- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Relationship between constraining fields and effective fields in constrained density functional theory calculations for spin dynamics

Marian Arale Brännvall, Björn Alling, and Rickard Armiento

PDF

Phys. Rev. B 113, 064437 – Published 24 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nwd8-nsk3

Abstract

For density functional theory (DFT) based adiabatic spin dynamics, we investigate the relationship between the effective fields driving the dynamics of the atomic magnetic moments and the constraining fields used to enforce a specific noncollinear magnetic configuration. We revisit a derivation and a numerical comparison by Streib et al. [Phys. Rev. B 102, 214407 (2020)] suggesting that the effective field from the energy gradient with respect to the magnetic moment direction and the constraining fields differ for systems with mean-field terms in the Hamiltonian, which they extended to include DFT. We find that a derivation focused on the DFT case clarifies what quantities to extract from the computational software to best represent the two fields. In particular, the definition of the magnetic moment magnitude must be consistent when making the comparison. This reestablishes the relationship of the two fields as having equal amplitude but opposite directions, in agreement with several earlier works. We also show that the constraining fields can be rescaled to reflect the correct field acting on the full, physically meaningful magnetic moment, rather than on the reduced moment used for numerical stability. Our numerical investigation is extended beyond the original case of an iron dimer to supercells of body-centered cubic iron in both ferromagnetic and disordered magnetic backgrounds, which further supports our conclusions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. E. Beaurepaire, J.-C. Merle, A. Daunois, and J.-Y. Bigot, Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250 (1996).
  2. T. J. Penfold, J. O. Johansson, and J. Eng, Towards understanding and controlling ultrafast dynamics in molecular photomagnets, Coord. Chem. Rev. 494, 215346 (2023).
  3. A. Bergman, B. Skubic, J. Hellsvik, L. Nordström, A. Delin, and O. Eriksson, Ultrafast switching in a synthetic antiferromagnetic magnetic random-access memory device, Phys. Rev. B 83, 224429 (2011).
  4. G. Venkat, D. A. Allwood, and T. J. Hayward, Magnetic domain walls: Types, processes and applications, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 57, 063001 (2024).
  5. O. Eriksson, A. Bergman, L. Bergqvist, and J. Hellsvik, Atomistic Spin Dynamics: Foundations and Applications, first ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017).
  6. H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Hou, M. Qin, X. Gao, and J. Liu, Magnetic skyrmions: Materials, manipulation, detection, and applications in spintronic devices, Mater. Futures 2, 032201 (2023).
  7. V. P. Antropov, M. I. Katsnelson, M. van Schilfgaarde, and B. N. Harmon, Ab initio spin dynamics in magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 729 (1995).
  8. V. P. Antropov, M. I. Katsnelson, B. N. Harmon, M. van Schilfgaarde, and D. Kusnezov, Spin dynamics in magnets: Equation of motion and finite temperature effects, Phys. Rev. B 54, 1019 (1996).
  9. I. Stockem, A. Bergman, A. Glensk, T. Hickel, F. Körmann, B. Grabowski, J. Neugebauer, and B. Alling, Anomalous phonon lifetime shortening in paramagnetic CrN caused by spin-lattice coupling: A combined spin and ab initio molecular dynamics study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 125902 (2018).
  10. D. Gambino, J. Klarbring, and B. Alling, Phase stability of Fe from first principles: Atomistic spin dynamics coupled with ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and thermodynamic integration, Phys. Rev. B 107, 014102 (2023).
  11. M. Arale Brännvall, D. Gambino, R. Armiento, and B. Alling, Machine learning approach for longitudinal spin fluctuation effects in bcc Fe at Tc and under Earth-core conditions, Phys. Rev. B 105, 144417 (2022).
  12. G. M. Stocks, B. Ujfalussy, X. Wang, D. M. C. Nicholson, W. A. Shelton, Y. Wang, A. Canning, and B. L. Györffy, Towards a constrained local moment model for first principles spin dynamics, Philos. Mag. B 78, 665 (1998).
  13. K. Capelle, G. Vignale, and B. L. Györffy, Spin currents and spin dynamics in time-dependent density-functional theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206403 (2001).
  14. K. Capelle and B. L. Gyorffy, Exploring dynamical magnetism with time-dependent density-functional theory: From spin fluctuations to Gilbert damping, Europhys. Lett. 61, 354 (2003).
  15. P. H. Dederichs, S. Blügel, R. Zeller, and H. Akai, Ground states of constrained systems: Application to cerium impurities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2512 (1984).
  16. D. M. Edwards, On the dynamics of itinerant electron magnets in the paramagnetic state, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 45, 151 (1984).
  17. B. Újfalussy, X.-D. Wang, D. M. C. Nicholson, W. A. Shelton, G. M. Stocks, Y. Wang, and B. L. Gyorffy, Constrained density functional theory for first principles spin dynamics, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 4824 (1999).
  18. P.-W. Ma and S. L. Dudarev, Constrained density functional for noncollinear magnetism, Phys. Rev. B 91, 054420 (2015).
  19. S. Streib, V. Borisov, M. Pereiro, A. Bergman, E. Sjöqvist, A. Delin, O. Eriksson, and D. Thonig, Equation of motion and the constraining field in ab initio spin dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 102, 214407 (2020).
  20. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).
  21. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994).
  22. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
  23. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  24. S. Streib, A. Szilva, V. Borisov, M. Pereiro, A. Bergman, E. Sjöqvist, A. Delin, M. I. Katsnelson, O. Eriksson, and D. Thonig, Exchange constants for local spin Hamiltonians from tight-binding models, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224413 (2021).
  25. S. Streib, R. Cardias, M. Pereiro, A. Bergman, E. Sjöqvist, C. Barreteau, A. Delin, O. Eriksson, and D. Thonig, Adiabatic spin dynamics and effective exchange interactions from constrained tight-binding electronic structure theory: Beyond the Heisenberg regime, Phys. Rev. B 105, 224408 (2022).
  26. R. Cardias, S. Streib, Z. Lu, M. Pereiro, A. Bergman, E. Sjöqvist, C. Barreteau, A. Delin, O. Eriksson, and D. Thonig, Coupled spin-lattice dynamics from the tight-binding electronic structure, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144303 (2024).
  27. T. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004).
  28. T. Yang, Z. Cai, Z. Huang, W. Tang, R. Shi, A. Godfrey, H. Liu, Y. Lin, C.-W. Nan, M. Ye, L. F. Zhang, K. Wang, H. Wang, and B. Xu, Deep learning illuminates spin and lattice interaction in magnetic materials, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064427 (2024).
  29. U. von Barth and L. Hedin, A local exchange-correlation potential for the spin polarized case. I, J. Phys. C 5, 1629 (1972).
  30. J. Kübler, Theory of Itinerant Electron Magnetism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, Great Britain, 2000).
  31. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  32. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  33. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  34. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
  35. B. Alling, T. Marten, and I. A. Abrikosov, Effect of magnetic disorder and strong electron correlations on the thermodynamics of CrN, Phys. Rev. B 82, 184430 (2010).
  36. B. L. Gyorffy, A. J. Pindor, J. Staunton, G. M. Stocks, and H. Winter, A first-principles theory of ferromagnetic phase transitions in metals, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 15, 1337 (1985).
  37. A. Savitzky and M. J. E. Golay, Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures, Anal. Chem. 36, 1627 (1964).
  38. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  39. R. Martin, Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2020).
  40. A. Liechtenstein, M. Katsnelson, V. Antropov, and V. Gubanov, Local spin density functional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 67, 65 (1987).
  41. P. Bruno, Exchange interaction parameters and adiabatic spin-wave spectra of ferromagnets: A “renormalized magnetic force theorem”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 087205 (2003).
  42. I. V. Solovyev, Exchange interactions and magnetic force theorem, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104428 (2021).
  43. I. V. Solovyev, Linear response theories for interatomic exchange interactions, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 223001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 113, 064437– Published 24 February, 2026
  • Received 25 March 2025
  • Revised 29 January 2026
  • Accepted 3 February 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by Bibsam.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation