Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Long-Range Nonstabilizerness and Phases of Matter

David Aram Korbany1, Michael J. Gullans2, and Lorenzo Piroli1

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 160404 – Published 16 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1hlj-h6t9

Abstract

Long-range nonstabilizerness can be defined as the amount of nonstabilizerness that cannot be removed by shallow local quantum circuits. We study long-range nonstabilizerness in the context of many-body quantum physics, a task with possible implications for quantum-state preparation protocols and implementation of quantum-error correcting codes. After presenting a simple argument showing that long-range nonstabilizerness is a generic property of many-body states, we restrict to the class of ground states of gapped local Hamiltonians. We focus on one-dimensional (1D) systems and present rigorous results in the context of translation-invariant matrix product states (MPSs), with our analysis extending to all gapped 1D phases under widely accepted physical assumptions. By analyzing the fixed points of the MPS renormalization-group flow, we provide a sufficient condition for long-range nonstabilizerness, which depends entirely on the local MPS tensors. Physically, our condition captures the fact that the mutual information between distant regions of stabilizer fixed points is quantized and remains so after applying shallow quantum circuits.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (97)

  1. D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction, Ph.D. thesis, Caltech, 1997.
  2. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  3. D. Gottesman, Phys. Rev. A 57, 127 (1998).
  4. D. Gottesman, arXiv:quant-ph/9807006.
  5. S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004).
  6. A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 303, 2 (2003).
  7. B. Eastin and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 110502 (2009).
  8. S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
  9. V. Veitch, S. H. Mousavian, D. Gottesman, and J. Emerson, New J. Phys. 16, 013009 (2014).
  10. D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter et al., Nature (London) 626, 58 (2024).
  11. R. Acharya, L. Aghababaie-Beni, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, N. Astrakhantsev, J. Atalaya et al., Nature (London) 638, 920 (2025).
  12. J. Preskill, in Introduction to Quantum Computation and Information (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), pp. 213–269.
  13. P. W. Shor, in Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE, New York, 1996), pp. 56–65.
  14. D. Litinski, Quantum 3, 205 (2019).
  15. F. Orts, G. Ortega, E. F. Combarro, I. F. Rúa, A. M. Puertas, and E. M. Garzón, J. Supercomput. 79, 12656 (2023).
  16. M. Howard and E. Campbell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 090501 (2017).
  17. C. D. White, C. J. Cao, and B. Swingle, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075145 (2021).
  18. T. D. Ellison, K. Kato, Z.-W. Liu, and T. H. Hsieh, Quantum 5, 612 (2021).
  19. S. Sarkar, C. Mukhopadhyay, and A. Bayat, New J. Phys. 22, 083077 (2020).
  20. T. J. Sewell and C. D. White, Phys. Rev. B 106, 125130 (2022).
  21. S. F. E. Oliviero, L. Leone, and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042426 (2022).
  22. Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, PRX Quantum 3, 020333 (2022).
  23. T. Haug and L. Piroli, Phys. Rev. B 107, 035148 (2023).
  24. P. S. Tarabunga, E. Tirrito, T. Chanda, and M. Dalmonte, PRX Quantum 4, 040317 (2023).
  25. P. S. Tarabunga, Quantum 8, 1413 (2024).
  26. P. R. N. Falcão, P. S. Tarabunga, M. Frau, E. Tirrito, J. Zakrzewski, and M. Dalmonte, Phys. Rev. B 111, L081102 (2025).
  27. P. S. Tarabunga, M. Frau, T. Haug, E. Tirrito, and L. Piroli,Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 045026 (2025).
  28. L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050402 (2022).
  29. L. Leone, S. F. Oliviero, Y. Zhou, and A. Hamma, Quantum 5, 453 (2021).
  30. J. Haferkamp, Quantum 6, 795 (2022).
  31. T. Haug, L. Aolita, and M. Kim, Quantum 9, 1801 (2025).
  32. J. A. M. López and P. Kos, J. Phys. A 57, 475301 (2024).
  33. X. Turkeshi, E. Tirrito, and P. Sierant, Nat. Commun. 16, 2575 (2025).
  34. N. Dowling, P. Kos, and X. Turkeshi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 050401 (2025).
  35. E. Tirrito, P. S. Tarabunga, G. Lami, T. Chanda, L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, M. Dalmonte, M. Collura, and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. A 109, L040401 (2024).
  36. A. Gu, S. F. Oliviero, and L. Leone, arXiv:2403.19610.
  37. G. E. Fux, E. Tirrito, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042030 (2024).
  38. M. Frau, P. S. Tarabunga, M. Collura, M. Dalmonte, and E. Tirrito, Phys. Rev. B 110, 045101 (2024).
  39. M. Bejan, C. McLauchlan, and B. Béri, PRX Quantum 5, 030332 (2024).
  40. P. S. Tarabunga and E. Tirrito, arXiv:2407.15939.
  41. D. Iannotti, G. Esposito, L. C. Venuti, and A. Hamma, Quantum 9, 1797 (2025).
  42. G. Lami, T. Haug, and J. De Nardis, arXiv:2404.18751.
  43. X. Turkeshi, M. Schirò, and P. Sierant, Phys. Rev. A 108, 042408 (2023).
  44. L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. A 107, 022429 (2023).
  45. L. Leone, S. F. Oliviero, G. Esposito, and A. Hamma, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032403 (2024).
  46. R. J. Garcia, K. Bu, and A. Jaffe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2217031120 (2023).
  47. X. Turkeshi, A. Dymarsky, and P. Sierant, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054301 (2025).
  48. S. Bera and M. Schirò, arXiv:2502.01582.
  49. M. Frau, P. S. Tarabunga, M. Collura, E. Tirrito, and M. Dalmonte, arXiv:2411.11720.
  50. P. S. Tarabunga and E. Tirrito, arXiv:2407.15939.
  51. A. Hamma, R. Ionicioiu, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Lett. A 337, 22 (2005).
  52. M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006).
  53. A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006).
  54. B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou, and X.-G. Wen, arXiv:1508.02595.
  55. B. Zeng and D.-L. Zhou, Europhys. Lett. 113, 56001 (2016).
  56. P. Fromholz, G. Magnifico, V. Vitale, T. Mendes-Santos, and M. Dalmonte, Phys. Rev. B 101, 085136 (2020).
  57. D. Perez-Garcia, F. Verstraete, M. Wolf, and J. Cirac, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 401 (2007).
  58. J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 378, 100 (2017).
  59. J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).
  60. C. Cao, G. Cheng, A. Hamma, L. Leone, W. Munizzi, and S. F. Oliviero, arXiv:2403.07056.
  61. C. Cao, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 001.
  62. D. Qian and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 111, 052443 (2025).
  63. A. A. Mele, Quantum 8, 1340 (2024).
  64. T. Singal, C. Chiang, E. Hsu, E. Kim, H.-S. Goan, and M.-H. Hsieh, Quantum 7, 1048 (2023).
  65. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155138 (2010).
  66. M. B. Hastings, Phys. Rev. B 88, 165114 (2013).
  67. B. Zeng and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 91, 125121 (2015).
  68. C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
  69. Up to some technical subtleties, the equivalence of these two definitions follows from the quantum-circuit representation of the evolution along the adiabatic path [70].

  70. M. B. Hastings and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045141 (2005).
  71. N. Schuch, D. Pérez-García, and I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. B 84, 165139 (2011).
  72. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 83, 035107 (2011).
  73. A. Kapustin, N. Sopenko, and B. Yang, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 62, 081901 (2021).
  74. Y. Ogata, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. B 8, 39 (2021).
  75. Y. Ogata, Commun. Math. Phys. 374, 705 (2020).
  76. C. Bourne and Y. Ogata, in Forum of Mathematics, Sigma (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2021), Vol. 9, p. e25.
  77. L. Piroli, G. Styliaris, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 220503 (2021).
  78. D. Malz, G. Styliaris, Z.-Y. Wei, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 040404 (2024).
  79. The RG fixed points are typically defined on chains of qudits of dimension d. However, we can always view a local d-dimensional space as that of ⌈log2(d)⌉ qubits. Note that any shallow circuit made of two-qudit gates on the qudit chain can always be expressed as a shallow local circuit made of two-qubit gates in the associated qubit chain, possibly up to a polylogarithmic overhead.

  80. One could ask if |ϕ˜[α,β]⟩ can be represented as a TI MPS (with N-independent tensors and without boundary tensors), for any α,β∈C, or at least for a dense set of them. This is indeed the case, possibly restricting to some values of N. For example, by summing n product states |0⟩⊗N and m product states |1⟩⊗N, we obtain a TI MPS of the form (5) with α=n/n2+m2 and β=m/n2+m2, which can approximate any pair of positive real numbers. When α∈C (we can always assume that β∈R+ up to a global phase), we can sum product states defined by local tensors with an additional phase eiφ, yielding the state eiNφ|0⟩⊗N. Choosing φ=2πr/s with r,s∈N and restricting to N≡1 (mod s), we obtain states of the form (5) where α has a phase angle φ=2πr/s.

  81. A. Hamma, R. Ionicioiu, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022315 (2005).
  82. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1hlj-h6t9 for additional technical details, which includes Refs. [83,84].
  83. A. Klappenecker and M. Rotteler, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 48, 2396 (2002).
  84. F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and M. M. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 140601 (2005).
  85. K. M. Audenaert, J. Phys. A 40, 8127 (2007).
  86. S. Sang, Y. Li, T. Zhou, X. Chen, T. H. Hsieh, and M. P. A. Fisher, PRX Quantum 2, 030313 (2021).
  87. T.-C. Lu and T. Grover, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235110 (2020).
  88. F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010).
  89. A. Keselman and E. Berg, Phys. Rev. B 91, 235309 (2015).
  90. T. Scaffidi, D. E. Parker, and R. Vasseur, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041048 (2017).
  91. R. Verresen, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 057001 (2018).
  92. R. Verresen, R. Thorngren, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041059 (2021).
  93. D. Gross, V. Nesme, H. Vogts, and R. F. Werner, Commun. Math. Phys. 310, 419 (2012).
  94. J. I. Cirac, D. Perez-Garcia, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, J. Stat. Mech. (2017) 083105.
  95. M. B. Şahinoğlu, S. K. Shukla, F. Bi, and X. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 98, 245122 (2018).
  96. N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, PRX Quantum 4, 020339 (2023).
  97. A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Phys. Rev. B 94, 224206 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation