Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter

Two-proton emission systematics

D. S. Delion1,2,3,4 and S. A. Ghinescu1,2

  • 1“Horia Hulubei” National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, 30 Reactorului, POB MG-6, RO-077125, Bucharest-Măgurele, România
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Bucharest, 405 Atomiştilor, POB MG-11, RO-077125, Bucharest-Măgurele, România
  • 3Academy of Romanian Scientists, 3 Ilfov RO-050044, Bucharest, România
  • 4Bioterra University, 81 Gârlei RO-013724, Bucharest, România

Phys. Rev. C 105, L031301 – Published 7 March, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L031301

Abstract

The simultaneous emission of two protons is an exotic and complex three-body process. It is very important for experimental groups investigating the nuclear stability on the proton drip line to have a simple rule predicting the two-proton decay widths with a reasonable accuracy for transitions between ground as well as excited states in terms of relevant physical variables. In spite of its complexity, we show that the two-proton emission process obeys similar rules as for binary emission processes like proton, α, and heavy cluster decays. It turns out that the logarithm of the decay width, corrected by the centrifugal barrier, linearly depends upon the Coulomb parameter within one order of magnitude. On the other hand, the universal linear dependence with a negative slope between the logarithm of the reduced width and the fragmentation potential, valid for any kind of binary decay process, is also fulfilled for the two-proton emission with a relative good accuracy. As a consequence of pairing correlations the two protons are simultaneously emitted from a spin singlet paired state. We evidence that indeed one obtains a linear dependence between the logarithm of the reduced width and pairing gap within a factor of two, giving a good predictive power to this law. It turns out that the two-proton and alpha-cluster formation probabilities have similar patterns versus the pairing gap, while in the one-proton case one has a quasiconstant behavior.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Authorization Required

We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

References (Subscription Required)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation