Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Precision mass measurement of Zn61 and updated Ft value for conserved vector current tests

P. F. Giesel1,*, D. Atanasov2,†, K. Blaum2, P. Fischer1, J. Karthein3,2, I. Kulikov4, Yu. A. Litvinov4,5, D. Lunney6,‡,§, M. Mougeot6,2,7 et al.

L. Nies7,1, L. Schweikhard1, V. A. Virtanen8,9, and F. Wienholtz1,∥

  • *Contact author: paul.giesel@uni-greifswald.de
  • †Present address: Belgian Nuclear Research Centre SCK CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
  • ‡Contact author: david.lunney@cnrs.fr
  • §Present address: CNRS International Research Laboratory for Nuclear Physics, Nuclear Astrophysics and Accelerator Technologies, TRIUMF, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • ∥Present address: Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.

Phys. Rev. C 113, 034318 – Published 23 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fbf3-nry6

Abstract

We report a high-precision mass measurement of Zn61, performed with the ISOLTRAP mass spectrometer at ISOLDE, CERN. Our result agrees with a recent measurement from the LEBIT Penning trap at FRIB and reduces the mass uncertainty by a factor of four. Combined with recent measurements of the mirror nuclide Ga61 performed by TITAN at TRIUMF and CSRe at HIRFL, we obtain a more accurate Q value. This new value slightly improves the determination of the corresponding Ft value in the Tz=1/2 mirror beta decays used to test the conserved vector current hypothesis in the standard model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner, Superallowed 0+→0+ nuclear β decays: 2020 critical survey, with implications for Vud and CKM unitarity, Phys. Rev. C 102, 045501 (2020).
  2. O. Naviliat-Cuncic and N. Severijns, Test of the conserved vector current hypothesis in T=1/2 mirror transitions and new determination of |Vud|, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 142302 (2009).
  3. N. Severijns, L. Hayen, V. De Leebeeck, S. Vanlangendonck, K. Bodek, D. Rozpedzik, and I. S. Towner, Ft values of the mirror β transitions and the weak-magnetism-induced current in allowed nuclear β decay, Phys. Rev. C 107, 015502 (2023).
  4. M. Mukherjee, D. Beck, K. Blaum, G. Bollen, J. Dilling, S. George, F. Herfurth, A. Herlert, A. Kellerbauer, H. J. Kluge, S. Schwarz, L. Schweikhard, and C. Yazidjian, ISOLTRAP: An on-line Penning trap for mass spectrometry on short-lived nuclides, Eur. Phys. J. A 35, 1 (2008).
  5. S. Kreim, et al., Recent exploits of the ISOLTRAP mass spectrometer, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 317, 492 (2013).
  6. S. F. Paul, et al., Mass measurements of Ga60–63 reduce x-ray burst model uncertainties and extend the evaluated T=1 isobaric multiplet mass equation, Phys. Rev. C 104, 065803 (2021).
  7. M. Wang, et al., Mass measurement of upper fp-shell N=Z−2 and N=Z−1 nuclei and the importance of three-nucleon force along the N=Z line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 192501 (2023).
  8. R. Catherall, et al., The ISOLDE facility, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 44, 094002 (2017).
  9. V. Fedosseev, K. Chrysalidis, T. D. Goodacre, B. Marsh, S. Rothe, C. Seiffert, and K. Wendt, Ion beam production and study of radioactive isotopes with the laser ion source at ISOLDE, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 44, 084006 (2017).
  10. F. Herfurth, J. Dilling, A. Kellerbauer, G. Bollen, S. Henry, H.-J. Kluge, E. Lamour, D. Lunney, R. Moore, C. Scheidenberger, S. Schwarz, G. Sikler, and J. Szerypo, A linear radiofrequency ion trap for accumulation, bunching, and emittance improvement of radioactive ion beams, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 469, 254 (2001).
  11. R. Wolf, et al., On-line separation of short-lived nuclei by a multi-reflection time-of-flight device, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 686, 82 (2012).
  12. R. Wolf, F. Wienholtz, et al., ISOLTRAP's multi-reflection time-of-flight mass separator/spectrometer, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 349–350, 123 (2013).
  13. F. Wienholtz, S. Kreim, M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, and R. Wolf, Mass-selective ion ejection from multi-reflection time-of-flight devices via a pulsed in-trap lift, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 421, 285 (2017).
  14. H. Raimbault-Hartmann, D. Beck, G. Bollen, M. König, H.-J. Kluge, E. Schark, J. Stein, S. Schwarz, and J. Szerypo, A cylindrical Penning trap for capture, mass selective cooling, and bunching of radioactive ion beams, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 126, 378 (1997).
  15. G. Savard, S. Becker, G. Bollen, H.-J. Kluge, R. Moore, T. Otto, L. Schweikhard, H. Stolzenberg, and U. Wiess, A new cooling technique for heavy ions in a Penning trap, Phys. Lett. A 158, 247 (1991).
  16. F. G. Kondev, M. Wang, W. J. Huang, S. Naimi, and G. Audi, The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties, Chinese Phys. C 45, 030001 (2021).
  17. S. Eliseev, K. Blaum, M. Block, C. Droese, M. Goncharov, E. Minaya Ramirez, D. A. Nesterenko, Y. N. Novikov, and L. Schweikhard, Phase-imaging ion-cyclotron-resonance measurements for short-lived nuclides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 082501 (2013).
  18. D. Stresau, K. Hunter, W. Sheils, P. Raffin, and Y. Benari, A new class of robust sub-nanosecond TOF detectors with high dynamic range (2006), https://www.etp-ms.com/file-repository/26.
  19. M. Guilhaus, Special feature: Tutorial. Principles and instrumentation in time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Physical and instrumental concepts, J. Mass Spectrom. 30, 1519 (1995).
  20. F. Wienholtz, et al., Masses of exotic calcium isotopes pin down nuclear forces, Nature (London) 498, 346 (2013).
  21. M. König, G. Bollen, H.-J. Kluge, T. Otto, and J. Szerypo, Quadrupole excitation of stored ion motion at the true cyclotron frequency, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 142, 95 (1995).
  22. J. Karthein, D. Atanasov, K. Blaum, D. Lunney, V. Manea, and M. Mougeot, Analysis methods and code for very high-precision mass measurements of unstable isotopes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108070 (2021).
  23. S. Eliseev, et al., A phase-imaging technique for cyclotron-frequency measurements, Appl. Phys. B 114, 107 (2014).
  24. A. Kellerbauer, K. Blaum, G. Bollen, F. Herfurth, H.-J. Kluge, M. Kuckein, E. Sauvan, C. Scheidenberger, and L. Schweikhard, From direct to absolute mass measurements: A study of the accuracy of ISOLTRAP, Eur. Phys. J. D 22, 53 (2003).
  25. Z. Meisel, A. Hamaker, et al., Improved nuclear physics near A=61 refines urca neutrino luminosities in accreted neutron star crusts, Phys. Rev. C 105, 025804 (2022).
  26. M. Wang, W. Huang, F. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references, Chinese Phys. C 45, 030003 (2021).
  27. N. A. Heckert and J. J. Filliben, Weighted standard deviation, in NIST Handbook 148: Dataplot Reference Manual (NIST, 2003), Vol. 2, Chap. 2.
  28. LogFT tool of the National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory: https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/logft/ (2025).
  29. P. F. Giesel, et al., Dataset: Precision mass measurement of 61Zn and updated F⁡t value for conserved vector current tests [Data set], Zenodo, (2026) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18939265.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation