- Featured in Physics
- Open Access
Unconventional production using high-energy bremsstrahlung and cross section evaluation
Phys. Rev. C 112, 054603 – Published 7 November, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/954z-cn34
Abstract
Background: The use of theranostic isotope pairs is an emerging field in contemporary medicine, yet their clinical availability is often constrained by production and supply chain challenges. Among them, has gained significant interest as the therapeutic counterpart in the theranostic pair. Traditional production methods rely on reactor-based or charged-particle accelerator routes, both of which face limitations in scalability and isotopic purity.
Purpose: This work investigates the photonuclear production of via the reaction, using high-energy bremsstrahlung photons from an electron accelerator. In addition to quantifying production yields and radionuclidic purity, the work provides spectrum-weighted average cross sections for multiple emission channels, serving as a test of reaction modeling under broad excitation conditions. The results inform both the optimization of production for theranostic applications and the improvement of nuclear reaction theory in an underexplored energy regime.
Method: Natural zinc targets were irradiated using bremsstrahlung photons from an 855 MeV electron beam at the Mainzer Mikrotron (MAMI). The photon energy spectrum was measured via tagging and extended beyond the tagged range using Geant4 simulations. Reaction products were identified via gamma-ray spectroscopy, and spectrum-weighted average cross sections were derived. Theoretical cross sections were calculated using talys, incorporating giant dipole resonance and quasideuteron components of the photon absorption cross section. A model sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the influence of level density and photon strength function variations on the predicted cross sections.
Results: A production yield of 0.410(16) MBq was measured for , with corresponding average cross sections determined from the bremsstrahlung spectrum. Yields and average cross sections were also measured for coproduced isotopes including , and . The relatively low production of nontarget isotopes indicates that the reaction proceeds with favorable radionuclidic selectivity under the applied irradiation conditions. talys calculations showed good agreement with the () channel, but neutron-emission and multi-particle channels were systematically overestimated. Model sensitivity points to assumptions in the photon strength function and level density, as well as the absence of explicit pion-resonance dynamics at high energies, as likely contributors to this behavior.
Conclusions: Photonuclear reactions provide a promising approach for high-purity production. Theoretical discrepancies highlight limitations in current reaction models, especially for () channels at high energy. Beyond this, the scalability of electron-driven methods, enabled by existing high-current infrastructure and compact low-energy linacs, offers flexibility for both centralized and decentralized isotope production. Continued development of accelerator technologies and nuclear models will be essential for expanding access to photonuclear-produced medical isotopes.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Focus
Making Fresh Radionuclides with Leftover Gamma Rays
Photons in high-energy probe beams that pass through their intended target can be “reused” for making promising nuclides in nuclear medicine, new experiments show.
See more in Physics
Article Text
References (93)
- S. Del Vecchio, A. Zannetti, R. Fonti, L. Pace, and M. Salvatore, Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 51, 152 (2007).
- F. Rösch, H. Herzog, and S. M. Qaim, Pharmaceuticals 10, 56 (2017).
- E. W. Price and C. Orvig, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 260 (2014).
- A. G. Follacchio, S. M. De Feo, G. De Vincentis, F. Monteleone, and M. Liberatore, Curr. Radiopharm. 11, 22 (2018).
- G. Ting, C.-H. Chang, and H.-E. Wang, Anticancer Res. 29, 4107 (2009).
- P. A. Schubiger, R. Alberto, and A. Smith, Bioconjugate Chem. 7, 165 (1996).
- Y. Sugo, K. Hashimoto, M. Kawabata, H. Saeki, S. Sato, K. Tsukada, and Y. Nagai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 023201 (2017).
- K. Zimmermann, J. Grünberg, M. Honer, S. Ametamey, P. August Schubiger, and I. Novak-Hofer, Nucl. Med. Biol. 30, 417 (2003).
- H. Junde, H. Xiaolong, and J. Tuli, Nucl. Data Sheets 106, 159 (2005).
- A. Boschi, P. Martini, E. Janevik-Ivanovska, and A. Duatti, Drug Discov. Today 23, 1489 (2018).
- F. Peng, X. Lu, J. Janisse, O. Muzik, and A. F. Shields, J. Nucl. Med. 47, 1649 (2006).
- Z.-H. Jin et al., Nucl. Med. Commun. 38, 347 (2017).
- B. M. Katz and A. Barnea, J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2017 (1990).
- K. Knogler, J. Grünberg, K. Zimmermann, S. Cohrs, M. Honer, S. Ametamey, P. Altevogt, M. Fogel, P. A. Schubiger, and I. Novak-Hofer, Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 603 (2007).
- I. Novak-Hofer and A. P. Schubiger, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 29, 821 (2002).
- N. A. Smith, D. L. Bowers, and D. A. Ehst, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 70, 2377 (2012).
- T. Katabuchi, S. Watanabe, N. S. Ishioka, Y. Iida, H. Hanaoka, K. Endo, and S. Matsuhashi, J. Radiol. Nucl. Chem. 277, 467 (2008).
- D. G. Medvedev, L. F. Mausner, G. E. Meinken, S. O. Kurczak, H. Schnakenberg, C. J. Dodge, E. M. Korach, and S. C. Srivastava, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 70, 423 (2012).
- D. J. sr Jamriska, W. A. Taylor, M. A. Ott, R. C. Heaton, D. R. Phillips, and M. M. Fowler, J. Radiol. Nucl. Chem. 195, 263 (1995).
- K. Hilgers, T. Stoll, Y. Skakun, H. Coenen, and S. Qaim, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 59, 343 (2003).
- J. Kozempel, K. Abbas, F. Simonelli, A. Bulgheroni, U. Holzwarth, and N. Gibson, Radiochim. Acta 100, 419 (2012).
- T. Ohya, K. Nagatsu, H. Suzuki, M. Fukada, K. Minegishi, M. Hanyu, and M.-R. Zhang, Nucl. Med. Biol. 59, 56 (2018).
- Y. Skakun and S. Qaim, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 60, 33 (2004).
- M. Kawabata, K. Hashimoto, H. Saeki, N. Sato, S. Motoishi, K. Takakura, C. Konno, and Y. Nagai, J. Radiol. Nucl. Chem. 303, 1205 (2015).
- T. Kin et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 034201 (2013).
- N. Sato et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 073201 (2014).
- I. Spahn, H. H. Coenen, and S. M. Qaim, Radiochim. Acta 92, 183 (2004).
- A. Gopalakrishna et al., Radiochim. Acta 106, 549 (2018).
- V. N. Starovoitova, L. Tchelidze, and D. P. Wells, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 85, 39 (2014).
- V. N. Starovoitova, P. L. Cole, and T. L. Grimm, J. Radiol. Nucl. Chem. 305, 127 (2015).
- M. Yagi and K. Kondo, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 29, 757 (1978).
- A. Koning, S. Hilaire, and S. Goriely, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 131 (2023).
- R. Schwarzbach, K. Zimmermann, P. Bläuenstein, A. Smith, and P. August Schubiger, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 46, 329 (1995).
- A. Dasgupta, L. Mausner, and S. Srivastava, Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. A 42, 371 (1991).
- S. Mirzadeh, L. Mausner, and S. Srivastava, Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. A 37, 29 (1986).
- S. A. Brühlmann, M. Walther, M. Kreller, F. Reissig, H.-J. Pietzsch, T. Kniess, and K. Kopka, Pharmaceuticals 16, 314 (2023).
- M. J. Merrick, D. A. Rotsch, A. Tiwari, J. Nolen, T. Brossard, J. Song, T. J. Wadas, J. J. Sunderland, and S. A. Graves, Phys. Med. Biol. 66, 035002 (2021).
- N. Marceau, T. Kruck, D. McConnell, and N. Aspin, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 21, 667 (1970).
- G. Hovhannisyan, T. Bakhshiyan, and R. Dallakyan, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 498, 48 (2021).
- N. I. Aizatsky, N. P. Diky, A. N. Dovbnya, D. Ehst, Yu. V. Lyashko, V. I. Nikiforov, A. Eh. Tenishev, A. V. Torgovkin, V. L. Uvarov, V. A. Shevchenko, and B. I. Shramenko, Probl. At. Sci. Technol. 53, 140 (2010).
- V. Starovoitova, D. Foote, J. Harris, V. Makarashvili, C. R. Segebade, V. Sinha, and D. P. Wells, AIP Conf. Proc. 1336, 502 (2011).
- M. Kawabata, S. Motoishi, A. Ohta, A. Motomura, H. Saeki, K. Tsukada, S. Hashimoto, N. Iwamoto, Y. Nagai, and K. Hashimoto, J. Radiol. Nucl. Chem. 330, 913 (2021).
- H. Herminghaus, A. Feder, K. Kaiser, W. Manz, and H. Schmitt, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 138, 1 (1976).
- A2 Collaboration, official website, https://wwwa2.kph.uni-mainz.de/.
- E. Mornacchi, Measurement of the proton scalar polarizabilities at MAMI, Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, (2021), https://doi.org/10.25358/openscience-6051.
- J. Allison et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 835, 186 (2016).
- S. T. Perkins, D. E. Cullen, and S. M. Seltzer, Tables and graphs of electron-interaction cross sections from 10 eV to 100 GeV derived from the LLNL Evaluated Electron Data Library (EEDL), = 1–100, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Technical Report, 1991, https://doi.org/10.2172/5691165.
- V. Ivanchenko et al., EPJ Web Conf. 245, 02009 (2020).
- R. Brun, F. Bruyant, F. Carminati, S. Giani, M. Maire, A. McPherson, G. Patrick, and L. Urban, GEANT: Detector description and simulation tool, Oct. 1994, CERN Program Library, long writeup W5013, CERN, 1993, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1082634.
- Y.-S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 815 (1974).
- NEA, PENELOPE 2018: A code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport: Workshop proceedings, Barcelona, OECD Publishing, Paris, Spain, 28 January – 1 February, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1787/32da5043-en.
- Zinc foil, Goodfellow online technical data sheet for product, https://www.goodfellow.com/uk/zinc-foil-1000225674.
- Calibration source, Eckert & Ziegler NG3 nuclide mixture calibration standard, https://www.ezag.com/products/isotope-products/isotrak-calibration-sources/reference-sources/geometry-sources/nuclide-mixtures-ng1-to-ng6/.
- J. Meija et al., Pure Appl. Chem. 88, 293 (2016).
- J. H. Hubbell and S. M. Seltzer, Tables of x-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients (version 1.4), http://physics.nist.gov/xaamdi.
- M. B. Chadwick, P. Obložinský, P. E. Hodgson, and G. Reffo, Phys. Rev. C 44, 814 (1991).
- R. Capote et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 3107 (2009).
- J. S. Levinger, Phys. Rev. 84, 43 (1951).
- J. R. Wu and C. C. Chang, Phys. Rev. C 16, 1812 (1977).
- J. Levinger, Phys. Lett. B 82, 181 (1979).
- L. A. Currie, Anal. Chem. 40, 586 (1968).
- T. Stoll, S. Kastleiner, Y. N. Shubin, H. H. Coenen, and S. M. Qaim, Radiochim. Acta 90, 309 (2002).
- T. Ericson, Adv. Phys. 9, 425 (1960).
- A. Gilbert and A. G. W. Cameron, Can. J. Phys. 43, 1446 (1965).
- W. Dilg, W. Schantl, H. Vonach, and M. Uhl, Nucl. Phys. A 217, 269 (1973).
- A. V. Ignatyuk, K. K. Istekov, and G. N. Smirenkin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 29, 875 (1979).
- A. V. Ignatyuk, J. L. Weil, S. Raman, and S. Kahane, Phys. Rev. C 47, 1504 (1993).
- S. Goriely, F. Tondeur, and J. Pearson, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 77, 311 (2001).
- S. Goriely, S. Hilaire, and A. J. Koning, Phys. Rev. C 78, 064307 (2008).
- S. Hilaire, M. Girod, S. Goriely, and A. J. Koning, Phys. Rev. C 86, 064317 (2012).
- J. Kopecky and M. Uhl, Phys. Rev. C 41, 1941 (1990).
- D. Brink, Nucl. Phys. 4, 215 (1957).
- P. Axel, Phys. Rev. 126, 671 (1962).
- S. Goriely and E. Khan, Nucl. Phys. A 706, 217 (2002).
- S. Goriely, E. Khan, and M. Samyn, Nucl. Phys. A 739, 331 (2004).
- S. Goriely, Phys. Lett. B 436, 10 (1998).
- I. Daoutidis and S. Goriely, Phys. Rev. C 86, 034328 (2012).
- S. Goriely, S. Hilaire, S. Péru, and K. Sieja, Phys. Rev. C 98, 014327 (2018).
- V. Plujko, O. Gorbachenko, R. Capote, and P. Dimitriou, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 123-124, 1 (2018).
- S. Goriely and V. Plujko, Phys. Rev. C 99, 014303 (2019).
- S. Goriely, S. Hilaire, and A. J. Koning, Astron. Astrophys. 487, 767 (2008).
- S. S. Dietrich and B. L. Berman, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 38, 199 (1988).
- A. Koning, D. Rochman, and S. van der Marck, Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 187 (2014).
- C. M. Tarbert et al. (Crystal Ball at MAMI and A2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 242502 (2014).
- C. M. Tarbert, Coherent photoproduction on nuclei, Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2007, https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/3501.
- J. Ahrens, Nucl. Phys. A 446, 229 (1985).
- N. Bianchi, V. Muccifora, E. De Sanctis, A. Fantoni, P. Levi Sandri, E. Polli, A. R. Reolon, P. Rossi, M. Anghinolfi, P. Corvisiero, M. Ripani, M. Sanzone, M. Taiuti, and A. Zucchiatti, Phys. Rev. C 54, 1688 (1996).
- P. Carlos, H. Beil, R. Bergére, J. Fagot, A. Leprêtre, A. De miniac, and A. Veyssiére, Nucl. Phys. A 431, 573 (1984).
- T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267 (1979).
- S. P. D. Mangles, C. D. Murphy, Z. Najmudin, A. G. R. Thomas, J. L. Collier, A. E. Dangor, E. J. Divall, P. S. Foster, J. G. Gallacher, C. J. Hooker, D. A. Jaroszynski, A. J. Langley, W. B. Mori, P. A. Norreys, F. S. Tsung, R. Viskup, B. R. Walton, and K. Krushelnick, Nature (London) 431, 535 (2004).
- J. Faure, Y. Glinec, A. Pukhov, S. Kiselev, S. Gordienko, E. Lefebvre, J.-P. Rousseau, F. Burgy, and V. Malka, Nature (London) 431, 541 (2004).
- J. Faure, C. Rechatin, A. Norlin, A. Lifschitz, Y. Glinec, and V. Malka, Nature (London) 444, 737 (2006).
- J. Krämer, G. Blokesch, M. Grewe, B. Keune, V. Kümper, M. Pekeler, C. Piel, C. Quitmann, T. Trinh, and P. vom Stein, in Proceedings of the 31st International Linear Accelerator Conference (LINAC'22) (JACoW, Geneva, 2022), pp. 35–37.