Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Bound states at semiconductor–Mott insulator interfaces

Jan Verlage and Peter Kratzer

Phys. Rev. B 113, 045110 – Published 6 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ywd2-bh2w

Abstract

Utilizing the hierarchy of correlations in the context of a Fermi-Hubbard model, we deduce the presence of quasiparticle bound states at the interface between a Mott insulator and a semiconductor, as well as within a semiconductor–Mott–semiconductor heterostructure forming a quantum well. In the case of the solitary interface, the existence of bound states necessitates the presence of an additional perturbation with a minimal strength depending on the spin background of the Mott insulator. Conversely, within the quantum well, this additional perturbation is still required to have bound states while standing-wave solutions even exist in its absence.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. A. Ohtomo, D. Muller, J. Grazul, and H. Y. Hwang, Artificial charge-modulation in atomic-scale perovskite titanate superlattices, Nature (London) 419, 378 (2002).
  2. H. Yamada, Y. Ogawa, Y. Ishii, H. Sato, M. Kawasaki, H. Akoh, and Y. Tokura, Engineered interface of magnetic oxides, Science 305, 646 (2004).
  3. H. Y. Hwang, Y. Iwasa, M. Kawasaki, B. Keimer, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces, Nat. Mater. 11, 103 (2012).
  4. N. Reyren, S. Gariglio, A. Caviglia, D. Jaccard, T. Schneider, and J.-M. Triscone, Anisotropy of the superconducting transport properties of the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 112506 (2009).
  5. J. Mannhart, D. H. Blank, H. Hwang, A. Millis, and J.-M. Triscone, Two-dimensional electron gases at oxide interfaces, MRS Bull. 33, 1027 (2008).
  6. L. Bjaalie, B. Himmetoglu, L. Weston, A. Janotti, and C. Van de Walle, Oxide interfaces for novel electronic applications, New J. Phys. 16, 025005 (2014).
  7. H. Zhou and J. Goodenough, Localized or itinerant TiO3 electrons in RTiO3 perovskites, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 7395 (2005).
  8. A. Ohtomo and H. Hwang, A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface, Nature (London) 427, 423 (2004).
  9. S. Thiel, G. Hammerl, A. Schmehl, C. W. Schneider, and J. Mannhart, Tunable quasi-two-dimensional electron gases in oxide heterostructures, Science 313, 1942 (2006).
  10. I. V. Maznichenko, S. Ostanin, A. Ernst, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Formation and tuning of 2D electron gas in perovskite heterostructures, Phys. Status Solidi B 257, 1900540 (2020).
  11. I. V. Maznichenko, S. Ostanin, A. Ernst, and I. Mertig, Tunable 2D electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3(001) interface, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 074006 (2019).
  12. S. Stemmer and S. James Allen, Two-dimensional electron gases at complex oxide interfaces, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 151 (2014).
  13. N. Bristowe, P. Ghosez, P. B. Littlewood, and E. Artacho, The origin of two-dimensional electron gases at oxide interfaces: Insights from theory, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 143201 (2014).
  14. Y. Hotta, T. Susaki, and H. Y. Hwang, Polar discontinuity doping of the LaVO3/SrTiO3 interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236805 (2007).
  15. I. V. Maznichenko, S. Ostanin, D. Maryenko, V. K. Dugaev, E. Y. Sherman, P. Buczek, I. Mertig, M. Kawasaki, and A. Ernst, Emerging two-dimensional conductivity at the interface between mott and band insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 216201 (2024).
  16. D. Maryenko, I. Maznichenko, S. Ostanin, M. Kawamura, K. Takahashi, M. Nakamura, V. Dugaev, E. Y. Sherman, A. Ernst, and M. Kawasaki, Superconductivity at epitaxial LaTiO3–KTaO3 interfaces, APL Mater. 11, 061102 (2023).
  17. K. Zou, S. Ismail-Beigi, K. Kisslinger, X. Shen, D. Su, F. Walker, and C. Ahn, LaTiO3/KTaO3 interfaces: A new two-dimensional electron gas system, APL Mater. 3, 036104 (2015).
  18. S. Pairault, D. Senechal, and A. Tremblay, Strong-coupling perturbation theory of the Hubbard model, Eur. Phys. J. B 16, 85 (2000).
  19. M. Iskin and J. K. Freericks, Strong-coupling perturbation theory for the extended Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 79, 053634 (2009).
  20. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
  21. J. Betancourt, T. R. Paudel, E. Y. Tsymbal, and J. P. Velev, Spin-polarized two-dimensional electron gas at GdTiO3/SrTiO3 interfaces: Insight from first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045113 (2017).
  22. L. Kornblum, Conductive oxide interfaces for field effect devices, Adv. Mater. Inter. 6, 1900480 (2019).
  23. P. Sharma, S. Ryu, J. Burton, T. Paudel, C. Bark, Z. Huang, Ariando, E. Tsymbal, G. Catalan, C. Eom, et al., Mechanical tuning of LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface conductivity, Nano Lett. 15, 3547 (2015).
  24. J. Podkaminer, T. Hernandez, M. Huang, S. Ryu, C. Bark, S. Baek, J. Frederick, T. Kim, K. Cho, J. Levy, et al., Creation of a two-dimensional electron gas and conductivity switching of nanowires at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface grown by 90 degree off-axis sputtering, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 071604 (2013).
  25. F. Ji, P. Sharma, T. Xin, D. Zhang, Y. Liu, R. Niu, J. M. Cairney, and J. Seidel, Lateral gating of 2D electron gas in cross-sectional LaAlO3/SrTiO3, Adv. Electron. Mater. 6, 2000068 (2020).
  26. M. Kitamura, M. Kobayashi, E. Sakai, R. Takahashi, M. Lippmaa, K. Horiba, H. Fujioka, and H. Kumigashira, Determination of band diagram for a pn junction between Mott insulator LaMnO3 and band insulator Nb:SrTiO3, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 061605 (2015).
  27. M. Nakamura, A. Sawa, J. Fujioka, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Interface band profiles of mott-insulator/Nb:SrTiO3 heterojunctions as investigated by optical spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 82, 201101(R) (2010).
  28. R. Pentcheva and W. E. Pickett, Charge localization or itineracy at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces: Hole polarons, oxygen vacancies, and mobile electrons, Phys. Rev. B 74, 035112 (2006).
  29. I. V. Maznichenko, A. Ernst, D. Maryenko, V. K. Dugaev, E. Y. Sherman, P. Buczek, S. S. P. Parkin, and S. Ostanin, Fragile altermagnetism and orbital disorder in mott insulator LaTiO3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 064403 (2024).
  30. J. A. Santana, J. T. Krogel, S. Okamoto, and F. A. Reboredo, Electron confinement and magnetism of (LaTiO3)1/(SrTiO3)5 heterostructure: A diffusion quantum Monte Carlo study, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 643 (2020).
  31. H. Ishida and A. Liebsch, Origin of metallicity of LaTiO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115350 (2008).
  32. S. Okamoto and A. J. Millis, Electronic reconstruction at an interface between a mott insulator and a band insulator, Nature (London) 428, 630 (2004).
  33. P. Navez and R. Schützhold, Emergence of coherence in the mott-insulator–superfluid quench of the Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 82, 063603 (2010).
  34. F. Queisser and R. Schützhold, Environment-induced prerelaxation in the Mott-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155110 (2019).
  35. J. Verlage, F. Queisser, N. Szpak, J. König, P. Kratzer, and R. Schützhold, Quasi-particle propagation across semiconductor–mott insulator interfaces, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 63, 285 (2024).
  36. J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 276, 238 (1963).
  37. L. D. Landau, The theory of a Fermi liquid, Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 920 (1957).
  38. V. V. Solovyev and I. V. Kukushkin, Renormalized landau quasiparticle dispersion revealed by photoluminescence spectra from a two-dimensional Fermi liquid at the MgZnO/ZnO heterointerface, Phys. Rev. B 96, 115131 (2017).
  39. F. Queisser, K. V. Krutitsky, P. Navez, and R. Schützhold, Equilibration and prethermalization in the Bose-Hubbard and Fermi-Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. A 89, 033616 (2014).
  40. J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands-IV. The atomic representation, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 285, 542 (1965).
  41. S. G. Ovchinnikov and V. V. Val'kov, Hubbard Operators in the Theory of Strongly Correlated Electrons (World Scientific Press, Singapore, 2004).
  42. F. Mancini and A. Avella, The Hubbard model within the equations of motion approach, Adv. Phys. 53, 537 (2004).
  43. P. Navez, F. Queisser, and R. Schützhold, Quasi-particle approach for lattice Hamiltonians with large coordination numbers, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 225004 (2014).
  44. A. Avella, F. Mancini, D. Villani, L. Siurakshina, and V. Y. Yushankhai, The Hubbard model in the two-pole approximation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 12, 81 (1998).
  45. T. Herrmann and W. Nolting, Magnetism in the single-band Hubbard model, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 170, 253 (1997).
  46. L. M. Roth, Electron correlation in narrow energy bands. I. The two-pole approximation in a narrow S band, Phys. Rev. 184, 451 (1969).
  47. J. Beenen and D. M. Edwards, Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 52, 13636 (1995).
  48. F. Queisser and R. Schützhold, Boltzmann relaxation dynamics in the strongly interacting Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053617 (2019).
  49. F. Queisser, S. Schreiber, P. Kratzer, and R. Schützhold, Boltzmann relaxation dynamics of strongly interacting spinless fermions on a lattice, Phys. Rev. B 100, 245110 (2019).
  50. F. Queisser and R. Schützhold, Hierarchy of double-time correlations, J. Stat. Mech. (2023) 053101.
  51. S. Okamoto, Nonequilibrium transport and optical properties of model metal–Mott-insulator–metal heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 76, 035105 (2007).
  52. S. Okamoto and A. J. Millis, Spatial inhomogeneity and strong correlation physics: A dynamical mean-field study of a model mott-insulator–band-insulator heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B 70, 241104(R) (2004).
  53. R. W. Helmes, T. A. Costi, and A. Rosch, Kondo proximity effect: How does a metal penetrate into a mott insulator? Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 066802 (2008).
  54. H. Kajueter and G. Kotliar, New iterative perturbation scheme for lattice models with arbitrary filling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 131 (1996).
  55. K. V. Krutitsky, P. Navez, F. Queisser, and R. Schützhold, Propagation of quantum correlations after a quench in the mott-insulator regime of the Bose-Hubbard model, EPJ Quantum Technol. 1, 12 (2014).
  56. A. Zujev and P. Sengupta, Induced magnetism versus Kondo screening in alternating mott-metal layers, Phys. Rev. B 88, 094415 (2013).
  57. M. Jiang, G. G. Batrouni, and R. T. Scalettar, Density of states and magnetic correlations at a metal-mott insulator interface, Phys. Rev. B 86, 195117 (2012).
  58. D. Sheets, K. Lyszak, M. Jain, G. W. Fernando, I. Sochnikov, J. Franklin, J. N. Hancock, and R. M. Geilhufe, Mott insulating low thermal expansion perovskite TiF3, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235140 (2023).
  59. M. Pinterić, P. Lazić, A. Pustogow, T. Ivek, M. Kuveždić, O. Milat, B. Gumhalter, M. Basletić, M. Čulo, B. Korin-Hamzić, A. Löhle, R. Hübner, M. Sanz Alonso, T. Hiramatsu, Y. Yoshida, G. Saito, M. Dressel, and S. Tomić, Anion effects on electronic structure and electrodynamic properties of the Mott insulator κ−(BEDT−TTF)2Ag2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. B 94, 161105(R) (2016).
  60. S. Tomeno, M. Maesato, Y. Yoshida, A. Kiswandhi, and H. Kitagawa, Triangular-lattice organic mott insulator with a disorder-free polyanion, Inorg. Chem. 59, 8647 (2020).
  61. Y. Shimizu, H. Akimoto, H. Tsujii, A. Tajima, and R. Kato, Mott transition in a valence-bond solid insulator with a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256403 (2007).
  62. F. Queisser, C. Kohlfürst, and R. Schützhold, Back-reaction and correlation effects on prethermalization in Mott-Hubbard systems, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195140 (2024).
  63. Z. S. Popovic and S. Satpathy, Wedge-shaped potential and airy-function electron localization in oxide superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 176805 (2005).
  64. S. Okamoto, A. J. Millis, and N. A. Spaldin, Lattice relaxation in oxide heterostructures: LaTiO3/SrTiO3 superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 056802 (2006).
  65. I. Leonov, V. I. Anisimov, and D. Vollhardt, Metal-insulator transition and lattice instability of paramagnetic V2O3, Phys. Rev. B 91, 195115 (2015).
  66. L. Zhang, P. Staar, A. Kozhevnikov, Y.-P. Wang, J. Trinastic, T. Schulthess, and H.-P. Cheng, DFT+ DMFT calculations of the complex band and tunneling behavior for the transition metal monoxides MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO, Phys. Rev. B 100, 035104 (2019).
  67. M. Stübinger, J. Gabel, P. Scheiderer, M. Zapf, M. Schmitt, P. Schütz, B. Leikert, J. Küspert, M. Kamp, P. K. Thakur, et al., Hard x-ray photoemission spectroscopy of LaVO3/SrTiO3: Band alignment and electronic reconstruction, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235128 (2021).
  68. L. Bjaalie, A. Azcatl, S. McDonnell, C. R. Freeze, S. Stemmer, R. M. Wallace, and C. G. Van de Walle, Band alignments between SmTiO3, GdTiO3, and SrTiO3, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 34, 061102 (2016).
  69. J. Iaconis, H. Ishizuka, D. N. Sheng, and L. Balents, Kinetic magnetism at the interface between mott and band insulators, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155144 (2016).
  70. F. J. Wong, S.-H. Baek, R. V. Chopdekar, V. V. Mehta, H.-W. Jang, C.-B. Eom, and Y. Suzuki, Metallicity in LaTiO3 thin films induced by lattice deformation, Phys. Rev. B 81, 161101(R) (2010).
  71. F. Schoofs, M. A. Carpenter, M. E. Vickers, M. Egilmez, T. Fix, J. E. Kleibeuker, J. L. MacManus-Driscoll, and M. G. Blamire, Carrier density modulation by structural distortions at modified LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 175005 (2013).
  72. T. Fister, H. Zhou, Z. Luo, S. S. A. Seo, S. Hruszkewycz, D. Proffit, J. Eastman, P. Fuoss, P. Baldo, H. N. Lee, et al., Octahedral rotations in strained LaAlO3/SrTiO3(001) heterostructures, APL Mater. 2, 021102 (2014).
  73. J.-L. Maurice, C. Carrétéro, M.-J. Casanove, K. Bouzehouane, S. Guyard, É. Larquet, and J.-P. Contour, Electronic conductivity and structural distortion at the interface between insulators SrTiO3 and LaAlO3, Phys. Status Solidi A 203, 2209 (2006).
  74. D. Newns, Self-consistent model of hydrogen chemisorption, Phys. Rev. 178, 1123 (1969).
  75. P. W. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev. 124, 41 (1961).
  76. I. Avigo, F. Queisser, P. Zhou, M. Ligges, K. Rossnagel, R. Schützhold, and U. Bovensiepen, Doublon bottleneck in the ultrafast relaxation dynamics of hot electrons in 1T−TaS2, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022046(R) (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation