the target space length scale should be introduced when evaluating the integral.

  48. M. Marino and P. Putrov, ABJM theory as a Fermi gas, J. Stat. Mech. (2012) P03001.
  49. Y. Hatsuda, ABJM on ellipsoid and topological strings, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 026.
  50. T. Nosaka, Large N expansion of mass deformed ABJM matrix model: M2-instanton condensation and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 087.
  51. N. Kubo, T. Nosaka, and Y. Pang, Exact large N expansion of mass deformed ABJM theory on squashed sphere, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 106.
  52. A. Kapustin, B. Willett, and I. Yaakov, Exact results for Wilson loops in superconformal Chern-Simons theories with matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 089.
  53. D. L. Jafferis, The exact superconformal R-symmetry extremizes Z, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2012) 159.
  54. N. Hama, K. Hosomichi, and S. Lee, Notes on SUSY gauge theories on three-sphere, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 127.
  55. D. S. Berman and M. J. Perry, M-theory and the string genus expansion, Phys. Lett. B 635, 131 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation