Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Competing magnetic phases in Cr3+δTe4 are spatially segregated

    V. K. Bhartiya1,*, Anirban Goswami2, Nicholas Ng3,4, Wei Tian5, Matthew G. Tucker5, Niraj Aryal1, Lijun Wu1, Weiguo Yin1, Yimei Zhu1 et al.

    Milinda Abeykoon6, Emmanuel Yakubu2, Samaresh Guchhait2, and J. M. Tranquada1,†

    • *Contact author: vbhartiya1@bnl.gov
    • †Contact author: jtran@bnl.gov

    Phys. Rev. B 113, 184406 – Published 4 May, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zjjt-nrsc

    Abstract

    Cr1+xTe2 is a self-intercalated van der Waals system that is of current interest for its room-temperature room-temperature ferromagnetic (FM) phases and tunable topological properties. In bulk samples, the strain from the interstitial Cr ions leads to distinct structural phases for different ranges of x. Early neutron powder diffraction (NPD) measurements on the monoclinic phase Cr3Te4 (x=0.5) presented evidence for competing FM and antiferromagnetic (AFM) phases. Here we apply neutron diffraction to a single crystal of Cr3+δTe4 with δ=−0.10 and discover that it consists of two distinct monoclinic phases, one with FM order below TC≈321 K and another that develops AFM order below TN≈86 K. In contrast, we find that a crystal with δ=−0.26 exhibits only FM order below TC≈285 K. The single-crystal analysis is complemented by results obtained with NPD, x-ray powder diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements on the δ=−0.10 composition. From observations of spontaneous magnetostriction of opposite sign at TC and TN, along with the TEM evidence for both monoclinic phases in a single thin (≈100 nm) grain, we conclude that the two phases must have a fine-grained (≲100 nm) intergrowth character, as might occur from high-temperature spinodal decomposition during the growth process. Calculations of the relaxed lattice structures for the FM and AFM phases with density functional theory provide a rationalization of the observed spontaneous magnetostrictions. Correlations between the magnitude and orientation of the magnetic moments with lattice parameter variation demonstrate that the magnetic orders are sensitive to strain, thus explaining why magnetic ordering temperatures and anisotropies can be different between bulk and thin-film samples, when the latter are subject to epitaxial strain. Our results point to the need to investigate the supposed coexistence FM and AFM phases reported elsewhere in the Cr1+xTe2 system, such as in the Cr5Te8 phase (x=0.25).

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation