Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Collective mode spectroscopy in time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductors

Silvia Neri, Walter Metzner, and Dirk Manske

Phys. Rev. B 112, 224502 – Published 2 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pzzp-vbyv

Abstract

Collective excitations in superconductors provide essential insights into the symmetry of the broken phase, acting as indicators for identifying the ground state gap symmetry. Time-reversal symmetry breaking (TRSB) superconductors exhibit a rich spectrum of collective modes due to the complexity of their order parameters. These modes, known as “generalized clapping modes,” draw analogies to the clapping modes of helium-3 phase A. This study investigates two-dimensional TRSB superconductors with an order parameter of the form Δ=Δ1+iΔ2, exploring the characteristics of their collective mode spectrum. We begin with a phenomenological Ginzburg-Landau approach to build intuition, then develop a dynamical theory by deriving linearized equations of motion using the pseudospin formalism. Beyond the linear regime, we propose a classification scheme based on the potential to induce (an)isotropic oscillations in the superconducting condensate. By perturbing the system in symmetry channels distinct from the ground state, we aim to selectively enhance or suppress different mode responses. This study analyzes the features of these generalized clapping modes as a function of the ratio between the order parameter components under various excitation schemes. We believe that our findings could help distinguish between different order parameter symmetries in TRSB superconducting condensates and estimate the magnitude of their components.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (63)

  1. T. Cea, C. Castellani, and L. Benfatto, Nonlinear optical effects and third-harmonic generation in superconductors: Cooper pairs versus Higgs mode contribution, Phys. Rev. B 93, 180507(R) (2016).
  2. R. Haenel, P. Froese, D. Manske, and L. Schwarz, Time-resolved optical conductivity and Higgs oscillations in two-band dirty superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 104, 134504 (2021).
  3. M. A. Müller and I. M. Eremin, Signatures of Bardasis-Schrieffer mode excitation in third-harmonic generated currents, Phys. Rev. B 104, 144508 (2021).
  4. M. A. Müller, P. A. Volkov, I. Paul, and I. M. Eremin, Collective modes in pumped unconventional superconductors with competing ground states, Phys. Rev. B 100, 140501 (2019).
  5. Y. Murotani and R. Shimano, Nonlinear optical response of collective modes in multiband superconductors assisted by nonmagnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224510 (2019).
  6. Y. Murotani, N. Tsuji, and H. Aoki, Theory of light-induced resonances with collective Higgs and Leggett modes in multiband superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 95, 104503 (2017).
  7. F. Gabriele, M. Udina, and L. Benfatto, Non-linear terahertz driving of plasma waves in layered cuprates, Nat. Commun. 12, 752 (2021).
  8. T. Cea and L. Benfatto, Nature and Raman signatures of the Higgs amplitude mode in the coexisting superconducting and charge-density-wave state, Phys. Rev. B 90, 224515 (2014).
  9. L. Schwarz, R. Haenel, and D. Manske, Phase signatures in the third-harmonic response of Higgs and coexisting modes in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 104, 174508 (2021).
  10. Y. Wu, Y. Wang, D. Bao, X. Deng, S. Zhang, L. Yu-chun, S. Ke, J. Liu, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, P. Ham, A. Hanna, J. Pan, X. Hu, Z. Li, J. Zhou, and C. Wang, Emerging probing perspective of two-dimensional materials physics: Terahertz emission spectroscopy, Light Sci. Appl. 13, 146 (2024).
  11. A. Liu, Multidimensional terahertz probes of quantum materials, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 18 (2025).
  12. M. H. S. Amin, E. V. Bezuglyi, A. S. Kijko, and A. N. Omelyanchouk, Wigner distribution function formalism for superconductors and collisionless dynamics of the superconducting order parameter, Low Temp. Phys. 30, 661 (2004).
  13. R. A. Barankov and L. S. Levitov, Synchronization in the BCS pairing dynamics as a critical phenomenon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 230403 (2006).
  14. A. F. Volkov and S. M. Kogan, Collisionless relaxation of the energy gap in superconductors, Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 38, 1018 (1974).
  15. T. Papenkort, V. M. Axt, and T. Kuhn, Coherent dynamics and pump-probe spectra of BCS superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 76, 224522 (2007).
  16. H. Krull, D. Manske, G. S. Uhrig, and A. P. Schnyder, Signatures of nonadiabatic BCS state dynamics in pump-probe conductivity, Phys. Rev. B 90, 014515 (2014).
  17. A. J. Leggett, A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid He3, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975).
  18. P. W. Anderson and P. Morel, Generalized Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer states and the proposed low-temperature phase of liquid He3, Phys. Rev. 123, 1911 (1961).
  19. R. Balian and N. R. Werthamer, Superconductivity with pairs in a relative p wave, Phys. Rev. 131, 1553 (1963).
  20. G. E. Volovik and L. P. Gor'kov, Superconducting classes in heavy-fermion systems, in Ten Years of Superconductivity: 1980–1990, edited by H. R. Ott (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1993), pp. 144–155.
  21. T. M. Rice and M. Sigrist, Sr2RuO4: An electronic analog of He3? J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 7, L643 (1995).
  22. S. Tewari, C. Zhang, V. M. Yakovenko, and S. Das Sarma, Time-reversal symmetry breaking by a (d+id) density-wave state in underdoped cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 217004 (2008).
  23. J. Xia, E. Schemm, G. Deutscher, S. A. Kivelson, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, R. Liang, W. Siemons, G. Koster, M. M. Fejer, and A. Kapitulnik, Polar Kerr-effect measurements of the high-temperature YBa2Cu3O6+x superconductor: Evidence for broken symmetry near the pseudogap temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 127002 (2008).
  24. W.-C. Lee, S.-C. Zhang, and C. Wu, Pairing state with a time-reversal symmetry breaking in FeAs-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 217002 (2009).
  25. C. Farhang, N. Zaki, J. Wang, G. Gu, P. D. Johnson, and J. Xia, Revealing the origin of time-reversal symmetry breaking in Fe-chalcogenide superconductor FeTe1−xSex, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 046702 (2023).
  26. E. M. Levenson-Falk, E. R. Schemm, Y. Aoki, M. B. Maple, and A. Kapitulnik, Polar Kerr effect from time-reversal symmetry breaking in the heavy-fermion superconductor PrOs4Sb12, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 187004 (2018).
  27. K. I. Wysokiaski, Time reversal symmetry breaking superconductors: Sr2RuO4 and beyond, Condensed Matter 4, 47 (2019).
  28. E. R. Schemm, W. J. Gannon, C. M. Wishne, W. P. Halperin, and A. Kapitulnik, Observation of broken time-reversal symmetry in the heavy-fermion superconductor UPt3, Science 345, 190 (2014).
  29. E. R. Schemm, R. E. Baumbach, P. H. Tobash, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, and A. Kapitulnik, Evidence for broken time-reversal symmetry in the superconducting phase of URu2Si2, Phys. Rev. B 91, 140506 (2015).
  30. D. S. Wei, D. Saykin, O. Y. Miller, S. Ran, S. R. Saha, D. F. Agterberg, J. Schmalian, N. P. Butch, J. Paglione, and A. Kapitulnik, Interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in UTe2, Phys. Rev. B 105, 024521 (2022).
  31. M. Kuiri, C. Coleman, Z. Gao, A. Vishnuradhan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Zhu, A. H. MacDonald, and J. Folk, Spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nat. Commun. 13, 6468 (2022).
  32. H. Deng, G. Liu, Z. Guguchia, T. Yang, J. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Xie, S. Shao, H. Ma, W. Liège, F. Bourdarot, X.-Y. Yan, H. Qin, C. Mielke, R. Khasanov, H. Luetkens, X. Wu, G. Chang, J. Liu, M. H. Christensen et al., Evidence for time-reversal symmetry-breaking kagome superconductivity, Nat. Mater. 23, 1639 (2024).
  33. A. V. Balatsky, P. Kumar, and J. R. Schrieffer, Collective mode in a superconductor with mixed-symmetry order parameter components, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4445 (2000).
  34. W.-H. Hsiao, Universal collective modes in two-dimensional chiral superfluids, Phys. Rev. B 100, 094510 (2019).
  35. D. Vollhardt and P. Woelfle, The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3, 1st ed. (CRC Press, London, 1990), p. 640.
  36. G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009).
  37. R. Ling, J. Saunders, and E. R. Dobbs, The collective modes of superfluid He3-A, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26, 119 (1987).
  38. N. R. Poniatowski, J. B. Curtis, A. Yacoby, and P. Narang, Spectroscopic signatures of time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity, Commun. Phys. 5, 44 (2022).
  39. B. A. Levitan, Y. Oreg, E. Berg, M. S. Rudner, and I. Iorsh, Linear spectroscopy of collective modes and the gap structure in two-dimensional superconductors, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043170 (2024).
  40. S. Sarkar and S. Maiti, Electronic Raman response of a superconductor across a time reversal symmetry breaking phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094515 (2024).
  41. L. Schwarz, B. Fauseweh, N. Tsuji, N. Cheng, N. Bittner, H. Krull, M. Berciu, G. S. Uhrig, A. P. Schnyder, S. Kaiser, and D. Manske, Classification and characterization of nonequilibrium Higgs modes in unconventional superconductors, Nat. Commun. 11, 287 (2020).
  42. J. Garaud, M. Silaev, and E. Babaev, Microscopically derived multi-component Ginzburg–Landau theories for s+is superconducting state, Phys. C: Supercond. Appl. 533, 63 (2017).
  43. Y. Ren, J.-H. Xu, and C. S. Ting, Ginzburg-Landau equations for mixed s+d symmetry superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 53, 2249 (1996).
  44. Q. Han and L. Zhang, Ginzburg-Landau theory and vortex structure for a d+s-wave superconductor with orthorhombic distortion, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11942 (1997).
  45. P. W. Anderson, Random-phase approximation in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958).
  46. N. Tsuji and H. Aoki, Theory of Anderson pseudospin resonance with Higgs mode in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 92, 064508 (2015).
  47. S. Maiti, A. V. Chubukov, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Conservation laws, vertex corrections, and screening in Raman spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014503 (2017).
  48. T. Cea and L. Benfatto, Signature of the Leggett mode in the A1g Raman response: From MgB2 to iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 94, 064512 (2016).
  49. S. Maiti and P. J. Hirschfeld, Collective modes in superconductors with competing s- and d-wave interactions, Phys. Rev. B 92, 094506 (2015).
  50. E. A. Yuzbashyan, B. L. Altshuler, V. B. Kuznetsov, and V. Z. Enolskii, Nonequilibrium Cooper pairing in the nonadiabatic regime, Phys. Rev. B 72, 220503 (2005).
  51. E. A. Yuzbashyan, O. Tsyplyatyev, and B. L. Altshuler, Relaxation and persistent oscillations of the order parameter in fermionic condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 179905(E) (2006).
  52. F. Peronaci, M. Schiró, and M. Capone, Transient dynamics of d-Wave superconductors after a sudden excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 257001 (2015).
  53. T. Papenkort, T. Kuhn, and V. M. Axt, Coherent control of the gap dynamics of BCS superconductors in the nonadiabatic regime, Phys. Rev. B 78, 132505 (2008).
  54. S. Dal Conte, C. Giannetti, G. Coslovich, F. Cilento, D. Bossini, T. Abebaw, F. Banfi, G. Ferrini, H. Eisaki, M. Greven, A. Damascelli, D. van der Marel, and F. Parmigiani, Disentangling the electronic and phononic glue in a high-Tc superconductor, Science 335, 1600 (2012).
  55. A. Pashkin, M. Porer, M. Beyer, K. W. Kim, A. Dubroka, C. Bernhard, X. Yao, Y. Dagan, R. Hackl, A. Erb, J. Demsar, R. Huber, and A. Leitenstorfer, Femtosecond response of quasiparticles and phonons in superconducting YBa2Cu3O7−δ studied by wideband terahertz spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 067001 (2010).
  56. F. Rossi and T. Kuhn, Theory of ultrafast phenomena in photoexcited semiconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 895 (2002).
  57. F. Junginger, B. Mayer, C. Schmidt, O. Schubert, S. Mährlein, A. Leitenstorfer, R. Huber, and A. Pashkin, Nonperturbative interband response of a bulk InSb semiconductor driven off resonantly by terahertz electromagnetic few-cycle pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 147403 (2012).
  58. N. Gedik, J. Orenstein, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, and W. N. Hardy, Diffusion of nonequilibrium quasiparticles in a cuprate superconductor, Science 300, 1410 (2003).
  59. A. Shankar, E. A. Yuzbashyan, V. Gurarie, P. Zoller, J. J. Bollinger, and A. M. Rey, Simulating dynamical phases of chiral p+ip superconductors with a trapped ion magnet, PRX Quantum 3, 040324 (2022).
  60. A. C. Potter and P. A. Lee, Engineering a p+ip superconductor: Comparison of topological insulator and Rashba spin-orbit-coupled materials, Phys. Rev. B 83, 184520 (2011).
  61. L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008).
  62. J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Optical responses of chiral Majorana edge states in two-dimensional topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 237002 (2021).
  63. J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation