- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum dynamics of monitored free fermions: Evolution of quantum correlations and scaling at measurement-induced phase transitions

Igor Poboiko and Alexander D. Mirlin

PDF

Phys. Rev. B 113, 144311 – Published 17 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/w1yq-xxbk

Abstract

We explore, both analytically and numerically, the quantum dynamics of a many-body free-fermion system subjected to local density measurements. We begin by extending the mapping to the nonlinear sigma-model (NLSM) field theory for the case of finite evolution time T and different classes of initial states, which lead to different NLSM boundary conditions. The analytical formalism is then used to study how quantum correlations gradually develop, with increasing T, from those determined by the initial state towards their steady-state form. The analytical results are confirmed by numerical simulations for several types of initial states. We further consider the long-time limit, when the system in d+1 space-time dimensions becomes quasi-one-dimensional, and analyze the scaling of the “localization” time (which is simultaneously the purification time and the charge-sharpening time for this class of problems). The analytical predictions for scaling properties are fully confirmed by numerical simulations in a d=2 model around the measurement-induced phase transition. We use this dynamical approach to determine numerically the measurement-induced transition point and the associated correlation-length critical exponent.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018).
  2. B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019).
  3. A. Chan, R. M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, and G. Smith, Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224307 (2019).
  4. X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. De Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Phys. 7, 024 (2019).
  5. M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, Entanglement transition from variable-strength weak measurements, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064204 (2019).
  6. Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134306 (2019).
  7. Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104301 (2020).
  8. A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Entanglement dynamics in hybrid quantum circuits, in Entanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applications, edited by A. Bayat, S. Bose, and H. Johannesson (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 211–249.
  9. M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 335 (2023).
  10. C. Noel, P. Niroula, D. Zhu, A. Risinger, L. Egan, D. Biswas, M. Cetina, A. V. Gorshkov, M. J. Gullans, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Measurement-induced quantum phases realized in a trapped-ion quantum computer, Nat. Phys. 18, 760 (2022).
  11. J. M. Koh, S.-N. Sun, M. Motta, and A. J. Minnich, Measurement-induced entanglement phase transition on a superconducting quantum processor with mid-circuit readout, Nat. Phys. 19, 1314 (2023).
  12. J. C. Hoke, et al. (Google Quantum AI and Collaborators), Measurement-induced entanglement and teleportation on a noisy quantum processor, Nature (London) 622, 481 (2023).
  13. U. Agrawal, J. Lopez-Piqueres, R. Vasseur, S. Gopalakrishnan, and A. C. Potter, Observing quantum measurement collapse as a learnability phase transition, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041012 (2024).
  14. X. Turkeshi, A. Biella, R. Fazio, M. Dalmonte, and M. Schirò, Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quantum Ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224210 (2021).
  15. O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Entanglement transition in a monitored free-fermion chain: From extended criticality to area law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170602 (2021).
  16. M. Buchhold, Y. Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, Effective theory for the measurement-induced phase transition of Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041004 (2021).
  17. M. Coppola, E. Tirrito, D. Karevski, and M. Collura, Growth of entanglement entropy under local projective measurements, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094303 (2022).
  18. F. Carollo and V. Alba, Entangled multiplets and spreading of quantum correlations in a continuously monitored tight-binding chain, Phys. Rev. B 106, L220304 (2022).
  19. M. Szyniszewski, O. Lunt, and A. Pal, Disordered monitored free fermions, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165126 (2023).
  20. C.-M. Jian, H. Shapourian, B. Bauer, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in quantum circuits of non-interacting fermions: Born-rule versus forced measurements, arXiv:2302.09094.
  21. M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Nonlinear sigma models for monitored dynamics of free fermions, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041045 (2023).
  22. I. Poboiko, P. Pöpperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Theory of free fermions under random projective measurements, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041046 (2023).
  23. I. Poboiko, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement-induced phase transition for free fermions above one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 110403 (2024).
  24. K. Chahine and M. Buchhold, Entanglement phases, localization, and multifractality of monitored free fermions in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054313 (2024).
  25. L. Lumia, E. Tirrito, R. Fazio, and M. Collura, Measurement-induced transitions beyond Gaussianity: A single particle description, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023176 (2024).
  26. E. Starchl, M. H. Fischer, and L. M. Sieberer, Generalized zeno effect and entanglement dynamics induced by fermion counting, PRX Quantum 6, 030302 (2025).
  27. M. Fava, L. Piroli, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Monitored fermions with conserved U(1) charge, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043246 (2024).
  28. C.-M. Jian, B. Bauer, A. Keselman, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Criticality and entanglement in nonunitary quantum circuits and tensor networks of noninteracting fermions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134206 (2022).
  29. Z. Xiao and K. Kawabata, Symmetry and topology of monitored quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 113, 134307 (2026).
  30. K. Mochizuki and R. Hamazaki, Measurement-induced spectral transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 010410 (2025).
  31. H. Oshima, K. Mochizuki, R. Hamazaki, and Y. Fuji, Topology and spectrum in measurement-induced phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 240401 (2025).
  32. H. Pan, H. Shapourian, and C.-M. Jian, Topological modes in monitored quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 112, 144301 (2025).
  33. Z. Xiao, T. Ohtsuki, and K. Kawabata, Universal stochastic equations of monitored quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 140401 (2025).
  34. M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical purification phase transition induced by quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041020 (2020).
  35. A. Zabalo, M. J. Gullans, J. H. Wilson, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, and J. H. Pixley, Critical properties of the measurement-induced transition in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 060301(R) (2020).
  36. M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Scalable probes of measurement-induced criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070606 (2020).
  37. G. S. Bentsen, S. Sahu, and B. Swingle, Measurement-induced purification in large-n hybrid brownian circuits, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094304 (2021).
  38. O. Lunt, M. Szyniszewski, and A. Pal, Measurement-induced criticality and entanglement clusters: A study of one-dimensional and two-dimensional clifford circuits, Phys. Rev. B 104, 155111 (2021).
  39. U. Agrawal, A. Zabalo, K. Chen, J. H. Wilson, A. C. Potter, J. H. Pixley, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Entanglement and charge-sharpening transitions in U(1) symmetric monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041002 (2022).
  40. H. Lóio, A. De Luca, J. De Nardis, and X. Turkeshi, Purification timescales in monitored fermions, Phys. Rev. B 108, L020306 (2023).
  41. B. Fan, C. Yin, and A. M. García-García, Entanglement dynamics of monitored noninteracting fermions on graphics processing units, Phys. Rev. B 113, 094317 (2026).
  42. I. Poboiko, P. Pöpperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement-induced transitions for interacting fermions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024204 (2025).
  43. I. Klich and L. Levitov, Quantum noise as an entanglement meter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100502 (2009).
  44. See Fig. 3 of Ref. [22], which shows the reduction of the effective diffusion constant g(q)=C(q)/|q| due to ballistic and localization effects in the relevant range of q for various values of γ, including γ=0.1 used in numerical study in Sec. 3b of the present work.
  45. F. Barratt, U. Agrawal, S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Field theory of charge sharpening in symmetric monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120604 (2022).
  46. B. Kramer, A. MacKinnon, T. Ohtsuki, and K. Slevin, Finite size scaling analysis of the Anderson transition, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 24, 1841 (2010).
  47. K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, The Anderson transition: Time reversal symmetry and universality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4083 (1997).
  48. K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Critical exponent for the Anderson transition in the three-dimensional orthogonal universality class, New J. Phys. 16, 015012 (2014).
  49. A. MacKinnon and B. Kramer, One-parameter scaling of localization length and conductance in disordered systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1546 (1981).
  50. J. L. Pichard and G. Sarma, Finite size scaling approach to Anderson localisation, J. Phys. C 14, L127 (1981).
  51. I. Poboiko, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Mesoscopic fluctuations and multifractality at and across measurement-induced phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 112, L220202 (2025).
  52. M. Janssen, Statistics and scaling in disordered mesoscopic electron systems, Phys. Rep. 295, 1 (1998).
  53. F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
  54. K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Corrections to scaling at the Anderson transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 382 (1999).
  55. K. Slevin and T. Ohtsuki, Critical exponent for the quantum Hall transition, Phys. Rev. B 80, 041304(R) (2009).
  56. I. Poboiko, M. Szyniszewski, C. J. Turner, I. V. Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, and A. Pal, Measurement-induced lévy flights of quantum information, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 170403 (2025).
  57. H. Guo, M. S. Foster, C.-M. Jian, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Field theory of monitored interacting fermion dynamics with charge conservation, Phys. Rev. B 112, 064304 (2025).
  58. I. Poboiko and A. D. Mirlin, Data for “Quantum dynamics of monitored free fermions: Evolution of quantum correlations and scaling at measurement-induced phase transitions,” Zenodo (2026), http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19152255.
  59. A. Kamenev and A. Levchenko, Keldysh technique and non-linear σ-model: Basic principles and applications, Adv. Phys. 58, 197 (2009).
  60. D. Politis, J. Romano, and M. Wolf, Subsampling, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York, 1999).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 113, 144311– Published 17 April, 2026
  • Received 1 December 2025
  • Accepted 26 March 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation