- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Topological and nontopological defects from quantum reset dynamics

R. Jafari1,2,3,*, Henrik Johannesson4,†, and Sebastian Eggert3

  • *Contact author: raadmehr.jafari@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: henrik.johannesson@physics.gu.se
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 113, 224312 – Published 22 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qfdf-qw9m

Abstract

We analyze mechanisms for universal out-of-equilibrium dynamics near criticality by exploring the effect of randomized quantum resetting (QR) under a linear finite-time drive across, or very close to, an equilibrium quantum critical point. Using the transverse-field Ising chain as a minimal model and exploiting its exact solution, QR is found to cause a crossover of the scaling of the defect density with the time scale τ of the drive, from Kibble-Zurek to anti-Kibble-Zurek scaling as τ increases. Depending on whether the ramp ends in a symmetry-broken phase or not, the resulting defects are topological or nontopological. The competition between QR and the Kibble-Zurek mechanism gives rise to local minima of the defect densities at optimal annealing times. These times and the corresponding local minima are shown to scale as universal power laws with the rate of QR. Additional results for the scaling of the mean excess energy suggest that a system driven across, or very close to, a quantum critical point exhibits the same scaling behavior under a linear finite-time drive with QR as with uncorrelated noise. We suggest that these results may serve as benchmarks for validating quantum annealing devices.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (58)

  1. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  2. A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 132 (2020).
  3. K. Bharti, A. Cervera-Lierta, T. H. Kyaw, T. Haug, S. Alperin-Lea, A. Anand, M. Degroote, H. Heimonen, J. S. Kottmann, T. Menke, W.-K. Mok, S. Sim, L.-C. Kwek, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015004 (2022).
  4. T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018).
  5. B. Keimer and J. E. Moore, The physics of quantum materials, Nat. Phys. 13, 1045 (2017).
  6. A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
  7. T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9, 1387 (1976).
  8. W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium? Nature (London) 317, 505 (1985).
  9. B. Damski, The simplest quantum model supporting the Kibble-Zurek mechanism of topological defect production: Landau-Zener transitions from a new perspective, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 035701 (2005).
  10. W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701 (2005).
  11. A. Polkovnikov, Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B 72, 161201 (2005).
  12. J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: Exact solution of the quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 245701 (2005).
  13. J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Adv. Phys. 59, 1063 (2010).
  14. A. del Campo and W. H. Zurek, Universality of phase transition dynamics: Topological defects from symmetry breaking, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430018 (2014).
  15. S. M. Griffin, M. Lilienblum, K. T. Delaney, Y. Kumagai, M. Fiebig, and N. A. Spaldin, Scaling behavior and beyond equilibrium in the hexagonal manganites, Phys. Rev. X 2, 041022 (2012).
  16. A. Dutta, A. Rahmani, and A. del Campo, Anti-Kibble-Zurek behavior in crossing the quantum critical point of a thermally isolated system driven by a noisy control field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 080402 (2016).
  17. M. Singh and S. Gangadharaiah, Driven quantum spin chain in the presence of noise: Anti-Kibble-Zurek behavior, Phys. Rev. B 104, 064313 (2021).
  18. S. Sadeghizade, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Anti-Kibble-Zurek behavior in the quantum XY spin-1/2 chain driven by correlated noisy magnetic field and anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 111, 104310 (2025).
  19. Z.-P. Gao, D.-W. Zhang, Y. Yu, and S.-L. Zhu, Anti-Kibble-Zurek behavior of a noisy transverse-field XY chain and its quantum simulation with two-level systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 224303 (2017).
  20. R. Puebla, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Universal anti-Kibble-Zurek scaling in fully connected systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 230602 (2020).
  21. M.-Z. Ai, J.-M. Cui, R. He, Z.-H. Qian, X.-X. Gao, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Experimental verification of anti–Kibble-Zurek behavior in a quantum system under a noisy control field, Phys. Rev. A 103, 012608 (2021).
  22. D. Subires, F. J. Gómez-Ruiz, A. Ruiz-García, D. Alonso, and A. del Campo, Benchmarking quantum annealing dynamics: The spin-vector Langevin model, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023104 (2022).
  23. M. Singh, S. Dhara, and S. Gangadharaiah, Driven one-dimensional noisy Kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. B 107, 014303 (2023).
  24. K. Iwamura and T. Suzuki, Analytical derivation and extension of the anti-Kibble-Zurek scaling in the transverse field Ising model, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144102 (2024).
  25. H.-C. Kou, Z.-H. Zhang, and P. Li, Kibble-Zurek scaling immune to anti-Kibble-Zurek behavior in driven open systems at the limit of loss difference, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155152 (2025).
  26. B. Gardas, J. Dziarmaga, W. Zurek, and M. Zwolak, Defects in quantum computers, Sci. Rep. 8, 4539 (2018).
  27. P. Weinberg, M. Tylutki, J. M. Rönkkö, J. Westerholm, J. A. Åström, P. Manninen, P. Törmä, and A. W. Sandvik, Scaling and diabatic effects in quantum annealing with a D-Wave device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 090502 (2020).
  28. Y. Bando, Y. Susa, H. Oshiyama, N. Shibata, M. Ohzeki, F. J. Gómez-Ruiz, D. A. Lidar, S. Suzuki, A. del Campo, and H. Nishimori, Probing the universality of topological defect formation in a quantum annealer: Kibble-Zurek mechanism and beyond, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033369 (2020).
  29. A. D. King, S. Suzuki, J. Raymond, A. Zucca, T. Lanting, F. Altomare, A. J. Berkley, A. Ejtemaee, E. Hoskinson, S. Huang, E. Ladizinsky, A. J. R. MacDonald, G. Marsden, T. Oh, G. Poulin-Lamarre, M. Reis, C. Rich, Y. Sato, J. D. Whittaker, J. Yao, et al., Coherent quantum annealing in a programmable 2,000 qubit Ising chain, Nat. Phys. 18, 1324 (2022).
  30. A. Soriani, P. Nazé, M. V. S. Bonança, B. Gardas, and S. Deffner, Three phases of quantum annealing: Fast, slow, and very slow, Phys. Rev. A 105, 042423 (2022).
  31. A. Rajak, S. Suzuki, A. Dutta, and B. K. Chakrabarti, Quantum annealing: An overview, Phil. Trans. A 381, 20210417 (2023).
  32. R. D. Somma and G. Ortiz, in Quantum Quenching, Annealing and Computation, edited by A. K. Chandra, A. Das, and B. K. Chakrabarti (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 1–20.
  33. C. C. McGeoch, Adiabatic Quantum Computation and Quantum Annealing: Theory and Practice (Morgan and Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, California, 2014).
  34. D. Guéry-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 045001 (2019).
  35. A. del Campo, M. M. Rams, and W. H. Zurek, Assisted finite-rate adiabatic passage across a quantum critical point: Exact solution for the quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 115703 (2012).
  36. M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Stochastic resetting and applications, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 193001 (2020).
  37. B. Mukherjee, K. Sengupta, and S. N. Majumdar, Quantum dynamics with stochastic reset, Phys. Rev. B 98, 104309 (2018).
  38. H. Friedman, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Quantum renewal equation for the first detection time of a quantum walk, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 04LT01 (2017).
  39. D. C. Rose, H. Touchette, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Garrahan, Spectral properties of simple classical and quantum reset processes, Phys. Rev. E 98, 022129 (2018).
  40. F. Thiel, E. Barkai, and D. A. Kessler, First detected arrival of a quantum walker on an infinite line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 040502 (2018).
  41. G. Perfetto, F. Carollo, M. Magoni, and I. Lesanovsky, Designing nonequilibrium states of quantum matter through stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. B 104, L180302 (2021).
  42. G. Perfetto, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Thermodynamics of quantum-jump trajectories of open quantum systems subject to stochastic resetting, SciPost Phys. 13, 079 (2022).
  43. R. Yin and E. Barkai, Restart expedites quantum walk hitting times, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 050802 (2023).
  44. M. Kulkarni and S. N. Majumdar, Generating entanglement by quantum resetting, Phys. Rev. A 108, 062210 (2023).
  45. S. Ghosh, M. Kulkarni, K. Sengupta, and S. N. Majumdar, Generating pairwise entanglement in periodically driven quantum spin chains with stochastic resetting, arXiv:2604.19333.
  46. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
  47. P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field, Ann. Phys. 57, 79 (1970).
  48. L. Buffoni and M. Campisi, Cooperative quantum information erasure, Quantum 7, 961 (2023).
  49. L. Buffoni and M. Campisi, Collective preparation of large quantum registers with high fidelity, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 025053 (2025).
  50. O. Michel, M. Werner, and A. Riera, A quantum state transfer protocol with Ising Hamiltonians, Quantum Sci. Technol. 11, 035006 (2026).
  51. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys. 16, 407 (1961).
  52. G. B. Mbeng, A. Russomanno, and G. E. Santoro, The quantum Ising chain for beginners, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 82, 1 (2024).
  53. N. V. Vitanov and B. M. Garraway, Landau-Zener model: Effects of finite coupling duration, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4288 (1996).
  54. H.-B. Zeng, C.-Y. Xia, and A. del Campo, Universal breakdown of Kibble-Zurek scaling in fast quenches across a phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 060402 (2023).
  55. K. Zawadzki, A. Kiely, G. T. Landi, and S. Campbell, Non-Gaussian work statistics at finite-time driving, Phys. Rev. A 107, 012209 (2023).
  56. H.-C. Kou and P. Li, Varying quench dynamics in the transverse Ising chain: The Kibble-Zurek, saturated, and presaturated regimes, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214307 (2023).
  57. C. De Grandi, V. Gritsev, and A. Polkovnikov, Quench dynamics near a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B 81, 012303 (2010).
  58. R. Jafari and A. Akbari, Separation of the Kibble-Zurek mechanism from quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, L022027 (2026).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 113, 224312– Published 22 June, 2026
  • Received 30 January 2026
  • Revised 21 May 2026
  • Accepted 26 May 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation