Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Precise approach to determining the He3 neutron incoherent scattering length bi

H. Lu1, O. Holderer2, A. Ioffe2, S. Pasini2, P. Pistel3, Z. Salhi2, B. M. Goodson4, W. M. Snow1, and E. Babcock2,*

  • 1Indiana University/CEEM, 2401 Milo B. Sampson Lane, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, USA
  • 2Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Centre for Neutron Science (JCNS) at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), 85747 Garching, Germany
  • 3Forschungzentrum Jülich GmbH, ZEA-1, 52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 4School of Chemical and Biomolecular Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA

  • *e.babcock@fz-juelich.de

Phys. Rev. C 108, L031001 – Published 11 September, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L031001

Abstract

We report the first results from a new approach for measuring the He3 neutron incoherent scattering length bi. bi is directly proportional to the difference Δb=b+−b− in the two low-energy s-wave neutron-nucleus scattering amplitudes b+ and b−, corresponding to the singlet J=0 and triplet J=1 states of the neutron-He3 interaction, respectively. An accurate measurement of bi can help distinguish among different models of three-nucleon interactions by comparison to ab initio nuclear theory calculations. The neutron birefringence caused by Δb results in neutron spin rotation around the nuclear polarization. We measured Δb using polarized neutron spin rotation and the transmission of neutrons through a He3 gas target polarized in situ by spin-exchange optical pumping. This brief test measurement performed on the J-NSE Phoenix neutron spin echo spectrometer, yielded Δb=[−5.27±0.05 (stat.) −0.05 (syst.)] fm. We argue that this method can be improved in precision to resolve the discrepancies between two prior measurements of bi which are dependent on the polarized absorption cross section σp. With absolute He3 polarization measurement via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (in a properly shaped cell) concurrent with accurate neutron transmission measurements, σp can be measured to obtain independent values of b+ and b−.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (62)

  1. M. C. Atkinson, W. H. Dickhoff, M. Piarulli, A. Rios, and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044333 (2020).
  2. C. W. Johnson, K. D. Launey, N. Auerbach, S. Bacca, B. R. Barrett, C. R. Brune, M. A. Caprio, P. Descouvemont, W. H. Dickhoff, C. Elster et al., J. Phys. G 47, 123001 (2020).
  3. H. Kamada, A. Nogga, W. Glockle, E. Hiyama, M. Kamimura, K. Varga, Y. Suzuki, M. Viviani, A. Kievsky, S. Rosati et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 044001 (2001).
  4. R. B. Wiringa, S. C. Pieper, J. Carlson, and V. R. Pandharipande, Phys. Rev. C 62, 014001 (2000).
  5. A. Nogga, H. Kamada, W. Glockle, and B. R. Barrett, Phys. Rev. C 65, 054003 (2002).
  6. R. Lazauskas and J. Carbonell, Phys. Rev. C 70, 044002 (2004).
  7. M. Viviani, A. Kievsky, and S. Rosati, Phys. Rev. C 71, 024006 (2005).
  8. B. S. Pudliner, V. R. Pandharipande, J. Carlson, and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4396 (1995).
  9. R. Machleidt and D. R. Entem, Phys. Rep. 503, 1 (2011).
  10. J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, F. Pederiva, S. C. Pieper, R. Schiavilla, K. E. Schmidt, and R. B. Wiringa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1067 (2015).
  11. A. Baroni, R. Schiavilla, L. E. Marcucci, L. Girlanda, A. Kievsky, A. Lovato, S. Pastore, M. Piarulli, S. C. Pieper, M. Viviani, and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C 98, 044003 (2018).
  12. O. Zimmer, G. Ehlers, B. Farago, H. Humblot, W. Ketter, and R. Scherm, EPJ Direct 4, 1 (2002).
  13. M. G. Huber, M. Arif, W. C. Chen, T. R. Gentile, D. S. Hussey, T. C. Black, D. A. Pushin, C. B. Shahi, F. E. Wietfeldt, and L. Yang, Phys. Rev. C 90, 064004 (2014).
  14. H. Kaiser, H. Rauch, G. Badurek, W. Bauspiess, and U. Bonse, Z. Phys. A 291, 231 (1979).
  15. P. R. Huffman, D. L. Jacobson, K. Schoen, M. Arif, T. C. Black, W. M. Snow, and S. A. Werner, Phys. Rev. C 70, 014004 (2004).
  16. W. Ketter, W. Heil, G. Badurek, M. Baron, E. Jericha, R. Loidl, and H. Rauch, Europhys. J A 27, 243 (2006).
  17. H. M. Hofmann and G. M. Hale, Phys. Rev. C 68, 021002(R) (2003).
  18. H. M. Hofmann and G. M. Hale, Phys. Rev. C 77, 044002 (2008).
  19. J. Kirscher, H. W. Griesshammer, D. Shukla, and H. M. Hofmann, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 239 (2010).
  20. K. M. Nollett, S. C. Pieper, R. B. Wiringa, J. Carlson, and G. M. Hale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 022502 (2007).
  21. A. Kievsky, S. Rosati, M. Viviani, L. E. Marcucci, and L. Girlanda, J. Phys. G 35, 063101 (2008).
  22. P. Navratil, S. Quaglioni, G. Hupin, C. Romero-Redondo, and A. Calci, Phys. Scr. 91, 053002 (2016).
  23. J. E. Lynn, I. Tews, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, A. Gezerlis, K. E. Schmidt, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 062501 (2016).
  24. R. Lazauskas and J. Carbonell, Front. Phys. 7, 251 (2020).
  25. A. R. Flores and K. M. Nollett, arXiv:2209.00093 [Phys. Rev. C (to be published)].
  26. M. Piarulli and I. Tews, Front. Phys. 7, 245 (2020).
  27. M. Viviani, A. Deltuva, R. Lazauskas, J. Carbonell, A. C. Fonseca, A. Kievsky, L. E. Marcucci, and S. Rosati, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054010 (2011).
  28. M. Viviani, A. Deltuva, R. Lazauskas, A. C. Fonseca, A. Kievsky, and L. E. Marcucci, Phys. Rev. C 95, 034003 (2017).
  29. S. Quaglioni and P. Navrátil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 092501 (2008).
  30. P. Navrátil, R. Roth, and S. Quaglioni, Phys. Rev. C 82, 034609 (2010).
  31. V. Baryshevsky and M. Podgoretsky, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1050 (1964).
  32. A. Abragam and M. Goldman, Nuclear Magnetism: Order and Disorder (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982).
  33. V. F. Sears, Neutron Optics: An Introduction to the Theory of Neutron Optical Phenomena and Their Applications (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
  34. J. Als-Nielsen and O. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. 133, B925 (1964).
  35. S. B. Borzakov, K. Maletski, L. B. Pikelner, M. Stehmpinski, and E. I. Sharapov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 35, 307 (1982).
  36. C. D. Keith, Z. Chowdhuri, D. R. Rich, W. M. Snow, J. D. Bowman, S. L. Penttilä, D. A. Smith, M. B. Leuschner, V. R. Pomeroy, G. L. Jones, and E. I. Sharapov, Phys. Rev. C 69, 034005 (2004).
  37. L. Passell and R. I. Schermer, Phys. Rev. 150, 146 (1966).
  38. T. Chupp, K. Coulter, M. Kandes, M. Sharma, T. Smith, G. L. Jones, W. Chen, T. Gentile, D. Rich, B. Lauss et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 574, 500 (2007).
  39. M. V. Romalis and G. D. Cates, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3004 (1998).
  40. E. Babcock, I. A. Nelson, S. Kadlecek, and T. G. Walker, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013414 (2005).
  41. P. Nikolaou, A. Coffey, K. Ranta, L. Walkup, B. Gust, M. Barlow, M. Rosen, B. Goodson, and E. Chekmenev, J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 4809 (2014).
  42. E. Wilms, M. Ebert, W. Heil, and R. Surkau, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 401, 491 (1997).
  43. A. Vlassenbroek, J. Jeener, and P. Broekaert, J. Magn. Reson. A 118, 234 (1996).
  44. M. V. Romalis, D. Sheng, B. Saam, and T. G. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 188901 (2014).
  45. M. E. Limes, N. Dural, M. V. Romalis, E. L. Foley, T. W. Kornack, A. Nelson, L. R. Grisham, and J. Vaara, Phys. Rev. A 100, 010501(R) (2019).
  46. A. Schneider, B. Sikora, S. Dickopf, M. Müller, N. Oreshkina, A. Rischka, I. Valuev, S. Ulmer, J. Walz, Z. Harman et al., Nature (London) 606, 878 (2022).
  47. D.-X. Chen, E. Pardo, and A. Sanchez, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 306, 135 (2006).
  48. R. I. Joseph, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 4639 (1966).
  49. R. Haun, F. E. Wietfeldt, M. Arif, M. G. Huber, T. C. Black, B. Heacock, D. A. Pushin, and C. B. Shahi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 012501 (2020).
  50. S. Pasini, O. Holderer, T. Kozielewski, D. Richter, and M. Monkenbusch, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 043107 (2019).
  51. H. Lu, M. J. Barlow, D. Basler, P. Gutfreund, O. Holderer, A. Ioffe, S. Pasini, P. Pistel, Z. Salhi, K. Zhernenkov, B. M. Goodson, W. M. Snow, and E. Babcock, arXiv:2301.00460.
  52. T. G. Walker and W. Happer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 629 (1997).
  53. Z. Salhi, E. Babcock, P. Pistel, and A. Ioffe, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 528, 012015 (2014).
  54. N. F. Ramsey, Molecular Beams (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1956).
  55. N. F. Ramsey, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 541 (1990).
  56. F. Mezei, Z. Phys. A 255, 146 (1972).
  57. E. L. Hahn, Phys. Rev. 80, 580 (1950).
  58. Z. Salhi, E. Babcock, K. Bingol, K. Bussmann, H. Kammerling, V. Ossovyi, A. Heynen, H. Deng, V. Hutanu, S. Masalovich et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1316, 012009 (2019).
  59. R. A. Campbell, H. P. Wacklin, I. Sutton, R. Cubitt, and G. Fragneto, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 126, 107 (2011).
  60. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L031001 for a description of the correction due to the magnetic field integral of a polarized particle beam through a polarized target.
  61. M. Ohl, M. Monkenbusch, N. Arend, T. Kozielewski, G. Vehres, C. Tiemann, M. Butzek, H. Soltner, U. Giesen, R. Achten et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 696, 85 (2012).
  62. M. M. Musgrave, S. Baessler, S. Balascuta, L. Barron-Palos, D. Blyth, J. D. Bowman, V. Cianciolo, C. Crawford, K. Craycraft, N. Fomin et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 895, 19 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation