Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Excited states from local effective Hamiltonians of matrix product states and their entanglement spectrum transition

Denise Cocchiarella1,2, Mingru Yang1,2, Yueshui Zhang3, Mari Carmen Bañuls1,2, Hong-Hao Tu3, and Yuhan Liu1,2,*

  • *Contact author: yuhan.liu@mpq.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. B 113, 205145 – Published 26 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/prgj-ndfm

Abstract

Solving excited states is a challenging task for interacting systems. For one-dimensional critical systems, however, excited states can be directly accessed from the eigenvectors of the local effective Hamiltonian that is constructed from the ground state obtained by variational matrix product state (MPS) optimization. Despite its numerical success, the theoretical mechanism underlying this method has remained largely unexplored. In this work, we provide a conformal field theory (CFT) perspective that helps elucidate this connection. The key insight is that this construction effectively uses a truncated basis of ground-state Schmidt vectors to represent excited states, where the contribution of each Schmidt vector can be expressed as a CFT correlation function and shown to decay with increasing Schmidt index. The CFT analysis further predicts an entanglement-spectrum transition of excited states as the ratio of the subsystem size to the total system size is varied. Our numerical results support this picture and demonstrate a reorganization of the entanglement spectrum into distinct conformal towers as this ratio changes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  2. S. Östlund and S. Rommer, Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3537 (1995).
  3. F. Verstraete, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac, Density matrix renormalization group and periodic boundary conditions: A quantum information perspective, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 227205 (2004).
  4. D. Perez-Garcia, F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product state representations, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 401 (2007).
  5. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011).
  6. J. I. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).
  7. F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Adv. Phys. 57, 143 (2008).
  8. J. I. Cirac and F. Verstraete, Renormalization and tensor product states in spin chains and lattices, J. Phys. A 42, 504004 (2009).
  9. R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys. 349, 117 (2014).
  10. P. Silvi, F. Tschirsich, M. Gerster, J. Jünemann, D. Jaschke, M. Rizzi, and S. Montangero, The tensor networks anthology: Simulation techniques for many-body quantum lattice systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 8 (2019).
  11. K. Okunishi, T. Nishino, and H. Ueda, Developments in the tensor network — From statistical mechanics to quantum entanglement, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 062001 (2022).
  12. M. C. Bañuls, Tensor network algorithms: A route map, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 173 (2023).
  13. T. Xiang, Density Matrix and Tensor Network Renormalization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023).
  14. J. L. Cardy, Conformal invariance and universality in finite-size scaling, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 17, L385 (1984).
  15. C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 424, 443 (1994).
  16. G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003).
  17. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. (2004) P06002.
  18. Q. Hu, A. Franco-Rubio, and G. Vidal, Emergent universality in critical quantum spin chains: Entanglement Virasoro algebra, arXiv:2009.11383.
  19. Y. Liu, Y. Kusuki, J. Kudler-Flam, R. Sohal, and S. Ryu, Multipartite entanglement in two-dimensional chiral topological liquids, Phys. Rev. B 109, 085108 (2024).
  20. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully, Phys. Rev. B 73, 094423 (2006).
  21. N. Chepiga and F. Mila, Excitation spectrum and density matrix renormalization group iterations, Phys. Rev. B 96, 054425 (2017).
  22. A. A. Eberharter, L. Vanderstraeten, F. Verstraete, and A. M. Läuchli, Extracting the speed of light from matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 226502 (2023).
  23. X. Li, Z. Zhou, G. Xu, R. Chi, Y. Guo, T. Liu, H. Liao, and T. Xiang, Accurate determination of low-energy eigenspectra with multitarget matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045115 (2024).
  24. D. Cocchiarella and M. C. Bañuls, Low-temperature Gibbs states with tensor networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033184 (2025).
  25. O. Kovalska, J. von Delft, and A. Gleis, Tangent space Krylov computation of real-frequency spectral functions: Influence of density-assisted hopping on 2D Mott physics, arXiv:2510.07279.
  26. F. C. Alcaraz, M. I. Berganza, and G. Sierra, Entanglement of low-energy excitations in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 201601 (2011).
  27. M. I. Berganza, F. C. Alcaraz, and G. Sierra, Entanglement of excited states in critical spin chains, J. Stat. Mech. (2012) P01016.
  28. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010).
  29. M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P08024.
  30. G. Vidal, Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003).
  31. I. P. McCulloch, From density-matrix renormalization group to matrix product states, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P10014.
  32. P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field, Ann. Phys. 57, 79 (1970).
  33. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases 4 (2022).
  34. J. Cardy and E. Tonni, Entanglement Hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory, J. Stat. Mech. (2016) 123103.
  35. Y. Liu, Y. Zou, and S. Ryu, Operator fusion from wave-function overlap: Universal finite-size corrections and application to the Haagerup model, Phys. Rev. B 107, 155124 (2023).
  36. For simplicity, we perform the CFT derivation with periodic boundary conditions. Changing to open boundary conditions is expected to modify only subleading terms and therefore does not affect the qualitative behavior.
  37. K. Ohmori and Y. Tachikawa, Physics at the entangling surface, J. Stat. Mech. (2015) P04010.
  38. A. M. Läuchli, Operator content of real-space entanglement spectra at conformal critical points, arXiv:1303.0741.
  39. J. L. Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula, Nucl. Phys. B 324, 581 (1989).
  40. Y. You, E. Wybo, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Observing quasiparticles through the entanglement lens, Phys. Rev. B 106, L161104 (2022).
  41. A. Zamolodchikov and V. Fateev, Nonlocal (parafermion) currents in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory and self-dual critical points in Zn-symmetric statistical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 62, 215 (1985).
  42. W. Li, S. Yang, H.-H. Tu, and M. Cheng, Criticality in translation-invariant parafermion chains, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115133 (2015).
  43. I. Affleck, M. Oshikawa, and H. Saleur, Boundary critical phenomena in the three-state Potts model, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 5827 (1998).
  44. J. Cardy and C. P. Herzog, Universal thermal corrections to single interval entanglement entropy for two dimensional conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 171603 (2014).
  45. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Quantum quenches in extended systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P06008.
  46. D. Cocchiarella, M. Yang, Y. Zhang, M. C. Bañuls, H.-H. Tu, and Y. Liu, Excited states from local effective Hamiltonians of matrix product states and their entanglement spectrum transition [data set], Zenodo (2025), doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17094370.
  47. S. Bravyi, Lagrangian representation for fermionic linear optics, Quantum Inf. Comp. 5, 216 (2005).
  48. S. Bravyi and D. Gosset, Complexity of quantum impurity problems, Commun. Math. Phys. 356, 451 (2017).
  49. A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys. Usp. 44, 131 (2001).
  50. I. Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, J. Phys. A 36, L205 (2003).
  51. L. Fidkowski, Entanglement spectrum of topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 130502 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation