Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Topological edge states in two-dimensional Z4 Potts paramagnet protected by the Z4×3 symmetry

Hrant Topchyan1, Tigran Hakobyan1,2, Mkhitar Mirumyan1, Tigran A. Sedrakyan1,3, and Ara Sedrakyan1

Phys. Rev. B 114, 065111 – Published 8 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xszt-gsss

Abstract

We construct a two-dimensional bosonic symmetry-protected topological (SPT) paramagnet protected by an on-site G=Z4×3 symmetry, starting from a three-component Z4 Potts paramagnet on a triangular lattice. Within the group-cohomology framework, H3[G,U(1)]≅Z4×7, we focus on a colorless cocycle representative obtained by antisymmetrizing the basic Z4 three-cocycle, and generate the corresponding SPT Hamiltonian via a cocycle-induced local unitary transformation H3[G,U(1)]≅Z4×7 followed by symmetry averaging. For open geometry, we derive the boundary theory explicitly: one color sector decouples, while the nontrivial edge reduces to an interacting Z4 chain with next-nearest-neighbor constraints that admits a compact dressed-Potts form. Using DMRG we show that the boundary model is gapless, with the lowest gap scaling as 1/L and an entanglement-entropy scaling consistent with a conformal field theory of central charge c=2.191(4)≃11/5. The rational value c=11/5 matches the coset SU(3)3/SU(2)3, making it a candidate for the continuum description of the Z4×3 edge; we outline spectral and symmetry-resolved diagnostics needed to test this identification at the level of conformal towers beyond the central charge.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou, and X.-G. Wen, Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter: From Quantum Entanglement to Topological Phases of Many-Body Systems, 1st ed., Quantum Science and Technology (Springer, New York, 2019).
  2. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phases of Matter (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023).
  3. L. D. Landau, On the theory of phase transitions, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 7, 19 (1937).
  4. L. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2013), Vol. 5.
  5. Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topological order, Phys. Rev. B 80, 155131 (2009).
  6. T. Senthil, Symmetry-protected topological phases of quantum matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 299 (2015).
  7. X.-G. Wen, Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041004 (2017).
  8. F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Oshikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075125 (2012).
  9. F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010).
  10. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155138 (2010).
  11. L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, Topological phases of fermions in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 83, 075103 (2011).
  12. N. Schuch, D. Pérez-García, and I. Cirac, Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Phys. Rev. B 84, 165139 (2011).
  13. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  14. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  15. F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear field theory of large-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets: Semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy-axis Néel state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1153 (1983).
  16. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry-protected topological orders in interacting bosonic systems, Science 338, 1604 (2012).
  17. G. 't Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59, 135 (1980).
  18. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155114 (2013).
  19. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 83, 035107 (2011).
  20. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Complete classification of one-dimensional gapped quantum phases in interacting spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235128 (2011).
  21. K. Kawagoe and M. Levin, Anomalies in bosonic symmetry-protected topological edge theories: Connection to f symbols and a method of calculation, Phys. Rev. B 104, 115156 (2021).
  22. J. Maeda and T. Oishi, N-ality symmetry and SPT phases in (1+1)d, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 063.
  23. M. Levin and Z.-C. Gu, Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 86, 115109 (2012).
  24. R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 132.
  25. N. Seiberg, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space, SciPost Phys. 16, 154 (2024).
  26. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d, SciPost Phys. 18, 032 (2025).
  27. A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, and S. Schäfer-Nameki, SymTFT for (3+1)d gapless SPTs and obstructions to confinement, SciPost Phys. 18, 114 (2025).
  28. Q. Jia and Z. Jia, Subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases from subsystem SymTFT of 2-foliated exotic tensor gauge theory, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 170.
  29. N. Seiberg, S.-H. Shao, and W. Zhang, LSM and CPT, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 116.
  30. N. Seiberg and S. Seifnashri, Symmetry transmutation and anomaly matching, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 014.
  31. K. Wang and T. A. Sedrakyan, Universal finite-size scaling around tricriticality between topologically ordered, symmetry-protected topological, and trivial phases, Phys. Rev. B 101, 035410 (2020).
  32. K. Wang and T. A. Sedrakyan, Universal finite-size amplitude and anomalous entanglement entropy of z=2 quantum Lifshitz criticalities in topological chains, SciPost Phys. 12, 134 (2022).
  33. L. Li, C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Yao, and M. Oshikawa, Boundary conditions and anomalies of conformal field theories in dimensions D≥3, Phys. Rev. B 110, 045118 (2024).
  34. Y. Liu, H. Shimizu, A. Ueda, and M. Oshikawa, Finite-size corrections to the energy spectra of gapless one-dimensional systems in the presence of boundaries, SciPost Phys. 17, 099 (2024).
  35. K. Ding, H.-R. Zhang, B.-T. Liu, and S. Yang, Boundary anomaly detection in two-dimensional subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 111, 205125 (2025).
  36. K. Loo and Q.-R. Wang, Systematic construction of interfaces and anomalous boundaries for fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 111, 205102 (2025).
  37. Y. Xu and C.-M. Jian, Average-exact mixed anomalies and compatible phases, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125128 (2025).
  38. Y. Guo and S. Yang, Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking meets average symmetry-protected topological order, Phys. Rev. B 111, L201108 (2025).
  39. X. Chen, Y.-M. Lu, and A. Vishwanath, Symmetry-protected topological phases from decorated domain walls, Nature Commun. 5, 3507 (2014).
  40. B. Yoshida, Topological phases with generalized global symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155131 (2016).
  41. T. A. Sedrakyan, V. M. Galitski, and A. Kamenev, Topological spin ordering via Chern-Simons superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094511 (2017).
  42. R. Wang, B. Wang, and T. Sedrakyan, Chern-Simons superconductors and their instabilities, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054404 (2022).
  43. R. Wang, B. Wang, and T. A. Sedrakyan, Chern-Simons fermionization approach to two-dimensional quantum magnets: Implications for antiferromagnetic magnons and unconventional quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 98, 064402 (2018).
  44. H. Topchyan, V. Iugov, M. Mirumyan, S. Khachatryan, T. Hakobyan, and T. Sedrakyan, Z3 and (×Z3)3 symmetry protected topological paramagnets, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 199.
  45. H. Topchyan, SPT extension of Z2 quantum ising model's ferromagnetic phase, Phys. Lett. A 517, 129669 (2024).
  46. H. Topchyan, V. Iugov, M. Mirumyan, T. Hakobyan, T. A. Sedrakyan, and A. G. Sedrakyan, Two-dimensional topological paramagnets protected by Z3 symmetry: Properties of the boundary Hamiltonian, SciPost Phys. 18, 068 (2025).
  47. L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, Decorated defect construction of gapless-SPT states, SciPost Phys. 17, 013 (2024).
  48. A. Mesaros and Y. Ran, Classification of symmetry enriched topological phases with exactly solvable models, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155115 (2013).
  49. B. Yoshida, Gapped boundaries, group cohomology and fault-tolerant logical gates, Ann. Phys. (NY) 377, 387 (2017).
  50. M. de Wild Propitius, Topological interactions in broken gauge theories, arXiv:hep-th/9511195.
  51. H. Topchyan, The ZN×3 symmetry protected boundary modes in two-dimensional Potts paramagnets, arXiv:2604.00910.
  52. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 504005 (2009).
  53. H. Topchyan, T. Hakobyan, M. Mkhitar, T. A. Sedrakyan, and A. Sedrakyan, Low energy state data in the Z43 symmetry protected topological paramagnet [Data set], Zenodo, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18086997.
  54. H. W. J. Blöte, J. L. Cardy, and M. P. Nightingale, Conformal invariance, the central charge, and universal finite-size amplitudes at criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 742 (1986).
  55. J. L. Cardy, Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories, Nucl. Phys. B 270, 186 (1986).
  56. J. L. Cardy, Effect of boundary conditions on the operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories, Nucl. Phys. B 275, 200 (1986).
  57. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation