Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Optimal observables for the chiral magnetic effect from machine learning

Yuji Hirono1,*, Kazuki Ikeda2,3,†, Dmitri E. Kharzeev3,4,‡, Ziyi Liu5,§, and Shuzhe Shi5,6,∥

  • *Contact author: hirono@iit.tsukuba.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: kazuki.ikeda@umb.edu
  • ‡Contact author: dmitri.kharzeev@stonybrook.edu
  • §Contact author: ziyi-liu24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
  • ∥Contact author: shuzhe-shi@tsinghua.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. C 112, L051904 – Published 25 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hxjq-p67d

Abstract

The detection of the chiral magnetic effect (CME) in relativistic heavy-ion collisions remains challenging due to substantial background contributions that obscure the expected signal. In this Letter, we present a novel machine learning approach for constructing optimized observables that significantly enhance CME detection capabilities. By parametrizing generic observables constructed from flow harmonics and optimizing them to maximize the signal-to-background ratio, we systematically develop CME-sensitive measures that outperform conventional methods. Using simulated data from the anomalous viscous fluid dynamics framework, our machine learning observables demonstrate up to 90% higher sensitivity to CME signals compared to traditional γ and δ correlators, while maintaining minimal background contamination. The constructed observables provide physical insight into optimal CME detection strategies and offer a promising path forward for experimental searches of the CME at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the CERN Large Hadron Collider.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008).
  2. D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008).
  3. D. E. Kharzeev, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75, 133 (2014).
  4. B. I. Abelev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 251601 (2009).
  5. B. I. Abelev et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 054908 (2010).
  6. L. Adamczyk et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 044908 (2014).
  7. L. Adamczyk et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 064911 (2013).
  8. L. Adamczyk et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 052302 (2014).
  9. J. Adam et al., Phys. Lett. B 798, 134975 (2019).
  10. M. S. Abdallah et al., Phys. Rev. C 106, 034908 (2022).
  11. M. S. Abdallah et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 092301 (2022).
  12. The STAR Collaboration, arXiv:2506.00278.
  13. The STAR Collaboration, arXiv:2506.00275.
  14. B. Abelev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 012301 (2013).
  15. S. Acharya et al., Phys. Lett. B 777, 151 (2018).
  16. S. Acharya et al., J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 160.
  17. V. Khachatryan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 122301 (2017).
  18. A. M. Sirunyan et al., Phys. Rev. C 97, 044912 (2018).
  19. S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 70, 057901 (2004).
  20. F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 81, 064902 (2010).
  21. S. Pratt, arXiv:1002.1758.
  22. A. Bzdak, V. Koch, and J. Liao, Phys. Rev. C 81, 031901(R) (2010).
  23. A. Bzdak, V. Koch, and J. Liao, Phys. Rev. C 83, 014905 (2011).
  24. J. Zhao and F. Wang, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 200 (2019).
  25. W. Li and G. Wang, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 293 (2020).
  26. A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, Phys. Rep. 853, 1 (2020).
  27. A. Bzdak, V. Koch, and J. Liao, Lect. Notes Phys. 871, 503 (2013).
  28. S. Choudhury et al., Chin. Phys. C 46, 014101 (2022).
  29. P. Christakoglou, S. Qiu, and J. Staa, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 717 (2021).
  30. D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, and P. Tribedy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430007 (2024).
  31. D. E. Kharzeev and J. Liao, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 55 (2021).
  32. D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S. A. Voloshin, and G. Wang, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 88, 1 (2016).
  33. Y. Feng, S. A. Voloshin, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 031001 (2025).
  34. F. Wang, Nucl. Phys. Rev. 41, 1 (2024).
  35. J. Chen et al., Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 214 (2024).
  36. M. Abdallah et al., Phys. Rev. C 105, 014901 (2022).
  37. G. Aarts, K. Fukushima, T. Hatsuda, A. Ipp, S. Shi, L. Wang, and K. Zhou, Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 154 (2025).
  38. K. Zhou, L. Wang, L.-G. Pang, and S. Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135, 104084 (2024).
  39. Y.-S. Zhao, L. Wang, K. Zhou, and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. C 106, L051901 (2022).
  40. S. Guo, L. Wang, K. Zhou, and G. Ma, Chinese Phys. Lett. 42 110101 (2025).
  41. S. Shi, Y. Jiang, E. Lilleskov, and J. Liao, Ann. Phys. 394, 50 (2018).
  42. Y. Jiang, S. Shi, Y. Yin, and J. Liao, Chin. Phys. C 42, 011001 (2018).
  43. S. Shi, H. Zhang, D. Hou, and J. Liao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242301 (2020).
  44. X. An et al., Nucl. Phys. A 1017, 122343 (2022).
  45. S. Shi and Z. Liu, Optimal observables for the chiral magnetic effect from machine learning [Data set], Zenodo (2025), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17586247.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation