Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

In-medium heavy quark-antiquark T matrix without partial-wave expansion

Anurag Tiwari and Min He*

  • *Contact author: minhephys@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. C 113, 044908 – Published 13 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zflx-2vql

Abstract

The T matrix of the heavy quark-antiquark (QQ¯) pair interacting through a screened Cornell potential in the quark-gluon plasma is computed without employing the partial-wave expansion. This is compared with the results obtained using the conventional method of partial-wave expansion. Through a comprehensive survey over a range of screening mass and center-of-mass (c.m.) energy, which, when combined, determine the orbital angular momentum involved in the scattering, it is demonstrated that a substantial number of partial-wave terms are necessary to precisely match the full scattering amplitude directly obtained from the method without partial-wave expansion. For moderate screening masses (corresponding to one to two times the crossover transition temperature) and c.m. energy, the number of partial waves required for satisfactory matching turns out as large as 10–20, substantially larger than what one would expect based on simply measuring the magnitudes of the first few partial-wave amplitudes. This highlights the efficacy and advantage of the new method in directly obtaining the full scattering amplitude needed for further computation of physical observables, which is illustrated by comparing the calculations of heavy quark-antiquark scattering cross section and heavy quark drag coefficient between the two methods. We also employ the new method to calculate the T matrix at c.m. energies below the QQ¯mass threshold, and demonstrate the presence of bound states of different orbital quantum numbers simultaneously in a single energy scan.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. R. Rapp, D. Blaschke, and P. Crochet, Charmonium and bottomonium in heavy-ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 65, 209 (2010).
  2. A. Andronic, et al., Heavy-flavour and quarkonium production in the LHC era: from proton–proton to heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 107 (2016).
  3. J. Zhao, K. Zhou, S. Chen, and P. Zhuang, Heavy flavors under extreme conditions in high energy nuclear collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 114, 103801 (2020).
  4. T. Matsui and H. Satz, J/ψ suppression by quark-gluon plasma formation, Phys. Lett. B 178, 416 (1986).
  5. A. Tumasyan, et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of the Υ(3S) meson and suppression of Υ states in pb-pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 022302 (2024).
  6. D. Kharzeev and H. Satz, Quarkonium interactions in hadronic matter, Phys. Lett. B 334, 155 (1994).
  7. L. Grandchamp and R. Rapp, Thermal versus direct J/ψ production in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 523, 60 (2001).
  8. M. Laine, O. Philipsen, P. Romatschke, and M. Tassler, Real-time static potential in hot QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2007) 054.
  9. R. L. Thews, M. Schroedter, and J. Rafelski, Enhanced J/ψ production in deconfined quark matter, Phys. Rev. C 63, 054905 (2001).
  10. P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, (Non)thermal aspects of charmonium production and a new look at J/ψ suppression, Phys. Lett. B 490, 196 (2000).
  11. L. Grandchamp, R. Rapp, and G. E. Brown, In-medium effects on charmonium production in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 212301 (2004).
  12. N. Brambilla, et al., Regeneration of bottomonia in an open quantum systems approach, Phys. Rev. D 108, L011502 (2023).
  13. X. Yao, W. Ke, Y. Xu, S. A. Bass, and B. Müller, Coupled Boltzmann transport equations of heavy quarks and quarkonia in quark-gluon plasma, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 046.
  14. L. Grandchamp, S. Lumpkins, D. Sun, H. van Hees, and R. Rapp, Bottomonium production at sNN=200GeV and sNN=5.5TeV, Phys. Rev. C 73, 064906 (2006).
  15. A. Andronic, et al., Comparative study of quarkonium transport in hot QCD matter, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 88 (2024).
  16. D. Bala, et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Static quark-antiquark interactions at nonzero temperature from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054513 (2022).
  17. A. Bazavov, et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Unscreened forces in the quark-gluon plasma? Phys. Rev. D 109, 074504 (2024).
  18. S. Ali, D. Bala, O. Kaczmarek, and Pavan, Thermal static potential and pseudoscalar quarkonium spectral functions from (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054510 (2025).
  19. M. Mannarelli and R. Rapp, Hadronic modes and quark properties in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064905 (2005).
  20. D. Cabrera and R. Rapp, T-matrix approach to quarkonium correlation functions in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 76, 114506 (2007).
  21. H. van Hees, M. Mannarelli, V. Greco, and R. Rapp, Nonperturbative heavy-quark diffusion in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 192301 (2008).
  22. F. Riek and R. Rapp, Quarkonia and heavy-quark relaxation times in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C 82, 035201 (2010).
  23. S. Y. F. Liu and R. Rapp, T-matrix approach to quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C 97, 034918 (2018).
  24. R. Blankenbecler and R. Sugar, Linear integral equations for relativistic multichannel scattering, Phys. Rev. 142, 1051 (1966).
  25. R. H. Thompson, Three-dimensional bethe-salpeter equation applied to the nucleon-nucleon interaction, Phys. Rev. D 1, 110 (1970).
  26. M. He, H. van Hees, and R. Rapp, Heavy-quark diffusion in the quark–gluon plasma, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 130, 104020 (2023).
  27. B. Wu, Z. Tang, and R. RappNon-perturbative quarkonium dissociation rates in strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma, J. High Energ. Phys. 07 (2025) 162.
  28. M. I. Haftel and F. Tabakin, Nuclear saturation and the smoothness of nucleon-nucleon potentials, Nucl. Phys. A 158, 1 (1970).
  29. J. Holz and W. Glockle, Time-independent and time-dependent potential scattering without angular momentum decomposition, J. Comput. Phys. 76, 131 (1988).
  30. R. A. Rice and Y. E. Kim, Formulation of few-body equations without partial waves, Few-Body Syst. 14, 127 (1993).
  31. C. Elster, J. H. Thomas, and W. Glöckle, Two-body T -Matrices without angular-momentum decomposition: Energy and momentum dependences, Few-Body Syst. 24, 55 (1998).
  32. F. Karsch, M. T. Mehr, and H. Satz, Color screening and deconfinement for bound states of heavy quarks, Z. Phys. C 37, 617 (1988).
  33. D. Bala and S. Datta, Nonperturbative potential for the study of quarkonia in QGP, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034507 (2020).
  34. S. Y. F. Liu, M. He, and R. Rapp, Probing the in-medium QCD force by open heavy-flavor observables, Phys. Rev. C 99, 055201 (2019).
  35. B. Svetitsky, Diffusion of charmed quarks in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 37, 2484 (1988).
  36. Y. Burnier, O. Kaczmarek, and A. Rothkopf, Quarkonium at finite temperature: towards realistic phenomenology from first principles, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 1.
  37. G. Caia, V. Pascalutsa, and L. E. Wright, Solving potential scattering equations without partial wave decomposition, Phys. Rev. C 69, 034003 (2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation