Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Energy-differential measurement of the Cnat(n,p) and Cnat(n,d) reactions at the n_TOF facility at CERN

P. Žugec1,*, N. Colonna2, D. Rochman3, M. Barbagallo2,4, J. Andrzejewski5, J. Perkowski5, A. Ventura6, D. Bosnar1, A. Gawlik-Ramięga5 et al. (The n_TOF Collaboration)

A. Gawlik-Ramięga5, M. Sabaté-Gilarte4,7, M. Bacak4,8,9, F. Mingrone4, E. Chiaveri10,4, O. Aberle4, V. Alcayne11, S. Amaducci12,13, L. Audouin14, V. Babiano-Suarez15, S. Bennett10, E. Berthoumieux9, J. Billowes10, A. Brown16, M. Busso17,18, M. Caamaño19, L. Caballero-Ontanaya15, F. Calviño20, M. Calviani4, D. Cano-Ott11, A. Casanovas20, F. Cerutti4, G. Cortés20, M. A. Cortés-Giraldo7, L. Cosentino12, S. Cristallo17,21, L. A. Damone2,22, P. J. Davies10, M. Diakaki23,4, M. Dietz24, C. Domingo-Pardo15, R. Dressler3, Q. Ducasse25, E. Dupont9, I. Durán19, Z. Eleme26, B. Fernández-Domínguez19, A. Ferrari4, P. Finocchiaro12, V. Furman27, K. Göbel28, R. Garg24, S. Gilardoni4, I. F. Gonçalves29, E. González-Romero11, C. Guerrero7, F. Gunsing9, H. Harada30, S. Heinitz3, J. Heyse31, D. G. Jenkins16, A. Junghans32, F. Käppeler33, Y. Kadi4, A. Kimura30, I. Knapová34, M. Kokkoris23, Y. Kopatch27, M. Krtička34, D. Kurtulgil28, I. Ladarescu15, C. Lederer-Woods24, H. Leeb8, J. Lerendegui-Marco7, S. J. Lonsdale24, D. Macina4, A. Manna35,6, T. Martínez11, A. Masi4, C. Massimi35,6, P. Mastinu36, M. Mastromarco4, E. A. Maugeri3, A. Mazzone2,37, E. Mendoza11, A. Mengoni38, V. Michalopoulou23,4, P. M. Milazzo39, J. Moreno-Soto9, A. Musumarra12,13, A. Negret40, R. Nolte25, F. Ogállar41, A. Oprea40, N. Patronis26, A. Pavlik42, G. Perfetto2, C. Petrone40, L. Piersanti17,2,21, E. Pirovano25, I. Porras41, J. Praena41, J. M. Quesada7, D. Ramos-Doval14, T. Rauscher43,44, R. Reifarth28, Y. Romanets29, C. Rubbia4, A. Saxena45, P. Schillebeeckx31, D. Schumann3, A. Sekhar10, A. G. Smith10, N. V. Sosnin10, P. Sprung3, A. Stamatopoulos23, G. Tagliente2, J. L. Tain15, A. Tarifeño-Saldivia20, L. Tassan-Got14,23,4, Th. Thomas28, P. Torres-Sánchez41, A. Tsinganis4, J. Ulrich3, S. Urlass32,4, S. Valenta34, G. Vannini35,6, V. Variale2, P. Vaz29, D. Vescovi17,21, V. Vlachoudis4, R. Vlastou23, A. Wallner46, P. J. Woods24, and T. Wright10 (The n_TOF Collaboration)

  • 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 2Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Italy
  • 3Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
  • 4European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Switzerland
  • 5University of Lodz, Poland
  • 6Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna, Italy
  • 7Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
  • 8TU Wien, Atominstitut, Stadionallee 2, 1020 Wien, Austria
  • 9CEA Irfu, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 10University of Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 11Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Spain
  • 12INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy
  • 13Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Catania, Italy
  • 14Institut de Physique Nucléaire, CNRS-IN2P3, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91406 Orsay Cedex, France
  • 15Instituto de Física Corpuscular, CSIC–Universidad de Valencia, Spain
  • 16University of York, United Kingdom
  • 17Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, Italy
  • 18Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, Università di Perugia, Italy
  • 19University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • 20Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain
  • 21Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica–Osservatorio Astronomico di Teramo, Italy
  • 22Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Bari, Italy
  • 23National Technical University of Athens, Greece
  • 24School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 25Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
  • 26University of Ioannina, Greece
  • 27Affiliated with an Institute or an International Laboratory Covered by a Cooperation Agreement with CERN
  • 28Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
  • 29Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 30Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai-Mura, Japan
  • 31European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Retieseweg 111, B-2440 Geel, Belgium
  • 32Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany
  • 33Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Campus North, IKP, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 34Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
  • 35Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, Italy
  • 36Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Legnaro, Italy
  • 37Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy
  • 38Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie (ENEA), Bologna, Italy
  • 39Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Italy
  • 40Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Romania
  • 41University of Granada, Spain
  • 42University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna, Austria
  • 43Department of Physics, University of Basel, Switzerland
  • 44Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
  • 45Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), India
  • 46Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

  • *Contact author: pzugec@phy.hr

Phys. Rev. C 113, 044621 – Published 24 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fkfd-ctqq

Abstract

Energy-differential cross section of the Cnat(n,p) and Cnat(n,d) reactions was measured at the neutron time-of-flight facility n_TOF at CERN. The measurement was performed in the first experimental area (EAR1; flight path of 182.5 m). Two position-sensitive ΔE−E silicon telescopes were used. Two naturally occurring carbon isotopes, C12 and C13, contribute to the reactions on natural carbon, with the (n,p) reaction threshold at 13.7 MeV and the (n,d) threshold at 14.9 MeV (determined by the C12 isotope for both reactions). This paper provides the details of the analysis leading to the final results published previously as a Letter. The cross-section results are reported up to 25 MeV. During the data analysis the population of the excited states in the daughter nuclei B11, B12, and B13 had to be considered, requiring the adoption of the branching ratios and angular distributions of the emitted particles from an external source of information. talys-2.0 calculations were used as the main source and an in-depth analysis of the model-related uncertainties was performed. The n_TOF results are largely inconsistent with the major evaluation libraries. On the other hand, an unexpected agreement is found with talys-2.0 calculations. Specifically, the obtained cross section for the (n,p) reaction is significantly higher than in the available evaluations, fully supporting the earlier finding from an integral measurement at n_TOF.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. M. Chadwick, L. J. Cox, P. G. Young, and A. S. Meigooni, Calculation and evaluation of cross sections and kerma factors for neutrons up to 100 MeV on carbon, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 123, 17 (1996).
  2. A. Ibarra, W. Królas, D. Bernardi, et al., DONES performance, experimental capabilities and perspectives, Nucl. Fusion 65, 122006 (2025).
  3. I. Podadera, P. Cara, B. Bolzon, et al., Overview and current status of the IFMIF-DONES accelerator systems, Nucl. Fusion 65, 122011 (2025).
  4. W. E. Kreger and B. D. Kern, C12(n,p)B12 cross section for 14.9- to 17.5-MeV neutrons, Phys. Rev. 113, 890 (1959).
  5. E. M. Rimmer and P. S. Fisher, Resonances in the (n, p) reaction on C12, Nucl. Phys. A 108, 567 (1968).
  6. V. E. Ablesimov, E. K. Bonyushkin, and A. P. Morozov, in Proceedings of the Neutron Physics Conference (Kiev, 1971), Vol. 1, p. 173.
  7. V. V. Bobyr, G. I. Primenko, K. K. Revyuk, et al., Excitation function for the reaction C-12(n,p)B-12 at the neutron energies 16-18 MeV, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Fiz. 36, 2621 (1972).
  8. M. Pillon, M. Angelone, A. Krása, et al., Measurement of neutron reaction cross sections in carbon using a single crystal diamond detector AIP Conf. Proc. 1412, 121 (2011).
  9. M. Pillon, M. Angelone, F. Belloni, et al., High-resolution measurements of the exited states (n,pn),(n,dn)C−12 cross sections, EPJ Web Conf. 146, 11005 (2017).
  10. D. A. Kellogg, Cross sections for products of 90-Mev neutrons on carbon, Phys. Rev. 90, 224 (1953).
  11. M. W. McNaughton, N. S. P. King, F. P. Brady, and J. L. Ullman, Improved predictions of neutron detection efficiency resulting from new measurements of C12(n,p) and C12(n,d) reactions at 56 MeV, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 129, 241 (1975).
  12. K. P. Jackson, A. Celler, W. P. Alford, et al., The (n,p) reaction as a probe of Gamow-Teller strength, Phys. Lett. B 201, 25 (1988).
  13. F. P. Brady, T. D. Ford, G. A. Needham, et al., C12(n,p)B12 reaction at 56, 60, and 65 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 43, 2284 (1991).
  14. D. S. Sorenson, X. Aslanoglou, F. P. Brady, et al., Energy dependence of the Gamow-Teller strength in p-shell nuclei observed in the (n,p) reaction, Phys. Rev. C 45, R500(R) (1992).
  15. X. Yang, L. Wang, J. Rapaport, et al., Dipole and spin-dipole resonances in charge-exchange reactions on C12, Phys. Rev. C 48, 1158 (1993).
  16. R. Pourang, J. W. Watson, R. Abegg, et al., High-spin stretched states excited in (n,p) reactions at 300 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 47, 2751 (1993).
  17. N. Olsson, H. Condé, E. Ramström, et al., The C12(n,p)B12 reaction at En=98MeV, Nucl. Phys. A 559, 368 (1993).
  18. C. J. Martoff, S. S. Hanna, D. Počanić, K. Wang, W. J. Cummings, R. C. Byrd, and C. C. Foster, Reaction C13(n,p)B13 at 118 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 54, 2767 (1996).
  19. K. Wang, C. J. Martoff, D. Počanić, et al., Reaction C13(n,p)B13 at 65 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1718 (1996).
  20. I. Slypen, S. Benck, J. P. Meulders, and V. Corcalciuc, Light charged particle production in fast neutron-induced reactions on carbon (En=20 to 75 MeV), Nucl. Phys. A 671, 3 (2000).
  21. M. Majerle, M. Angelone, A. Krása, et al., The response of single crystal diamond detectors to 17–34 MeV neutrons, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 951, 163014 (2020).
  22. S. A. Kuvin, H. Y. Lee, B. DiGiovine, A. Georgiadou, S. Mosby, D. Votaw, M. White, and L. Zavorka, Validation of neutron-induced reactions on natural carbon using an active target at neutron energies up to 22 MeV at LANSCE, Phys. Rev. C 104, 014603 (2021).
  23. Z. Cui, H. Jiang, K. Sun, et al., Measurement of differential cross sections of neutron-induced deuteron production reactions on carbon from 25 to 52 MeV, Chin. Phys. C 45, 064001 (2021).
  24. A. Wantz, A. N. Kuchera, S. A. Kuvin, et al., Neutron-induced reaction cross section measurements on carbon at neutron energies up to 55 MeV at LANSCE, Phys. Rev. C 112, 014620 (2025).
  25. S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K. Amako, et al., GEANT4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003).
  26. J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, et al., Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  27. J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, et al., Recent developments in GEANT4, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 835, 186 (2016).
  28. P. Žugec, N. Colonna, D. Bosnar, et al., Integral measurement of the C12(n,p)B12 reaction up to 10 GeV, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 101 (2016).
  29. P. Žugec, N. Colonna, D. Bosnar, et al., Measurement of the C12(n,p)B12 cross section at n_TOF at CERN by in-beam activation analysis Phys. Rev. C 90, 021601(R) (2014)
  30. P. Žugec, N. Colonna, D. Rochman, et al., Measurement of the Cnat(n,p) and Cnat(n,d) reactions from n_TOF at CERN, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139713 (2025).
  31. C. Rubbia, S. Andriamonje, D. Bouvet-Bensimon, et al., A high resolution spallation driven facility at the CERN-PS to measure neutron cross sections in the interval from 1eV to 250MeV, CERN-LHC-98-002-EET (1998).
  32. N. Patronis, A. Mengoni, S. Goula, et al., Status report of the n_TOF facility after the 2nd CERN long shutdown period, EPJ Tech. Instrum. 10, 13 (2023).
  33. M. Barbagallo, C. Guerrero, A. Tsinganis, et al., High-accuracy determination of the neutron flux at n_TOF, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 156 (2013).
  34. M. Sabaté-Gilarte, M. Barbagallo, N. Colonna, et al., High-accuracy determination of the neutron flux in the new experimental area n_TOF-EAR2 at CERN, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 210 (2017).
  35. S. Lo Meo, M. A. Cortés-Giraldo, C. Massimi, et al., GEANT4 simulations of the n_TOF spallation source and their benchmarking, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 160 (2015).
  36. J. Lerendegui-Marco, S. Lo Meo, C. Guerrero, et al., GEANT4 simulation of the n_TOF-EAR2 neutron beam: Characteristics and prospects, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 100 (2016).
  37. C. Guerrero, A. Tsinganis, E. Berthoumieux, et al., Performance of the neutron time-of-flight facility n_TOF at CERN, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 27 (2013).
  38. C. Weiß, E. Chiaveri, S. Girod, et al., The new vertical neutron beam line at the CERN n_TOF facility design and outlook on the performance, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 799, 90 (2015).
  39. N. Colonna, E. Chiaveri, and F. Gunsing, The second beam-line and experimental area at n_TOF: A new opportunity for challenging neutron measurements at CERN, Nucl. Phys. News 25, 19 (2015).
  40. S. Barros, I. Bergström, V. Vlachoudis, and C. Weiß, Optimization of n_TOF-EAR2 using FLUKA, J. Instrum. 10, P09003 (2015).
  41. M. Ferrari, D. Senajova, O. Aberle, et al., Design development and implementation of an irradiation station at the neutron time-of-flight facility at CERN, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 25, 103001 (2022).
  42. M. E. Stamati, P. Torres-Sánchez, P. Pérez-Maroto, et al., The n_TOF NEAR Station Commissioning and first physics case, EPJ Web Conf. 284, 06009 (2023)
  43. N. Patronis, A. Mengoni, N. Colonna, et al., The CERN n_TOF NEAR station for astrophysics- and application-related neutron activation measurements, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 215 (2025).
  44. P. Žugec, M. Barbagallo, J. Andrzejewski, et al., A synchronization method for the multi-channel silicon telescope, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. A 983, 164606 (2020).
  45. P. Žugec, M. Barbagallo, J. Andrzejewski, et al., Study of a data analysis method for the angle resolving silicon telescope, J. Instrum. 15, P02011 (2020).
  46. P. Žugec, M. Barbagallo, J. Andrzejewski, et al., Machine learning based event classification for the energy-differential measurement of the Cnat(n,p) and Cnat(n,d) reactions, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1033, 166686 (2022).
  47. M. Barbagallo, J. Andrzejewski, M. Mastromarco, et al., Experimental setup and procedure for the measurement of the Be7(n,p)Li7 reaction at n_TOF, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 887, 27 (2018).
  48. L. Damone, M. Barbagallo, M. Mastromarco, et al., Be7(n,p)Li7 reaction and the cosmological lithium problem: Measurement of the cross section in a wide energy range at n_TOF at CERN, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 042701 (2018).
  49. P. Žugec, C. Weiß, C. Guerrero, et al., Pulse processing routines for neutron time-of-flight data, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 812, 134 (2016).
  50. V. Vlachoudis, M. Sabate-Gilarte, V. Alcayne, et al., On the resolution function of the n_TOF facility: A comprehensive study and user guide, n_TOF-PUB-2021-001, CERN Document Server, 2021.
  51. P. Žugec, N. Colonna, M. Sabate-Gilarte, et al., A direct method for unfolding the resolution function from measurements of neutron induced reactions, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 875, 41 (2017).
  52. P. Žugec, M. Sabaté-Gilarte, M. Bacak, et al., Machine learning based parametrization of the resolution function for the first experimental area of the n_TOF facility at CERN, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 235 (2025).
  53. J. M. Belleman, W. Andreazza, and A. A. Nosych, A new wall current monitor for the CERN Proton Synchrotron, in Proceedings of the 5th International Beam Instrumentation Conference, IBIC2016 (Barcelona, Spain, 2016), pp. 143–146.
  54. C. Ahdida, D. Bozzato, D. Calzolari, et al., New capabilities of the FLUKA multi-purpose code, Front. Phys. 9, 788253 (2022).
  55. M. B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Obložinský, et al., ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: Cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data, Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887 (2011).
  56. Data Analysis in High Energy Physics, edited by O. Behnke, K. Kröninger, G. Schott, and T. Schörner-Sadenius (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2013).
  57. A. J. Koning and D. Rochman, Modern nuclear data evaluation with the TALYS code system, Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 2841 (2012).
  58. A. Koning, S. Hilaire, and S. Goriely, TALYS: Modeling of nuclear reactions, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 131 (2023).
  59. TALYS & related software, https://nds.iaea.org/talys/.
  60. A. J. Koning, D. Rochman, J.-Ch Sublet, et al., TENDL: Complete nuclear data library for innovative nuclear science and technology, Nucl. Data Sheets 155, 1 (2019).
  61. https://tendl.web.psi.ch/tendl_2023/astro/astro.html.
  62. D. Rochman, A. Koning, S. Goriely, and S. Hilaire, TENDL-astro: A new nuclear data set for astrophysics interest, Nucl. Phys. A 1053, 122951 (2025).
  63. D. Rochman, A. Koning, S. Goriely, and S. Hilaire, What to expect from microscopic nuclear modelling for Keff calculations? Nucl. Phys. A 1054, 122979 (2025).
  64. J. H. Kelley, E. Kwan, J. E. Purcell, et al., Energy levels of light nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 880, 88 (2012).
  65. J. H. Kelley, J. E. Purcell, and C. G. Sheu, Energy levels of light nuclei A=12, Nucl. Phys. A 968, 71 (2017).
  66. F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Energy levels of light nuclei A=13–15, Nucl. Phys. A 523, 1 (1991).
  67. D. Rochman and A. J. Koning, TENDL-2009: On evaluations and Monte Carlo covariances, in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor Applications (Wonder, 2009), pp. 105–110.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation