Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Bayesian smooth-fit extrapolation of the C12+C12 astrophysical S factor

    A. M. Mukhamedzhanov

    Phys. Rev. C 114, 015809 – Published 28 July, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vhms-qgr4

    Abstract

    A Bayesian analysis of the astrophysical S factor for the C12+C12 fusion reaction is presented using available low-energy information at carbon-carbon relative energies E<3.5MeV, including direct measurements and recent inverse-kinematics data. The goal of the global Bayesian fit is not to reproduce the local resonance-by-resonance structure of the C12+C12 system, but rather to constrain the smooth global component of S*(E) using the direct and inverse-kinematics constraints. A conservative uncertainty model is adopted in order to combine heterogeneous datasets with different systematic uncertainties and normalizations. The inference is performed for y(E)=log10S*(E), which reduces the dynamic range of the data and leads to approximately Gaussian uncertainties. The function y(E) is represented by a quadratic polynomial, and the posterior distribution of its coefficients is determined. Propagation of this posterior gives the median smooth curve and the corresponding 68% posterior interval for S*(E). The resulting posterior S*(E) lies systematically below the traditional FCZ75 reference normalization over the energy interval considered. For example, at E=1.5MeV the median posterior value is S*(1.5MeV)=1.20×1016keVb, whereas the Fowler–Caughlan–Zimmerman reference value is SFCZ75*=3.0×1016keVb [W. A. Fowler, G. R. Caughlan, and B. A. Zimmerman, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 13, 69 (1975)]. Thus, the updated posterior favors a lower smooth low-energy trend and does not support a sharp increase of S*(E) as the energy decreases. The astrophysical consequence of the analysis is assessed through the thermonuclear reaction rate NA〈σv〉. The resulting median rate is lower than the CF88 analytic rate [G. R. Caughlan and W. A. Fowler, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 40, 283 (1988)] over the temperature interval considered, with Rpresent/RCF88≃0.33–0.46 for 0.3≤T9≤1.2. At higher temperatures, where the Gamow window extends above the upper end of the adopted integration interval, the calculated rate should be regarded as a truncated rate rather than a complete stellar rate.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation