Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Spectral measurement of the Bi214 β decay to the Po214 ground state with the XENONnT Experiment

E. Aprile1, J. Aalbers2, K. Abe3, M. Adrover4, S. Ahmed Maouloud5, L. Althueser6, B. Andrieu5, E. Angelino7, D. Antón Martin8 et al. (XENON Collaboration)

D. Antón Martin8, S. R. Armbruster9, F. Arneodo10, L. Baudis4, M. Bazyk11, L. Bellagamba12, R. Biondi13,7, A. Bismark4, K. Boese9, R. M. Braun6, A. Brown14, G. Bruno11, R. Budnik13, C. Cai15, C. Capelli4, J. M. R. Cardoso16, A. P. Cimental Chávez4, A. P. Colijn17, J. Conrad18, J. J. Cuenca-García4, V. D'Andrea7,*, L. C. Daniel Garcia5, M. P. Decowski17, A. Deisting19, C. Di Donato20,7, P. Di Gangi12, S. Diglio11, K. Eitel21, S. el Morabit17, R. Elleboro20, A. Elykov21, A. D. Ferella20,7, C. Ferrari7, H. Fischer14, T. Flehmke18, M. Flierman17, D. Fuchs18, W. Fulgione22,7, C. Fuselli17,†, R. Gaior5, F. Gao15, R. Giacomobono23, F. Girard5, R. Glade-Beucke14, L. Grandi8, J. Grigat14, H. Guan24, M. Guida9, P. Gyorgy19, R. Hammann9, A. Higuera25, C. Hils19, L. Hoetzsch4,9, N. F. Hood26, M. Iacovacci23, Y. Itow27, J. Jakob6, F. Joerg4, Y. Kaminaga3, M. Kara21, S. Kazama27, P. Kharbanda17, M. Kobayashi27, D. Koke6, K. Kooshkjalali19, A. Kopec26,‡, H. Landsman13, R. F. Lang24, L. Levinson13, I. Li25, S. Li28, S. Liang25, Z. Liang28, Y.-T. Lin6,9,§, S. Lindemann14, M. Lindner9, K. Liu15, M. Liu1, J. Loizeau11, F. Lombardi19, J. A. M. Lopes16,∥, G. M. Lucchetti12, T. Luce14, Y. Ma26, C. Macolino20,7, J. Mahlstedt18, F. Marignetti23, T. Marrodán Undagoitia9, K. Martens3, J. Masbou11, S. Mastroianni23, V. Mazza12, A. Melchiorre20,7, J. Merz19, M. Messina7, K. Miuchi29, A. Molinario22, S. Moriyama3, K. Morå1, M. Murra1, J. Müller14, K. Ni26, C. T. Oba Ishikawa3, U. Oberlack19, S. Ouahada4, B. Paetsch13, Y. Pan5, Q. Pellegrini5, R. Peres4, J. Pienaar13, M. Pierre17, G. Plante1, T. R. Pollmann17, A. Prajapati20, L. Principe11, J. Qin25, D. Ramírez García4, M. Rajado4, A. Ravindran11, A. Razeto7, R. Singh24, L. Sanchez25, J. M. F. dos Santos16, I. Sarnoff10, G. Sartorelli12, J. Schreiner9, P. Schulte6, H. Schulze Eißing6, M. Schumann14, L. Scotto Lavina5, M. Selvi12, F. Semeria12, P. Shagin19, S. Shi1, H. Simgen9, A. Stevens14, C. Szyszka19, A. Takeda3, Y. Takeuchi29, P.-L. Tan1, D. Thers11, G. Trinchero22, C. D. Tunnell25, F. Tönnies14, K. Valerius21, S. Vecchi30, S. Vetter21, G. Volta9, C. Weinheimer6, M. Weiss13, D. Wenz6, C. Wittweg4, V. H. S. Wu21, Y. Xing11, D. Xu1, Z. Xu1, M. Yamashita3, J. Yang28, L. Yang26, J. Ye31, M. Yoshida3, L. Yuan8, G. Zavattini30, Y. Zhao15, M. Zhong26, and T. Zhu3 (XENON Collaboration)

  • *Also at INFN-Roma Tre, 00146 Roma, Italy.
  • †Contact author: cfuselli@nikhef.nl
  • ‡Present address: Department of Physics & Astronomy, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • §Contact author: ylin3@uni-muenster.de
  • ∥Also at Coimbra Polytechnic - ISEC, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Contact author: xenon@lngs.infn.it

Phys. Rev. C 113, 044303 – Published 2 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b3r7-6ff4

Abstract

We report the measurement of the Bi214β-decay spectrum to the ground state of Po214 using the XENONnT detector. This decay is classified as first-forbidden nonunique, for which theoretical predictions require detailed nuclear structure modeling. A dedicated identification algorithm isolates a high-purity sample of ground-state β decays, explicitly excluding events with associated γ-ray emission. By comparing the measured spectrum, which covers energies up to 3.27MeV, with several nuclear models, we find that the prediction based on the conserved vector current hypothesis provides the best description of the data. Using this dataset, we additionally derive charge and light yield curves for electronic recoils, extending detector response modeling up to the megaelectronvolt scale.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (54)

  1. R. P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, Theory of Fermi interaction, Phys. Rev. 109, 193 (1958).
  2. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), WIMP dark matter search using a 3.1 tonne-year exposure of the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  3. J. Aalbers, et al. (LZ Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 4.2  tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  4. Z. Bo, et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Dark matter search results from exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
  5. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), Double-weak decays of Xe124 and Xe136 in the XENON1T and XENONnT experiments, Phys. Rev. C 106, 024328 (2022).
  6. S. A. Kharusi, et al. (EXO Collaboration), Search for two-neutrino double-beta decay of Xe136 to the excited state of Ba136 with the complete EXO-200 dataset, Chin. Phys. C 47, 103001 (2023).
  7. S. Abe, et al. (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Search for Majorana neutrinos with the complete KamLAND-Zen dataset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 262501 (2025).
  8. S.-C. Wu, Nucl. Data Sheets for A = 214, Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 681 (2009).
  9. M. Arnould, S. Goriely, and K. Takahashi, The r-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: Astrophysics and nuclear physics achievements and mysteries, Phys. Rep. 450, 97 (2007).
  10. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), The XENONnT dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 784 (2024).
  11. R. Arnold, et al. (NEMO-3 Collaboration), Results of the search for neutrinoless double-β decay in Mo100 with the NEMO-3 experiment, Phys. Rev. D 92, 072011 (2015).
  12. A. S. Barabash, et al. (SuperNEMO Collaboration), The BiPo-3 detector for the measurement of ultra low natural radioactivities of thin materials, J. Instrum. 12, P06002 (2017).
  13. E. D. Commins, Weak Interactions (McGraw–Hill, New York, 2007).
  14. S. J. Haselschwardt, J. Kostensalo, X. Mougeot, and J. Suhonen, Improved calculations of β decay backgrounds to new physics in liquid xenon detectors, Phys. Rev. C 102, 065501 (2020).
  15. X. Mougeot, BetaShape: A new code for improved analytical calculations of beta spectra, in EPJ Web Conference (EDP Sciences, Bruges, Belgium, 2016), Vol. 146, p. 12015.
  16. M. Ramalho and J. Suhonen, Computed total β-electron spectra for decays of Pb and Bi in the Rn220,222 radioactive chains, Phys. Rev. C 109, 014326 (2024).
  17. Q. Zhi, E. Caurier, J. J. Cuenca-García, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and K. Sieja, Shell-model half-lives including first-forbidden contributions for r-process waiting-point nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 87, 025803 (2013).
  18. F. F. Deppisch and J. Suhonen, Statistical analysis of β decays and the effective value of gA in the proton-neutron quasiparticle random-phase approximation framework, Phys. Rev. C 94, 055501 (2016).
  19. J. Kostensalo and J. Suhonen, gA-driven shapes of electron spectra of forbidden β decays in the nuclear shell model, Phys. Rev. C 96, 024317 (2017).
  20. J. Toivanen and J. Suhonen, Microscopic quasiparticle-phonon description of odd-mass isotopes and their β decay, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1237 (1998).
  21. E. Caurier, F. Nowacki, and A. Poves, Shell model description of the ββ decay of Xe136, Phys. Lett. B 711, 62 (2012).
  22. F. Iachello and P. V. Isacker, The Interacting Boson-Fermion Model (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991).
  23. J. Kostensalo and J. Suhonen, Mesonic enhancement of the weak axial charge and its effect on the half-lives and spectral shapes of first-forbidden j+↔j− decays, Phys. Lett. B 781, 480 (2018).
  24. H. Ejiri, J. Suhonen, and K. Zuber, Neutrino–nuclear responses for astro-neutrinos, single beta decays and double beta decays, Phys. Rep. 797, 1 (2019).
  25. N. Shimizu, T. Mizusaki, Y. Utsuno, and Y. Tsunoda, Thick-restart block Lanczos method for large-scale shell-model calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244, 372 (2019).
  26. E. K. Warburton and B. A. Brown, Appraisal of the Kuo-Herling shell-model interaction and application to A = 210–212 nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 43, 602 (1991).
  27. B. A. Brown and W. D. M. Rae, The shell-model code NuShellX@MSU, Nucl. Data Sheets 120, 115 (2014).
  28. H. Behrens and W. Bühring, Electron Radial Wave Functions and Nuclear Beta-decay, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982).
  29. J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner, New limits on fundamental weak-interaction parameters from superallowed β decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 092502 (2005).
  30. A. Kumar, P. C. Srivastava, and J. Suhonen, Second-forbidden nonunique β− decays of Fe59,60: Possible candidates for ga sensitive electron spectral-shape measurements, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 225 (2021).
  31. M. Haaranen, J. Kotila, and J. Suhonen, Spectrum-shape method and the next-to-leading-order terms of the β-decay shape factor, Phys. Rev. C 95, 024327 (2017).
  32. V. C. Antochi, et al., Improved quality tests of R11410-21 photomultiplier tubes for the XENONnT experiment, J. Instrum. 16, P08033 (2021).
  33. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), The neutron veto of the XENONnT experiment: Results with demineralized water, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 695 (2025).
  34. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), Material radiopurity control in the XENONnT experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 599 (2022).
  35. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), Application and modeling of an online distillation method to reduce krypton and argon in XENON1T, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 053H01 (2022).
  36. S. Lindemann and H. Simgen, Krypton assay in xenon at the ppq level using a gas chromatographic system and mass spectrometer, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2746 (2014).
  37. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), Online Rn222 removal by cryogenic distillation in the XENON100 experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 358 (2017).
  38. M. Murra, D. Schulte, C. Huhmann, C. Weinheimer, et al., Design, construction and commissioning of a high-flow radon removal system for XENONnT, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1104 (2022).
  39. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), Radon removal in XENONnT down to the solar neutrino level, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031079 (2025).
  40. F. Jörg, G. Eurin, and H. Simgen, Production and characterization of a Rn222-emanating stainless steel source, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 194, 110666 (2023).
  41. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), Results from a calibration of XENON100 using a source of dissolved radon-220, Phys. Rev. D 95, 072008 (2017).
  42. F. Jörg, D. Cichon, G. Eurin, L. Hötzsch, T. M. Undagoitia, and N. Rupp, Characterization of alpha and beta interactions in liquid xenon, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 361 (2022).
  43. M. J. Berger, J. H. Hubbell, S. M. Seltzer, J. Chang, J. S. Coursey, R. Sukumar, D. S. Zucker, and K. Olsen, XCOM: Photon cross section database (version 1.2) (1999), https://physics.nist.gov/xcom.
  44. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), Offline tagging of radon-induced backgrounds in XENON1T and applicability to other liquid xenon time projection chambers, Phys. Rev. D 110, 012011 (2024).
  45. A. Gando, et al. (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Search for Majorana neutrinos near the inverted mass hierarchy region with KamLAND-Zen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082503 (2016).
  46. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), Design and performance of the field cage for the XENONnT experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 138 (2024).
  47. H. Schulze Eißing, et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT/fuse: 1.4.2, Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14740249.
  48. S. Agostinelli, et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), GEANT4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003).
  49. J. Allison, et al., Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  50. J. R. Angevaare, et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT/straxen: v3.1.4, Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14996117.
  51. E. Aprile, et al. (XENON Collaboration), XENONnT analysis: Signal reconstruction, calibration, and event selection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 062006 (2025).
  52. M. Szydagis, N. Barry, K. Kazkaz, J. Mock, D. Stolp, M. Sweany, M. Tripathi, S. Uvarov, N. Walsh, and M. Woods, NEST: A comprehensive model for scintillation yield in liquid xenon, J. Instrum. 6, P10002 (2011).
  53. M. Szydagis, et al., A review of NEST models for liquid xenon and an exhaustive comparison with other approaches, Front. Detect. Sci. Technol. 2, 1480975 (2025).
  54. E. Aprile, C. E. Dahl, L. DeViveiros, R. Gaitskell, K. L. Giboni, J. Kwong, P. Majewski, K. Ni, T. Shutt, and M. Yamashita, Simultaneous measurement of ionization and scintillation from nuclear recoils in liquid xenon as target for a dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 081302 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation