- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tuning the angular dependence of the switching field of thin film nanomagnets

Ida Breivik* and Erik Folven

  • *Contact author: ida.breivik@ntnu.no
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 113, 014423 – Published 16 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rmpq-ft74

Abstract

Thin film nanomagnets show promise for a wide range of applications, such as in computing, data storage, sensors, and biomedical devices. Elongated single-domain nanomagnets are bistable, with the magnetization of its two stable states pointing in opposite directions along its long axis. We can switch the magnetization between the bistable states of the nanomagnet by applying an external field. Here, we investigate the switching characteristics of single-domain nanomagnets of different shapes, sizes, and aspect ratios, both in simulation and in experiment. We use a phenomenological approach to describe the angle dependence of the field required to switch the nanomagnets from one bistable state to the other. Our simulations and experimental results correspond well, and show that precise tuning of the angular switching characteristics is possible in a number of different ways. Such tuning of switching characteristics on a single-magnet level unlocks intriguing possibilities in nanomagnet device design, and could further pave the way for a variety of new nanomagnet-based technologies.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (39)

  1. R. P. Cowburn, Property variation with shape in magnetic nanoelements, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33, R1 (2000).
  2. C. König, M. Sperlich, R. Heinesch, R. Calarco, J. O. Hauch, U. Rüdiger, G. Güntherodt, S. Kirsch, B. Özyilmaz, and A. D. Kent, Shape-dependent magnetization reversal processes and flux-closure configurations of microstructured epitaxial Fe(110) elements, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3648 (2001).
  3. X. F. Han, M. Grimsditch, J. Meersschaut, A. Hoffmann, Y. Ji, J. Sort, J. Nogués, R. Divan, J. E. Pearson, and D. J. Keavney, Magnetic instability regions in patterned structures: Influence of element shape on magnetization reversal dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 147202 (2007).
  4. M. Niemier, M. Crocker, and X. S. Hu, Fabrication variations and defect tolerance for nanomagnet-based QCA, in 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance of VLSI Systems (IEEE, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008), p. 534.
  5. C. W. Han and S. H. Lim, Variation of the magnetic energy barrier with the cell shape of nanostructured magnetic thin films, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42, 045006 (2009).
  6. P. Li, G. Csaba, V. K. Sankar, X. Ju, P. Lugli, X. S. Hu, M. Niemier, W. Porod, and G. H. Bernstein, Switching behavior of lithographically fabricated nanomagnets for logic applications, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 07B911 (2012).
  7. M. T. Niemier, E. Varga, G. H. Bernstein, W. Porod, M. T. Alam, A. Dingler, A. Orlov, and X. S. Hu, Shape engineering for controlled switching with nanomagnet logic, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 11, 220 (2012).
  8. H. Dey, G. Csaba, X. S. Hu, M. Niemier, G. H. Bernstein, and W. Porod, Switching behavior of sharply pointed nanomagnets for logic applications, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 3549 (2013).
  9. D. Cimpoesu, L. Stoleriu, and A. Stancu, Generalized stoner-wohlfarth model accurately describing the switching processes in pseudo-single ferromagnetic particles, J. Appl. Phys. 114, 223901 (2013).
  10. T. Dion, D. M. Arroo, K. Yamanoi, T. Kimura, J. C. Gartside, L. F. Cohen, H. Kurebayashi, and W. R. Branford, Tunable magnetization dynamics in artificial spin ice via shape anisotropy modification, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054433 (2019).
  11. J. Li, S. Dong, W.-C. Yue, Z. Yuan, Z.-L. Xiao, Y.-Y. Lyu, T.-T. Wang, C. Li, C. Wang, W.-B. Xu, Y. Dong, H. Wang, P. Wu, W.-K. Kwok, and Y.-L. Wang, Tailoring magnetization reversal of a single-domain bar nanomagnet via its end geometry, AIP Adv. 11, 045010 (2021).
  12. N. Strandqvist, G. Fitez, O. Heinonen, and P. Schiffer, Nanomagnet shape effects on magnetic reversal in artificial spin ice, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184420 (2025).
  13. Y. Lu, P. L. Trouilloud, D. W. Abraham, R. Koch, J. Slonczewski, S. Brown, J. Bucchignano, E. O'Sullivan, R. A. Wanner, W. J. Gallagher, and S. S. P. Parkin, Observation of magnetic switching in submicron magnetic-tunnel junctions at low frequency, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5267 (1999).
  14. A. Anguelouch, B. D. Schrag, G. Xiao, Y. Lu, P. L. Trouilloud, R. A. Wanner, W. J. Gallagher, and S. S. P. Parkin, Two-dimensional magnetic switching of micron-size films in magnetic tunnel junctions, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 622 (2000).
  15. G. C. Han, B. Y. Zong, P. Luo, and Y. H. Wu, Angular dependence of the coercivity and remanence of ferromagnetic nanowire arrays, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 9202 (2003).
  16. C. Bran, A. P. Espejo, E. M. Palmero, J. Escrig, and M. Vázquez, Angular dependence of coercivity with temperature in co-based nanowires, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 396, 327 (2015).
  17. J. Escrig, M. Daub, P. Landeros, K. Nielsch, and D. Altbir, Angular dependence of coercivity in magnetic nanotubes, Nanotechnology 18, 445706 (2007).
  18. F. Ott, T. Maurer, G. Chaboussant, Y. Soumare, J.-Y. Piquemal, and G. Viau, Effects of the shape of elongated magnetic particles on the coercive field, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 013915 (2009).
  19. Y.-L. Wang, Z.-L. Xiao, A. Snezhko, J. Xu, L. E. Ocola, R. Divan, J. E. Pearson, G. W. Crabtree, and W.-K. Kwok, Rewritable artificial magnetic charge ice, Science 352, 962 (2016).
  20. Y.-L. Wang, X. Ma, J. Xu, Z.-L. Xiao, A. Snezhko, R. Divan, L. E. Ocola, J. E. Pearson, B. Janko, and W.-K. Kwok, Switchable geometric frustration in an artificial-spin-ice–superconductor heterosystem, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 560 (2018).
  21. J. Cui, T.-Y. Huang, Z. Luo, P. Testa, H. Gu, X.-Z. Chen, B. J. Nelson, and L. J. Heyderman, Nanomagnetic encoding of shape-morphing micromachines, Nature (London) 575, 164 (2019).
  22. C. L. Smart, T. G. Pearson, Z. Liang, M. X. Lim, M. I. Abdelrahman, F. Monticone, I. Cohen, and P. L. McEuen, Magnetically programmed diffractive robotics, Science 386, 1031 (2024).
  23. E. Iacocca, S. Gliga, and O. G. Heinonen, Tailoring spin-wave channels in a reconfigurable artificial spin ice, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 044047 (2020).
  24. H. Nomura, N. Yoshioka, S. Miura, and R. Nakatani, Controlling operation timing and data flow direction between nanomagnet logic elements with spatially uniform clock fields, Appl. Phys. Express 10, 123004 (2017).
  25. J. H. Jensen, A. Strømberg, I. Breivik, A. Penty, M. A. Niño, M. W. Khaliq, M. Foerster, G. Tufte, and E. Folven, Clocked dynamics in artificial spin ice, Nat. Commun. 15, 964 (2024).
  26. A. Penty, J. H. Jensen, I. Breivik, A. Strømberg, E. Folven, and G. Tufte, Controllable gliders in a nanomagnetic metamaterial, Nat. Commun. 16, 7500 (2025).
  27. E. C. Stoner and E. Wohlfarth, A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 240, 599 (1948).
  28. A. Thiaville, Extensions of the geometric solution of the two dimensional coherent magnetization rotation model, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 182, 5 (1998).
  29. J. H. Jensen, A. Strømberg, O. R. Lykkebø, A. Penty, J. Leliaert, M. Själander, E. Folven, and G. Tufte, Flatspin: A large-scale artificial spin ice simulator, Phys. Rev. B 106, 064408 (2022).
  30. A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014).
  31. J. C. Gartside, D. M. Arroo, D. M. Burn, V. L. Bemmer, A. Moskalenko, L. F. Cohen, and W. R. Branford, Realization of ground state in artificial kagome spin ice via topological defect-driven magnetic writing, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 53 (2018).
  32. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/rmpq-ft74 for the method used to determine the astorid parameters and anisotropy field, and simulated astroids of stadium-shaped nanomagnets with constant volume and varying aspect ratios.
  33. N. S. Bingham, X. Zhang, J. Ramberger, O. Heinonen, C. Leighton, and P. Schiffer, Collective ferromagnetism of artificial square spin ice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 067201 (2022).
  34. R. M. Corona, D. Altbir, and J. Escrig, Magnetic properties of elliptical and stadium-shaped nanoparticles: Effect of the shape anisotropy, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324, 3824 (2012).
  35. F. B. Mancoff, R. W. Dave, N. D. Rizzo, T. C. Eschrich, B. N. Engel, and S. Tehrani, Angular dependence of spin-transfer switching in a magnetic nanostructure, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1596 (2003).
  36. Y. Henry, S. Mangin, J. Cucchiara, J. A. Katine, and E. E. Fullerton, Distortion of the Stoner-Wohlfarth astroid by a spin-polarized current, Phys. Rev. B 79, 214422 (2009).
  37. S. Kanai, Y. Nakatani, M. Yamanouchi, S. Ikeda, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, In-plane magnetic field dependence of electric field-induced magnetization switching, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 072408 (2013).
  38. M. Själander, M. Jahre, G. Tufte, and N. Reissmann, EPIC: An energy-efficient, high-performance GPGPU computing research infrastructure, arXiv:1912.05848.
  39. I. Breivik and E. Folven, Experimental and simulated data for “Tuning the angular dependence of the switching field of thin film nanomagnets” [Data set], Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15472136.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 113, 014423– Published 16 January, 2026
  • Received 22 May 2025
  • Revised 25 August 2025
  • Accepted 23 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation