Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Measurement of the near-threshold J/ψ photoproduction cross section with the CLAS12 experiment

P. Chatagnon5,*, V. Kubarovsky41, R. Paremuzyan29,41, S. Stepanyan41, M. Tenorio33, R. Tyson46, A. G. Acar48, P. Achenbach6, J. S. Alvarado16 et al. (CLAS Collaboration)

J. S. Alvarado16, M. J. Amaryan33, W. R. Armstrong1, H. Avakian41, N. A. Baltzell41, L. Barion17, M. Bashkanov48, M. Battaglieri19, F. Benmokhtar9, A. Bianconi23,45, A. S. Biselli10, S. Boiarinov41, M. Bondi20,22, F. Bossù5, K.-Th. Brinkmann34, W. J. Briscoe14, S. Bueltmann33, V. D. Burkert41, T. Cao41, D. S. Carman41, A. Celentano13,19, H. Chinchay29, G. Ciullo11,17, P. L. Cole26, A. D'Angelo20,36, N. Dashyan52, M. Defurne5, R. De Vita19,41, A. Deur41, S. Diehl7,34, C. Dilks41, C. Djalali32, M. Dugger2, R. Dupré16, H. Egiyan41, M. Ehrhart1,16,†, A. El Alaoui43, L. El Fassi28, L. Elouadrhiri41, M. Farooq29, S. Fegan48, R. F. Ferguson46, I. P. Fernando50, E. Ferrand5, A. Filippi21, C. Fogler33, K. Gates48, G. P. Gilfoyle35, D. I. Glazier46, R. W. Gothe39, Y. Gotra41, B. Gualtieri12, K. Hafidi1, H. Hakobyan43, F. Hauenstein33,41, T. B. Hayward27, D. Heddle6,41, M. Hoballah16, D. Holmberg51, M. Holtrop29, C. E. Hyde33, Y. Ilieva39, D. G. Ireland46, E. L. Isupov38, H. S. Jo25, K. Joo7, T. Kageya41, M. Kerr27, A. Kim7, H. T. Klest1, V. Klimenko1, I. Korover49, A. Kripko34, S. E. Kuhn33, L. Lanza20,36, S. Lee40, P. Lenisa11,17, X. Li37, D. Marchand16, D. Martiryan52, V. Mascagna23,44,45, B. McKinnon46, A. Mehta30, R. G. Milner27, T. Mineeva42, M. Mirazita18, V. I. Mokeev41, E. F. Molina Cardenas42, C. Munoz Camacho16, P. Nadel-Turonski39,41, K. Neupane41, D. Nguyen41,47, S. Niccolai16, G. Niculescu24, M. Osipenko19, M. Ouillon28, P. Pandey27, M. Paolone30,40, L. L. Pappalardo11,17, E. Pasyuk41, C. Paudel30, S. J. Paul12, W. Phelps6,41, N. Pilleux1, L. Polizzi17, J. Poudel41, J. W. Price3, Y. Prok33, A. Radic43, J. Richards7, M. Ripani19, J. Ritman15, P. Rossi18,41, A. A. Rusova38, C. Salgado6,31, S. Schadmand15, A. Schmidt14,27, M. B. C. Scott14, Y. G. Sharabian41, E. V. Shirokov38, S. Shrestha40, E. Sidoretti20, N. Sparveris40, I. I. Strakovsky14, S. Strauch39, F. Touchte Codjo16, M. Ungaro41, D. W. Upton33, P. S. H. Vaishnavi17, S. Vallarino19, C. Velasquez48, L. Venturelli23,45, H. Voskanyan52, A. Vossen8,41, E. Voutier16, Y. Wang27, D. P. Watts48, U. Weerasinghe28, X. Wei41, M. H. Wood4, L. Xu16, Z. Xu1, Z. W. Zhao8, V. Ziegler41, and M. Zurek1 (CLAS Collaboration)

  • 1Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 2Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA
  • 3California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, California 90747, USA
  • 4Canisius College, Buffalo, New York 14208, USA
  • 5IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 6Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA
  • 7University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
  • 8Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 9Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15282, USA
  • 10Fairfield University, Fairfield, Connecticut 06824, USA
  • 11Università di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
  • 12Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, USA
  • 13Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Università, 16146 Genova, Italy
  • 14The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA
  • 15GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung GmbH, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 16Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, 91405 Orsay, France
  • 17INFN, Sezione di Ferrara, 44100 Ferrara, Italy
  • 18INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 00044 Frascati, Italy
  • 19INFN, Sezione di Genova, 16146 Genova, Italy
  • 20INFN, Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
  • 21INFN, Sezione di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy
  • 22INFN, Sezione di Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
  • 23INFN, Sezione di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
  • 24James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, USA
  • 25Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
  • 26Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas 77710, USA
  • 27Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 28Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
  • 29University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA
  • 30New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA
  • 31Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Virginia 23504, USA
  • 32Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA
  • 33Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA
  • 34II Physikalisches Institut der Universitaet Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
  • 35University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173, USA
  • 36Università di Roma Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
  • 37Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China
  • 38Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia
  • 39University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA
  • 40Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
  • 41Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA
  • 42Universidad de La Serena, Avda Juan Cisternos 1200, La Serena, Chile
  • 43Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Casilla 110-V, Valparaíso, Chile
  • 44Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy
  • 45Università degli Studi di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
  • 46University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
  • 47University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 48University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
  • 49University of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
  • 50University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901, USA
  • 51College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
  • 52Yerevan Physics Institute, 375036 Yerevan, Armenia

  • *Contact author: pierre.chatagnon@cea.fr
  • †Present address: DOTA, ONERA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91120, Palaiseau, France.

Phys. Rev. C 113, 065203 – Published 9 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lqv1-kf2n

Abstract

We present measurements of the total and differential cross sections for near-threshold J/ψ photoproduction obtained with the CLAS12 detector at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. The results are based on data collected during the fall 2018 and spring 2019 running periods, using electron beams with energies of 10.6 and 10.2 GeV, respectively, scattered off a liquid-hydrogen target. Near-threshold J/ψ photoproduction offers a unique sensitivity to the strong interaction in the nonperturbative regime of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). The energy dependence of the cross section constrains the underlying J/ψ production mechanisms, including multigluon exchange and potential baryonic excitations. Additionally, the t dependence of the differential cross section can be related to the transverse spatial distribution of gluons in the proton, providing critical input for theoretical descriptions of the gluonic structure of the proton. An interpretation of the results in terms of the gluon content of the proton is presented, providing new experimental constraints on QCD-inspired models of the proton structure and the role of gluonic degrees of freedom in hadronic mass generation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (90)

  1. B. Gittelman et al., Photoproduction of the ψ(3100) meson at 11 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1616 (1975).
  2. U. Camerini et al., Photoproduction of the ψ particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 483 (1975).
  3. S. Chekanov et al. (ZEUS Collaboration), Exclusive photoproduction of J/ψ mesons at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 345 (2002).
  4. A. Aktas et al. (H1 Collaboration), Elastic J/ψ production at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 585 (2006).
  5. C. Alexa et al. (H1 Collaboration), Elastic and proton-dissociative photoproduction of J/ψ mesons at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2466 (2013).
  6. B. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Exclusive J/ψ photoproduction off protons in ultraperipheral p−Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 232504 (2014).
  7. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Energy dependence of exclusive J/ψ photoproduction off protons in ultra-peripheral p–Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 402 (2019).
  8. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Central exclusive production of J/ψ and ψ(2S) mesons in pp collisions at s=13TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 167.
  9. P. A. Adderley et al., The continuous electron beam accelerator facility at 12 GeV, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 084802 (2024).
  10. A. Ali et al. (GlueX Collaboration), First measurement of near-threshold J/ψ exclusive photoproduction off the proton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 072001 (2019).
  11. S. Adhikari et al. (GlueX Collaboration), Measurement of the J/ψ photoproduction cross section over the full near-threshold kinematic region, Phys. Rev. C 108, 025201 (2023).
  12. I. Strakovsky et al., J/ψp scattering length from GlueX threshold measurements, Phys. Rev. C 101, 042201 (2020).
  13. B. Duran et al., Determining the gluonic gravitational form factors of the proton, Nature (London) 615, 813 (2023).
  14. H. Pagels, Energy-momentum structure form factors of particles, Phys. Rev. 144, 1250 (1966).
  15. X.-D. Ji, Gauge-invariant decomposition of nucleon spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610 (1997).
  16. V. D. Burkert et al., The pressure distribution inside the proton, Nature (London) 557, 396 (2018).
  17. M. V. Polyakov et al., Forces inside hadrons: Pressure, surface tension, mechanical radius, and all that, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1830025 (2018).
  18. C. Lorcé et al., Revisiting the mechanical properties of the nucleon, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 89 (2019).
  19. V. D. Burkert et al., Colloquium: Gravitational form factors of the proton, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 041002 (2023).
  20. S. Joosten et al., Near-threshold J/ψ→μ+μ− photoproduction and the gluonic gravitational form factors of the proton, arXiv:2602.14416.
  21. Y. Hatta et al., Near threshold J/ψ and Υ photoproduction at JLab and RHIC, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014032 (2019).
  22. Y. Guo et al., QCD analysis of near-threshold photon-proton production of heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096010 (2021).
  23. D. E. Kharzeev, Mass radius of the proton, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054015 (2021).
  24. K. A. Mamo et al., J/ψ near threshold in holographic QCD: A and D gravitational form factors, Phys. Rev. D 106, 086004 (2022).
  25. Y. Guo et al., Updated analysis of near-threshold heavy quarkonium production for probe of proton's gluonic gravitational form factors, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034003 (2023).
  26. P. E. Shanahan et al., Gluon gravitational form factors of the nucleon and the pion from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014511 (2019).
  27. D. A. Pefkou et al., Gluon gravitational structure of hadrons of different spin, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054509 (2022).
  28. D. C. Hackett et al., Gravitational form factors of the proton from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 251904 (2024).
  29. K. A. Mamo et al., Diffractive photoproduction of J/ψ and Υ using holographic QCD: Gravitational form factors and GPD of gluons in the proton, Phys. Rev. D 101, 086003 (2020).
  30. K. A. Mamo et al., Nucleon mass radii and distribution: Holographic QCD, lattice QCD, and GlueX data, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094010 (2021).
  31. K. A. Mamo et al., Electroproduction of heavy vector mesons using holographic QCD: From near threshold to high energy regimes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 066023 (2021).
  32. A. V. Radyushkin, Asymmetric gluon distributions and hard diffractive electroproduction, Phys. Lett. B 385, 333 (1996).
  33. J. C. Collins et al., Factorization for hard exclusive electroproduction of mesons in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2982 (1997).
  34. P. Hoodbhoy, Wave function corrections and off-forward gluon distributions in diffractive J/ψ electroproduction, Phys. Rev. D 56, 388 (1997).
  35. L. Frankfurt et al., Nondiagonal parton distributions in the leading logarithmic approximation, Phys. Lett. B 418, 345 (1998).
  36. Y. Guo et al., Bayesian inferring nucleon gravitational form factors via near-threshold J/ψ photoproduction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111902 (2025).
  37. L. Tang et al., Exclusive photoproduction of light and heavy vector mesons: Thresholds to very high energies, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 284 (2026).
  38. M.-L. Du et al., Deciphering the mechanism of near-threshold J/ψ photoproduction, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1053 (2020).
  39. D. Winney et al. (JPAC Collaboration), Dynamics in near-threshold J/ψ photoproduction, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054018 (2023).
  40. V. Kubarovsky et al., Formation of hidden-charm pentaquarks in photon-nucleon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 92, 031502 (2015).
  41. F.-K. Guo et al., How to reveal the exotic nature of the Pc(4450), Phys. Rev. D 92, 071502 (2015).
  42. M. I. Eides et al., Narrow nucleon- ψ(2S) bound state and LHCb pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 93, 054039 (2016).
  43. A. N. Hiller Blin et al., Studying the Pc(4450) resonance in J/ψ photoproduction off protons, Phys. Rev. D 94, 034002 (2016).
  44. I. Strakovsky et al., Plausibility of the LHCb Pc(4312)+ in the GlueX γp→J/ψp total cross sections, Phys. Rev. C 108, 015202 (2023).
  45. CLAS Physics Database, http://clasweb.jlab.org/physicsdb.
  46. V. D. Burkert et al. (CLAS Collaboration), The CLAS12 spectrometer at Jefferson Laboratory, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 959, 163419 (2020).
  47. R. Fair et al., The CLAS12 superconducting magnets, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 962, 163578 (2020).
  48. M. D. Mestayer et al., The CLAS12 drift chamber system, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 959, 163518 (2020).
  49. Y. G. Sharabian et al., The CLAS12 high threshold Cherenkov counter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 968, 163824 (2020).
  50. G. Asryan et al., The CLAS12 forward electromagnetic calorimeter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 959, 163425 (2020).
  51. D. S. Carman et al., The CLAS12 forward time-of-flight system, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 960, 163629 (2020).
  52. B. Raydo et al., The CLAS12 trigger system, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 960, 163529 (2020).
  53. S. Boyarinov et al., The CLAS12 data acquisition system, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 966, 163698 (2020).
  54. V. Ziegler et al., The CLAS12 software framework and event reconstruction, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 959, 163472 (2020).
  55. P. Chatagnon et al. (CLAS Collaboration), First measurement of timelike Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 262501 (2021).
  56. A. Hocker et al., TMVA—Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis, arXiv:physics/0703039.
  57. H. Voss et al., TMVA, the Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis with ROOT, PoS ACAT, 040 (2007).
  58. M. Ungaro et al., The CLAS12 Geant4 simulation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 959, 163422 (2020).
  59. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), Geant4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003).
  60. S. Stepanyan et al., CLAS12-Note 2020-005, Tech. Rep. (2020).
  61. T. Abe, GRAPE-Dilepton (version 1.1), Comput. Phys. Commun. 136, 126 (2001).
  62. TCSGen (TCS Event Generator), https://github.com/JeffersonLab/TCSGen (2025).
  63. JPsiGen (J/ψ Photoproduction Event Generator), https://github.com/JeffersonLab/JPsiGen (2025).
  64. M. Heller et al., Soft-photon corrections to the Bethe-Heitler process in the γp→l+l−p reaction, Phys. Rev. D 97, 076012 (2018).
  65. F. Ehlotzky et al., Radiative corrections to the leptonic-decay modes of the neutral vector mesons ρ0,ω,ϕ, Nuovo Cim. A 55, 181 (1968).
  66. A. Rogozhnikov, Reweighting with boosted decision trees, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 762, 012036 (2016).
  67. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  68. S. Frixione et al., Improving the Weizsäcker-Williams approximation in electron-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 319, 339 (1993).
  69. H. D. Schulz et al., Experimental confirmation of radiative corrections to bremsstrahlung and pair production at high energies, Phys. Rev. 167, 1280 (1968).
  70. K. Mork et al., Radiative corrections. I. High-energy bremsstrahlung and pair production, Phys. Rev. 140, B1661 (1965).
  71. K. Gottfried et al., On the connection between production mechanism and decay of resonances at high energies, Nuovo Cim. 33, 309 (1964).
  72. K. Schilling et al., On the analysis of vector-meson production by polarized photons, Nucl. Phys. B 15, 397 (1970).
  73. A. I. Titov et al., Structure of the φ photoproduction amplitude at a few GeV, Phys. Rev. C 60, 035205 (1999).
  74. P. Faccioli et al., Towards the experimental clarification of quarkonium polarization, Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 657 (2010).
  75. T. Skwarnicki, Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Nuclear Physics; DESY Report No. DESY-F31-86-02, 1986.
  76. V. Mathieu et al. (JPAC Collaboration), Vector meson photoproduction with a linearly polarized beam, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094003 (2018).
  77. E. Barberio et al., PHOTOS - a universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections: version 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 79, 291 (1994).
  78. V. Klimenko et al. (CLAS Collaboration), Inclusive electron scattering in the resonance region off a hydrogen target with CLAS12, Phys. Rev. C 112, 025201 (2025).
  79. D. Kharzeev et al., J/ψ-photoproduction and the gluon structure of the nucleon, Nucl. Phys. A 661, 568 (1999).
  80. L. Frankfurt et al., Two-gluon form factor of the nucleon and J/ψ photoproduction, Phys. Rev. D 66, 031502 (2002).
  81. E. Tiesinga et al., CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021).
  82. T.-J. Hou et al., New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014013 (2021).
  83. K. Tanaka, Three-loop formula for quark and gluon contributions to the QCD trace anomaly, J. High Energ. Phys. 01 (2019) 120.
  84. K. Tanaka, Twist-four gravitational form factor at NNLO QCD from trace anomaly constraints, J. High Energ. Phys. 03 (2023) 013.
  85. Z. E. Meziani, Gluonic gravitational form factors of the proton, PoS SPIN2023, 168 (2024).
  86. X. Ji, Proton mass decomposition: Naturalness and interpretations, Front. Phys. 16, 64601 (2021).
  87. K. Hafidi et al., Proposal PR12-12-006 to JLab-PAC39, https://www.jlab.org/exp_prog/proposals/12/PR12-12-006.pdf (2012).
  88. J. Arrington et al. (SoLID Collaboration), The solenoidal large intensity device (SoLID) for JLab 12 GeV, J. Phys. G 50, 110501 (2023).
  89. J. S. Alvarado et al., Electro- and photoproduction of muon pairs with μCLAS12: Double deeply virtual Compton scattering, timelike Compton scattering, and J/ψ production, arXiv:2605.11690.
  90. O. Gryniuk et al., Υ photoproduction on the proton at the electron-ion collider, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014016 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation