Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Van Hove singularities and competing instabilities in an altermagnetic metal

Peng Rao1, Johannes Knolle1,2,3, and Laura Classen1,4

Phys. Rev. B 112, 235140 – Published 15 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zfk4-rxh1

Abstract

Van Hove (VH) singularities in the single-particle band spectrum are important for interaction-driven quantum phases. Whereas VH points are usually spin-degenerate, in newly proposed altermagnets VH singularities can become spin-dependent, due to momentum-dependent spin polarization of the Fermi surfaces arising from combined rotation and time-reversal symmetry. We consider two altermagnetic models (dx2−y2- and dxy-wave) on a square lattice with spin-polarized VH points, and study their stable fixed-point solutions indicating interaction-induced instabilities using parquet renormalization group. For both models, we find new stable fixed-point solutions of the renormalization group equations which are not connected to the solution in the spin-degenerate limit. This implies that on the square lattice, the system with VH singularities is unstable with respect to altermagnetic perturbations. The leading instability for the dx2−y2 model is real transverse spin density wave. For the dxy-wave model, it is found to be real transverse spin density wave at large altermagnetic splitting. At small altermagnetic splitting both imaginary charge density wave and real longitudinal spin density waves are dominant.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. N. Furukawa, T. M. Rice, and M. Salmhofer, Truncation of a two-dimensional Fermi surface due to quasiparticle gap formation at the saddle points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3195 (1998).
  2. K. L. Hur and T. Maurice Rice, Superconductivity close to the Mott state: From condensed-matter systems to superfluidity in optical lattices, Ann. Phys. 324, 1452 (2009).
  3. R. Nandkishore, L. S. Levitov, and A. V. Chubukov, Chiral superconductivity from repulsive interactions in doped graphene, Nat. Phys. 8, 158 (2012).
  4. Y.-T. Hsu, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Spin-valley locked instabilities in Moiré transition metal dichalcogenides with conventional and higher-order van Hove singularities, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195134 (2021).
  5. H. Isobe, Noah F. Q. Yuan, and L. Fu, Unconventional superconductivity and density waves in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041041 (2018).
  6. R. Markiewicz, A survey of the van Hove scenario for high-tc superconductivity with special emphasis on pseudogaps and striped phases, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 58, 1179 (1997).
  7. S. Maiti and A. V. Chubukov, Superconductivity from repulsive interaction, AIP Conf. Proc. 1550, 3 (2013),.
  8. L. Classen and J. J. Betouras, High-order van Hove singularities and their connection to flat bands, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 16, 229 (2025).
  9. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
  10. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019).
  11. L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020).
  12. H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021).
  13. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).
  14. K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019).
  15. L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).
  16. I. I. Pomeranchuk, On the stability of a Fermi liquid, Sov. Phys. JETP 8, 361 (1959).
  17. C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B 75, 115103 (2007).
  18. A. V. Chubukov, A. Klein, and D. L. Maslov, Fermi-Liquid theory and Pomeranchuk instabilities: Fundamentals and new developments, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 127, 826 (2018).
  19. M. H. Fischer and E.-A. Kim, Mean-field analysis of intra-unit-cell order in the emery model of the CuO2 plane, Phys. Rev. B 84, 144502 (2011).
  20. Y. Li, V. Leeb, K. Wohlfeld, R. Valentí, and J. Knolle, Exploring d-wave magnetism in cuprates from oxygen moments, Phys. Rev. B 112, 125139 (2025).
  21. V. Leeb, A. Mook, L. Šmejkal, and J. Knolle, Spontaneous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236701 (2024).
  22. Y. Yu, H. G. Suh, M. Roig, and D. F. Agterberg, Altermagnetism from coincident van Hove singularities: Application to κ-Cl, Nat. Commun. 16, 2950 (2025).
  23. S. Giuli, C. Mejuto-Zaera, and M. Capone, Altermagnetism from interaction-driven itinerant magnetism, Phys. Rev. B 111, L020401 (2025).
  24. M. Dürrnagel, H. Hohmann, A. Maity, J. Seufert, M. Klett, L. Klebl, and R. Thomale, Altermagnetic phase transition in a Lieb metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036502 (2025).
  25. P. Das, V. Leeb, J. Knolle, and M. Knap, Realizing altermagnetism in Fermi-Hubbard models with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 263402 (2024).
  26. M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144412 (2024).
  27. P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-Group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022).
  28. T. A. Maier and S. Okamoto, Weak-coupling theory of neutron scattering as a probe of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 108, L100402 (2023).
  29. R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless Zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024404 (2024).
  30. Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromagnets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Mater. Today Phys. 32, 100991 (2023).
  31. B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei et al., A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 754 (2025).
  32. G. Sim and J. Knolle, Pair density waves and supercurrent diode effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, L020502 (2025).
  33. D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184505 (2023).
  34. S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite-momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 1801 (2024).
  35. D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced superconductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060508 (2024).
  36. S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024503 (2024).
  37. B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model, Phys. Rev. B 108, 224421 (2023).
  38. A. Bose, S. Vadnais, and A. Paramekanti, Altermagnetism and superconductivity in a multiorbital t-j model, Phys. Rev. B 110, 205120 (2024).
  39. N. Parthenios, P. M. Bonetti, R. González-Hernández, W. H. Campos, L. Šmejkal, and L. Classen, Spin and pair density waves in two-dimensional altermagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. B 112, 214410 (2025).
  40. R. Ojajärvi, A. V. Chubukov, Y.-C. Lee, M. Garst, and J. Schmalian, Pairing at a single van Hove point, npj Quantum Mater. 9, 105 (2024).
  41. C. Nayak, Density-wave states of nonzero angular momentum, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4880 (2000).
  42. R. Nandkishore, R. Thomale, and A. V. Chubukov, Superconductivity from weak repulsion in hexagonal lattice systems, Phys. Rev. B 89, 144501 (2014).
  43. I. E. Dzyaloshinskii and A. I. Larkin, Possible states of quasi-unidimensional systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 422 (1972).
  44. N. Kaushal and M. Franz, Altermagnetism in modified Lieb lattice Hubbard model, arXiv:2412.16421.
  45. P. Rao, Mathematica notebook for arXiv:2505.02786, Zenodo (2025), doi:10.5281/zenodo.17868124.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation