Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

One-Loop QCD β Function as an Index

Roland Bittleston* and Kevin Costello

  • *Contact author rbittleston@perimeterinstitute.ca

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 211601 – Published 29 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5kd5-3724

Abstract

In this Letter, we show that the one-loop QCD β function can be obtained from an index theorem on twistor space. This is achieved by recalling that the θ angle of self-dual gauge theory flows according the one-loop β function. Rewriting self-dual gauge theory as a holomorphic theory on twistor space this flow can be computed as the anomaly to scale invariance. The one-loop Weyl anomaly coefficient a−c can be recovered similarly.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (51)

  1. H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346 (1973).
  2. D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 8, 3633 (1973).
  3. L. F. Abbott, Nucl. Phys. B185, 189 (1981).
  4. L. F. Abbott, Acta Phys. Pol. B 13, 33 (1982).
  5. G. Chalmers and W. Siegel, Phys. Rev. D 54, 7628 (1996).
  6. A. Losev, I. Polyubin, and A. Rosly, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 041.
  7. T. Schäfer and E. V. Shuryak, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 323 (1998).
  8. The flow of θSD was computed by a direct Feynman diagram analysis in [6].

  9. G. ’t Hooft, Phys. Rev. D 14, 3432 (1976); 18, 2199(E) (1978).
  10. A. I. Vainshtein, V. I. Zakharov, V. A. Novikov, and M. A. Shifman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 25, 195 (1982).
  11. L. S. Brown and D. B. Creamer, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3695 (1978).
  12. N. K. Nielsen and B. Schroer, Nucl. Phys. B127, 493 (1977).
  13. M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, Ann. Math. 93, 119 (1971).
  14. D. Quillen, Funct. Anal. Appl. 19, 31 (1985).
  15. J.-M. Bismut and D. S. Freed, Commun. Math. Phys. 106, 159 (1986).
  16. R. S. Ward, Phys. Lett. 61A, 81 (1977).
  17. M. Atiyah, N. Hitchin, V. Drinfeld, and Y. I. Manin, Phys. Lett. 65A, 185 (1978).
  18. A. S. Schwarz, Commun. Math. Phys. 155, 249 (1993).
  19. A. Borel and J.-P. Serre, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 86, 97 (1958).
  20. F. Hirzebruch, A. Borel, and R. Schwarzenberger, Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry (Springer Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1966), Vol. 175.
  21. A. Grothendieck et al., Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1971), Vol. 225.
  22. D. S. Freed, Surveys Diff. Geom. 22, 125 (2017).
  23. G. Doran, R. Monteiro, and S. Wikeley, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 139.
  24. For example, the portion of the quantum effective action of a 4D field theory determined by the trace anomaly can be described by a dimension zero scalar field coupling to curvatures [25]. This is reminiscent of the Green-Schwarz mechanism for twistorial anomalies [25][26].

  25. R. J. Riegert, Phys. Lett. 134B, 56 (1984).
  26. K. J. Costello, arXiv:2111.08879.
  27. S. M. Christensen and M. J. Duff, Nucl. Phys. B154, 301 (1979).
  28. D. M. Capper and M. J. Duff, Nuovo Cimento A 23, 173 (1974).
  29. M. J. Duff, Nucl. Phys. B125, 334 (1977).
  30. M. J. Duff, Classical Quantum Gravity 11, 1387 (1994).
  31. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. 78B, 430 (1978).
  32. N. J. Hitchin, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 85, 465 (1979).
  33. R. Penrose, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 7, 31 (1976).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/5kd5-3724 for details of the index computation for the Weyl anomaly, and for the contributions of a range of massless fields to the gravitational anomaly on twistor space. Supplemental Material includes Refs. [35–39].
  35. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B203, 157 (1982).
  36. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Lett. B 110, 117 (1982); 126B (1983).
  37. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Lett. 134B, 187 (1984).
  38. E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 252, 189 (2004).
  39. N. Berkovits and E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2004) 009.
  40. W. E. Caswell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 244 (1974).
  41. D. R. T. Jones, Nucl. Phys. B75, 531 (1974).
  42. D. R. T. Jones, Nucl. Phys. B87, 127 (1975).
  43. The two-loop flow of the canonical coupling also receives contributions from Yukawa couplings which are difficult to incorporate on twistor space [44, 45].

  44. D. R. T. Jones, Phys. Rev. D 25, 581 (1982).
  45. M. E. Machacek and M. T. Vaughn, Nucl. Phys. B222, 83 (1983).
  46. V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. 166B, 329 (1986).
  47. N. Arkani-Hamed and H. Murayama, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2000) 030.
  48. C. LeBrun, J. Diff. Geom. 34, 223 (1991).
  49. R. Bittleston, A. Sharma, and D. Skinner, Commun. Math. Phys. 403, 1543 (2023).
  50. Although we note that the twistorial anomaly coefficient χ is proportional to the one-loop vacuum energy [51]. It is not clear to us if ψ also has a space-time avatar.

  51. L. Boyle and N. Turok, arXiv:2110.06258.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation