Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Noncollinear magnetic orders in PtFePt and PtMnPt stripes tailored by external electric fields: First-principles interactions and model energy landscapes

David Gallina*, Byungryul Jang, and G. M. Pastor

  • Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Straße 40, 34132 Kassel, Germany

  • *Contact author: gallina@uni-kassel.de

Phys. Rev. B 113, 064414 – Published 9 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vjz5-hfdr

Abstract

The stable and metastable magnetic orders in one-dimensional PtFePt and PtMnPt stripes, as well as the collective spin reorientations connecting them, are investigated by combining first-principles electronic theory with a detailed characterization of the associated energy landscapes. The relative stability of collinear and noncollinear magnetic orders is determined within density-functional theory by computing the frozen-magnon dispersion relations ɛδγα(q) as functions of wave number q, spin-polarization plane δγ, and chirality α=±1. The effective interactions between the local magnetic moments μi at the 3d transition metal atoms are derived, including the local magnetic anisotropy energies Kiδ, the symmetric exchange couplings Jijδ, and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) vectors Dij, where δ=x,y,z denotes the direction relative to the stripe geometry. The consequences of applying an external electric field (EF) on the magnetic couplings are quantified. Significant DM interactions are triggered by the EF, which breaks the inversion symmetry of the stripes. First-nearest-neighbor DM coupling dominates in ferromagnetic PtFePt, whereas second-nearest-neighbor DM coupling dominates in antiferromagnetic PtMnPt. The magnetic energy landscapes of the corresponding classical spin Hamiltonians H[μi] are systematically explored without imposing any constraints on the orientations of μi. The metastable magnetic configurations involve domain walls (DWs) superimposed on the ferromagnetic (PtFePt) or antiferromagnetic (PtMnPt) backgrounds, whose width can be tuned by the applied EF. The morphology of the transition states and the minimum-energy paths connecting the local minima reveal the mechanisms for the creation, annihilation, and translation of magnetic domains (MDs). One observes that MDs with walls of opposite chirality, yielding a total winding number ηz=0, identical to that of the ground state, are unstable, whereas domains with walls of the same chirality and ηz=±1 are stabilized by significant energy barriers. Extremely small upper bounds for the energy barriers associated with domain-wall translations along the stripes are found, implying remarkably high mobility. The roles of the microscopic interactions Kiδ, Jijδ, and Dij in the topological protection, energy barriers, and relative stability of magnetic configurations are disclosed. The present investigations may serve as a methodological blueprint for advancing our understanding of the local-environment dependence of interactions between magnetic moments, their role in collective responses and relaxation processes, and the energy landscapes that underlie the physics of magnetic low-dimensional systems and nanostructures.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (109)

  1. J. G. Gay and R. Richter, Spin anisotropy of ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2728 (1986).
  2. P. Bruno, Tight-binding approach to the orbital magnetic moment and magnetocrystalline anisotropy of transition-metal monolayers, Phys. Rev. B 39, 865(R) (1989).
  3. D. P. Pappas, K.-P. Kämper, and H. Hopster, Reversible transition between perpendicular and in-plane magnetization in ultrathin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3179 (1990).
  4. C. S. Arnold, D. P. Pappas, and A. P. Popov, Second- and first-order phase transitions in the magnetic reorientation of ultrathin Fe on Gd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3305 (1999).
  5. R. Allenspach and A. Bischof, Magnetization direction switching in Fe/Cu(100) epitaxial films: Temperature and thickness dependence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3385 (1992).
  6. N. Saratz, A. Lichtenberger, O. Portmann, U. Ramsperger, A. Vindigni, and D. Pescia, Experimental phase diagram of perpendicularly magnetized ultrathin ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 077203 (2010).
  7. B. N. Engel, M. H. Wiedman, and C. M. Falco, Overlayer-induced perpendicular anisotropy in ultrathin Co films, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6401 (1994).
  8. J. Kohlhepp and U. Gradmann, Magnetic surface anisotropies of Co(0001)-based interfaces from in situ magnetometry of Co films on Pd(111) covered with ultrathin films of Pd and Ag, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 139, 347 (1995).
  9. G. M. Pastor, J. Dorantes-Dávila, S. Pick, and H. Dreyssé, Magnetic anisotropy of 3d transition-metal clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 326 (1995).
  10. R. K. Kawakami, E. J. Escorcia-Aparicio, and Z. Q. Qiu, Symmetry-induced magnetic anisotropy in Fe films frown on stepped Ag(001), Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2570 (1996).
  11. J. Dorantes-Dávila and G. M. Pastor, In-plane magnetic anisotropy of ultrahin bcc (110) transition-metal films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4450 (1996).
  12. J. Dorantes-Dávila and G. M. Pastor, Magnetic anisotropy of one-dimensional nanostructures of transition metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 208 (1998).
  13. S. Boukari, E. Beaurepaire, H. Bulou, B. Carrière, J. P. Deville, F. Scheurer, M. Desantis, and R. Baudoing-Savois, Influence of strain on the magnetocrystalline anisotropy in epitaxial Cr/Co/Pd(111) films, Phys. Rev. B 64, 144431 (2001).
  14. P. Gambardella, A. Dallmeyer, K. Maiti, M. C. Malagoli, W. Eberhardt, K. Kern, and C. Carbone, Ferromagnetism in one-dimensional monatomic metal chains, Nature (London) 416, 301 (2002).
  15. P. Gambardella, S. Rusponi, M. Veronese, S. S. Dhesi, C. Grazioli, A. Dallmeyer, I. Cabria, R. Zeller, P. H. Dederichs, K. Kern, C. Carbone, and H. Brune, Giant magnetic anisotropy of single cobalt atoms and nanoparticles, Science 300, 1130 (2003).
  16. J. Dorantes-Dávila and G. M. Pastor, Magnetic reorientation transitions along the crossover from one-dimensional to two-dimensional transition-metal nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B 72, 085427 (2005).
  17. N. N. Negulyaev, J. Dorantes-Dávila, L. Niebergall, L. Juárez-Reyes, G. M. Pastor, and V. S. Stepanyuk, Alloying route to tailor giant magnetic anisotropy in transition-metal nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 87, 054425 (2013).
  18. J. B. Staunton, S. Ostanin, S. S. A. Razee, B. L. Gyorffy, L. Szunyogh, B. Ginatempo, and E. Bruno, Temperature dependent magnetic anisotropy in metallic magnets from an ab initio electronic structure theory: L10-ordered FePt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257204 (2004).
  19. A. Buruzs, P. Weinberger, L. Szunyogh, L. Udvardi, P. I. Chleboun, A. M. Fischer, and J. B. Staunton, Ab initio theory of temperature dependence of magnetic anisotropy in layered systems: Applications to thin Co films on Cu(100), Phys. Rev. B 76, 064417 (2007).
  20. I. A. Zhuravlev, V. P. Antropov, and K. D. Belashchenko, Spin-fluctuation mechanism of anomalous temperature dependence of magnetocrystalline anisotropy in itinerant magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 217201 (2015).
  21. J. Dorantes-Dávila, R. Garibay-Alonso, and G. M. Pastor, Spin-fluctuation theory of temperature-driven spin reorientations in ferromagnetic transition metal thin films, Phys. Rev. B 110, 174406 (2024).
  22. A. Fert and P. M. Levy, Role of anisotropic exchange interactions in determining the properties of spin-glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1538 (1980).
  23. V. Kashid, T. Schena, B. Zimmermann, Y. Mokrousov, S. Blügel, V. Shah, and H. G. Salunke, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and chiral magnetism in 3d−5d zigzag chains: Tight-binding model and ab initio calculations, Phys. Rev. B 90, 054412 (2014).
  24. H. Yang, A. Thiaville, S. Rohart, A. Fert, and M. Chshiev, Anatomy of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction at Co/Pt interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 267210 (2015).
  25. A. A. Khajetoorians, M. Steinbrecher, M. Ternes, M. Bouhassoune, M. dos Santos Dias, S. Lounis, J. Wiebe, and R. Wiesendanger, Tailoring the chiral magnetic interaction between two individual atoms, Nat. Commun. 7, 10620 (2016).
  26. A. Belabbes, G. Bihlmayer, F. Bechstedt, S. Blügel, and A. Manchon, Hund's rule-driven Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction at 3d−5d interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 247202 (2016).
  27. B. Schweflinghaus, B. Zimmermann, M. Heide, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blügel, Role of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction for magnetism in transition-metal chains at Pt step edges, Phys. Rev. B 94, 024403 (2016).
  28. M. Perini, S. Meyer, B. Dupé, S. von Malottki, A. Kubetzka, K. von Bergmann, R. Wiesendanger, and S. Heinze, Domain walls and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in epitaxial Co/Ir(111) and Pt/Co/Ir(111), Phys. Rev. B 97, 184425 (2018).
  29. H. Yang, J. Liang, and Q. Cui, First-principles calculations for Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 43 (2023).
  30. B. Jang, S. Riemer, and G. M. Pastor, Chiral magnetic interactions in small Fe clusters triggered by symmetry-breaking adatoms, Symmetry 15, 397 (2023).
  31. B. Jang and G. M. Pastor, Reversible electric field manipulation of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions in transition metal dimers, Phys. Rev. B 110, 014443 (2024).
  32. I. Dzyaloshinsky, A Thermodynamic Theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958).
  33. T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960).
  34. T. Moriya, New mechanism of anisotropic superexchange interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 228 (1960).
  35. M. Bode, M. Heide, K. von Bergmann, P. Ferriani, S. Heinze, G. Bihlmayer, A. Kubetzka, O. Pietzsch, S. Blügel, and R. Wiesendanger, Chiral magnetic order at surfaces driven by inversion asymmetry, Nature (London) 447, 190 (2007).
  36. S. Polesya, S. Mankovsky, S. Bornemann, D. Ködderitzsch, J. Minár, and H. Ebert, Skyrmion magnetic structure of an ordered FePt monolayer deposited on Pt(111), Phys. Rev. B 89, 184414 (2014).
  37. M. Perini, S. Meyer, A. Kubetzka, R. Wiesendanger, S. Heinze, and K. von Bergmann, Electrical detection of domain walls and skyrmions in Co films using noncollinear magnetoresistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237205 (2019).
  38. R. E. Camley and K. L. Livesey, Consequences of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Surf. Sci. Rep. 78, 100605 (2023).
  39. D. Rahmedov, D. Wang, J. Íñiguez, and L. Bellaiche, Magnetic cycloid of BiFeO3 from atomistic simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 037207 (2012).
  40. H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Spin current and magnetoelectric effect in noncollinear magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005).
  41. S. Meyer, B. Xu, M. J. Verstraete, L. Bellaiche, and B. Dupé, Spin-current driven Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in multiferroic BiFeO3 from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 108, 024403 (2023).
  42. L. Desplat, S. Meyer, J. Bouaziz, P. M. Buhl, S. Lounis, B. Dupé, and P.-A. Hervieux, Mechanism for ultrafast electric-field driven skyrmion nucleation, Phys. Rev. B 104, L060409 (2021).
  43. A. Deka, B. Rana, R. Anami, K. Miura, H. Takahashi, Y. C. Otani, and Y. Fukuma, Electric-field control of interfacial in-plane magnetic anisotropy in CoFeB/MgO junctions, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174405 (2020).
  44. A. Rajanikanth, T. Hauet, F. Montaigne, S. Mangin, and S. Andrieu, Magnetic anisotropy modified by electric field in V/Fe/MgO(001)/Fe epitaxial magnetic tunnel junction, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 062402 (2013).
  45. D. Preziosi, M. Alexe, D. Hesse, and M. Salluzzo, Electric-field control of the orbital occupancy and magnetic moment of a transition-metal oxide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 157401 (2015).
  46. W. Zhang, H. Zhong, R. Zang, Y. Zhang, S. Yu, G. Han, G. L. Liu, S. S. Yan, S. Kang, and L. M. Mei, Electrical field enhanced interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in MgO/Fe/Pt system, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 122406 (2018).
  47. T. Koyama, Y. Nakatani, J. Ieda, and D. Chiba, Electric field control of magnetic domain wall motion via modulation of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Sci. Adv. 4, eaav0265 (2018).
  48. M. Rafique, A. Herklotz, K. Dörr, and S. Manzoor, Reversible electric-field-driven magnetization in a columnar nanocomposite film, Thin Solid Films 685, 47 (2019).
  49. Y. Ba, S. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Gao, H. Zhou, M. Chen, W. Sun, Q. Liu, G. Chai, et al., Electric-field control of skyrmions in multiferroic heterostructure via magnetoelectric coupling, Nat. Commun. 12, 322 (2021).
  50. H. Terada, S. Ohya, L. D. Ahn, Y. Iwasa, and M. Tanada, Magnetic anisotropy control by applying an electric field to the side surface of ferromagnetic films, Sci. Rep. 7, 5618 (2017).
  51. H. Mizuno, T. Moriyama, K. Tanaka, K. Kawaguchi, K. T., D. Chiba, and T. Ono, Electric field effect on spectroscopic g-factor and magnetic anisotropy in a Pt/Co/MgO ultrathin film, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 61, 103001 (2022).
  52. B. Dai, D. Wu, S. A. Razavi, S. Xu, H. He, Q. Shu, M. Jackson, F. Mahfouzi, H. Huang, Q. Pan, et al., Electric field manipulation of spin chirality and skyrmion dynamic, Sci. Adv. 9, eade6836 (2023).
  53. X. Xue, Z. Zhou, B. Peng, M. Zhu, Y. Zhang, W. Ren, T. Ren, X. Yang, T. Nan, N. X. Sun, and M. Liu, Electric field induced reversible 180∘ magnetization switching through tuning of interfacial exchange bias along magnetic easy-axis in multiferroic laminates, Sci. Rep. 5, 16480 (2015).
  54. A. Sonntag, J. Hermenau, A. Schlenhoff, J. Friedlein, S. Krause, and R. Wiesendanger, Electric-field-induced magnetic anisotropy in a nanomagnet investigated on the atomic scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017204 (2014).
  55. P.-J. Hsu, A. Kubetzka, A. Finco, N. Romming, K. von Bergmann, and R. Wiesendanger, Electric-field-driven switching of individual magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 123 (2017).
  56. K. Nakamura, R. Shimabukuro, Y. Fujiwara, T. Akiyama, T. Ito, and A. J. Freeman, Giant modification of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy in transition-metal monolayers by an external electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 187201 (2009).
  57. J. Hu and R. Wu, Control of the magnetism and magnetic anisotropy of a single-molecule magnet with an electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 097202 (2013).
  58. M. Tsujikawa and T. Oda, Finite electric field effects in the large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy surface Pt/Fe/Pt(001): A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 247203 (2009).
  59. M. Tanveer, J. Dorantes-Dávila, and G. M. Pastor, Reversible electric-field manipulation of the adsorption morphology and magnetic anisotropy of small Fe and Co clusters on graphene, Phys. Rev. B 96, 224413 (2017).
  60. B. Pradines, B. Cahier, N. Suaud, and N. Guihéry, Impact of the electric field on isotropic and anisotropic spin Hamiltonian parameters, J. Chem. Phys. 157, 204308 (2022).
  61. N. N. Negulyaev, V. S. Stepanyuk, W. Hergert, and J. Kirschner, Electric field as a switching tool for magnetic states in atomic-scale nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 037202 (2011).
  62. E. Torun, H. Sahin, C. Bacaksiz, R. T. Senger, and F. M. Peeters, Tuning the magnetic anisotropy in single-layer crystal structures, Phys. Rev. B 92, 104407 (2015).
  63. X. Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal, Nature (London) 465, 901 (2010).
  64. M. Oba, K. Nakamura, T. Akiyama, T. Ito, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, Electric-field-induced modification of the magnon energy, exchange interaction, and Curie temperature of transition-metal thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 107202 (2015).
  65. M. A. Goerzen, S. von Malottki, G. J. Kwiatkowski, P. F. Bessarab, and S. Heinze, Atomistic spin simulations of electric-field-assisted nucleation and annihilation of magnetic skyrmions in Pd/Fe/Ir(111), Phys. Rev. B 105, 214435 (2022).
  66. S. Paul and S. Heinze, Electric-field driven stability control of skyrmions in an ultrathin transition-metal film, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 105 (2022).
  67. J. Hubbard, The magnetism of iron, Phys. Rev. B 19, 2626 (1979).
  68. H. Hasegawa, Single-siet spin Ffluctuation theory of itinerant-electron systems with narrow bands, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49, 178 (1980).
  69. R. Garibay-Alonso, J. Dorantes-Dávila, and G. M. Pastor, Finite-temperature magnetism of Ni monolayers: Interplay between flips and amplitude fluctuations of the local moments, Phys. Rev. B 85, 224409 (2012).
  70. L. Udvardi, L. Szunyogh, K. Palotás, and P. Weinberger, First-principles relativistic study of spin waves in thin magnetic films, Phys. Rev. B 68, 104436 (2003).
  71. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
  72. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
  73. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
  74. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  75. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  76. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  77. D. Hobbs, G. Kresse, and J. Hafner, Fully unconstrained noncollinear magnetism within the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11556 (2000).
  78. P. D. Haynes and M. C. Payne, Corrected penalty-functional method for linear-scaling calculations within density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. B 59, 12173 (1999).
  79. G. Kresse, M. Marsman, and J. Furthmüller, VASP Manual (2016) http://www.vasp.at/wiki/The_VASP_Manual.
  80. S. Steiner, S. Khmelevskyi, M. Marsmann, and G. Kresse, Calculation of the magnetic anisotropy with projected-augmented-wave methodology and the case study of disordered Fe1−xCox alloys, Phys. Rev. B 93, 224425 (2016).
  81. B. L. Gyorffy, A. J. Pindor, J. Staunton, G. M. Stocks, and H. Winter, A first-principles theory of ferromagnetic phase transitions in metals, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 15, 1337 (1985).
  82. L. Thomas and S. Parkin, Current induced domain-wall motion in magnetic nanowires, in Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2007) pp. 282–302.
  83. Multiple tests have been performed to assess the numerical accuracy of our calculations of the spin-wave energies Eδγα(q), particularly for δγ=xy and finite electric field Ey=0.5V/Å, where the dependence on chirality α=±1 is significant. For example, varying the cutoff energy in the range 500eV≤Emax≤750eV, the number of k points in the range in the range 60≤Nk≤180, and the convergence criterion for the total energy per atom in the range 10−5eV≥Ediff≥10−7eV shows that the energy differences yielding the nearest-neighbor DM interactions and the local anisotropy energies are converged within 0.1 meV. This value corresponds to the uncertainty associated with fitting the dispersion relations and is therefore sufficient for our purposes.
  84. H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19, 716 (1974).
  85. N. Sugiura, Further analysis of the data by Akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections, Commun. Stat. - Theory Methods 7, 13 (1978).
  86. M. R. Hestenes and E. Stiefel, Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 49, 409 (1952).
  87. R. Fletcher and C. M. Reeves, Function minimization by conjugate gradients, Comput. J. 7, 149 (1964).
  88. L. Armijo, Minimization of functions having Lipschitz continuous first partial derivatives, Pac. J. Math. 16, 1 (1966).
  89. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 2006).
  90. P.-A. Absil, R. Mahony, and R. Sepulchre, Optimization Algorithms on Matrix Manifolds (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008).
  91. N. Boumal, An introduction to Optimization on Smooth Manifolds (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023).
  92. H. Jónsson, G. Mills, and K. W. Jacobsen, Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions, in Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations, edited by B. J. Berne, G. Ciccotti, and D. F. Coker (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), pp. 385–404.
  93. G. Henkelman and H. Jónsson, Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978 (2000).
  94. P. F. Bessarab, V. M. Uzdin, and H. Jónsson, Method for finding mechanism and activation energy of magnetic transitions, applied to skyrmion and antivortex annihilation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 335 (2015).
  95. C. J. Cerjan and W. H. Miller, On finding transition states, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 2800 (1981).
  96. L. J. Munro and D. J. Wales, Defect migration in crystalline silicon, Phys. Rev. B 59, 3969 (1999).
  97. M. Tanveer, P. Ruiz-Díaz, and G. M. Pastor, Electronic and magnetic properties of spiral spin-density-wave states in transition-metal chains, Phys. Rev. B 94, 094403 (2016).
  98. The DFT calculations reproduce the symmetry constraints p−0,z=p+0,z=0, p+0,y=−p−0,y, and p−0,x=p+0,x within numerical accuracy, which is estimated to be of the order of 10−5eÅ. Notice that the dipole moments p+0,x=p−0,x along the bond connecting the Fe atoms need not be zero, since the SDWs break the reflection symmetry across the plane passing perpendicularly through the middle of the vector connecting the Fe atoms. Their values are typically one or two orders of magnitude smaller than the DM-relevant chiral component. In all circumstances, p0,x has no effect on the DM coupling because it is independent of chirality.
  99. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kanse, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  100. N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899 (2013).
  101. A. Thiaville and J. Miltat, Topology and magnetic domain walls, in Topology in Magnetism, edited by J. Zang, V. Cros, and A. Hoffmann (Springer International Publishing, New York, 2018), pp. 41–73.
  102. S. S. P. Parkin, M. Hayashi, and L. Thomas, Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory, Science 320, 190 (2008).
  103. G. S. D. Beach, C. Nistor, C. Knutson, M. Tsoi, and J. L. Erskine, Dynamics of field-driven domain-wall propagation in ferromagnetic nanowires, Nat. Mater. 4, 741 (2005).
  104. W. Töws and G. M. Pastor, Theoretical study of the temperature dependence of the magnon dispersion relation in transition-metal wires and monolayers, Phys. Rev. B 86, 054443 (2012).
  105. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies, Phys. Z. Sowjet. 8, 153 (1935).
  106. T. L. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004).
  107. J. C. Slonczewski, Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1 (1996).
  108. A. Brataas, A. D. Kent, and H. Ohno, Current-induced torques in magnetic materials, Nat. Mater. 11, 372 (2012).
  109. C. M. Hurvich and C. L. Tsai, Regression and time series model selection in small samples, Biometrika 76, 297 (1989).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation