Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Soft-hard framework with exact four-momentum conservation for small systems

I. Soudi1,2,3, W. Zhao1,4,5, A. Majumder1, C. Shen1,6, J. H. Putschke1, B. Boudreaux1, A. Angerami7, R. Arora8, S. A. Bass9 et al. (The JETSCAPE Collaboration)

S. A. Bass9, Y. Chen10,11,12, R. Datta1, L. Du13,4,5, R. Ehlers4,5, H. Elfner14,15,16, R. J. Fries17,18, C. Gale13, Y. He19, B. V. Jacak4,5, P. M. Jacobs4,5, S. Jeon13, Y. Ji20, L. Kasper12, M. Kelsey1, M. Kordell, II17,18, A. Kumar21,13, R. Kunnawalkam-Elayavalli12, J. Latessa8, Y.-J. Lee10,11, R. Lemmon22, M. Luzum23, S. Mak20, A. Mankolli12, C. Martin24, H. Mehryar8, T. Mengel24, C. Nattrass24, J. Norman25, C. Parker17,18, J.-F. Paquet12, H. Roch1, G. Roland10,11, B. Schenke26, L. Schwiebert8, A. Sengupta17,18, M. Singh12, C. Sirimanna1,9, D. Soeder27, R. A. Soltz1,7, Y. Tachibana28, J. Velkovska12, G. Vujanovic21, X.-N. Wang29,4,5, and X. Wu13,1 (The JETSCAPE Collaboration)

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA
  • 2University of Jyväskylä, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland
  • 3Helsinki Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
  • 4Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94270, USA
  • 5Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94270, USA
  • 6RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 7Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
  • 8Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA
  • 9Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 10Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachuaetts 02139, USA
  • 11Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 12Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA
  • 13Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal QC H3A 2T8, Canada
  • 14GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 15Institute for Theoretical Physics, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 16Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 17Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 18Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 19School of Physics and Optoelectronics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • 20Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 21Department of Physics, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
  • 22Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire, WA44AD, United Kingdom
  • 23Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, C.P. 66318, 05315-970 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • 24Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 25Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • 26Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 27Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 28Akita International University, Yuwa, Akita-city 010-1292, Japan
  • 29Key Laboratory of Quark and Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

Phys. Rev. C 112, 014905 – Published 17 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/r8jt-1xpk

Abstract

A new framework, called x-scape, for the combined study of both hard and soft transverse momentum sectors in high-energy proton-proton (p−p) and proton-nucleus (p−A) collisions is set up. A dynamical initial state is set up using the 3d-Glauber model with transverse locations of hotspots within each incoming nucleon. A hard scattering that emanates from two colliding hotspots is carried out using the Pythia generator. Initial state radiation from the incoming hard partons is carried out in a new module called I-matter, which includes the longitudinal location of initial splits. The energy-momentum of both the initial hard partons and their associated beam remnants is removed from the hot spots, depleting the energy-momentum available for the formation of the bulk medium. Outgoing showers are simulated using the matter generator, and results are presented for both cases, allowing for and not allowing for energy loss. First comparisons between this hard-soft model and single inclusive hadron and jet data from p−p and minimum bias p−Pb collisions are presented. Single hadron spectra in p−p are used to carry out a limited (in number of parameters) Bayesian calibration of the model. Fair comparisons with data are indicative of the utility of this new framework. Theoretical studies of the correlation between jet pT and event activity at mid and forward rapidity are carried out.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (87)

  1. J. Adams et al., Evidence from d + Au measurements for final state suppression of high-pT hadrons in Au+Au collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 072304 (2003).
  2. S. S. Adler et al., Absence of suppression in particle production at large transverse momentum in SNN = 200-GeV d + Au collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 072303 (2003).
  3. R. G. Arnold et al., Measurements of the A-dependence of deep inelastic electron scattering from nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 727 (1984).
  4. J. W. Cronin, H. J. Frisch, M. J. Shochet, J. P. Boymond, P. A. Piroue, and R. L. Sumner, Production of hadrons with large transverse momentum at 200-GeV and 300-GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1426 (1973).
  5. J. W. Cronin, H. J. Frisch, M. J. Shochet, J. P. Boymond, R. Mermod, P. A. Piroué, and R. L. Sumner, Production of hadrons with large transverse momentum at 200, 300, and 400 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 11, 3105 (1975).
  6. G. Aad et al., Observation of associated near-side and away-side long-range correlations in sNN=5.02TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 182302 (2013).
  7. S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of long-range near-side angular correlations in proton-lead collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 718, 795 (2013).
  8. B. Abelev et al., Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B 719, 29 (2013).
  9. J. L. Nagle and W. A. Zajc, Small system collectivity in relativistic hadronic and nuclear collisions, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 211 (2018).
  10. C. Shen, Studying QGP with flow: A theory overview, Nucl. Phys. A 1005, 121788 (2021).
  11. J. Noronha, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Progress and challenges in small systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430005 (2024)
  12. J. F. Grosse-Oetringhaus and U. A. Wiedemann, A decade of collectivity in small systems, arXiv:2407.07484.
  13. R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke, One fluid to rule them all: Viscous hydrodynamic description of event-by-event central p+p, p+Pb and Pb+Pb collisions at s=5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B 774, 351 (2017).
  14. B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Running the gamut of high energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044905 (2020).
  15. B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Hybrid color glass condensate and hydrodynamic description of the relativistic heavy ion collider small system scan, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135322 (2020).
  16. C. Shen, J. F. Paquet, G. S. Denicol, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Thermal photon radiation in high multiplicity p+Pb collisions at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 072301 (2016).
  17. C. Shen, J.-F. Paquet, G. S. Denicol, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Collectivity and electromagnetic radiation in small systems, Phys. Rev. C 95, 014906 (2017).
  18. V. Khachatryan (PHENIX), Direct photon production and scaling properties in large and small system collisions, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1602, 012015 (2020).
  19. G. Aad et al., Centrality and rapidity dependence of inclusive jet production in sNN=5.02TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 748, 392 (2015).
  20. A. Białłas, M. Bleszynski, and W. Czyz, Multiplicity distributions in nucleus-nucleus collisions at high-energies, Nucl. Phys. B 111, 461 (1976).
  21. J. Adam et al., Centrality dependence of particle production in p-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. C 91, 064905 (2015).
  22. G. Aad et al., Transverse momentum, rapidity, and centrality dependence of inclusive charged-particle production in sNN=5.02TeVp+ Pb collisions measured by the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B 763, 313 (2016).
  23. S. Acharya et al., Constraints on jet quenching in p-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV measured by the event-activity dependence of semi-inclusive hadron-jet distributions, Phys. Lett. B 783, 95 (2018).
  24. G. Aad et al., Strong constraints on jet quenching in centrality-dependent p+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV from ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 072301 (2023).
  25. M. Aaboud et al., Measurements of long-range azimuthal anisotropies and associated Fourier coefficients for pp collisions at s=5.02 and 13TeV and p+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C 96, 024908 (2017).
  26. G. Aad et al., Transverse momentum and process dependent azimuthal anisotropies in sNN=8.16TeVp+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 73 (2020).
  27. T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner, EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. C 92, 034906 (2015).
  28. Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, Interplay between core and corona components in high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 105, 024905 (2022).
  29. C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad, and H. Shah, The Angantyr model for heavy-ion collisions in PYTHIA8, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 134.
  30. K. Aamodt et al., Charged-particle multiplicity density at midrapidity in central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252301 (2010).
  31. C. Shen, U. Heinz, P. Huovinen, and H. Song, Radial and elliptic flow in Pb+Pb collisions at the large hadron collider from viscous hydrodynamic, Phys. Rev. C 84, 044903 (2011).
  32. A. Majumder and M. Van Leeuwen, The theory and phenomenology of perturbative QCD based jet quenching, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66, 41 (2011).
  33. S. Cao and X.-N. Wang, Jet quenching and medium response in high-energy heavy-ion collisions: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 024301 (2021).
  34. A. Kumar et al., Inclusive jet and hadron suppression in a multistage approach, Phys. Rev. C 107, 034911 (2023).
  35. M. Kordell and A. Majumder, Jets in d(p)−A collisions: Color transparency or energy conservation, Phys. Rev. C 97, 054904 (2018).
  36. A. Huss, A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, R. Paatelainen, W. van der Schee, and U. A. Wiedemann, Predicting parton energy loss in small collision systems, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054903 (2021).
  37. M. Alvioli, B. A. Cole, L. Frankfurt, D. V. Perepelitsa, and M. Strikman, Evidence for x-dependent proton color fluctuations in pA collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 93, 011902(R) (2016).
  38. G. Ovanesyan, F. Ringer, and I. Vitev, Initial-state splitting kernels in cold nuclear matter, Phys. Lett. B 760, 706 (2016).
  39. I. Kolbe and W. A. Horowitz, Short path length corrections to Djordjevic-Gyulassy-Levai-Vitev energy loss, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024913 (2019).
  40. The X-SCAPE project of the JETSCAPE Collaboration, https://github.com/JETSCAPE/X-SCAPE.
  41. J. H. Putschke et al., The JETSCAPE framework, arXiv:1903.07706.
  42. Y. Mehtar-Tani, C. A. Salgado, and K. Tywoniuk, Jets in QCD media: From color coherence to decoherence, Phys. Lett. B 707, 156 (2012).
  43. J. Casalderrey-Solana, Y. Mehtar-Tani, C. A. Salgado, and K. Tywoniuk, New picture of jet quenching dictated by color coherence, Phys. Lett. B 725, 357 (2013).
  44. A. Kumar, A. Majumder, and C. Shen, Energy and scale dependence of q̂ and the “JET puzzle,” Phys. Rev. C 101, 034908 (2020).
  45. N. J. Abdulameer et al., Disentangling centrality bias and final-state effects in the production of high-pT neutral pions using direct photon in d+Au collisions at sNN=200GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 022302 (2025).
  46. C. Gale, S. Jeon, B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Event-by-event anisotropic flow in heavy-ion collisions from combined Yang-Mills and viscous fluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 012302 (2013).
  47. J. Weil et al., Particle production and equilibrium properties within a new hadron transport approach for heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 94, 054905 (2016).
  48. U. Heinz and J. S. Moreland, Energy dependent growth of the nucleon and hydrodynamic initial conditions, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054905 (2011).
  49. C. Shen, Z. Qiu, H. Song, J. Bernhard, S. Bass, and U. Heinz, The iEBE-VISHNU code package for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 199, 61 (2016).
  50. J. S. Moreland, J. E. Bernhard, and S. A. Bass, Alternative ansatz to wounded nucleon and binary collision scaling in high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 92, 011901(R) (2015).
  51. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  52. T. Sjöstrand and M. van Zijl, A multiple interaction model for the event structure in hadron collisions, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2019 (1987).
  53. A. Majumder, Incorporating space-time within medium-modified jet event generators, Phys. Rev. C 88, 014909 (2013).
  54. S. Cao and A. Majumder, Nuclear modification of leading hadrons and jets within a virtuality ordered parton shower, Phys. Rev. C 101, 024903 (2020).
  55. S. Cao et al., Multistage Monte-Carlo simulation of jet modification in a static medium, Phys. Rev. C 96, 024909 (2017).
  56. R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling, and B. R. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011), Vol. 8.
  57. C. Shen and B. Schenke, Longitudinal dynamics and particle production in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 105, 064905 (2022).
  58. J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, H.-L. Lai, Z. Li, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, D. Stump, and C. P. Yuan, CT10 next-to-next-to-leading order global analysis of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 89, 033009 (2014).
  59. C. Shen and B. Schenke, Dynamical initial state model for relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 97, 024907 (2018).
  60. M. Li and J. I. Kapusta, Large baryon densities achievable in high energy heavy ion collisions outside the central rapidity region, Phys. Rev. C 99, 014906 (2019).
  61. A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Equation of state at finite densities for QCD matter in nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024907 (2019).
  62. W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory, Ann. Phys. 118, 341 (1979).
  63. G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar, and D. H. Rischke, Derivation of transient relativistic fluid dynamics from the Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114047 (2012); 91, 039902(E) (2015).
  64. G. S. Denicol, C. Gale, S. Jeon, A. Monnai, B. Schenke, and C. Shen, Net baryon diffusion in fluid dynamic simulations of relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 98, 034916 (2018).
  65. F. Cooper and G. Frye, Comment on the single particle distribution in the hydrodynamic and statistical thermodynamic models of multiparticle production, Phys. Rev. D 10, 186 (1974).
  66. P. Huovinen and H. Petersen, Particlization in hybrid models, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 171 (2012).
  67. Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, Nonequilibrium components in the region of very low transverse momentum in high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 106, 054908 (2022).
  68. K. Werner and B. Guiot, Perturbative QCD concerning light and heavy flavor in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C 108, 034904 (2023).
  69. K. Werner, Parallel scattering, saturation, and generalized Abramovskii-Gribov-Kancheli (AGK) theorem in the EPOS4 framework, with applications for heavy-ion collisions at sNN of 5.02 TeV and 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 109, 034918 (2024).
  70. K. Werner, Core-corona procedure and microcanonical hadronization to understand strangeness enhancement in proton-proton and heavy ion collisions in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C 109, 014910 (2024).
  71. K. Werner, Revealing a deep connection between factorization and saturation: New insight into modeling high-energy proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus scattering in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C 108, 064903 (2023).
  72. J. Adam et al., Multiplicity dependence of charged pion, kaon, and (anti)proton production at large transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B 760, 720 (2016).
  73. S. Acharya et al., Production of charged pions, kaons, and (anti-)protons in Pb-Pb and inelastic pp collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. C 101, 044907 (2020).
  74. V. Greco, C. M. Ko, and P. Levai, Parton coalescence and anti-proton/pion anomaly at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 202302 (2003).
  75. R. J. Fries, B. Muller, C. Nonaka, and S. A. Bass, Hadronization in heavy ion collisions: Recombination and fragmentation of partons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 202303 (2003).
  76. W. Zhao, C. M. Ko, Y.-X. Liu, G.-Y. Qin, and H. Song, Probing the partonic degrees of freedom in high-multiplicity p−Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 072301 (2020).
  77. X.-N. Wang, Systematic study of high pT hadron spectra in pp, pA and AA collisions from SPS to RHIC energies, Phys. Rev. C 61, 064910 (2000).
  78. S. Acharya et al., Measurements of inclusive jet spectra in pp and central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. C 101, 034911 (2020).
  79. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  80. W. Fan et al., Multiscale evolution of charmed particles in a nuclear medium, Phys. Rev. C 107, 054901 (2023).
  81. A. Kumar et al., JETSCAPE framework: p+p results, Phys. Rev. C 102, 054906 (2020).
  82. B. A. Kniehl, G. Kramer, and B. Potter, Fragmentation functions for pions, kaons, and protons at next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 582, 514 (2000).
  83. T. J. Boerner, S. Deems, T. R. Furlani, S. L. Knuth, and J. Towns, ACCESS: Advancing innovation: NSF's advanced cyberinfrastructure coordination ecosystem: Services & support, in Proceedings of the Conference on Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing (PEARC'23) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2023), pp. 173–176.
  84. https://github.com/JETSCAPE/X-SCAPE.
  85. https://github.com/JETSCAPE/TEST-EXAMPLES.
  86. C. Shen, B. Schenke, and W. Zhao, Viscosities of the baryon-rich quark-gluon plasma from beam energy scan data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 072301 (2024).
  87. W. Zhao, S. Ryu, C. Shen, and B. Schenke, 3D structure of anisotropic flow in small collision systems at energies available at the BNL Relativistic heavy ion collider, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014904 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation