Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Disoriented isospin condensates may be the source of anomalous kaon correlations measured in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=2.76 TeV

Joseph I. Kapusta1, Scott Pratt2, and Mayank Singh1

  • 1School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy and Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA

Phys. Rev. C 109, L031902 – Published 11 March, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.L031902

Abstract

The magnitude of fluctuations between charged and neutral kaons measured by the ALICE Collaboration in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC exceeds conventional explanation. Here it is shown that if the scalar condensate, which is typically associated with chiral symmetry, is accompanied by an isospin=1 field, then the combination can produce large fluctuations where 〈u¯u〉≠〈d¯d〉. Hadronizing strange and antistrange quarks might then strongly fluctuate between charged (us¯ or su¯) and neutral (ds¯ or sd¯) kaons.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (22)

  1. A. A. Anselm and M. G. Ryskin, Phys. Lett. B 266, 482 (1991).
  2. J. P. Blaizot and A. Krzywicki, Phys. Rev. D 46, 246 (1992).
  3. K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 399, 395 (1993).
  4. J. D. Bjorken, K. L. Kowalski, and C. C. Taylor, SLAC-PUB-6109, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
  5. A. A. Anselm and M. G. Ryskin, Z. Phys. A 358, 353 (1997).
  6. B. Mohanty and J. Serreau, Phys. Rep. 414, 263 (2005).
  7. M. M. Aggarwal et al. (WA98 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 420, 169 (1998).
  8. H. Appelshäuser et al. (NA49 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 459, 679 (1999).
  9. T. C. Brooks et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 032003 (2000).
  10. M. M. Aggarwal et al. (WA98 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 64, 011901 (2001).
  11. M. M. Aggarwal et al. (WA98 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 67, 044901 (2003).
  12. See the proceedings of the Quark Matter Conference series, the most recently available being Acta Phys. Pol. B Proc. Suppl. 16, 143 (2023).
  13. J. W. Harris and B. Müller, arXiv:2308.05743.
  14. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 832, 137242 (2022).
  15. J. I. Kapusta, S. Pratt, and M. Singh, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014913 (2023).
  16. S. Gavin and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 65, 054910 (2002).
  17. R. Nayak, S. Dash, B. K. Nandi, and C. Pruneau, Phys. Rev. C 101, 054904 (2020).
  18. A. Bazavov et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 85, 054503 (2012).
  19. S. A. Bass, P. Danielewicz, and S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2689 (2000).
  20. J. Schaffner-Bielich and J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. C 59, 3329 (1999).
  21. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  22. J. I. Kapusta, E. Rrapaj, and S. Rudaz, Phys. Rev. C 101, 031901(R) (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation