Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter

Elastic α-scattering experiments on Sr88 to constrain the α-induced reaction cross sections for weak-r-process studies

Z. Kóródi1,2, G. G. Kiss2,*, P. Mohr2, T. N. Szegedi2, C. Marshall3,4, R. Nunes5,6, L. Csedreki2, Gy. Gyürky2, Z. Halász2 et al.

T. Szücs2, S. R. Kovács1,2, Zs. Mátyus1,2, Á. Tóth2, G. L. Guardo7, M. La Cognata7, A. Tumino7, A. Di Pietro7, A. Nurmukhanbetova7, L. Balliet8,9, and C. Fougères10,11

  • *Contact author: ggkiss@atomki.hu

Phys. Rev. C 113, L062801 – Published 8 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7q3r-h51x

Abstract

Background: Low-mass neutron-rich isotopes between Fe and Ag are predicted to be synthesized in neutrino-driven winds emitted after the collapse of a massive star. The modeling of this nucleosynthesis scenario, called weak r-process or α-process, requires large nuclear reaction network calculations. The necessary reaction cross sections are usually taken from the statistical model which uses global optical potentials. Several global α+ nucleus optical potential (α-OMP) parametrizations exist and deviations between their predicted cross sections exceed even an order of magnitude at astrophysical energies.

Purpose: In the relevant mass range of the weak r-process, cross-section calculations performed with the Atomki-V2 potential generally reproduce experimental data within ±50%. However, recently the Sr88(α,n)Zr91 cross section was measured and it was found that, unlike other available cross section data, it is lower than the calculations performed with recent OMPs, including the Atomki-V2 calculations, by a factor of 3. Thus, to better understand the source of the discrepancy, the present work aims to determine the Sr88 total reaction cross section by measuring Sr88(α,α)Sr88 elastic scattering angular distributions.

Methods: Between ϑlab.=20∘–167.5∘ complete elastic α scattering angular distributions were measured at Elab.=13.50,16.21,and19.47MeV energies, with precision better than 7% for each angle.

Results: The total reaction cross section (σreac) was determined from the experimental data using three independent methods. First, the standard approach of fitting the parameters of the complex α-nucleus optical potential was applied. Second, a model-independent phase shift fit was used. Finally, σreac values were also derived using a Bayesian analysis. The excellent agreement of the derived σreac from the three fundamentally different methods shows that the measured angular distributions constrain the total reaction cross sections well.

Conclusions: There is serious tension between the very-well-constrained experimental σreac values from elastic scattering and those obtained from the measured (α,n) data. The present results from elastic scattering are robust, agree well with the prediction of recent α-OMPs, and fit into the general systematics of cross sections. Thus, an independent verification of the Sr88(α,n)Zr91 cross section data is clearly needed.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Authorization Required

We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

References (Subscription Required)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation