Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Dilepton Production from Moaton Quasiparticles

Zohar Nussinov1,2,*, Michael C. Ogilvie1,†, Laurin Pannullo3,‡, Robert D. Pisarski4,§, Fabian Rennecke5,6,∥, Stella T. Schindler7,8,¶, and Marc Winstel9,**

  • *Contact author: zohar@wustl.edu
  • †Contact author: mco@wustl.edu
  • ‡Contact author: lpannullo@physik.uni-bielefeld.de
  • §Contact author: pisarski@bnl.gov
  • ∥Contact author: fabian.rennecke@theo.physik.uni-giessen.de
  • Contact author: schindler@lanl.gov
  • **Contact author: winstel@itp.uni-frankfurt.de

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101904 – Published 4 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1f8w-p4m4

Abstract

The phase diagram of QCD probably exhibits a moat regime over a large region of temperature T and chemical potential μ≠0. A moat regime is characterized by quasiparticle moatons (pions) whose energy is minimal at nonzero spatial momentum. At μ≠0, higher mass dimension operators play a critical role in a moat regime. At dimension six, there are nine possible gauge-invariant couplings between scalars and photons. For back-to-back dilepton production, only one operator contributes, which significantly enhances production near a moat threshold. This enhancement is an experimental signature of moatons.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (123)

  1. A. Bazavov et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett. B 795, 15 (2019).
  2. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. l. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, QCD crossover at finite chemical potential from lattice simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 052001 (2020).
  3. M. Asakawa and K. Yazaki, Chiral restoration at finite density and temperature, Nucl. Phys. A504, 668 (1989).
  4. M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. V. Shuryak, Signatures of the tricritical point in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4816 (1998).
  5. M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. V. Shuryak, Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 60, 114028 (1999).
  6. P. Parotto, M. Bluhm, D. Mroczek, M. Nahrgang, J. Noronha-Hostler, K. Rajagopal, C. Ratti, T. Schäfer, and M. Stephanov, QCD equation of state matched to lattice data and exhibiting a critical point singularity, Phys. Rev. C 101, 034901 (2020).
  7. A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, Mapping the phases of quantum chromodynamics with beam energy scan, Phys. Rep. 853, 1 (2020).
  8. W. J. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, The QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054032 (2020).
  9. F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, QCD phase structure from functional methods, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034027 (2020).
  10. F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, Chiral phase structure and critical end point in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136584 (2021).
  11. P. J. Gunkel and C. S. Fischer, Locating the critical endpoint of QCD: Mesonic backcoupling effects, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054022 (2021).
  12. G. Basar, QCD critical point, Lee-Yang edge singularities, and Padé resummations, Phys. Rev. C 110, 015203 (2024).
  13. D. A. Clarke, P. Dimopoulos, F. Di Renzo, J. Goswami, C. Schmidt, S. Singh, and K. Zambello, Searching for the QCD critical endpoint using multi-point Padé approximations, arXiv:2405.10196.
  14. To be more precise, the critical mode is a mixture between the σ, the ω0 meson, and the Polyakov loops, and the relevant mass that vanishes at the CEP is the spacelike screening mass [15].

  15. M. Haensch, F. Rennecke, and L. von Smekal, Medium induced mixing, spatial modulations, and critical modes in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 110, 036018 (2024).
  16. J. Braun, B. Klein, and P. Piasecki, On the scaling behavior of the chiral phase transition in QCD in finite and infinite volume, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1576 (2011).
  17. B. J. Schaefer and M. Wagner, QCD critical region and higher moments for three flavor models, Phys. Rev. D 85, 034027 (2012).
  18. J. Braun, W. J. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, D. Rosenblüh, and S. Yin, Chiral susceptibility in (2+1)-flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D 102, 056010 (2020).
  19. F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, Phase structure of (2+1)-flavor QCD and the magnetic equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094020 (2022).
  20. W.-j. Fu, X. Luo, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and S. Yin, Ripples of the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 111, L031502 (2025).
  21. J. Bernhardt and C. S. Fischer, QCD phase transitions in the light quark chiral limit, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114018 (2023).
  22. J. Braun et al., Soft modes in hot QCD matter, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094010 (2025).
  23. Y. Lu, F. Gao, Y.-X. Liu, and J. M. Pawlowski, QCD equation of state and thermodynamic observables from computationally minimal Dyson-Schwinger equations, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014036 (2024).
  24. W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, R. Wen, and S. Yin, The QCD moat regime and its real-time properties, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094026 (2025).
  25. J. Stephenson, Ising model with antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor coupling: Spin correlations and disorder points, Phys. Rev. B 1, 4405 (1970).
  26. M. A. Schindler, S. T. Schindler, L. Medina, and M. C. Ogilvie, Universality of pattern formation, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114510 (2020).
  27. M. A. Schindler, S. T. Schindler, and M. C. Ogilvie, PT symmetry, pattern formation, and finite-density QCD, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2038, 012022 (2021).
  28. A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems (Courier Corporation, McGraw-Hill New York 2012).
  29. A. W. Overhauser, Structure of nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 415 (1960).
  30. A. B. Migdal, Pion condensation, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 61, 2210 (1971) [Sov. Phys. JETP 36, 1052 (1973)].
  31. R. F. Sawyer, Condensed pion phase in neutron star matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 382 (1972).
  32. A. B. Migdal, Pi condensation in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 257 (1973).
  33. D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Strange goings on in dense nucleonic matter, Phys. Lett. B 175, 57 (1986).
  34. A. Kryjevski, Spontaneous superfluid current generation in the kaon condensed color flavor locked phase at nonzero strange quark mass, Phys. Rev. D 77, 014018 (2008).
  35. B.-J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, Susceptibilities near the QCD (tri)critical point, Phys. Rev. D 75, 085015 (2007).
  36. A. Koenigstein, L. Pannullo, S. Rechenberger, M. J. Steil, and M. Winstel, Detecting inhomogeneous chiral condensation from the bosonic two-point function in the (1+1)-dimensional Gross–Neveu model in the mean-field approximation*, J. Phys. A 55, 375402 (2022).
  37. A. Yoshimori, A new type of antiferromagnetic structure, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 14, 807 (1959).
  38. R. M. Hornreich, M. Luban, and S. Shtrikman, Critical behavior at the onset of k→-space instability on the λ line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1678 (1975).
  39. M. Seul and D. Andelman, Domain shapes and patterns: The phenomenology of modulated phases, Science 267, 476 (1995).
  40. S. Chakrabarty and Z. Nussinov, Modulation and correlations lengths in systems with competing interactions: New exponents and other universal features, Phys. Rev. B 84, 144402 (2011).
  41. S. Chakrabarty, V. Dobrosavljevic, A. Seidel, and Z. Nussinov, Universality of modulation length (and time) exponents, Phys. Rev. E 86, 041132 (2012).
  42. This also includes models of magnetic materials [37, 38, 39, 43], elastic stressed systems [44], liquid crystals [45, 46], chemical mixtures and membranes [39], and general Ginzburg-Landau theories describing competing orders [47]. In these and numerous other arenas, the interplay between the varying order gradient terms leads to low-energy states which may obtain their minima at finite wave vectors. The resulting moat-type structures underlie basic aspects of crystallization [48, 49], superconductors in external magnetic fields [50, 51, 52], quantum Hall systems [53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59], and countless others.

  43. W. Selke, The Annni model- theoretical analysis and experimental application, Phys. Rep. 170, 213 (1988).
  44. A. Aharony and A. D. Bruce, Lifshitz-point critical and tricritical behavior in anisotropically stressed perovskites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 462 (1979).
  45. E. Abrahams and I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, A possible Lifshitz point for TTF-TCNQ, Solid State Commun. 23, 883 (1977).
  46. J. V. Selinger, Director deformations, geometric frustration, and modulated phases in liquid crystals, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 49 (2022).
  47. Z. Nussinov, I. Vekhter, and A. V. Balatsky, Nonuniform glassy electronic phases from competing local orders, Phys. Rev. B 79, 165122 (2009).
  48. S. A. Brazovskii, Phase transition of an isotropic system to a nonuniform state, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 68, 175 (1975), http://www.jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_041_01_0085.pdf.
  49. S. A. Brazovskii, I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, and A. R. Muratov, Theory of weak crystallization, Sov. Phys. JETP 66, 625 (1987), http://www.jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/e/index/e/66/3/p625?a=list.
  50. P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964).
  51. A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1136 (1964), https://inspirehep.net/literature/47905.
  52. A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonuniform state of superconductors, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762 (1965), https://inspirehep.net/literature/47905.
  53. M. P. Lilly, K. B. Cooper, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Evidence for an anisotropic state of two-dimensional electrons in high Landau levels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 394 (1999).
  54. E. Fradkin and S. A. Kivelson, Liquid-crystal phases of quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8065 (1999).
  55. M. M. Fogler, A. A. Koulakov, and B. I. Shklovskii, Ground state of a two-dimensional electron liquid in a weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 54, 1853 (1996).
  56. R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Exact results for interacting electrons in high Landau levels, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5006 (1996).
  57. A. A. Koulakov, M. M. Fogler, and B. I. Shklovskii, Charge density wave in two-dimensional electron liquid in weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 499 (1996).
  58. R. Du, D. Tsui, H. Stormer, L. Pfeiffer, K. Baldwin, and K. West, Strongly anisotropic transport in higher two-dimensional Landau levels, Solid State Commun. 109, 389 (1999).
  59. S. Pu, A. C. Balram, J. Taylor, E. Fradkin, and Z. Papic, Microscopic model for fractional quantum Hall nematics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236503 (2024).
  60. T. A. Sedrakyan, L. I. Glazman, and A. Kamenev, Absence of Bose condensation on lattices with moat bands, Phys. Rev. B 89, 201112(R) (2014).
  61. P. N. Meisinger and M. C. Ogilvie, PT symmetry in classical and quantum statistical mechanics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20120058 (2013).
  62. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  63. C. M. Bender, P. E. Dorey, C. Dunning, A. Fring, D. W. Hook, H. F. Jones, S. Kuzhel, G. Lévai, and R. Tateo, PT Symmetry (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2019).
  64. C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics, arXiv:2312.17386.
  65. M. Thies and K. Urlichs, Revised phase diagram of the Gross-Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D 67, 125015 (2003).
  66. G. Basar and G. V. Dunne, A twisted kink crystal in the chiral Gross-Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065022 (2008).
  67. G. Basar, G. V. Dunne, and M. Thies, Inhomogeneous condensates in the thermodynamics of the chiral NJL(2) model, Phys. Rev. D 79, 105012 (2009).
  68. J. Lenz, L. Pannullo, M. Wagner, B. Wellegehausen, and A. Wipf, Inhomogeneous phases in the Gross-Neveu model in 1+1 dimensions at finite number of flavors, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094512 (2020).
  69. J. J. Lenz, M. Mandl, and A. Wipf, Inhomogeneities in the two-flavor chiral Gross-Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034512 (2022).
  70. J. J. Lenz and M. Mandl, Remnants of large-Nf inhomogeneities in the 2-flavor chiral Gross-Neveu model, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 415 [arXiv:2110.12757].
  71. C. Nonaka and K. Horie, Inhomogeneous phases in the chiral Gross-Neveu model on the lattice, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 150 [arXiv:2112.02261].
  72. L. Pannullo, Inhomogeneous condensation in the Gross-Neveu model in noninteger spatial dimensions 1≤d<3, Phys. Rev. D 108, 036022 (2023).
  73. A. Koenigstein and L. Pannullo, Inhomogeneous condensation in the Gross-Neveu model in noninteger spatial dimensions 1≤d<3. II. Nonzero temperature and chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D 109, 056015 (2024).
  74. D. Nickel, Inhomogeneous phases in the Nambu-Jona-Lasino and quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D 80, 074025 (2009).
  75. M. Buballa and S. Carignano, Inhomogeneous chiral symmetry breaking in dense neutron-star matter, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 57 (2016).
  76. T.-G. Lee, E. Nakano, Y. Tsue, T. Tatsumi, and B. Friman, Landau-Peierls instability in a Fulde-Ferrell type inhomogeneous chiral condensed phase, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034024 (2015).
  77. Y. Hidaka, K. Kamikado, T. Kanazawa, and T. Noumi, Phonons, pions and quasi-long-range order in spatially modulated chiral condensates, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034003 (2015).
  78. M. Buballa and S. Carignano, Inhomogeneous chiral phases away from the chiral limit, Phys. Lett. B 791, 361 (2019).
  79. S. Carignano and M. Buballa, Inhomogeneous chiral condensates in three-flavor quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014026 (2020).
  80. L. Pannullo, M. Wagner, and M. Winstel, Regularization effects in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model: Strong scheme dependence of inhomogeneous phases and persistence of the moat regime, Phys. Rev. D 110, 076006 (2024).
  81. T. F. Motta, J. Bernhardt, M. Buballa, and C. S. Fischer, Inhomogenuous instabilities at large chemical potential in a rainbow-ladder QCD model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074014 (2024).
  82. T. F. Motta, M. Buballa, and C. S. Fischer, New tool to detect inhomogeneous chiral symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074030 (2025).
  83. H. Nishimura, M. C. Ogilvie, and K. Pangeni, Complex saddle points in QCD at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 90, 045039 (2014).
  84. H. Nishimura, M. C. Ogilvie, and K. Pangeni, Complex saddle points and disorder lines in QCD at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054004 (2015).
  85. S. Töpfel, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Braun, Phase structure of quark matter and in-medium properties of mesons from Callan-Symanzik flows, arXiv:2412.16059.
  86. H. Nishimura, M. C. Ogilvie, and K. Pangeni, Complex spectrum of finite-density lattice QCD with static quarks at strong coupling, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094501 (2016).
  87. H. Nishimura, M. C. Ogilvie, and K. Pangeni, Liquid-gas phase transitions and CK symmetry in quantum field theories, Phys. Rev. D 95, 076003 (2017).
  88. M. Winstel, Spatially oscillating correlation functions in (2+1)-dimensional four-fermion models: The mixing of scalar and vector modes at finite density, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034008 (2024).
  89. In perturbative QCD with massless quarks, Friedel oscillations arise as an oscillatory function times a power-law falloff [90].

  90. J. I. Kapusta and T. Toimela, Friedel oscillations in relativistic QED and QCD, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3731 (1988).
  91. R. D. Pisarski, V. V. Skokov, and A. M. Tsvelik, Fluctuations in cool quark matter and the phase diagram of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 99, 074025 (2019).
  92. R. D. Pisarski, A. M. Tsvelik, and S. Valgushev, How transverse thermal fluctuations disorder a condensate of chiral spirals into a quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. D 102, 016015 (2020).
  93. M. Winstel and S. Valgushev, Lattice study of disordering of inhomogeneous condensates and the quantum pion liquid in effective O(N) model, Acta Phys. Pol. B Proc. Suppl. 17, 6 (2024).
  94. R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, A. Tsvelik, and S. Valgushev, The Lifshitz regime and its experimental signals, Nucl. Phys. A1005, 121910 (2021).
  95. R. D. Pisarski and F. Rennecke, Signatures of moat regimes in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 152302 (2021).
  96. F. Rennecke, R. D. Pisarski, and D. H. Rischke, Particle interferometry in a moat regime, Phys. Rev. D 107, 116011 (2023).
  97. K. Fukushima, Y. Hidaka, K. Inoue, K. Shigaki, and Y. Yamaguchi, Hanbury-Brown–Twiss signature for clustered substructures probing primordial inhomogeneity in hot and dense QCD matter, Phys. Rev. C 109, L051903 (2024).
  98. T. Nishimura, M. Kitazawa, and T. Kunihiro, Anomalous enhancement of dilepton production as a precursor of color superconductivity, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 093D02 (2022).
  99. T. Nishimura, M. Kitazawa, and T. Kunihiro, Enhancement of dilepton production rate and electric conductivity around the QCD critical point, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2023, 053D01 (2023).
  100. T. Nishimura, M. Kitazawa, and T. Kunihiro, Electromagnetic response of dense quark matter around color-superconducting phase transition and QCD critical point, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 469, 169768 (2024).
  101. K. Hayashi and Y. Tsue, Modified dilepton production rate from charged pion-pair annihilation in the inhomogeneous chiral condensed phase, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094051 (2024).
  102. Recently, Ref. [101] appeared and analyzed dilepton production from a specific inhomogeneous phase. Reference [101] includes the modified dispersion relation of a dual chiral density wave but not the changes to the photon-moaton vertices. This is discussed in Supplemental Material [103].

  103. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/1f8w-p4m4, which compares our results to literature on dilepton production in a chiral spiral, as well as contrasts our moaton effective Lagrangian to chiral perturbation theory Refs. [104–109].
  104. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral perturbation theory to one loop, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984).
  105. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral perturbation theory: Expansions in the mass of the strange quark, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
  106. A. V. Manohar, Introduction to effective field theories, in Effective Field Theory in Particle Physics and Cosmology: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 108, 2017, edited by S. Davidson, P. Gambino, M. Laine, M. Neubert, and C. Salomon (Oxford Academic, Oxford, 2020).
  107. I. W. Stewart, Effective field theory lecture notes EdX (2014), https://courses.edx.org/c4x/MITx/8.EFTx/asset/notes_EFT.pdf.
  108. F. Gross et al., 50 years of quantum chromodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023).
  109. C. Arzt, Reduced effective Lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B 342, 189 (1995).
  110. I. Balog, H. Chaté, B. Delamotte, M. Marohnic, and N. Wschebor, Convergence of nonperturbative approximations to the renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240604 (2019).
  111. On a lattice, the continuum limit k4 term is replaced by a squared lattice Laplacian corresponding to competing nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor interactions.

  112. If higher derivative terms dominate with negative coefficients, then, even if Z>0, it is possible that E(p) about p=0 is a local minimum but that the global minimum of E(p) is at p≠0.

  113. This occurs, e.g., for a roton, where p=0 is the global minimum, but there is a local minimum for one or more proton≠0.

  114. L. D. McLerran and T. Toimela, Photon and dilepton emission from the quark—gluon plasma: Some general considerations, Phys. Rev. D 31, 545 (1985).
  115. H. B. O’Connell, B. C. Pearce, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, ρ−ω mixing, vector meson dominance and the pion form-factor, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 201 (1997).
  116. R. Rapp and J. Wambach, Chiral symmetry restoration and dileptons in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 25, 1 (2000).
  117. R. Rapp and H. van Hees, Thermal electromagnetic radiation in heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 257 (2016).
  118. R. Rapp, Electric conductivity of QCD matter and dilepton spectra in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 110, 054909 (2024).
  119. This can be derived in a matrix form, where Φ=σ+iπaσa, with σa the Pauli matrices. Under a gauge transformation, Φ→eieθσ3Φe−ieθσ3, with Dμ=∂μ−ieAμ[σ3,]. For example, charged pions contribute to the usual kinetic term as |(∂μ−ieAμ)π+|2.

  120. There is also a term which is odd under charge conjugation, ∼F0i(D0ϕ→·Diϕ→). Unlike the other electromagnetic couplings, this term couples a photon to both charged and neutral (the σ and π3) fields. If μ≠0 implies net electrical charge, then the coefficient of this term must vanish at μ=0.

  121. E. Braaten, R. D. Pisarski, and T.-C. Yuan, Production of soft dileptons in the quark—gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2242 (1990).
  122. R. Rapp, E. V. Shuryak, and I. Zahed, A chiral crystal in cold QCD matter at intermediate densities?, Phys. Rev. D 63, 034008 (2001).
  123. W.-J. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, R. Wen, and S. Yin, The QCD moat regime and its real-time properties, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094026 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation