- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Anisotropic piezomagnetism in noncollinear antiferromagnets

Vu Thi Ngoc Huyen1,*,†, Yuki Yanagi2,*, and Michi-To Suzuki3,4

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: vu.thi.ngoc.huyen.b6@tohoku.ac.jp
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 112, 104421 – Published 12 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/wcwq-bfhb

Abstract

In 3d-electron magnetic systems, the magnetic structures that transform each other by spin rotation have very close degenerate energies due to small spin-orbit coupling and can be easily controlled by chemical substitution and external magnetic fields. We investigate anisotropic piezomagnetic effects, exhibiting the different magnetic responses depending on the type of strain and the magnetic structures, for noncollinear magnetic states in Mn3AN (A= Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga) and Mn3X (X= Sn and Ge) based on detailed symmetry analysis using spin group and magnetic group and first-principles calculations of piezomagnetic responses. In Mn3AN, magnetization develops along two distinct directions under the same applied stress, corresponding to two AFM states connected by spin rotation. Analysis of the piezomagnetic tensor based on magnetic and spin point groups for the states with and without spin-orbit coupling, respectively, shows that the difference in the magnitude of magnetization along different directions is attributed to the spin-orbit coupling. Mn3X are known to stabilize different AFM structures in the directions of the applied in-plane magnetic fields. Under uniaxial stress along the orthorhombic x- and y-axes, magnetization is induced without breaking the magnetic symmetry, but it develops in the opposite direction due to exchange interaction. Our study demonstrates that the direction and sign of strain-induced magnetization in Mn3AN and Mn3X can be effectively controlled by strain in combination with magnetic fields. These findings highlight the potential for strain-tunable magnetic devices in noncollinear AFMs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (71)

  1. Y. Zhang, W. Sun, K. Cao, X.-X. Yang, Y. Yang, S. Lu, A. Du, C. Hu, C. Feng, Y. Wang, J. Cai, B. Cui, H.-G. Piao, W. Zhao, and Y. Zhao, Electric-field control of nonvolatile resistance state of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction via magnetoelectric coupling, Sci. Adv. 10, eadl4633 (2024).
  2. F. Matsukura, Y. Tokura, and H. Ohno, Control of magnetism by electric fields, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 209 (2015).
  3. R. Ramesh and S. Manipatruni, Electric field control of magnetism, Proc. R. Soc. London A 477, 20200942 (2021).
  4. V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018).
  5. T. G. Phillips, R. L. Townsend, and R. L. White, Piezomagnetism of α−Fe2 O3 and the magnetoelastic tensor of Fe3+ in Al2 O3, Phys. Rev. 162, 382 (1967).
  6. I. E. Dzialoshinskii, The problem of piezomagnetism, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 807 (1957) [Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 1053 (1958)].
  7. T. Moriya, Piezomagnetism in CoF2, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 73 (1959).
  8. D. Boldrin, A. P. Mihai, B. Zou, J. Zemen, R. Thompson, E. Ware, B. V. Neamtu, L. Ghivelder, B. Esser, D. W. McComb, P. Petrov, and L. F. Cohen, Giant piezomagnetism in Mn3NiN, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 18863 (2018).
  9. M. Ikhlas, S. Dasgupta, F. Theuss, T. Higo, S. Kittaka, B. J. Ramshaw, O. Tchernyshyov, C. W. Hicks, and S. Nakatsuji, Piezomagnetic switching of the anomalous Hall effect in an antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nat. Phys. 18, 1086 (2022).
  10. F. Theuss, S. Ghosh, T. Chen, O. Tchernyshyov, S. Nakatsuji, and B. J. Ramshaw, Strong magnetoelastic coupling in Mn3X (X=Ge, Sn), Phys. Rev. B 105, 174430 (2022).
  11. Q. Meng, J. Dong, P. Nie, L. Xu, J. Wang, S. Jiang, H. Zuo, J. Zhang, X. Li, Z. Zhu, L. Balents, and K. Behnia, Magnetostriction, piezomagnetism and domain nucleation in a kagome antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 15, 6921 (2024).
  12. M.-T. Suzuki, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, and R. Arita, Cluster multipole theory for anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094406 (2017).
  13. M.-T. Suzuki, T. Nomoto, R. Arita, Y. Yanagi, S. Hayami, and H. Kusunose, Multipole expansion for magnetic structures: A generation scheme for a symmetry-adapted orthonormal basis set in the crystallographic point group, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174407 (2019).
  14. V. T. N. Huyen, M.-T. Suzuki, K. Yamauchi, and T. Oguchi, Topology analysis for anomalous Hall effect in the noncollinear antiferromagnetic states of Mn3A N (A=Ni,Cu,Zn,Ga,Ge,Pd,In,Sn,Ir,Pt), Phys. Rev. B 100, 094426 (2019).
  15. S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature (London) 527, 212 (2015).
  16. D. Torres-Amaris, A. Bautista-Hernandez, R. González-Hernández, A. H. Romero, and A. C. Garcia-Castro, Anomalous Hall conductivity control in Mn3NiN antiperovskite by epitaxial strain along the kagome plane, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195113 (2022).
  17. I. Samathrakis and H. Zhang, Tailoring the anomalous Hall effect in the noncollinear antiperovskite Mn3 GaN, Phys. Rev. B 101, 214423 (2020).
  18. M. Kobayashi and M. Mochizuki, Theory of magnetism-driven negative thermal expansion in inverse perovskite antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 024407 (2019).
  19. Y. Song, Y. Qiao, Q. Huang, C. Wang, X. Liu, Q. Li, J. Chen, and X. Xing, Opposite thermal expansion in isostructural noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds of Mn3A (A = Ge and Sn), Chem. Mater. 30, 6236 (2018).
  20. S. Tomiyoshi and Y. Yamaguchi, Magnetic structure and weak ferromagnetism of Mn3 Sn studied by polarized neutron diffraction, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 2478 (1982).
  21. S. W. Cheong and F. T. Huang, Altermagnetism with non-collinear spins, npj Quantum Mater. 9, 13 (2024).
  22. Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO2: a density functional calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294 (2016).
  23. K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019).
  24. M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019).
  25. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019).
  26. L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020).
  27. I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022).
  28. I. V. Solovyev, Magneto-optical effect in the weak ferromagnets LaMO3 (M= Cr, Mn, and Fe), Phys. Rev. B 55, 8060 (1997).
  29. L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).
  30. P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022).
  31. T. Kawamura, K. Yoshimi, K. Hashimoto, A. Kobayashi, and T. Misawa, Compensated ferrimagnets with colossal spin splitting in organic compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 156502 (2024).
  32. H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021).
  33. S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered magnetic octupoles in d-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024).
  34. T. Aoyama and K. Ohgushi, Piezomagnetic properties in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, L041402 (2024).
  35. D. B. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974).
  36. D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Acta Crystallogr. Sec. A 33, 279 (1977).
  37. H. Watanabe, K. Shinohara, T. Nomoto, A. Togo, and R. Arita, Symmetry analysis with spin crystallographic groups: Disentangling effects free of spin-orbit coupling in emergent electromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094438 (2024).
  38. A. S. Borovik-Romanov and H. Grimmer, International Tables for Crystallography (International Union of Crystallography, 2013), Vol. D, Sec. 1.5.7, pp. 133–139.
  39. A. Authier and A. Zarembowitch, International Tables for Crystallography (International Union of Crystallography, 2013), Vol. D, Sec. 1.3.2, pp. 76–80.
  40. O. H. Nielsen and R. M. Martin, Quantum-mechanical theory of stress and force, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3780 (1985).
  41. M. Torrent, F. Jollet, F. Bottin, G. Zérah, and X. Gonze, Implementation of the projector augmented-wave method in the ABINIT code: Application to the study of iron under pressure, Comput. Mater. Sci. 42, 337 (2008).
  42. A. Sharma and P. Suryanarayana, On the calculation of the stress tensor in real-space Kohn-Sham density functional theory, J. Chem. Phys. 149, 194104 (2018).
  43. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  44. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  45. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  46. D. Fruchart and E. F. Bertaut, Magnetic studies of the metallic perovskite-type compounds of manganese, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 44, 781 (1978).
  47. M. Wu, C. Wang, Y. Sun, L. Chu, J. Yan, D. Chen, Q. Huang, and J. W. Lynn, Magnetic structure and lattice contraction in Mn3NiN, J. Appl. Phys. 114, 123902 (2013).
  48. K. Takenaka, M. Ichigo, T. Hamada, A. Ozawa, T. Shibayama, T. Inagaki, and K. Asano, Magnetovolume effects in manganese nitrides with antiperovskite structure, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 15, 015009 (2014).
  49. A. Markou, J. M. Taylor, A. Kalache, P. Werner, S. S. P. Parkin, and C. Felser, Noncollinear antiferromagnetic Mn3 Sn films, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 051001 (2018).
  50. N. Kiyohara, T. Tomita, and S. Nakatsuji, Giant anomalous Hall effect in the chiral antiferromagnet Mn3 Ge, Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 064009 (2016).
  51. K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).
  52. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
  53. Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024).
  54. X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031038 (2024).
  55. Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024).
  56. H. Schiff, A. Corticelli, A. Guerreiro, J. Romhányi, and P. McClarty, The crystallographic spin point groups and their representations, SciPost Phys. 18, 109 (2025).
  57. Y. Ogawa and S. Hayami, Nonlinear piezomagnetic effects in g-wave altermagnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 063704 (2025).
  58. S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Classification of atomic-scale multipoles under crystallographic point groups and application to linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165110 (2018).
  59. M. Yatsushiro, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami, Multipole classification in 122 magnetic point groups for unified understanding of multiferroic responses and transport phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054412 (2021).
  60. S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Unified description of electronic orderings and cross correlations by complete multipole representation, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 072001 (2024).
  61. A. Urru and N. A. Spaldin, Magnetic octupole tensor decomposition and second-order magnetoelectric effect, Ann. Phys. 447, 168964 (2022).
  62. X. H. Verbeek, D. Voderholzer, S. Schären, Y. Gachnang, N. A. Spaldin, and S. Bhowal, Nonrelativistic ferromagnetotriakontadipolar order and spin splitting in hematite, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043157 (2024).
  63. J. Zemen, Z. Gercsi, and K. G. Sandeman, Piezomagnetism as a counterpart of the magnetovolume effect in magnetically frustrated Mn-based antiperovskite nitrides, Phys. Rev. B 96, 024451 (2017).
  64. P. Lukashev, R. F. Sabirianov, and K. Belashchenko, Theory of the piezomagnetic effect in Mn-based antiperovskites, Phys. Rev. B 78, 184414 (2008).
  65. S. Holm-Janas, M. Akaki, E. Fogh, T. Kihara, M. D. Le, P. C. Forino, S. E. Nikitin, T. Fennell, A. Painganoor, D. Vaknin, M. Watanabe, N. B. Christensen, H. Nojiri, and R. Toft-Petersen, Magnetic structure and magnetoelectric properties of the spin-flop phase in LiFePO4, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174413 (2024).
  66. V. T. N. Huyen, Y. Yanagi, and M.-T. Suzuki, Supporting data for anisotropic piezomagnetism in noncollinear antiferromagnets (2025), https://github.com/VuThiNgocHuyen/Piezomag.
  67. D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 (2005).
  68. T. Thonhauser, D. Ceresoli, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Orbital magnetization in periodic insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137205 (2005).
  69. D. Vanderbilt, Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2018).
  70. J. Zemen, E. Mendive-Tapia, Z. Gercsi, R. Banerjee, J. B. Staunton, and K. G. Sandeman, Frustrated magnetism and caloric effects in Mn-based antiperovskite nitrides: Ab initio theory, Phys. Rev. B 95, 184438 (2017).
  71. T. Hammerschmidt, P. Kratzer, and M. Scheffler, Elastic response of cubic crystals to biaxial strain: Analytic results and comparison to density functional theory for InAs, Phys. Rev. B 75, 235328 (2007).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 112, 104421– Published 12 September, 2025
  • Received 26 April 2025
  • Revised 8 August 2025
  • Accepted 20 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation