Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tensor-Network Study of the Roughening Transition in a (2+1)D Z2 Lattice Gauge Theory with Matter

Wen-Tao Xu, Michael Knap, and Frank Pollmann

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036503 – Published 17 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3lxj-dx76

Abstract

Within the confined phase of (2+1)D lattice gauge theories a roughening transition arises between a weakly confined regime with floppy string excitations and a strongly confined regime with stiff string excitations. In this Letter, we use an infinite Density Matrix Renormalization Group (iDMRG) algorithm to quantitatively characterize the properties of confined strings. To this end, we stabilize the state with a string excitation by ’t Hooft loop operators. While for zero gauge-matter coupling we can use bare ’t Hooft loop operators to do so, for finite gauge-matter coupling we have to transform them to emergent ones, which we achieve with an adiabatic protocol. By analyzing the scaling of both a novel order parameter and the entanglement entropy, our approach allows us to accurately determine the roughening transition, even at finite gauge-matter coupling.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (85)

  1. K. G. Wilson, Confinement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
  2. B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, Two-dimensional Ising field theory in a magnetic field: Breakup of the cut in the two-point function, Phys. Rev. D 18, 1259 (1978).
  3. S. B. Rutkevich, Energy spectrum of bound-spinons in the quantum Ising spin-chain ferromagnet, J. Stat. Phys. 131, 917 (2008).
  4. M. Kormos, M. Collura, G. Takács, and P. Calabrese, Real-time confinement following a quantum quench to a non-integrable model, Nat. Phys. 13, 246 (2017).
  5. P. P. Mazza, G. Perfetto, A. Lerose, M. Collura, and A. Gambassi, Suppression of transport in nondisordered quantum spin chains due to confined excitations, Phys. Rev. B 99, 180302(R) (2019).
  6. F. Liu, R. Lundgren, P. Titum, G. Pagano, J. Zhang, C. Monroe, and A. V. Gorshkov, Confined quasiparticle dynamics in long-range interacting quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 150601 (2019).
  7. A. Lerose, F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Perfetto, M. Collura, and A. Gambassi, Quasilocalized dynamics from confinement of quantum excitations, Phys. Rev. B 102, 041118(R) (2020).
  8. R. Verdel, G.-Y. Zhu, and M. Heyl, Dynamical localization transition of string breaking in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 230402 (2023).
  9. S. Birnkammer, A. Bastianello, and M. Knap, Prethermalization in one-dimensional quantum many-body systems with confinement, Nat. Commun. 13, 7663 (2022).
  10. J. Simon, W. S. Bakr, R. Ma, M. E. Tai, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum simulation of antiferromagnetic spin chains in an optical lattice, Nature (London) 472, 307 (2011).
  11. W. L. Tan, P. Becker, F. Liu, G. Pagano, K. S. Collins, A. De, L. Feng, H. B. Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, R. Lundgren, W. Morong, S. Whitsitt, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Domain-wall confinement and dynamics in a quantum simulator, Nat. Phys. 17, 742 (2021).
  12. J. Vovrosh and J. Knolle, Confinement and entanglement dynamics on a digital quantum computer, Sci. Rep. 11, 11577 (2021).
  13. A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F. M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E. R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K. S. Collins, Z. Davoudi, A. V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, and C. Monroe, Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator, arXiv:2410.13815.
  14. J. Mildenberger, W. Mruczkiewicz, J. C. Halimeh, Z. Jiang, and P. Hauke, Confinement in a Z2 lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Nat. Phys. 21, 312 (2025).
  15. M. Lüscher, G. Münster, and P. Weisz, How thick are chromo-electric flux tubes?, Nucl. Phys. B180, 1 (1981).
  16. M. Lüscher, Symmetry-breaking aspects of the roughening transition in gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B180, 317 (1981).
  17. A. Hasenfratz, E. Hasenfratz, and P. Hasenfratz, Generalized roughening transition and its effect on the string tension, Nucl. Phys. B180, 353 (1981).
  18. T. A. Cochran, B. Jobst, E. Rosenberg, Y. D. Lensky, G. Gyawali et al., Visualizing dynamics of charges and strings in (2+1)d lattice gauge theories, Nature (London) 642, 315 (2025).
  19. M. Caselle, F. Gliozzi, U. Magnea, and S. Vinti, Width of long colour flux tubes in lattice gauge systems, Nucl. Phys. B460, 397 (1996).
  20. G. Münster and P. Weisz, On the roughening transition in Abelian lattice gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B180, 13 (1981).
  21. J. Drouffe and J. Zuber, Roughening transition in lattice gauge theories in arbitrary dimension: (I). The Z2 case, Nucl. Phys. B180, 253 (1981).
  22. J. Drouffe and J. Zuber, Roughening transition in lattice gauge theories in arbitrary dimension: (II). The groups Z3, U(1), SU(2), SU(3), Nucl. Phys. B180, 264 (1981).
  23. E. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979).
  24. F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized Ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 12, 2259 (1971).
  25. E. Fradkin, Roughening transition in quantum interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5338 (1983).
  26. E. Bürkner and D. Stauffer, Monte Carlo study of surface roughening in the three-dimensional Ising model, Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter 53, 241 (1983).
  27. M. Hasenbusch and K. Pinn, Computing the roughening transition of ising and solid-on-solid models by BCSOS model matching, J. Phys. A 30, 63 (1997).
  28. M. Caselle, M. Hasenbusch, and M. Panero, String effects in the 3d gauge Ising model, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2003) 057.
  29. M. Caselle, M. Hasenbusch, and M. Panero, The interface free energy: Comparison of accurate Monte Carlo results for the 3d Ising model with effective interface models, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2007) 117.
  30. H. Dashti-Naserabadi, A. A. Saberi, S. H. E. Rahbari, and H. Park, Two-dimensional super-roughening in the three-dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. E 100, 060101(R) (2019).
  31. W. Krinitsin, N. Tausendpfund, M. Rizzi, M. Heyl, and M. Schmitt, Roughening dynamics of interfaces in the two-dimensional quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 240402 (2025).
  32. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973).
  33. V. L. Berezinskiǐ, Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a continuous symmetry group I. Classical systems, Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 32, 493 (1971), https://inspirehep.net/files/f55503250f690969aedfda4ceaf9b4f9.
  34. V. L. Berezinskiǐ, Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems possessing a continuous symmetry group. II. Quantum systems, Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 34, 610 (1972), https://inspirehep.net/files/0f7b50c47ec26bed99a50ff199960259.
  35. C. D. Batista and Z. Nussinov, Generalized Elitzur’s theorem and dimensional reductions, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045137 (2005).
  36. Z. Nussinov and G. Ortiz, A symmetry principle for topological quantum order, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 324, 977 (2009).
  37. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 172.
  38. J. McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 57 (2023).
  39. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys. Rep. 1051, 1 (2024).
  40. M. B. Hastings and X.-G. Wen, Quasiadiabatic continuation of quantum states: The stability of topological ground-state degeneracy and emergent gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045141 (2005).
  41. X.-G. Wen, Emergent anomalous higher symmetries from topological order and from dynamical electromagnetic field in condensed matter systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205139 (2019).
  42. A. M. Somoza, P. Serna, and A. Nahum, Self-dual criticality in three-dimensional Z2 gauge theory with matter, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041008 (2021).
  43. S. D. Pace and X.-G. Wen, Exact emergent higher-form symmetries in bosonic lattice models, Phys. Rev. B 108, 195147 (2023).
  44. A. Cherman and T. Jacobson, Emergent 1-form symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 109, 125013 (2024).
  45. P. Serna, A. M. Somoza, and A. Nahum, Worldsheet patching, 1-form symmetries, and Landau* phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 115102 (2024).
  46. Y.-J. Liu, W.-T. Xu, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Detecting emergent 1-form symmetries with quantum error correction, arXiv:2502.17572.
  47. J. B. Kogut and D. K. Sinclair, Analyticity of the off-axis string tension and the restoration of rotational symmetry in lattice systems, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1610 (1981).
  48. J. B. Kogut, D. K. Sinclair, R. B. Pearson, J. L. Richardson, and J. Shigemitsu, Fluctuating string of lattice gauge theory: The heavy-quark potential, the restoration of rotational symmetry, and roughening, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2945 (1981).
  49. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  50. S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993).
  51. I. P. McCulloch, Infinite size density matrix renormalization group, revisited, arXiv:0804.2509.
  52. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 326, 96 (2011), January 2011 Special Issue.
  53. J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975).
  54. J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979).
  55. I. S. Tupitsyn, A. Kitaev, N. V. Prokof’ev, and P. C. E. Stamp, Topological multicritical point in the phase diagram of the toric code model and three-dimensional lattice gauge Higgs model, Phys. Rev. B 82, 085114 (2010).
  56. W.-T. Xu, T. Rakovszky, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Entanglement properties of gauge theories from higher-form symmetries, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011001 (2025).
  57. A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 303, 2 (2003).
  58. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/3lxj-dx76 for the roughening transition in the viewpoint of the dual Ising model, the disorder parameter of the translational symmetry and the Wilson loop correlator, details on sequential iDMRG simulations, supplementary data of the Z2 lattice gauge theory on a cylinder with a circumference Ly=8, and the results from the Z3 clock model. Supplemental Material also contains Refs. [59–63].
  59. S. Trebst, P. Werner, M. Troyer, K. Shtengel, and C. Nayak, Breakdown of a topological phase: Quantum phase transition in a loop gas model with tension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070602 (2007).
  60. L. Lootens, C. Delcamp, G. Ortiz, and F. Verstraete, Dualities in one-dimensional quantum lattice models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and matrix product operator intertwiners, PRX Quantum 4, 020357 (2023).
  61. E. Fradkin, Disorder operators and their descendants, J. Stat. Phys. 167, 427 (2017).
  62. D. S. Philippe Di Francesco, Pierre Mathieu, Conformal Field Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).
  63. H. W. J. Blöte and Youjin Deng, Cluster Monte Carlo simulation of the transverse Ising model, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066110 (2002).
  64. L. Tagliacozzo, T. R. de Oliveira, S. Iblisdir, and J. I. Latorre, Scaling of entanglement support for matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 78, 024410 (2008).
  65. F. Pollmann, S. Mukerjee, A. M. Turner, and J. E. Moore, Theory of finite-entanglement scaling at one-dimensional quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 255701 (2009).
  66. F. Tschirsich, S. Montangero, and M. Dalmonte, Phase diagram and conformal string excitations of square ice using gauge invariant matrix product states, SciPost Phys. 6, 028 (2019).
  67. The BKT phase of the weakly confined floppy string is similar to the BKT phase of the 1D p-state quantum clock model with a global internal symmetry Zp, which has an intermediate BKT phase with emergent U(1) symmetry for p≥5 [68], even though the Hamiltonian has a discrete symmetry.

  68. L. Tsui, Y.-T. Huang, H.-C. Jiang, and D.-H. Lee, The phase transitions between zn×zn bosonic topological phases in 1 + 1d, and a constraint on the central charge for the critical points between bosonic symmetry protected topological phases, Nucl. Phys. B919, 470 (2017).
  69. P. B. Wiegmann, One-dimensional Fermi system and plane XY model, J. Phys. C 11, 1583 (1978).
  70. H. Matsuo and K. Nomura, Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transitions in the six-state clock model, J. Phys. A 39, 2953 (2006).
  71. When h>hBKT, the correlation length ξ(χ→∞) is finite. However, as long as we remain in the regime where ξ(χ)≪ξ(χ→∞), we can still extract a scaling dimension from the finite-χ data.

  72. A. G. Grushin, J. Motruk, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Pollmann, Characterization and stability of a fermionic ν=1/3 fractional Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. B 91, 035136 (2015).
  73. J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical simulations with tensor networks: Tensor network Python (TeNPy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 5 (2018); code available from https://github.com/tenpy/tenpy.
  74. M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Flux insertion, entanglement, and quantized responses, J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P10007.
  75. V. Khemani, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Obtaining highly excited eigenstates of many-body localized Hamiltonians by the density matrix renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 247204 (2016).
  76. T. Devakul, V. Khemani, F. Pollmann, D. A. Huse, and S. L. Sondhi, Obtaining highly excited eigenstates of the localized XX chain via DMRG-X, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20160431 (2017).
  77. W.-T. Xu, Q. Zhang, and G.-M. Zhang, Tensor network approach to phase transitions of a non-Abelian topological phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 130603 (2020).
  78. W.-T. Xu and N. Schuch, Characterization of topological phase transitions from a non-Abelian topological state and its galois conjugate through condensation and confinement order parameters, Phys. Rev. B 104, 155119 (2021).
  79. W.-T. Xu, J. Garre-Rubio, and N. Schuch, Complete characterization of non-Abelian topological phase transitions and detection of anyon splitting with projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205139 (2022).
  80. U. Borla, J. J. Osborne, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, String breaking in a 2+1d Z2 lattice gauge theory, arXiv:2501.17929.
  81. A. Allais and M. Caselle, On the linear increase of the flux tube thickness near the deconfinement transition, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 073.
  82. M. Caselle, Flux tube delocalization at the deconfinement point, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 063.
  83. W.-T. Xu and R.-Z. Huang, Finite correlation length scaling of disorder parameter at quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 146503 (2025).
  84. W.-T. Xu, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Critical behavior of Fredenhagen-Marcu string order parameters at topological phase transitions with emergent higher-form symmetries, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 74 (2025).
  85. W.-T. Xu, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Tensor-network study of the roughening transition in a (2+1)D Z2 lattice gauge theory with matter, 10.5281/zenodo.15324471 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation