Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Fate of Bosonic Topological Edge Modes in the Presence of Many-Body Interactions

Niclas Heinsdorf1,2, Darshan G. Joshi3, Hosho Katsura4,5,6, and Andreas P. Schnyder1

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 146702 – Published 3 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1pty-fvpf

Abstract

Many magnetic materials are predicted to exhibit bosonic topological edge modes in their excitation spectra, because of the nontrivial topology of their magnon, triplon, or other quasiparticle band structures. However, there is a discrepancy between theory prediction and experimental observation, which suggests some underlying mechanism that intrinsically suppresses the expected experimental signatures, like the thermal Hall current. Many-body interactions that are not accounted for in the noninteracting quasiparticle picture are most often identified as the reason for the absence of the topological edge modes. Here we report persistent bosonic edge modes at the boundaries of a ladder quantum paramagnet with gapped triplon excitations in the presence of the full many-body interaction. We use tensor network methods to resolve topological edge modes in the time-dependent spin-spin correlations and the dynamical structure factor, which is directly accessible experimentally. We further show that signatures of these edge modes survive even when the noninteracting quasiparticle theory breaks down; we discuss the topological phase diagram of the model, demonstrate the fractionalization of its low-lying excitations, and propose potential material candidates.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (143)

  1. Onur Hosten and Paul Kwiat, Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements, Science 319, 787 (2008).
  2. Zheng Wang, Yidong Chong, John D. Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljačić, Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states, Nature (London) 461, 772 (2009).
  3. Philippe Ben-Abdallah, Photon thermal Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 084301 (2016).
  4. Frederick Duncan Michael Haldane and Srinivas Raghu, Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013904 (2008).
  5. Srinivas Raghu and Frederick Duncan Michael Haldane, Analogs of quantum-Hall-effect edge states in photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. A 78, 033834 (2008).
  6. Masaru Onoda, Shuichi Murakami, and Naoto Nagaosa, Hall effect of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 083901 (2004).
  7. C. Strohm, G. L. J. A. Rikken, and P. Wyder, Phenomenological evidence for the phonon Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 155901 (2005).
  8. Yu. Kagan and L. A. Maksimov, Anomalous Hall effect for the phonon heat conductivity in paramagnetic dielectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 145902 (2008).
  9. Kaori Sugii, Masaaki Shimozawa, Daiki Watanabe, Yoshitaka Suzuki, Mario Halim, Motoi Kimata, Yosuke Matsumoto, Satoru Nakatsuji, and Minoru Yamashita, Thermal Hall effect in a phonon-glass Ba3CuSb2O9, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 145902 (2017).
  10. L. Sheng, D. N. Sheng, and C. S. Ting, Theory of the phonon Hall effect in paramagnetic dielectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 155901 (2006).
  11. Hosho Katsura, Naoto Nagaosa, and Patrick A. Lee, Theory of the thermal Hall effect in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066403 (2010).
  12. Hiroki Kondo, Yutaka Akagi, and Hosho Katsura, Three-dimensional topological magnon systems, Phys. Rev. B 100, 144401 (2019).
  13. Hiroki Kondo and Yutaka Akagi, Dirac surface states in magnonic analogs of topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 177201 (2021).
  14. Ryo Matsumoto and Shuichi Murakami, Rotational motion of magnons and the thermal Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 84, 184406 (2011).
  15. Satoshi Fujimoto, Hall effect of spin waves in frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 047203 (2009).
  16. Ryuichi Shindou, Jun-ichiro Ohe, Ryo Matsumoto, Shuichi Murakami, and Eiji Saitoh, Chiral spin-wave edge modes in dipolar magnetic thin films, Phys. Rev. B 87, 174402 (2013).
  17. Ryuichi Shindou, Ryo Matsumoto, Shuichi Murakami, and Jun-ichiro Ohe, Topological chiral magnonic edge mode in a magnonic crystal, Phys. Rev. B 87, 174427 (2013).
  18. Se Kwon Kim, Héctor Ochoa, Ricardo Zarzuela, and Yaroslav Tserkovnyak, Realization of the Haldane-Kane-Mele model in a system of localized spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 227201 (2016).
  19. Darshan G. Joshi, Topological excitations in the ferromagnetic Kitaev-Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 98, 060405(R) (2018).
  20. Judit Romhányi, Karlo Penc, and Ramachandran Ganesh, Hall effect of triplons in a dimerized quantum magnet, Nat. Commun. 6, 6805 (2015).
  21. Darshan G. Joshi and Andreas P. Schnyder, Topological quantum paramagnet in a quantum spin ladder, Phys. Rev. B 96, 220405(R) (2017).
  22. Darshan G. Joshi and Andreas P. Schnyder, z2 topological quantum paramagnet on a honeycomb bilayer, Phys. Rev. B 100, 020407(R) (2019).
  23. Andrii V. Chumak, Vitaliy I. Vasyuchka, Alexander A. Serga, and Burkard Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 453 (2015).
  24. Z.-X. Li, Yunshan Cao, and Peng Yan, Topological insulators and semimetals in classical magnetic systems, Phys. Rep. 915, 1 (2021).
  25. Ryo Matsumoto and Shuichi Murakami, Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 197202 (2011).
  26. X. S. Wang, H. W. Zhang, and X. R. Wang, Topological magnonics: A paradigm for spin-wave manipulation and device design, Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 024029 (2018).
  27. António T. Costa, Daniel Lourenço R. Santos, Nuno M. R. Peres, and Joaquín Fernández-Rossier, Topological magnons in CrI3 monolayers: An itinerant fermion description, 2D Mater. 7, 045031 (2020).
  28. Shuyi Li and Andriy H. Nevidomskyy, Topological Weyl magnons and thermal Hall effect in layered honeycomb ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 104, 104419 (2021).
  29. Kyusung Hwang, Nandini Trivedi, and Mohit Randeria, Topological magnons with nodal-line and triple-point degeneracies: Implications for thermal Hall effect in pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 047203 (2020).
  30. Pontus Laurell and Gregory A. Fiete, Magnon thermal Hall effect in kagome antiferromagnets with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B 98, 094419 (2018).
  31. Alexander Mook, Jürgen Henk, and Ingrid Mertig, Magnon Hall effect and topology in kagome lattices: A theoretical investigation, Phys. Rev. B 89, 134409 (2014).
  32. S. A. Owerre, Topological honeycomb magnon Hall effect: A calculation of thermal hall conductivity of magnetic spin excitations, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 043903 (2016).
  33. Jung Hoon Han and Hyunyong Lee, Spin chirality and hall-like transport phenomena of spin excitations, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 011007 (2017).
  34. Fei-Ye Li, Yao-Dong Li, Yong Baek Kim, Leon Balents, Yue Yu, and Gang Chen, Weyl magnons in breathing pyrochlore antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 7, 12691 (2016).
  35. Fengfeng Zhu, Lichuan Zhang, Xiao Wang, Flaviano José Dos Santos, Junda Song, Thomas Mueller, Karin Schmalzl, Wolfgang F. Schmidt, Alexandre Ivanov, Jitae T. Park et al., Topological magnon insulators in two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnets CrSiTe3 and CrGeTe3: Toward intrinsic gap-tunability, Sci. Adv. 7, eabi7532 (2021).
  36. Heda Zhang, Chunqiang Xu, Caitlin Carnahan, Milos Sretenovic, Nishchay Suri, Di Xiao, and Xianglin Ke, Anomalous thermal Hall effect in an insulating van der Waals magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 247202 (2021).
  37. Paul A. McClarty, F. Krüger, Tatiana Guidi, S. F. Parker, Keith Refson, A. W. Parker, Dharmalingam Prabhakaran, and Radu Coldea, Topological triplon modes and bound states in a Shastry-Sutherland magnet, Nat. Phys. 13, 736 (2017).
  38. Peter Czajka, Tong Gao, Max Hirschberger, Paula Lampen-Kelley, Arnab Banerjee, Nicholas Quirk, David G. Mandrus, Stephen E. Nagler, and N. Phuan Ong, Planar thermal Hall effect of topological bosons in the Kitaev magnet α−RuCl3, Nat. Mater. 22, 36 (2023).
  39. Max Hirschberger, Robin Chisnell, Young S. Lee, and Nai Phuan Ong, Thermal Hall effect of spin excitations in a kagome magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 106603 (2015).
  40. Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Observation of the magnon Hall effect, Science 329, 297 (2010).
  41. S. Suetsugu, T. Yokoi, K. Totsuka, T. Ono, I. Tanaka, S. Kasahara, Y. Kasahara, Z. Chengchao, H. Kageyama, and Y. Matsuda, Intrinsic suppression of the topological thermal Hall effect in an exactly solvable quantum magnet, Phys. Rev. B 105, 024415 (2022).
  42. Luke Pritchard Cairns, J.-Ph. Reid, Robin Perry, Dharmalingam Prabhakaran, and Andrew Huxley, Thermal Hall effect of topological triplons in SrCu2(BO3)2, JPS Conf. Proc. 30, 011089 (2020).
  43. M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Colloquium: Spontaneous magnon decays, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 219 (2013).
  44. A. L. Chernyshev and P. A. Maksimov, Damped topological magnons in the kagome-lattice ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 187203 (2016).
  45. Jonas Habel, Alexander Mook, Josef Willsher, and Johannes Knolle, Breakdown of chiral edge modes in topological magnon insulators, arXiv:2308.03168.
  46. Andreas Thomasen, Karlo Penc, Nic Shannon, and Judit Romhányi, Fragility of Z2 topological invariant characterizing triplet excitations in a bilayer kagome magnet, Phys. Rev. B 104, 104412 (2021).
  47. S. S. Pershoguba, Saikat Banerjee, J. C. Lashley, Jihwey Park, Hans Ågren, Gabriel Aeppli, and A. V. Balatsky, Dirac magnons in honeycomb ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011010 (2018).
  48. Stephen M. Winter, Kira Riedl, Pavel A. Maksimov, Alexander L. Chernyshev, Andreas Honecker, and Roser Valentí, Breakdown of magnons in a strongly spin-orbital coupled magnet, Nat. Commun. 8, 1152 (2017).
  49. Hao Sun, Dhiman Bhowmick, Bo Yang, and Pinaki Sengupta, Interacting topological dirac magnons, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134426 (2023).
  50. P. A. McClarty, X.-Y. Dong, M. Gohlke, J. G. Rau, F. Pollmann, R. Moessner, and K. Penc, Topological magnons in Kitaev magnets at high fields, Phys. Rev. B 98, 060404(R) (2018).
  51. Note that the topological phases studied here fall under the umbrella of band topological phases, which classifies families of (Bloch) states generated by a parameterized set of matrices. While technically symmetry-protected (i.e., non-intrinsic), they are to be distinguished from classifications that characterize the topology of individual many-body (ground) states, e.g. of spin chains. The topology of these phases is determined by their projective boundary action and they typically do not have a Bloch bundle analogue.

  52. D. Schmidiger, Pierre Bouillot, S. Mühlbauer, S. Gvasaliya, Corinna Kollath, Thierry Giamarchi, and A. Zheludev, Spectral and thermodynamic properties of a strong-leg quantum spin ladder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 167201 (2012).
  53. Elbio Dagotto and T. M. Rice, Surprises on the way from one-to two-dimensional quantum magnets: The ladder materials, Science 271, 618 (1996).
  54. Subir Sachdev and R. N. Bhatt, Bond-operator representation of quantum spins: Mean-field theory of frustrated quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9323 (1990).
  55. Darshan G. Joshi, Kris Coester, Kai P. Schmidt, and Matthias Vojta, Nonlinear bond-operator theory and 1/d expansion for coupled-dimer magnets. I. Paramagnetic phase, Phys. Rev. B 91, 094404 (2015).
  56. Darshan G. Joshi and Matthias Vojta, Nonlinear bond-operator theory and 1/d expansion for coupled-dimer magnets. II. Antiferromagnetic phase and quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 91, 094405 (2015).
  57. F. Duncan M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
  58. C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005).
  59. Liang Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological insulators in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).
  60. B. Andrei Bernevig, Taylor L. Hughes, and Shou-Cheng Zhang, Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006).
  61. Hiroki Kondo, Yutaka Akagi, and Hosho Katsura, Z2 topological invariant for magnon spin hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 041110(R) (2019).
  62. Olivier Mentré, El Mostafa Ketatni, Marie Colmont, Marielle Huve, Francis Abraham, and Vaclav Petricek, Structural features of the modulated BiCu2 (P1−XVX) O6 solid solution; 4-D treatment of X=0.87 compound and magnetic spin-gap to gapless transition in new Cu2+ two-leg ladder systems, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10857 (2006).
  63. Frédéric Mila, Patrice Millet, and Jacques Bonvoisin, Exchange integrals of vanadates as revealed by magnetic-susceptibility measurements of NaV2O5, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11925 (1996).
  64. Masahiko Isobe and Yutaka Ueda, Magnetic susceptibility of quasi-one-dimensional compound α’-NaV2O5–possible spin-peierls compound with high critical temperature of 34 k, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1178 (1996).
  65. Z. Hiroi and M. Takano,Absence of superconductivity in the doped antiferromagnetic spin-ladder compound (La, Sr) Cuo2.5, Nature (London) 377, 41 (1995).
  66. Yoshimitsu Kohama, Shuang Wang, Atsuko Uchida, Krunoslav Prsa, Sergei Zvyagin, Yuri Skourski, Ross D. McDonald, Luis Balicas, H. M. Ronnow, Christian Rüegg, and M. Jaime, Anisotropic cascade of field-induced phase transitions in the frustrated spin-ladder system BiCu2PO6, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 167204 (2012).
  67. V. Kiryukhin, Y. J. Kim, K. J. Thomas, F. C. Chou, R. W. Erwin, Q. Huang, M. A. Kastner, and R. J. Birgeneau, Magnetic properties of the s=1 2 quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnet CaCu2O3, Phys. Rev. B 63, 144418 (2001).
  68. Masaki Azuma, Z. Hiroi, M. Takano, K. Ishida, and Y. Kitaoka, Observation of a spin gap in Sr Cu2O3 comprising spin-1/2 quasi-1D two-leg ladders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3463 (1994).
  69. Ya-ping Wang, Chang-wen Zhang, Wei-xiao Ji, Run-wu Zhang, Ping Li, Pei-ji Wang, Miao-juan Ren, Xin-lian Chen, and Min Yuan, Tunable quantum spin Hall effect via strain in two-dimensional arsenene monolayer, J. Phys. D 49, 055305 (2016).
  70. Chi-Ho Cheung, Huei-Ru Fuh, Ming-Chien Hsu, Yeu-Chung Lin, and Ching-Ray Chang, Spin orbit coupling gap and indirect gap in strain-tuned topological insulator-antimonene, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11, 1 (2016).
  71. L. Winterfeld, L. A. Agapito, Jin Li, Nicholas Kioussis, Peter Blaha, and Y. P Chen, Strain-induced topological insulator phase transition in HgSe, Phys. Rev. B 87, 075143 (2013).
  72. T. J. Liu, M. A. Springer, Niclas Heinsdorf, Agnieszka Kuc, Roser Valentí, and T. Heine, Semimetallic square-octagon two-dimensional polymer with high mobility, Phys. Rev. B 104, 205419 (2021).
  73. Nanse Esaki, Yutaka Akagi, and Hosho Katsura, Electric field induced thermal Hall effect of triplons in the quantum dimer magnets XCuCl3 (X=Tl, K), Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L032050 (2024).
  74. K. Sturm, Dynamic structure factor: An introduction, Z. Naturforsch. A 48, 233 (1993).
  75. Léon Van Hove, Correlations in space and time and born approximation scattering in systems of interacting particles, Phys. Rev. 95, 249 (1954).
  76. D. G. Joshi, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Takei, Detecting end states of topological quantum paramagnets via spin Hall noise spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 98, 064401 (2018).
  77. Steven R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  78. Guifré Vidal, Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004).
  79. Andrew John Daley, Corinna Kollath, Ulrich Schollwöck, and Guifré Vidal, Time-dependent density-matrix renormalization-group using adaptive effective hilbert spaces, J. Stat. Mech. (2004) P04005.
  80. S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Real-time evolution using the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 076401 (2004).
  81. Jutho Haegeman, J. Ignacio Cirac, T. J. Osborne, Iztok Pižorn, Henri Verschelde, and Frank Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011).
  82. Jutho Haegeman, Christian Lubich, Ivan Oseledets, Bart Vandereycken, and Frank Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016).
  83. M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, C. Karrasch, J. E. Moore, and F. Pollmann, Time-evolving a matrix product state with long-ranged interactions, Phys. Rev. B 91, 165112 (2015).
  84. Odd refers to a sign change under exchange of the two atoms in the unit cell, In a scattering experiment on a stack of ladders, the odd part of the dynamical structure factor can be probed at q⊥=π, where q⊥ is the momentum transfer along the stacking direction. For the model considered here, the odd part exactly corresponds to the triplon modes tx and tz [see Eqs. (a1), (a3)]. All relevant topology is contained also in the standard dynamical structure factor, which contains the sum of all spin moments in the unit cell.

  85. Matthias Gohlke, Roderich Moessner, and Frank Pollmann, Dynamical and topological properties of the Kitaev model in a [111] magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014418 (2018).
  86. Nicholas E. Sherman, Maxime Dupont, and J. E. Moore, Spectral function of the J1−J2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 107, 165146 (2023).
  87. Pierre Bouillot, Corinna Kollath, A. M. Läuchli, Mikhail Zvonarev, Benedikt Thielemann, Christian Rüegg, Edmond Orignac, Roberta Citro, Martin Klanjšek, Claude Berthier, M. Horvatic, and T. Giamarchi, Statics and dynamics of weakly coupled antiferromagnetic spin-1 2 ladders in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 83, 054407 (2011).
  88. Pontus Laurell, Allen Scheie, D. Alan Tennant, Satoshi Okamoto, Gonzalo Alvarez, and Elbio Dagotto, Magnetic excitations, nonclassicality, and quantum wake spin dynamics in the Hubbard chain, Phys. Rev. B 106, 085110 (2022).
  89. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1pty-fvpf for an analysis of the scaling of the numerical error and convergence, which includes Refs. [90–95].
  90. Johannes Hauschild and Frank Pollmann, Efficient numerical simulations with tensor networks: Tensor network python (tenpy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 5 (2018).
  91. Charles R. Harris et al., Array programming with numpy, Nature (London) 585, 357 (2020).
  92. Sebastian Paeckel, Thomas Köhler, Andreas Swoboda, Salvatore R. Manmana, Ulrich Schollwöck, and Claudius Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 411, 167998 (2019).
  93. Elena Canovi, Elisa Ercolessi, Piero Naldesi, Luca Taddia, and Davide Vodola, Dynamics of entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum crossing a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 89, 104303 (2014).
  94. Maxime Dupont, Nicolas Didier, M. J. Hodson, J. E. Moore, and M. J. Reagor, Entanglement perspective on the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022423 (2022).
  95. Andrew D. King et al., Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation, Science 388, 199 (2025).
  96. Mikel Iraola, Niclas Heinsdorf, Apoorv Tiwari, Dominik Lessnich, Thomas Mertz, Francesco Ferrari, M. H. Fischer, S. M. Winter, Frank Pollmann, Titus Neupert, R. Valenti, and M. G. Vergniory, Towards a topological quantum chemistry description of correlated systems: The case of the Hubbard diamond chain, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195125 (2021).
  97. Ruben Verresen, Roderich Moessner, and Frank Pollmann, Avoided quasiparticle decay from strong quantum interactions, Nat. Phys. 15, 750 (2019).
  98. Alexander Mook, Kirill Plekhanov, Jelena Klinovaja, and Daniel Loss, Interaction-stabilized topological magnon insulator in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021061 (2021).
  99. André-Marie Tremblay, A refresher in many-body theory, CIFAR-PITP International Summer School on Numerical Methods for Correlated Systems in Condensed Matter, Sherbrooke (2008).
  100. A. Hunter, S. Beck, E. Cappelli, F. Margot, M. Straub, Y. Alexanian, G. Gatti, M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho, N. C. Plumb, M. Shi, M. Radović, D. A. Sokolov, A. P. Mackenzie, M. Zingl, J. Mravlje, A. Georges, F. Baumberger, and A. Tamai, Fate of quasiparticles at high temperature in the correlated metal Sr2Ruo4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 236502 (2023).
  101. S. Smit, M. Bluschke, P. Moen, N. Heinsdorf, E. Zavatti, G. Bellomia, S Giuli, S. K. Y. Dufresne, C. T. Suen, V. Zimmermann et al., Enhanced coherence and layer-selective charge order in a trilayer cuprate superconductor, arXiv:2506.01448.
  102. Rhine Samajdar, Mathias S. Scheurer, Shubhayu Chatterjee, Haoyu Guo, Cenke Xu, and Subir Sachdev, Enhanced thermal Hall effect in the square-lattice néel state, Nat. Phys. 15, 1290 (2019).
  103. Masataka Kawano and Chisa Hotta, Thermal Hall effect and topological edge states in a square-lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054422 (2019).
  104. Xiaodong Cao, Kai Chen, and Dahai He, Magnon Hall effect on the lieb lattice, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 166003 (2015).
  105. B Sriram Shastry and Bill Sutherland, Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet, Physica (Amsterdam) 108B+C, 1069 (1981).
  106. M. E. Zayed, Ch. Rüegg, Th. Strässle, U. Stuhr, B. Roessli, M. Ay, J. Mesot, P. Link, E. Pomjakushina, M. Stingaciu, K. Conder, and H. M. Rønnow, Correlated decay of triplet excitations in the shastry-sutherland compound SrCu2(Bo3)2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 067201 (2014).
  107. S. E. Nikitin, B. Fåk, K. W. Krämer, T. Fennell, B. Normand, A. M, Läuchli, and C. Rüegg, Thermal evolution of dirac magnons in the honeycomb ferromagnet CrBr3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 127201 (2022).
  108. Y. S. Lu, J. L. Li, and C. T. Wu, Topological phase transitions of dirac magnons in honeycomb ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 217202 (2021).
  109. Chunyu Guo, Lunhui Hu, Carsten Putzke, Jonas Diaz, Xiangwei Huang, Kaustuv Manna, Feng-Ren Fan, Chandra Shekhar, Yan Sun, Claudia Felser et al., Quasi-symmetry-protected topology in a semi-metal, Nat. Phys. 18, 813 (2022).
  110. Chao Shang, Owen Ganter, Niclas Heinsdorf, and S. M. Winter, Irf 4: From tetrahedral compass model to topological semimetal, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125111 (2023).
  111. Victor Gurarie, Single-particle Green’s functions and interacting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 83, 085426 (2011).
  112. Zhong Wang and Binghai Yan, Topological Hamiltonian as an exact tool for topological invariants, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 155601 (2013).
  113. Zhong Wang and Shou-Cheng Zhang, Simplified topological invariants for interacting insulators, Phys. Rev. X 2, 031008 (2012).
  114. A. Kapustin and L. Spodyneiko, Higher-dimensional generalizations of Berry curvature, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235130 (2020).
  115. Ken Shiozaki, Niclas Heinsdorf, and Shuhei Ohyama, Higher berry curvature from matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 112, 035154 (2025).
  116. Philipp Hauke, Markus Heyl, Luca Tagliacozzo, and Peter Zoller, Measuring multipartite entanglement through dynamic susceptibilities, Nat. Phys. 12, 778 (2016).
  117. Song Bao, Jinghui Wang, Wei Wang, Zhengwei Cai, Shichao Li, Zhen Ma, Di Wang, Kejing Ran, Zhao-Yang Dong, DL Abernathy et al., Discovery of coexisting dirac and triply degenerate magnons in a three-dimensional antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 9, 2591 (2018).
  118. M. Elliot, Paul A. McClarty, D Prabhakaran, R. D. Johnson, H. C. Walker, P Manuel, and R. Coldea, Order-by-disorder from bond-dependent exchange and intensity signature of nodal quasiparticles in a honeycomb cobaltate, Nat. Commun. 12, 3936 (2021).
  119. Weiliang Yao, Chenyuan Li, Lichen Wang, Shangjie Xue, Yang Dan, Kazuki Iida, Kazuya Kamazawa, Kangkang Li, Chen Fang, and Yuan Li, Topological spin excitations in a three-dimensional antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys. 14, 1011 (2018).
  120. Bo Yuan, Ilia Khait, Guo-Jiun Shu, F. C. Chou, M. B. Stone, J. P. Clancy, Arun Paramekanti, and Y. J. Kim, Dirac magnons in a honeycomb lattice quantum XY magnet CoTiO3, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011062 (2020).
  121. L.-C. Zhang, Y. A. Onykiienko, P. M. Buhl, Y. V. Tymoshenko, P. Čermák, A. Schneidewind, J. R. Stewart, A. Henschel, M. Schmidt, S. Blügel et al., Magnonic Weyl states in Cu2OSeO3, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013063 (2020).
  122. Igor V. Gornyi, Alexander D. Mirlin, and Dmitry G. Polyakov, Interacting electrons in disordered wires: Anderson localization and low-t transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 206603 (2005).
  123. Rahul Nandkishore and David A. Huse, Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015).
  124. Ehud Altman and Ronen Vosk, Universal dynamics and renormalization in many-body-localized systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 383 (2015).
  125. Fabien Alet and Nicolas Laflorencie, Many-body localization: An introduction and selected topics, C.R. Phys. 19, 498 (2018).
  126. Dmitry A. Abanin, Ehud Altman, Immanuel Bloch, and Maksym Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  127. A. S. Jermyn, R. S. K. Mong, Jason Alicea, and Paul Fendley, Stability of zero modes in parafermion chains, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165106 (2014).
  128. Jack Kemp, Norman Y. Yao, Christopher R. Laumann, and Paul Fendley, Long coherence times for edge spins, J. Stat. Mech. 2017, P063105 (2017).
  129. Dominic V. Else, Paul Fendley, Jack Kemp, and Chetan Nayak, Prethermal strong zero modes and topological qubits, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041062 (2017).
  130. Maksym Serbyn, Dmitry A. Abanin, and Zlatko Papić, Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nat. Phys. 17, 675 (2021).
  131. Anushya Chandran, Thomas Iadecola, Vedika Khemani, and Roderich Moessner, Quantum many-body scars: A quasiparticle perspective, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 443 (2023).
  132. Sanjay Moudgalya, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Nicolas Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and hilbert space fragmentation: A review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022).
  133. Daniel E. Parker, Romain Vasseur, and Thomas Scaffidi, Topologically protected long edge coherence times in symmetry-broken phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 240605 (2019).
  134. Ivan Amelio and Iacopo Carusotto, Theory of the coherence of topological lasers, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041060 (2020).
  135. Petr Zapletal, Bogdan Galilo, and Andreas Nunnenkamp, Long-lived elementary excitations and light coherence in topological lasers, Optica 7, 1045 (2020).
  136. Yasaman Bahri, Ronen Vosk, Ehud Altman, and Ashvin Vishwanath, Localization and topology protected quantum coherence at the edge of hot matter, Nat. Commun. 6, 7341 (2015).
  137. Rajesh Chaunsali, Haitao Xu, Jinkyu Yang, P. G. Kevrekidis, and Georgios Theocharis, Stability of topological edge states under strong nonlinear effects, Phys. Rev. B 103, 024106 (2021).
  138. Daria Smirnova, Daniel Leykam, Yidong Chong, and Yuri Kivshar, Nonlinear topological photonics, Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 021306 (2020).
  139. Daniel Leykam and Yi Dong Chong, Edge solitons in nonlinear-photonic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 143901 (2016).
  140. Nathan Goldman, Jérôme Beugnon, and Fabrice Gerbier, Detecting chiral edge states in the hofstadter optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 255303 (2012).
  141. Nathan Goldman, Jean Dalibard, Alexandre Dauphin, Fabrice Gerbier, Maciej Lewenstein, Peter Zoller, and Ian B. Spielman, Direct imaging of topological edge states in cold-atom systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 6736 (2013).
  142. Yuan Yao, Masahiro Sato, Tetsuya Nakamura, Nobuo Furukawa, and Masaki Oshikawa, Theory of electron spin resonance in one-dimensional topological insulators with spin-orbit couplings: Detection of edge states, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205424 (2017).
  143. Berislav Buča, Out-of-time-ordered crystals and fragmentation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 100601 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation