Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Electric dipole strength in sd-shell nuclei from small-angle proton scattering

R. W. Fearick1, O. Le Noan2,3, H. Matsubara4,5, P. von Neumann-Cosel6,*, K. Sieja2,3, and A. Tamii4

  • *Contact author: vnc@ikp.tu-darmstadt.de

Phys. Rev. C 113, 064311 – Published 12 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4yjj-ybpj

Abstract

Background: Total photoabsorption cross sections are important for an understanding of nuclear structure and for many applications, in particular in astrophysics. The majority of data stems from measurements of neutron emission after photoexcitation, which, in heavy nuclei, represent a good approximation to the total cross sections. However, this does not hold for light nuclei, where charged-particle emission thresholds are typically lower in energy. Accordingly, data in light nuclei are scarce.

Purpose: The present work reports new total photoabsorption cross sections for the N=Z nuclei in the sd-shell Ne20, Mg24, Si28, S32, Ar36, and for Mg26. The results are compared to predictions of a data-driven artificial neural network application and to configuration-interaction shell-model calculations covering the excitation energy region of the isovector giant dipole resonance.

Methods: Double-differential cross sections of the (p,p′) reaction at an incident proton energy of 295 MeV have been measured between 0∘ and 14∘. The angular distributions of the E1 parts due to Coulomb excitation have been extracted with a multipole decomposition analysis for excitation energies 12 to 24 MeV and converted to equivalent photoabsorption cross sections with the virtual photon method.

Results: Reasonable agreement of the photoabsorption cross sections with previous experiments is found for Mg24 and Si28, while the present results diverge for S32. For the first time, data are presented for Ne20, Mg26, and Ar36. Configuration-interaction shell-model calculations provide an overall satisfactory description of the fragmented E1 strength distributions. The same holds for absolute cross sections except for Mg26 and Ar36, where the experimental results significantly exceed the expected exhaustion of the Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn energy-weighted sum rule.

Conclusions: Despite a reduction of Coulomb relative to nuclear cross sections in light nuclei with respect to previous analyses of the same kind in medium-mass and heavy nuclei, forward-angle proton scattering at energies of several hundred MeV remains a valuable tool to extract the nuclear E1 response. However, there is a larger model dependence, in particular for excitation energies above 20 MeV, due to the need to constrain the continuum background with additional assumptions. The overall success of the shell-model approach to describe the features of the experimental photoabsorption cross sections motivates its application in large-scale reaction network calculations aiming at an understanding of the mass composition of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (58)

  1. A. Bracco, E. Lanza, and A. Tamii, Isoscalar and isovector dipole excitations: Nuclear properties from low-lying states and from the isovector giant dipole resonance, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106, 360 (2019).
  2. A. Zilges, D. Balabanski, J. Isaak, and N. Pietralla, Photonuclear reactions—From basic research to applications, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 122, 103903 (2022).
  3. B. L. Berman and S. C. Fultz, Measurements of the giant dipole resonance with monoenergetic photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 713 (1975).
  4. D. Savran, T. Aumann, and A. Zilges, Experimental studies of the pygmy dipole resonance, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 70, 210 (2013).
  5. E. Lanza, L. Pellegri, A. Vitturi, and M. Andrés, Theoretical studies of pygmy resonances, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 129, 104006 (2023).
  6. A. Repko, V. O. Nesterenko, J. Kvasil, and P.-G. Reinhard, Systematics of toroidal dipole modes in Ca, Ni, Zr, and Sn isotopes, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 242 (2019).
  7. P. von Neumann-Cosel, V. O. Nesterenko, I. Brandherm, P. I. Vishnevskiy, P.-G. Reinhard, J. Kvasil, H. Matsubara, A. Repko, A. Richter, M. Scheck, and A. Tamii, Candidate toroidal electric dipole mode in the spherical nucleus Ni58, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 232502 (2024).
  8. P. von Neumann-Cosel and A. Tamii, Electric and magnetic dipole modes in high-resolution inelastic proton scattering at 0°, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 110 (2019).
  9. A. Tamii, I. Poltoratska, P. von Neumann-Cosel, Y. Fujita, T. Adachi, C. A. Bertulani, J. Carter, M. Dozono, H. Fujita, K. Fujita, K. Hatanaka, D. Ishikawa, M. Itoh, T. Kawabata, Y. Kalmykov, A. M. Krumbholz, E. Litvinova, H. Matsubara, K. Nakanishi, R. Neveling, et al., Complete electric dipole response and the neutron skin in Pb208, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 062502 (2011).
  10. S. Bassauer, P. von Neumann-Cosel, P.-G. Reinhard, A. Tamii, S. Adachi, C. A. Bertulani, P. Y. Chan, A. D'Alessio, H. Fujioka, H. Fujita, Y. Fujita, G. Gey, M. Hilcker, T. H. Hoang, A. Inoue, J. Isaak, C. Iwamoto, T. Klaus, N. Kobayashi, Y. Maeda, et al., Electric and magnetic dipole strength in Sn112,114,116,118,120,124, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034327 (2020).
  11. D. Martin, P. von Neumann-Cosel, A. Tamii, N. Aoi, S. Bassauer, C. A. Bertulani, J. Carter, L. Donaldson, H. Fujita, Y. Fujita, T. Hashimoto, K. Hatanaka, T. Ito, A. Krugmann, B. Liu, Y. Maeda, K. Miki, R. Neveling, N. Pietralla, I. Poltoratska, et al., Test of the Brink-Axel hypothesis for the pygmy dipole resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 182503 (2017).
  12. I. Brandherm, P. von Neumann-Cosel, R. Mancino, G. Martínez-Pinedo, H. Matsubara, V. Y. Ponomarev, A. Richter, M. Scheck, and A. Tamii, Electric and magnetic dipole strength in Ni58 from forward-angle proton scattering, Phys. Rev. C 110, 034319 (2024).
  13. I. Brandherm, F. Bonaiti, P. von Neumann–Cosel, S. Bacca, G. Colò, G. R. Jansen, Z. Z. Li, H. Matsubara, Y. F. Niu, P.-G. Reinhard, A. Richter, X. Roca-Maza, and A. Tamii, Electric dipole polarizability of Ni58, Phys. Rev. C 111, 024312 (2025).
  14. J. Birkhan, M. Miorelli, S. Bacca, S. Bassauer, C. A. Bertulani, G. Hagen, H. Matsubara, P. von Neumann–Cosel, T. Papenbrock, N. Pietralla, V. Y. Ponomarev, A. Richter, A. Schwenk, and A. Tamii, Electric dipole polarizability of Ca48 and implications for the neutron skin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 252501 (2017).
  15. R. W. Fearick, P. von Neumann-Cosel, S. Bacca, J. Birkhan, F. Bonaiti, I. Brandherm, G. Hagen, H. Matsubara, W. Nazarewicz, N. Pietralla, V. Y. Ponomarev, P.-G. Reinhard, X. Roca-Maza, A. Richter, A. Schwenk, J. Simonis, and A. Tamii, Electric dipole polarizability of Ca40, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022044 (2023).
  16. P. von Neumann-Cosel and A. Tamii, Electric dipole polarizability constraints on neutron skin and symmetry energy, Front. Phys. 13, 1629987 (2025).
  17. A. Tamii, L. Pellegri, P.-A. Söderström, D. Allard, S. Goriely, T. Inakura, E. Khan, E. Kido, M. Kimura, E. Litvinova, S. Nagataki, P. von Neumann-Cosel, N. Pietralla, N. Shimizu, N. Tsoneva, Y. Utsuno, S. Adachi, P. Adsley, A. Bahini, D. Balabanski, et al., PANDORA project for the study of photonuclear reactions below A=60, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 208 (2023).
  18. L. A. Anchordoqui, Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, Phys. Rep. 801, 1 (2019).
  19. ELI–NP White Book, https://www.eli-np.ro/download.php.
  20. R. Neveling, H. Fujita, F. Smit, T. Adachi, G. Berg, E. Buthelezi, J. Carter, J. Conradie, M. Couder, R. Fearick, S. Förtsch, D. Fourie, Y. Fujita, J. Görres, K. Hatanaka, M. Jingo, A. Krumbholz, C. Kureba, J. Mira, S. Murray, et al., High energy-resolution zero-degree facility for light-ion scattering and reactions at iThemba LABS, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 654, 29 (2011).
  21. M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen, and P.-G. Reinhard, Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121 (2003).
  22. K. Sieja, Brink-Axel hypothesis in the pygmy-dipole resonance region, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 147 (2023).
  23. O. Le Noan and K. Sieja, Electric dipole response of sd-shell nuclei within the configuration-interaction shell-model approach, Phys. Rev. C 111, 064308 (2025).
  24. H. Matsubara, A. Tamii, H. Nakada, T. Adachi, J. Carter, M. Dozono, H. Fujita, K. Fujita, Y. Fujita, K. Hatanaka, W. Horiuchi, M. Itoh, T. Kawabata, S. Kuroita, Y. Maeda, P. Navrátil, P. von Neumann-Cosel, R. Neveling, H. Okamura, L. Popescu, et al., Nonquenched isoscalar spin-M1 excitations in sd-shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 102501 (2015).
  25. R. Eramzhyan, B. Ishkhanov, I. Kapitonov, and V. Neudatchin, The giant dipole resonance in light nuclei and related phenomena, Phys. Rep. 136, 229 (1986).
  26. R. W. Fearick, B. Erler, H. Matsubara, P. von Neumann-Cosel, A. Richter, R. Roth, and A. Tamii, Origin of fine structure of the giant dipole resonance in sd-shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 97, 044325 (2018).
  27. P. von Neumann-Cosel, Comment on “new formulas for the (−2) moment of the photoabsorption cross section, σ−2”, Phys. Rev. C 93, 049801 (2016).
  28. M. Fujiwara, H. Akimune, I. Daito, H. Fujimura, Y. Fujita, K. Hatanaka, H. Ikegami, I. Katayama, K. Nagayama, N. Matsuoka, S. Morinobu, T. Noro, M. Yoshimura, H. Sakaguchi, Y. Sakemi, A. Tamii, and M. Yosoi, Magnetic spectrometer Grand Raiden, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 422, 484 (1999).
  29. A. Tamii, Y. Fujita, H. Matsubara, T. Adachi, J. Carter, M. Dozono, H. Fujita, K. Fujita, H. Hashimoto, K. Hatanaka, T. Itahashi, M. Itoh, T. Kawabata, K. Nakanishi, S. Ninomiya, A. Perez-Cerdan, L. Popescu, B. Rubio, T. Saito, H. Sakaguchi, et al., Measurement of high energy resolution inelastic proton scattering at and close to zero degrees, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 605, 326 (2009).
  30. H. Matsubara, A. Tamii, Y. Shimizu, K. Suda, Y. Tameshige, and J. Zenihiro, Wide-window gas target system for high resolution experiment with magnetic spectrometer, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 678, 122 (2012).
  31. H. Matsubara, H. Sakaguchi, T. Kishi, and A. Tamii, Self-supporting elemental sulfur target for charged particle irradiation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 267, 3682 (2009).
  32. H. Matsubara, Isoscalar and isovector spin-M1 transitions from the even-even, N = Z nuclei across the sd-shell region, Ph.D. thesis, Osaka University, 2010.
  33. P. D. Kunz, programm DWUCK4 (unpublished).
  34. C. Kalbach, Systematics of continuum angular distributions: Extensions to higher energies, Phys. Rev. C 37, 2350 (1988).
  35. C. A. Bertulani and A. M. Nathan, Excitation and photon decay of giant resonances from high-energy collisions of heavy ions, Nucl. Phys. A 554, 158 (1993).
  36. T. Kawano, Y. Cho, P. Dimitriou, D. Filipescu, N. Iwamoto, V. Plujko, X. Tao, H. Utsunomiya, V. Varlamov, R. Xu, R. Capote, I. Gheorghe, O. Gorbachenko, Y. Jin, T. Renstrøm, M. Sin, K. Stopani, Y. Tian, G. Tveten, J. Wang, et al., IAEA photonuclear data library 2019, Nucl. Data Sheets 163, 109 (2020).
  37. B. S. Dolbilkin, V. A. Zapevalov, V. I. Korin, L. E. Lazareva, and F. A. Nikolaev, F19, Mg24 and Ca40 gamma-quantum absorption cross sections for energy region 10-30 MeV, Bull. Acad. Sci. 30, 354 (1966).
  38. J. M. Wyckoff, B. Ziegler, H. W. Koch, and R. Uhlig, Total photonuclear cross sections for low atomic number elements, Phys. Rev. 137, B576 (1965).
  39. N. Bezić, D. Jamnik, G. Kernel, J. Krajnik, and J. Šnajder, Absorption of gamma rays in silicon and calcium, Nucl. Phys. A 117, 124 (1968).
  40. J. Ahrens, H. Borchert, K. Czock, H. Eppler, H. Gimm, H. Gundrum, M. Kröning, P. Riehn, G. Sita Ram, A. Zieger, and B. Ziegler, Total nuclear photon absorption cross sections for some light elements, Nucl. Phys. A 251, 479 (1975).
  41. K. P. Schelhaas, J. M. Henneberg, N. Wieloch-Laufenberg, U. Zurmühl, B. Ziegler, M. Schumacher, and F. Wolf, Nuclear photon scattering by Si, Nucl. Phys. A 528, 189 (1991).
  42. H. Harada, K. Furutaka, H. Ohgaki, and H. Toyokawa, Fine structure of giant resonance in the Si28(γ,abs) reaction, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 38, 465 (2001).
  43. B. S. Dolbilkin, A. I. Isakov, V. Korin, L. E. Lazareva, and F. A. Nikolaev, Cross section for absorption of gamma-rays by sulphur nuclei in the region of the giant dipole resonance, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 8, 626 (1969).
  44. W. G. Love and M. A. Franey, Effective nucleon-nucleon interaction for scattering at intermediate energies, Phys. Rev. C 24, 1073 (1981).
  45. M. A. Franey and W. G. Love, Nucleon-nucleon t-matrix interaction for scattering at intermediate energies, Phys. Rev. C 31, 488 (1985).
  46. W. G. Jiang, T. Egert, S. Bacca, F. Bonaiti, and P. von Neumann–Cosel, Data-driven analysis of dipole strength functions using artificial neural networks, Phys. Rev. C 111, L051308 (2025).
  47. B. S. Ishkhanov, I. M. Kapitonov, E. I. Lileeva, E. V. Shirokov, V. A. Erokhova, M. A. Elkin, and A. V. Izotova, Cross Sections of Photon Absorption by Nuclei with Nucleon Numbers 12-65, Technical Report No. MSU-INP-2002-27/711 (Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 2002).
  48. V. V. Varlamov, M. E. Stepanov, and V. V. Chesnokov, New data on photoabsorption reaction cross sections, Bull. Acad. Sci. 67, 724 (2003).
  49. M. Bouhelal, F. Haas, E. Caurier, F. Nowacki, and A. Bouldjedri, A PSDPF interaction to describe the 1 ℏω intruder states in sd shell nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 864, 113 (2011).
  50. O. Le Noan and K. Sieja, Configuration interaction shell model studies of photon strength functions of light nuclei, Acta Phys. Pol. B Proc. Suppl. 18, 1 (2025).
  51. O. Le Noan, E. Khan, S. Goriely, and K. Sieja, Modeling ultra-high-energy cosmic rays propagation using the input from configuration interaction shell model Phys. Rev. C 113, 044319 (2026).
  52. D. H. Gloeckner and R. D. Lawson, Spurious center-of-mass motion, Phys. Lett. B 53, 313 (1974).
  53. E. Caurier, G. Martínez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, and A. P. Zuker, The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 427 (2005).
  54. E. Lipparini and S. Stringari, Sum rules and giant resonances in nuclei, Phys. Rep. 175, 103 (1989).
  55. P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer, Berlin, 1980).
  56. H. Gräf, V. Heil, A. Richter, E. Spamer, W. Stock, and O. Titze, Isospin forbidden electroexcitation of the 1−, T=0 state at 6.95 MeV in Ca40, continuum shell-model and effective charge of the convection current, Phys. Lett. B 72, 179 (1977).
  57. J. Friedrich and N. Voegler, Violation of Siegert's theorem in the electro-excitation of the (1−, T=0)-level at 7.117 MeV in O16, Phys. Lett. B 217, 220 (1989).
  58. M. C. A. Campos, P. von Neumann–Cosel, F. Neumeyer, A. Richter, G. Schrieder, E. Spamer, B. A. Brown, and R. J. Peterson, Isospin mixing in the electroexcitation of the Ex=10.84 MeV, Jπ;T=1−;0 state in C12 at low momentum transfers, Phys. Lett. B 349, 433 (1995).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation