Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Deuteron-deuteron nuclear reactions at extremely low energies

Konrad Czerski*

  • Institute of Physics, University of Szczecin, 70-451 Szczecin, Poland

  • *konrad.czerski@usz.edu.pl

Phys. Rev. C 106, L011601 – Published 12 July, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.L011601

Abstract

The theoretical analysis of the H2(d,p)3H reaction taking place in both metallic as well as gaseous targets at deuteron energies of several keV presented here indicates a strong contribution of the single-particle 0+ threshold resonance. Additional arguments based on the weak coupling between the 2 + 2 and 3 + 1 clustering states of the compound nucleus He4 support this resonance and suggest its large partial width for the internal electron-positron pair formation that overestimates the proton width. A detailed study of the interplay between the resonance transition and the electron screening effect enables estimation of the nuclear reaction rate of the deuteron-deuteron fusion reactions at room temperature.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. M. Fleischmann and S. J. Pons, J. Electroanal. Chem. 261, 301 (1989).
  2. S. E. Jones, E. P. Palmer, J. B. Czirr, D. L. Decker, G. L. Jensen, J. M. Thorne, S. F. Taylor, and J. Rafelski., Nature (London) 338, 737 (1989).
  3. A. W. Fowler, Nature (London) 339, 345 (1989).
  4. S. E. Koonin and M. Nauenberg, Nature (London) 339, 690 (1989).
  5. U. Greife, F. Gorris, M. Junker, C. Rolfs, and D. Zahnow, Z. Phys. A 351, 107 (1995).
  6. F. E. Cecil, H. Liu, J. S. Yan, and G. M. Hale, Phys. Rev. C 47, 1178 (1993).
  7. F. J. Wilkinson III and F. E. Cecil, Phys. Rev. C 31, 2036 (1985).
  8. J. C. Jackson, Nature (London) 339, 345 (1989).
  9. V. Violante, E. Castagna, S. Lecci, F. Sarto, M. Sansovini, A. Torre, A. La Gatta, R. Duncan, G. Hubler, A. El Boher et al., Curr. Sci. 108, 540 (2015).
  10. C. P. Berlinguette, Y.-M. Chiang, J. N. Munday, T. Schenkel, D. K. Fork, R. Koningstein, and M. D. Threvithick, Nature (London) 570, 45 (2019).
  11. L. J. Perkins, C. D. Orth, and M. Tabak, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory report, UCRL-ID-TR-200850 (2003).
  12. B. Ivlev, Phys. Rev. C 87, 034619 (2013).
  13. A. V. Dodonov and V. V. Dodonov, Phys. Lett. A 378, 1071 (2014).
  14. V. I. Vysotskii and M. V. Vysotskyy, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 125, 195 (2017).
  15. F. Premuda, Fusion Technol. 33, 350 (1998).
  16. T. X. Zhang and M. Y. Ye, Prog. Phys. 15, 191 (2019).
  17. K. Czerski, A. Huke, A. Biller, P. Heide, M. Hoeft, and G. Ruprecht, Europhys. Lett. 54, 449 (2001).
  18. K. Czerski, A. Huke, P. Heide, and G. Ruprecht, Europhys. Lett. 68, 363 (2004).
  19. E. E. Salpeter, Aust. J. Phys. 7, 373 (1954).
  20. H. J. Assenbaum, K. Langanke, and C. Rolfs, Z. Phys. A 327, 461 (1987).
  21. S. Ichimaru and H. Kitamura, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2649 (1999).
  22. F. Raiola, P. Migliardi, G. Gyürky, M. Aliotta, A. Formicola, R. Bonetti, C. Broggini, L. Campajola, P. Corvisiero, P. Corvisiero et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 13, 377 (2002).
  23. F. Raiola, P. Migliardi, L. Gang, C. Bonomo, G. Gyürky, R. Bonetti, C. Broggini, N. E. Christensen, P. Corvisiero, J. Cruz et al., Phys. Lett. B 547, 193 (2002).
  24. J. Kasagi, H. Yuki, T. Baba, T. Noda, T. Ohtsuki, and A. G. Lipson, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 2881 (2002).
  25. K. Czerski, A. Huke, P. Heide, and G. Ruprecht, Eur. Phys. J. A 27, 83 (2006).
  26. A. Huke, K. Czerski, P. Heide, G. Ruprecht, N. Targosz, and W. Żebrowski, Phys. Rev. C 78, 015803 (2008).
  27. K. Czerski, D. Weissbach, A. I. Kilic, G. Ruprecht, A. Huke, M. Kaczmarski, N. Targosz- Ślęczka, and K. Maass, Europhys. Lett. 113, 22001 (2016).
  28. A. M. Lane and R. G. Thomas, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 257 (1958).
  29. H. Paetz gen and Schieck, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 321 (2010).
  30. R. E. Brown and N. Jarmie, Phys. Rev. C 41, 1391 (1990).
  31. T. D. Shoppa, S. E. Koonin, K. Langanke, and R. Seki, Phys. Rev. C 48, 837 (1993).
  32. H. M. Hofmann and G. M. Hale, Phys. Rev. C 77, 044002 (2008).
  33. K. Arai, S. Aoyama, Y. Suzuki, P. Descouvemont, and D. Baye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 132502 (2011).
  34. S. Aoyama, K. Arai, Y. Suzuki, P. Descouvemont, and D. Baye, Few-Body Syst. 52, 97 (2012).
  35. D. R. Tilley, H. R. Weller, and G. M. Hale, Nucl. Phys. A 541, 1 (1992).
  36. V. A. Sergeyev, Phys. Lett. B 38, 286 (1972).
  37. E. Hiyama, B. F. Gibson, and M. Kamimura, Phys. Rev. C 70, 031001(R) (2004).
  38. A. Csótó and G. M. Hale, Phys. Rev. C 55, 2366 (1997).
  39. C. Werntz and H. Überall, Phys. Rev. 149, 762 (1966).
  40. J. T. H. Dowie, T. Kibédi, T. K. Eriksen, and A. E. Stuchbery, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 131, 1 (2020).
  41. R. Farrell, Phys. Rev. 107, 1631 (1957).
  42. K. Czerski, N. Targosz-Ślęczka, and M. Kaczmarski, Acta Phys. Pol. B 51, 649 (2020).
  43. F. Hoyle, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 1, 121 (1954).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation