Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Edge of Safety: Charge-Charge Correlation in the Back-to-Back Limit

Pier Francesco Monni1,*, Gherardo Vita1,†, Zhen Xu2,‡, and Hua Xing Zhu3,4,§

  • 1CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
  • 2Zhejiang Institute of Modern Physics, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
  • 3School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 4Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

  • *Contact author: pier.monni@cern.ch
  • †Contact author: gherardo.vita@cern.ch
  • ‡Contact author: zhen.xu@zju.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: zhuhx@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 031901 – Published 13 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3pqk-qr64

Abstract

We investigate the charge-charge correlation (QQC) in electron-positron annihilation as a probe of charge dynamics in quantum chromodynamics. While generally divergent beyond leading order, we show that the QQC is infrared and collinear safe in the back-to-back limit, a property that we dub leading-power safety. This enables an analytic perturbative treatment that bypasses the reliance on nonperturbative track or fragmentation functions. Using soft-collinear effective field theory, we derive a factorization theorem and determine its logarithmic behavior analytically up to four loops in QCD, uncovering remarkable connections with the energy-energy correlation (EEC). Prior to this Letter, the behavior of the QQC beyond leading order was entirely unknown; we now establish its resummation to next-to-next-to-next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (N4LL) accuracy, placing it among the observables with the highest perturbative precision alongside the EEC. Our results are validated through a numerical analysis using event2, exhibiting excellent agreement with the predicted singular terms. This Letter establishes the QQC as a novel, calculable probe of charge dynamics and unveils a new window into the inner workings of non-Abelian gauge theories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (78)

  1. F. R. Ore, Jr. and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B165, 93 (1980).
  2. N. A. Sveshnikov and F. V. Tkachov, Phys. Lett. B 382, 403 (1996).
  3. G. P. Korchemsky, G. Oderda, and G. F. Sterman, AIP Conf. Proc. 407, 988 (1997).
  4. G. P. Korchemsky and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B555, 335 (1999).
  5. A. V. Belitsky, G. P. Korchemsky, and G. F. Sterman, Phys. Lett. B 515, 297 (2001).
  6. C. Lee and G. F. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 75, 014022 (2007).
  7. D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2008) 012.
  8. D. Chicherin, J. M. Henn, E. Sokatchev, and K. Yan, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 053.
  9. G. Cuomo, E. Firat, F. Nardi, and L. Ricci, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 223.
  10. A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, Nucl. Phys. B884, 206 (2014).
  11. A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 071601 (2014).
  12. A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, Nucl. Phys. B884, 305 (2014).
  13. Z. Komargodski, M. Kulaxizi, A. Parnachev, and A. Zhiboedov, Phys. Rev. D 95, 065011 (2017).
  14. J. M. Henn, E. Sokatchev, K. Yan, and A. Zhiboedov, Phys. Rev. D 100, 036010 (2019).
  15. M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 128.
  16. G. P. Korchemsky, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 008.
  17. H. Chen, I. Moult, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054012 (2020).
  18. C.-H. Chang, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 059.
  19. H. Chen, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 112003 (2021).
  20. G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 188.
  21. H. Chen, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 233.
  22. H. Chen, I. Moult, J. Sandor, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 199.
  23. C.-H. Chang and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 126.
  24. S. Caron-Huot, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Meltzer, and D. Simmons-Duffin, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 014.
  25. K. Lee, B. Meçaj, and I. Moult, Phys. Rev. D 111, L011502 (2025).
  26. K. Lee and I. Moult, arXiv:2308.00746.
  27. H. Chen, X. Zhou, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 132.
  28. H. Chen, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 035.
  29. H. Chen, P. F. Monni, Z. Xu, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 231901 (2024).
  30. S. He, X. Jiang, Q. Yang, and Y.-Q. Zhang, arXiv:2408.04222.
  31. I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, arXiv:2506.09119.
  32. T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory (CRC Press, 1981), Vol. 1.
  33. H.-M. Chang, M. Procura, J. Thaler, and W. J. Waalewijn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 102002 (2013).
  34. H. T. Li and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076020 (2020).
  35. Z.-B. Kang, X. Liu, S. Mantry, and D. Y. Shao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242003 (2020).
  36. S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Nucl. Phys. B570, 287 (2000).
  37. F. Caola, R. Grabarczyk, M. L. Hutt, G. P. Salam, L. Scyboz, and J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094010 (2023).
  38. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, and M. E. Luke, Phys. Rev. D 63, 014006 (2000).
  39. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114020 (2001).
  40. C. W. Bauer and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Lett. B 516, 134 (2001).
  41. C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054022 (2002).
  42. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B193, 381 (1981); B213, 545(E) (1983).
  43. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B197, 446 (1982).
  44. J. Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011), Vol. 32.
  45. R. N. Lee, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 212002 (2022).
  46. A. Chakraborty, T. Huber, R. N. Lee, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074009 (2022).
  47. Y. Li and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 022004 (2017).
  48. J. C. Collins and A. Metz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 252001 (2004).
  49. I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 160.
  50. Y. J. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 018.
  51. S. M. Aybat and T. C. Rogers, Phys. Rev. D 83, 114042 (2011).
  52. M. A. Ebert, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 121.
  53. M.-x. Luo, T.-Z. Yang, H. X. Zhu, and Y. J. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 115.
  54. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B194, 445 (1982).
  55. M. A. Ebert, I. Moult, I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, G. Vita, and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 123.
  56. C. Duhr, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 162001 (2022).
  57. G. Vita, P. F. Monni, H. Zhu, and Z. Xu, The QQC jet function at N3LO, Zenodo repository (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.18935325.
  58. M. A. Ebert, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 022.
  59. D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, Nucl. Phys. B704, 387 (2005).
  60. U. G. Aglietti and G. Ferrera, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114004 (2024).
  61. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/3pqk-qr64 for details of RG evolution and additional checks of the results against Monte Carlo simulations.
  62. F. Herzog, S. Moch, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 790, 436 (2019).
  63. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kühn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 082002 (2017).
  64. G. P. Korchemsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Nucl. Phys. B283, 342 (1987).
  65. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and V. A. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 72, 085001 (2005).
  66. J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and B. Mistlberger, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 018.
  67. B. Agarwal, A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer, and R. M. Schabinger, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136503 (2021).
  68. I. Moult, H. X. Zhu, and Y. J. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 280.
  69. H. Chen, P. F. Monni, Z. Pang, G. Vita, and H. X. Zhu, arXiv:2510.07377.
  70. A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov, Nucl. Phys. B661, 19 (2003); B685, 405(E) (2004).
  71. S. Catani and M. H. Seymour, Nucl. Phys. B485, 291 (1997); B510, 503(E) (1998).
  72. M. van Beekveld et al., SciPost Phys. Codebases 2024, 31 (2024).
  73. M. van Beekveld et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011901 (2025).
  74. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  75. H. Bossi, Y.-C. Chen, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, G. M. Innocenti, A. Badea, A. Baty, M. Maggi, C. McGinn, and Y.-J. Lee, arXiv:2505.11828.
  76. A. Gao, H. T. Li, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 062001 (2019).
  77. H. T. Li, I. Vitev, and Y. J. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 051.
  78. H. T. Li, Y. Makris, and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094005 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation