Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Comparison of relativistic and nonrelativistic Faddeev calculations for proton-deuteron elastic scattering

    H. Kamada*

    A. Arslanaliev†, Y. Kostylenko‡, and A. V. Shebeko§

    J. Golak∥, R. Skibiński, K. Topolnicki**, and H. Witała††

    V. Chahar‡‡ and D. F. Ramírez Jiménez§§

    W. N. Polyzou∥∥

    • M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, PL-30348 Kraków, Poland

    • Jagiellonian University, Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, PL-30348 Kraków, Poland and M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, PL-30348 Kraków, Poland

    • *Contact author: kamada@rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp
    • †Contact author: arslanaliev.kh@gmail.com
    • ‡Contact author: nlokost@gmail.com
    • §Contact author: shebeko@kipt.kharkov.ua
    • ∥Contact author: jacek.golak@uj.edu.pl
    • Contact author: roman.skibinski@uj.edu.pl
    • **Contact author: kacper.topolnicki@uj.edu.pl
    • ††Contact author: vaibhav.chahar@doctoral.uj.edu.pl
    • ‡‡Contact author: df.ramirez@doctoral.uj.edu.pl
    • §§Contact author: henryk.witala@uj.edu.pl
    • ∥∥Contact author: polyzou@uiowa.edu

    Phys. Rev. C 114, 024001 – Published 3 August, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cjf3-hk9v

    Abstract

    This investigation compares nonrelativistic and relativistic nucleon-nucleon potentials in the context of proton-deuteron scattering. Conventional NN potentials (e.g., CDBonn, AV18, Nijmegen) rely on the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation, whereas the Kharkiv potential is intrinsically relativistic. We employ the Coester-Pieper-Serduke (CPS) and Kamada-Glöckle (KG) conversion methods to construct a phenomenological-relativistic potential (PRP) from a realistic NN potential, preserving the deuteron binding energy and phase shifts. Focusing on relativistic effects and not including Coulomb forces to avoid complexity, the solutions are compared by solving relativistic and nonrelativistic Faddeev equations. Calculations of the differential cross section using the relativistic Faddeev equation show that relativistic effects—particularly the deviation at the backward angle—become pronounced at 135MeV. The differences in the forward angle were attributed to the characteristics of the Kharkiv potential itself. The reverse transformation of the Kharkiv potential into a pseudononrelativistic potential (PNRP) confirms that the backward-angle relativistic effect increases with energy in the range from 100MeV to 400MeV. Comparisons of the polarization observables indicate that relativistic effects, as well as the discrepancy between the CPS and KG transformations, become significant above 300MeV. However, for polarization observations below 300MeV, the nonrelativistic results from PNRP do not deviate significantly from relativistic calculations.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation