Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Mirror symmetry and cluster structures of resonant states in Be9 and B9

Myagmarjav Odsuren1,*, Yuma Kikuchi2,†, Takayuki Myo3,4,‡, and Kiyoshi Katō5,§

  • *Contact author: odsuren@num.edu.mn
  • †Contact author: kikuchi@tokuyama.ac.jp
  • ‡Contact author: takayuki.myo@oit.ac.jp
  • §Contact author: kato@nucl.sci.hokudai.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. C 113, 024324 – Published 17 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2kn8-vd5t

Abstract

We apply the complex-scaling method (CSM) to the α+α+N three-body model to study the nuclear structure of Be9 and B9 nuclei, focusing mainly on mirror symmetry in the resonant states. In our previous paper [Phys. Rev. C 110, 064316 (2024)], we reported the energy-level structure below about 15 MeV excitation energy in Be9 and B9 nuclei and discussed the significant effect of the Coulomb force. In this paper, we investigate the wave functions of these states, i.e., the matter- and charge-distribution radii, and the cluster-channel amplitudes. The results show a clear mirror-symmetry breaking between Be9 and B9 nuclei, which is mainly due to the Coulomb interaction.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. M. Odsuren, T. Myo, K. Kikuchi, and K. Katō, Phys. Rev. C 110, 064316 (2024).
  2. S. Okabe, Y. Abe, and H. Tanaka, Prog. Theo. Phys. 57, 866 (1977).
  3. S. Okabe and Y. Abe, Prog. Theo. Phys. 61, 1049 (1979).
  4. K. Arai, P. Descouvemont, D. Baye, W. N. Catford, Phys. Rev. C 68, 014310 (2003).
  5. P. Descouvemont, Eur. Phys. J. A 12, 413 (2001).
  6. R. Alvarez-Rodriguez, A. S. Jensen, E. Garrido, and D. V. Fedorov, Phys. Rev. C 82, 034001 (2010).
  7. A. V. Nesterov, V. S. Vasilevsky, and T. P. Kovalenko, Phys. At. Nucl. 77, 555 (2014).
  8. J. Casal, M. Rodriguez-Gallardo, J. M. Arias, and I. J. Thompson, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044304 (2014).
  9. Y. H. Yang, Y. G. Ma, S. M. Wang, B. Zhou, and D. Q. Fang, Phys. Rev. C 108, 044307 (2023).
  10. W. John and J. M. Prosser, Phys. Rev. 127, 231 (1962).
  11. M. Fujishiro, T. Tabata, K. Okamoto, and T. Tsujimoto, Can. J. Phys. 60, 1672 (1982).
  12. H. Utsunomiya, Y. Yonezawa, H. Akimune, T. Yamagata, M. Ohta, M. Fujishiro, H. Toyokawa, and H. Ohgaki, Phys. Rev. C 63, 018801 (2000).
  13. H. Akimune, M. Fujimura, M. Fujiwara, K. Hara, T. Ishikawa, T. Kawabata, H. Utsunomiya, T. Yamagata, K. Yamasaki, and M. Yosoi, Phys. Rev. C 64, 041305(R) (2001).
  14. O. Burda, P. von Neumann-Cosel, A. Richter, C. Forssen, and B. A. Brown, Phys. Rev. C 82, 015808 (2010).
  15. J. H. Gibbons, R. L. Macklin, J. B. Marion, and H. W. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. 114, 1319 (1959).
  16. V. Efros and J. Bang, Eur. Phys. J. A 4, 33 (1999).
  17. E. Garrido, D. V. Fedorov, and A. S. Jensen, Phys. Lett. B 684, 132 (2010).
  18. C. W. Arnold, T. B. Clegg, C. Iliadis, H. J. Karwowski, G. C. Rich, J. R. Tompkins, and C. R. Howell, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044605 (2012).
  19. H. Utsunomiya, S. Katayama, I. Gheorghe, S. Imai, H. Yamaguchi, D. Kahl, Y. Sakaguchi, T. Shima, K. Takahisa, and S. Miyamoto, Phys. Rev. C 92, 064323 (2015).
  20. M. Odsuren, Y. Kikuchi, T. Myo, M. Aikawa, and K. Katō, Phys. Rev. C 92, 014322 (2015).
  21. M. Odsuren, T. Myo, and K. Katō, Phys. Rev. C 107, 044003 (2023).
  22. Y. Kikuchi, M. Odsuren, T. Myo, and K. Katō, Phys. Rev. C 93, 054605 (2016).
  23. K. Ho, Phys. Rep. 99, 1 (1983).
  24. J. Aguilar and J. M. Combes, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 269 (1971); E. Balslev and J. M. Combes, ibid. 22, 280 (1971).
  25. S. Aoyama, T. Myo, K. Katō, and K. Ikeda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 116, 1 (2006).
  26. T. Myo, Y. Kikuchi, H. Masui, and K. Katō, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 79, 1 (2014).
  27. T. Myo and K. Katō, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014301 (2023).
  28. T. Myo and K. Katō, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 12A101 (2020).
  29. S. Saito, Prog. Theor. Phys. 40, 893 (1968); 41, 705 (1969); Suppl. 62, i (1977).
  30. E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).
  31. W. Nörtershäuser, D. Tiedemann, M. Žáková, Z. Andjelkovic, K. Blaum, M. L. Bissell, R. Cazan, G. W. F. Drake, C. Geppert, M. Kowalska, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 062503 (2009).
  32. D. Tilley, J. Kelley, J. Godwin, D. Millener, J. Purcell, C. Sheu, and H. Weller, Nucl. Phys. A 745, 155 (2004).
  33. I. Tanihata, T. Kobayashi, O. Yamakawa, S. Shimoura, K. Ekuni, K. Sugimoto, N. Takahashi, T. Shimoda, and H. Sato, Phys. Lett. B 206, 592 (1988).
  34. W. von Oertzen, Z. Phys. A 357, 355 (1997).
  35. W. von Oertzen, Martin Freer, and Yoshiko Kanada-En'yo, Phys. Rep. 432, 43 (2006).
  36. J. P. Elliott, Proc. Roy. Soc, A 245, 562 (1958).
  37. M. Harvey, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 1, 67 (1968).
  38. H. Furutani, et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 68, 193 (1980).
  39. R. G. Thomas, Phys. Rev. 88, 1109 (1952).
  40. J. B. Ehrman, Phys. Rev. 81, 412 (1951).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation