Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Predicting the formation probability PCN of a compound nucleus with machine learning

    Jiatai Li*

    Nobuaki Imai

    • Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan and RIKEN Nishina Center, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan

    • *Contact author: jt.li@cns.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

    Phys. Rev. C 113, 034617 – Published 23 March, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pymg-tmxz

    Abstract

    The formation probability of the compound nucleus PCN, predominated by quasifission, is pivotal for synthesizing heavy and superheavy elements via fusion-evaporation reactions. However, PCN has thus far been formulated only phenomenologically, with substantial discrepancies observed in certain systems. Therefore, accurate prediction of PCN is essential when designing heavy-ion fusion experiments. In this study, we quantitatively investigate PCN using a machine learning (ML) algorithm, eXtreme Gradient Boosting. To reproduce entrance-channel properties as accurately as possible, we introduced various input features, including the charge product, the ratio of center-of-mass energies to the Bass barrier, fissility parameters, mass asymmetry, and static deformation parameters of the compound nucleus. The precision of the ML model was characterized using the mean absolute error (MAE), which is the average absolute difference between log 10 of the predicted and experimental PCN values. The associated uncertainty was evaluated by repeatedly training on randomly split subsets of the dataset. The trained models achieved mean MAEs of 0.056 and 0.070 for the training and validation sets, respectively. For the test set, the mean MAE was 0.077, and the ratios between the predicted and experimental PCN values were mostly distributed within a factor of 10±0.2. Furthermore, we compared the predictability of our ML approach with PCN values calculated using the semiempirical formula proposed by Zagrebaev and Greiner, revealing that our ML model yielded better performance on the test set by aligning closer with the experimental results.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation