Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Conformal Data for the O(3) Wilson-Fisher Conformal Field Theory from Fuzzy Sphere Realization of the Quantum Rotor Model

Arjun Dey1,2,*, Loic Herviou3, Christopher Mudry1,2, and Andreas Martin Läuchli1,2

  • *Contact author: arjundey123456789@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 206504 – Published 21 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4yfv-xbcj

Abstract

We present a model for strongly interacting fermions with internal O(3) symmetry on the fuzzy sphere that (i) preserves the rotational symmetry of the fuzzy sphere and (ii) undergoes a quantum phase transition in the (2+1)-dimensional O(3) Wilson-Fisher universality class. Using exact diagonalization and density matrix renormalization group, we locate the quantum critical point via conformal perturbation theory and obtain scaling dimensions from finite-size spectra. We identify 24 primary operators and determine some of their operator product expansion coefficients through first-order conformal perturbation theory. The results are benchmarked against conformal bootstrap and large quantum-number expansions and reveal a weakly irrelevant operator that plays a role in dimerized antiferromagnets. Our Letter provides a general framework for quantitatively accessing conformal data for O(N) Wilson-Fisher conformal field theories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (67)

  1. A. M. Polyakov, JETP Lett. 12, 381 (1970).
  2. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, New York, NY, 1997).
  3. S. Rychkov, EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D>=3 Dimensions, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer, New York, 2016), .
  4. J. Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
  5. N. Goldenfeld, Lectures On Phase Transitions and rhe Renormalization Group (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018).
  6. W. Witczak-Krempa, P. Ghaemi, T. Senthil, and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245102 (2012).
  7. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  8. A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, and A. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B241, 333 (1984).
  9. M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2933 (1970).
  10. M. Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
  11. M. Hasenbusch, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054428 (2022).
  12. S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Phys. Rev. D 86, 025022 (2012).
  13. F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 036.
  14. S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su, and A. Vichi, Phys. Rev. D 104, 105013 (2021).
  15. S. E. Derkachov and A. N. Manashov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1423 (1997).
  16. K. Lang and W. Rühl, Nucl. Phys. B402, 573 (1993).
  17. J. Henriksson, F. Herzog, S. R. Kousvos, and J. R. Nepveu, Phys. Lett. B 874, 140235 (2026).
  18. W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann, and Y.-C. He, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021009 (2023).
  19. L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031601 (2023).
  20. C. Han, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235123 (2023).
  21. L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Nat. Commun. 15, 9013 (2024).
  22. Z. Zhou, D. Gaiotto, Y.-C. He, and Y. Zou, SciPost Phys. 17, 021 (2024).
  23. L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155151 (2025).
  24. G. Cuomo, Y.-C. He, and Z. Komargodski, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 061.
  25. Z. Zhou and Y. Zou, SciPost Phys. 18, 031 (2025).
  26. G. Fardelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and E. Katz, SciPost Phys. 18, 086 (2025).
  27. Z. Zhou, L. Hu, W. Zhu, and Y.-C. He, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021044 (2024).
  28. Y.-C. He, arXiv:2506.14904.
  29. J. Taylor, C. Voinea, Z. Papić, and R. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 056503 (2026).
  30. C. Han, L. Hu, and W. Zhu, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115113 (2024).
  31. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/4yfv-xbcj for additional figures, derivations, and computational details, which includes Refs. [32–49].
  32. S. Hellerman, D. Orlando, S. Reffert, and M. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 071.
  33. L. Alvarez-Gaume, O. Loukas, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 059.
  34. D. Banerjee, S. Chandrasekharan, and D. Orlando, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 061603 (2018).
  35. D. Banerjee, S. Chandrasekharan, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 051603 (2019).
  36. L. Alvarez-Gaume, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 142.
  37. M. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 264.
  38. S. Giombi and J. Hyman, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 184.
  39. L. Á. Gaumé, D. Orlando, and S. Reffert, Phys. Rep. 933, 1 (2021).
  40. R. V. Lange, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 3 (1965).
  41. H. Nielsen and S. Chadha, Nucl. Phys. B105, 445 (1976).
  42. H. Watanabe and T. c. v. Brauner, Phys. Rev. D 84, 125013 (2011).
  43. H. Watanabe and T. c. v. Brauner, Phys. Rev. D 85, 085010 (2012).
  44. A. Nicolis and F. Piazza, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 011602 (2013).
  45. H. Watanabe, T. c. v. Brauner, and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021601 (2013).
  46. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 4 (2022).
  47. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 4 (2022).
  48. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  49. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 72, 180403 (2005).
  50. G. F. Cuomo, Ph.D. thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (2020), thèse no. 8397, Faculté des sciences de base, Laboratoire de physique théorique des particules, Programme doctoral en physique.
  51. G. Cuomo, A. Esposito, E. Gendy, A. Khmelnitsky, A. Monin, and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 068.
  52. J. Henriksson, Phys. Rep. 1002, 1 (2023).
  53. F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 605 (1983).
  54. J. Madore, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16, 639 (2001).
  55. B.-X. Lao and S. Rychkov, SciPost Phys. 15, 243 (2023).
  56. A. M. Läuchli, L. Herviou, P. H. Wilhelm, and S. Rychkov, SciPost Phys. 19, 076 (2025).
  57. M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 65, 144520 (2002).
  58. D. J. Amit and L. Peliti, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 140, 207 (1982).
  59. L. Fritz, R. L. Doretto, S. Wessel, S. Wenzel, S. Burdin, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. B 83, 174416 (2011).
  60. N. Ma, P. Weinberg, H. Shao, W. Guo, D.-X. Yao, and A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 117202 (2018).
  61. M. T. Kao, D. J. Tan, and F. J. Jiang, arXiv:1202.1057.
  62. S. Yasuda and S. Todo, Phys. Rev. E 88, 061301 (2013).
  63. S. Wenzel, L. Bogacz, and W. Janke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 127202 (2008).
  64. A. Monin, D. Pirtskhalava, R. Rattazzi, and F. K. Seibold, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 011.
  65. D. R. Nelson, J. M. Kosterlitz, and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 813 (1974).
  66. W. Guo, Z. Zhou, T.-C. Wei, and Y.-C. He, arXiv:2512.02234.
  67. A. Dey, L. Herviou, C. Mudry, and A. M. Läuchli. Data for the article “Conformal data for the O(3) Wilson-Fisher conformal field theory from fuzzy sphere realization of the quantum rotor model,” Zenodo, version v1 (2026), 10.5281/zenodo.19889910.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation