- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Replica Keldysh field theory of quantum-jump processes: General formalism and application to imbalanced and inefficient fermion counting

Felix Kloiber-Tollinger and Lukas M. Sieberer*

  • *Contact author: lukas.sieberer@uibk.ac.at
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 114, 024307 – Published 13 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pgyt-cs59

Abstract

Measurement-induced phase transitions have largely been explored for projective or continuous measurements of Hermitian observables, assuming perfect detection without information loss. Yet such transitions also arise in more general settings, including quantum-jump processes with non-Hermitian jump operators, and under inefficient detection. A theoretical framework for treating these broader scenarios has been missing. Here we develop a comprehensive replica Keldysh field theory for general quantum-jump processes in both bosonic and fermionic systems. Our formalism provides a unified description of pure-state quantum trajectories under efficient detection and mixed-state dynamics emerging from inefficient monitoring, with deterministic Lindbladian evolution appearing as a limiting case. It thus establishes a direct connection between phase transitions in nonequilibrium steady states of driven open quantum matter and in measurement-induced dynamics. As an application, we study imbalanced and inefficient fermion counting in a one-dimensional lattice system: monitored gain and loss of fermions occurring at different rates, with a fraction of gain and loss jumps undetected. For imbalanced but efficient counting, we recover the qualitative picture of the balanced case: entanglement obeys an area law for any nonzero jump rate, with an extended quantum-critical regime emerging between two parametrically separated length scales. Inefficient detection introduces a finite correlation length beyond which entanglement, as quantified by the fermionic logarithmic negativity, obeys an area law, while the subsystem entropy shows volume-law scaling. Numerical simulations support our analytical findings. Our results offer a general and versatile theoretical foundation for studying measurement-induced phenomena across a wide class of monitored and open quantum systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (85)

  1. Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018).
  2. B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entanglement, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019).
  3. Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134306 (2019).
  4. M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 335 (2023).
  5. X. Cao, A. Tilloy, and A. De Luca, Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous monitoring, SciPost Phys. 7, 024 (2019).
  6. Y. Fuji and Y. Ashida, Measurement-induced quantum criticality under continuous monitoring, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054302 (2020).
  7. S. Goto and I. Danshita, Measurement-induced transitions of the entanglement scaling law in ultracold gases with controllable dissipation, Phys. Rev. A 102, 033316 (2020).
  8. Q. Tang and W. Zhu, Measurement-induced phase transition: A case study in the nonintegrable model by density-matrix renormalization group calculations, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013022 (2020).
  9. N. Lang and H. P. Büchler, Entanglement transition in the projective transverse field Ising model, Phys. Rev. B 102, 094204 (2020).
  10. D. Rossini and E. Vicari, Measurement-induced dynamics of many-body systems at quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035119 (2020).
  11. O. Alberton, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Entanglement transition in a monitored free-fermion chain: From extended criticality to area law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170602 (2021).
  12. Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Symmetry enriched phases of quantum circuits, Ann. Phys. 435, 168618 (2021).
  13. M. Buchhold, Y. Minoguchi, A. Altland, and S. Diehl, Effective theory for the measurement-induced phase transition of Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041004 (2021).
  14. T. Botzung, S. Diehl, and M. Müller, Engineered dissipation induced entanglement transition in quantum spin chains: From logarithmic growth to area law, Phys. Rev. B 104, 184422 (2021).
  15. X. Turkeshi, A. Biella, R. Fazio, M. Dalmonte, and M. Schiró, Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quantum Ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224210 (2021).
  16. C.-M. Jian, B. Bauer, A. Keselman, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Criticality and entanglement in nonunitary quantum circuits and tensor networks of noninteracting fermions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134206 (2022).
  17. T. Müller, S. Diehl, and M. Buchhold, Measurement-induced dark state phase transitions in long-ranged fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010605 (2022).
  18. G. Kells, D. Meidan, and A. Romito, Topological transitions in weakly monitored free fermions, SciPost Phys. 14, 031 (2023).
  19. I. Poboiko, P. Pöpperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Theory of free fermions under random projective measurements, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041046 (2023).
  20. C.-M. Jian, H. Shapourian, B. Bauer, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in quantum circuits of non-interacting fermions: Born-rule versus forced measurements, arXiv:2302.09094.
  21. M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Nonlinear sigma models for monitored dynamics of free fermions, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041045 (2023).
  22. J. Merritt and L. Fidkowski, Entanglement transitions with free fermions, Phys. Rev. B 107, 064303 (2023).
  23. K. Chahine and M. Buchhold, Entanglement phases, localization, and multifractality of monitored free fermions in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054313 (2024).
  24. I. Poboiko, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement-induced phase transition for free fermions above one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 110403 (2024).
  25. M. Tsitsishvili, D. Poletti, M. Dalmonte, and G. Chiriacò, Measurement induced transitions in non-Markovian free fermion ladders, SciPost Phys. Core 7, 011 (2024).
  26. M. Fava, L. Piroli, D. Bernard, and A. Nahum, Monitored fermions with conserved U(1) charge, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043246 (2024).
  27. X. Turkeshi, L. Piroli, and M. Schirò, Density and current statistics in boundary-driven monitored fermionic chains, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144306 (2024).
  28. H. Guo, M. S. Foster, C.-M. Jian, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Field theory of monitored interacting fermion dynamics with charge conservation, Phys. Rev. B 112, 064304 (2025).
  29. I. Poboiko, P. Pöpperl, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Measurement-induced transitions for interacting fermions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024204 (2025).
  30. E. Starchl, M. H. Fischer, and L. M. Sieberer, Generalized Zeno effect and entanglement dynamics induced by fermion counting, PRX Quantum 6, 030302 (2025).
  31. T. Müller, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Monitored interacting Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174201 (2025).
  32. R. D. Soares, Y. Le Gal, and M. Schirò, Entanglement transition due to particle losses in a monitored fermionic chain, Phys. Rev. B 111, 064313 (2025).
  33. B. Fan, C. Yin, and A. M. García-García, Entanglement dynamics of monitored noninteracting fermions on graphics processing units, Phys. Rev. B 113, 094317 (2026).
  34. C. Niederegger, T. Vovk, E. Starchl, and L. M. Sieberer, Absence of measurement- and unraveling-induced entanglement transitions in continuously monitored one-dimensional free fermions, Phys. Rev. B 113, 144317 (2026).
  35. B. Ladewig, S. Diehl, and M. Buchhold, Monitored open fermion dynamics: Exploring the interplay of measurement, decoherence, and free Hamiltonian evolution, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033001 (2022).
  36. Y. Minoguchi, P. Rabl, and M. Buchhold, Continuous Gaussian measurements of the free boson CFT: A model for exactly solvable and detectable measurement-induced dynamics, SciPost Phys. 12, 009 (2022).
  37. G. Passarelli, X. Turkeshi, A. Russomanno, P. Lucignano, M. Schirò, and R. Fazio, Many-body dynamics in monitored atomic gases without postselection barrier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 163401 (2024).
  38. C. Y. Leung, D. Meidan, and A. Romito, Theory of free fermions dynamics under partial postselected monitoring, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021020 (2025).
  39. C. Y. Leung and A. Romito, Entanglement and operator correlation signatures of many-body quantum Zeno phases in inefficiently monitored noisy systems, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022427 (2025).
  40. A. Paviglianiti, G. D. Fresco, A. Silva, B. Spagnolo, D. Valenti, and A. Carollo, Breakdown of measurement-induced phase transitions under information loss, Quantum 9, 1781 (2025).
  41. M. Mezard, G. Parisi, and M. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond, World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 9 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986).
  42. F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
  43. Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104301 (2020).
  44. C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104302 (2020).
  45. A. Altland and B. D. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010).
  46. L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 096001 (2016).
  47. L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 025004 (2025).
  48. F. Thompson and A. Kamenev, Field theory of many-body Lindbladian dynamics, Ann. Phys. 455, 169385 (2023).
  49. A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-equilibrium Systems, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023).
  50. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012).
  51. C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, The Quantum World of Ultra-Cold Atoms and Light, Book I: Foundations of Quantum Optics, Cold Atoms Vol. 2 (Imperial College Press, London, UK, 2014).
  52. C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, The Quantum World of Ultra-Cold Atoms and Light, Book II: The Physics of Quantum-Optical Devices, Cold Atoms Vol. 4 (Imperial College Press, London, UK, 2015).
  53. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009).
  54. K. Jacobs, Quantum Measurement Theory and Its Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
  55. S. Lieu, M. McGinley, and N. R. Cooper, Tenfold way for quadratic Lindbladians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 040401 (2020).
  56. A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Symmetry classes of open fermionic quantum matter, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021037 (2021).
  57. C. Gneiting, A. Koottandavida, A. V. Rozhkov, and F. Nori, Unraveling the topology of dissipative quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023036 (2022).
  58. L. Sá, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Symmetry classification of many-body Lindbladians: Tenfold way and beyond, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031019 (2023).
  59. K. Kawabata, A. Kulkarni, J. Li, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Symmetry of open quantum systems: Classification of dissipative quantum chaos, PRX Quantum 4, 030328 (2023).
  60. Z. Xiao and K. Kawabata, Topology of monitored quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 113, 134307 (2026).
  61. A. Bhuiyan, H. Pan, and C.-M. Jian, Free-fermion dynamics with measurements: Topological classification and adaptive preparation of topological states, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 023147 (2026).
  62. H. Shapourian, K. Shiozaki, and S. Ryu, Partial time-reversal transformation and entanglement negativity in fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 165101 (2017).
  63. H. Shapourian and S. Ryu, Entanglement negativity of fermions: Monotonicity, separability criterion, and classification of few-mode states, Phys. Rev. A 99, 022310 (2019).
  64. M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998).
  65. A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Adv. Phys. 63, 77 (2014).
  66. For fermionic systems, the tensor product is understood within the bosonic Hilbert space obtained via a Jordan-Wigner transformation. Fermionic operators can then be implemented in the replicated Hilbert space [21, 26].
  67. Q. Yang, Y. Zuo, and D. E. Liu, Keldysh nonlinear sigma model for a free-fermion gas under continuous measurements, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033174 (2023).
  68. B. Buča and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: Transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys. 14, 073007 (2012).
  69. V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014).
  70. I. Klich and L. Levitov, Quantum noise as an entanglement meter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100502 (2009).
  71. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, New York, NY, 1997).
  72. A. W. W. Ludwig, Topological phases: Classification of topological insulators and superconductors of non-interacting fermions, and beyond, Phys. Scr. 2016, 014001 (2016).
  73. I. Peschel and V. Eisler, Reduced density matrices and entanglement entropy in free lattice models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 504003 (2009).
  74. V. Alba and F. Carollo, Logarithmic negativity in out-of-equilibrium open free-fermion chains: An exactly solvable case, SciPost Phys. 15, 124 (2023).
  75. T. Prosen, Third quantization: A general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New J. Phys. 10, 043026 (2008); Spectral theorem for the Lindblad equation for quadratic open fermionic systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P07020.
  76. T. Barthel and Y. Zhang, Solving quasi-free and quadratic Lindblad master equations for open fermionic and bosonic systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 113101.
  77. C.-E. Bardyn, M. A. Baranov, C. V. Kraus, E. Rico, A. Imamoglu, P. Zoller, and S. Diehl, Topology by dissipation, New J. Phys. 15, 085001 (2013).
  78. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  79. S. Sayyad, J. Yu, A. G. Grushin, and L. M. Sieberer, Entanglement spectrum crossings reveal non-Hermitian dynamical topology, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033022 (2021).
  80. F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian skin effect and chiral damping in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170401 (2019).
  81. H. Fröml, A. Chiocchetta, C. Kollath, and S. Diehl, Fluctuation-induced quantum Zeno effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040402 (2019).
  82. M. Žnidarič, Exact solution for a diffusive nonequilibrium steady state of an open quantum chain, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) L05002.
  83. Y. L. Gal and M. Schirò, Replica field theory of quantum jumps monitoring: Application to the Ising chain, arXiv:2511.22506.
  84. F. Kloiber-Tollinger and L. M. Sieberer, Data for “Replica Keldysh field theory of quantum-jump processes: General formalism and application to imbalanced and inefficient fermion counting,” Zenodo, 2026, https://zenodo.org/records/20660728.
  85. E. Starchl and L. M. Sieberer, Quantum quenches in driven-dissipative quadratic fermionic systems with parity-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013016 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 114, 024307– Published 13 July, 2026
  • Received 23 December 2025
  • Accepted 15 June 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation