Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Universality Emerging in a Universality: Derivation of the Ericson Transition in Stochastic Quantum Scattering and Experimental Validation

Simon Köhnes1,*, Jiongning Che2,†, Barbara Dietz2,3,‡,§, and Thomas Guhr1,║

  • *Contact author: simon.koehnes@uni-due.de
  • †Present address: Yangtze Delta Region Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Huzhou, China.
  • ‡Contact author: bdietzp@gmail.com
  • §Present address: Max-Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems and TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • ║Contact author: thomas.guhr@uni-due.de

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 050403 – Published 29 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3gvv-2hq6

Abstract

At lower energies, the resonances in scattering experiments are often isolated. In quantum chaotic many-body, disordered, or generically stochastic systems, the resonances overlap at larger energies. Eventually, the Ericson regime is reached in which the cross section behaves like a random function. The scattering-matrix elements then follow a universal Gaussian distribution. For more than 60 years, the emergence of this robust additional universal behavior on top of the universal system stochasticity has awaited a concise analytical treatment. We derive the transition to the Ericson regime in the universal Heidelberg approach and prove the universal Gaussian distribution by a proper asymptotic expansion. We also obtain explicit formulas for the moments and for the cross-section distribution. We compare with microwave experiments and numerical simulations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (88)

  1. D. Brink and R. Stephen, Phys. Lett. 5, 77 (1963).
  2. P. Von Brentano, J. Ernst, O. Häusser, T. Mayer-Kuckuk, A. Richter, and W. Von Witsch, Phys. Lett. 9, 48 (1964).
  3. C. E. Porter, Statistical Theories of Spectra: Fluctuations, 1st ed. (Academic, New York, 1965).
  4. H. Harney, A. Hüpper, and A. Richter, Nucl. Phys. A518, 35 (1990).
  5. J. Main and G. Wunner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 586 (1992).
  6. H. Feshbach, Nuclear Reactions, 1st ed. (Wiley Classics Library, New York, 1993).
  7. T. Guhr, A. Müller-Groeling, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rep. 299, 189 (1998).
  8. H. A. Weidenmüller and G. E. Mitchell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 539 (2009).
  9. G. E. Mitchell, A. Richter, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2845 (2010).
  10. A. Frisch, M. Mark, K. Aikawa, F. Ferlaino, J. L. Bohn, C. Makrides, A. Petrov, and S. Kotochigova, Nature (London) 507, 475 (2014).
  11. T. Kawano, P. Talou, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rev. C 92, 044617 (2015).
  12. R. Blümel and U. Smilansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 477 (1988).
  13. M. Lombardi and T. H. Seligman, Phys. Rev. A 47, 3571 (1993).
  14. B. Grémaud, D. Delande, and J. C. Gay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1615 (1993).
  15. K. Dupret, J. Zakrzewski, and D. Delande, Europhys. Lett. 31, 251 (1995).
  16. R. Schinke, H. M. Keller, M. Stumpf, and A. J. Dobbyn, J. Phys. B 28, 3081 (1995).
  17. S. A. Reid and H. Reisler, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 474 (1996).
  18. G. Stania and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 194101 (2005).
  19. J. Madroñero and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 263601 (2005).
  20. M. Mayle, G. Quéméner, B. P. Ruzic, and J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012709 (2013).
  21. J. Che, X. Zhang, W. Zhang, B. Dietz, and G. Chai, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014211 (2022).
  22. T. Kottos and U. Smilansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4794 (1997).
  23. S. Gnutzmann and U. Smilansky, Adv. Phys. 55, 527 (2006).
  24. M. Ławniczak, S. Bauch, O. Hul, and L. Sirko, Phys. Scr. 2012, 014018 (2012).
  25. G. L. Celardo, F. M. Izrailev, V. G. Zelevinsky, and G. P. Berman, Phys. Rev. E 76, 031119 (2007).
  26. R. Schäfer, T. Gorin, T. H. Seligman, and H.-J. Stöckmann, J. Phys. A 36, 3289 (2003).
  27. E. Doron, U. Smilansky, and A. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3072 (1990).
  28. H. Alt, H. D. Gräf, H. L. Harney, R. Hofferbert, H. Lengeler, A. Richter, P. Schardt, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 62 (1995).
  29. U. Kuhl, M. Martínez-Mares, R. A. Méndez-Sánchez, and H.-J. Stöckmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 144101 (2005).
  30. S. Hemmady, X. Zheng, J. Hart, T. M. Antonsen, E. Ott, and S. M. Anlage, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036213 (2006).
  31. B. Dietz, T. Friedrich, H. L. Harney, M. Miski-Oglu, A. Richter, F. Schäfer, and H. A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rev. E 81, 036205 (2010).
  32. B. Dietz, H. Harney, A. Richter, F. Schäfer, and H. Weidenmüller, Phys. Lett. B 685, 263 (2010).
  33. U. Kuhl, R. Höhmann, J. Main, and H.-J. Stöckmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 254101 (2008).
  34. O. Hul, O. Tymoshchuk, S. Bauch, P. M. Koch, and L. Sirko, J. Phys. A 38, 10489 (2005).
  35. M. Ławniczak, O. Hul, S. Bauch, P. Seba, and L. Sirko, Phys. Rev. E 77, 056210 (2008).
  36. M. Ławniczak, B. van Tiggelen, and L. Sirko, Phys. Rev. E 102, 052214 (2020).
  37. L. Chen, S. M. Anlage, and Y. V. Fyodorov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 204101 (2021).
  38. R. L. Weaver, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1005 (1989).
  39. C. Ellegaard, T. Guhr, K. Lindemann, H. Q. Lorensen, J. Nygård, and M. Oxborrow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1546 (1995).
  40. J.-B. Gros, O. Legrand, F. Mortessagne, E. Richalot, and K. Selemani, Wave Motion 51, 664 (2014).
  41. C. W. J. Beenakker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 731 (1997).
  42. P. A. Lee, A. D. Stone, and H. Fukuyama, Phys. Rev. B 35, 1039 (1987).
  43. Y. Alhassid, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 895 (2000).
  44. M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1584 (1992).
  45. A. D. Mirlin, A. Müller-Groeling, and M. R. Zirnbauer, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 236, 325 (1994).
  46. J. A. Folk, S. R. Patel, S. F. Godijn, A. G. Huibers, S. M. Cronenwett, C. M. Marcus, K. Campman, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1699 (1996).
  47. V. N. Bringi and V. Chandrasekar, Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar: Principles and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).
  48. J.-H. Yeh, T. M. Antonsen, E. Ott, and S. M. Anlage, Phys. Rev. E 85, 015202(R) (2012).
  49. T. Ericson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 430 (1960).
  50. T. Ericson, Adv. Phys. 9, 425 (1960).
  51. T. Ericson and T. Mayer-Kuckuck, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 16, 183 (1966).
  52. H. A. Weidenmüller, Nucl. Phys. A518, 1 (1990).
  53. S. Sorathia, F. M. Izrailev, G. L. Celardo, V. G. Zelevinsky, and G. P. Berman, Europhys. Lett. 88, 27003 (2009).
  54. R. Blümel, Phys. Rev. A 54, 5420 (1996).
  55. B. Grémaud and D. Delande, Europhys. Lett. 40, 363 (1997).
  56. J. Eiglsperger and J. Madroñero, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022512 (2009).
  57. J. Eiglsperger and J. Madroñero, Phys. Rev. A 82, 033422 (2010).
  58. J. Eiglsperger, T. Kramer, and J. Madroñero, New J. Phys. 13, 063033 (2011).
  59. M. Mayle, B. P. Ruzic, and J. L. Bohn, Phys. Rev. A 85, 062712 (2012).
  60. S. Hunn, M. Hiller, D. Cohen, T. Kottos, and A. Buchleitner, J. Phys. B 45, 085302 (2012).
  61. Z. Pluhař and H. A. Weidenmüller, Phys. Rev. E 88, 022902 (2013).
  62. C. Mahaux and H. A. Weidenmüller, Shell-Model Approach to Nuclear Reactions (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1969).
  63. D. Agassi, H. Weidenmüller, and G. Mantzouranis, Phys. Rep. 22, 145 (1975).
  64. J. J. M. Verbaarschot, H. A. Weidenmüller, and M. R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rep. 129, 367 (1985).
  65. J. M. Blatt and V. F. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics, 1st ed. (Springer, New York, 1979).
  66. K. B. Efetov, Adv. Phys. 32, 53 (1983).
  67. K. Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
  68. S. Kumar, A. Nock, H.-J. Sommers, T. Guhr, B. Dietz, M. Miski-Oglu, A. Richter, and F. Schäfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 030403 (2013).
  69. A. Nock, S. Kumar, H.-J. Sommers, and T. Guhr, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 342, 103 (2014).
  70. S. Kumar, B. Dietz, T. Guhr, and A. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 244102 (2017).
  71. J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 168, 368 (1986).
  72. M. Kieburg, H. Kohler, and T. Guhr, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 50, 013528 (2009).
  73. Z. Pluhar, H. A. Weidenmüller, J. A. Zuk, C. H. Lewenkopf, and F. J. Wegner, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 243, 1 (1995).
  74. Y. V. Fyodorov and H.-J. Sommers, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 38, 1918 (1997).
  75. I. Rozhkov, Y. V. Fyodorov, and R. L. Weaver, Phys. Rev. E 68, 016204 (2003).
  76. I. Rozhkov, Y. V. Fyodorov, and R. L. Weaver, Phys. Rev. E 69, 036206 (2004).
  77. E. T. Copson, Asymptotic Expansions, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1965).
  78. D. Kaminski and R. B. Paris, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 356, 583 (1998).
  79. D. Kaminski and R. B. Paris, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 356, 625 (1998).
  80. R. Wong, Asymptotic approximations of integrals, in Classics in Applied Mathematics 34, 1st ed. (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2001).
  81. Y. V. Fyodorov and E. Safonova, Phys. Rev. E 108, 044206 (2023).
  82. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/3gvv-2hq6 for the derivation of the exponential law.
  83. B. Dietz, A. Richter, and H. Weidenmüller, Phys. Lett. B 697, 313 (2011).
  84. M. Simonius, Phys. Lett. B 52, 279 (1974).
  85. P. A. Moldauer, Phys. Rev. C 11, 426 (1975).
  86. Y. V. Fyodorov and H.-J. Sommers, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 63, 1026 (1996).
  87. Y. V. Fyodorov and H.-J. Sommers, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 38, 1918 (1997).
  88. T. Kottos and H. Schanz, Waves Random Media 14, S91 (2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation