Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Josephson anomalous vortices

Dan Crawford, Stefan Ilić, Pauli Virtanen, and Tero T. Heikkilä

  • Department of Physics and Nanoscience Center, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (YFL), FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland

Phys. Rev. B 113, L020503 – Published 20 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nsdg-sn1b

Abstract

We show that vortices with circulating current, related with odd-frequency triplet pairing, appear in Josephson junctions where the barrier is a weak ferromagnet with strong spin-orbit coupling. By symmetry analysis we show that there is an additional term—a rotary invariant—in the superconducting free energy which allows for magnetoelectric effects even when the previously considered Lifshitz invariant vanishes. Using a microscopic model based on a modified Usadel equation incorporating those effects, we show that the size, shape, and position of these vortices can be controlled by manipulating Rashba spin-orbit coupling in the weak link, via gates, and we suggest that these vortices could be detected via scanning magnetometry techniques. We also show that the transverse triplet components of the pairing amplitudes can form a texture.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (49)

  1. A. A. Abrikosov, The magnetic properties of superconducting alloys, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2, 199 (1957).
  2. A. V. Ustinov, Solitons in Josephson junctions, Phys. D 123, 315 (1998).
  3. V. S. Stolyarov, T. Cren, C. Brun, I. A. Golovchanskiy, O. V. Skryabina, D. I. Kasatonov, M. M. Khapaev, M. Y. Kupriyanov, A. A. Golubov, and D. Roditchev, Expansion of a superconducting vortex core into a diffusive metal, Nat. Commun. 9, 2277 (2018).
  4. D. Roditchev, C. Brun, L. Serrier-Garcia, J. C. Cuevas, V. H. L. Bessa, M. V. Milošević, F. Debontridder, V. Stolyarov, and T. Cren, Direct observation of Josephson vortex cores, Nat. Phys. 11, 332 (2015).
  5. S. S. Pershoguba, K. Björnson, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and A. V. Balatsky, Currents induced by magnetic impurities in superconductors with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 116602 (2015).
  6. M. Amundsen and J. Linder, Supercurrent vortex pinball via a triplet cooper pair inverse Edelstein effect, Phys. Rev. B 96, 064508 (2017).
  7. F. S. Bergeret and I. V. Tokatly, Theory of the magnetic response in finite two-dimensional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 102, 060506(R) (2020).
  8. R. Rantanen and V. B. Eltsov, Transitions in vortex skyrmion structures in superfluid He3–A driven by an analog of the zero-charge effect, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104505 (2023).
  9. R. Rantanen and V. Eltsov, Competition of vortex core structures in superfluid He3–B, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043112 (2024).
  10. R. Rantanen, E. Thuneberg, and V. Eltsov, Structure of a single-quantum vortex in He3–A, J. Low Temp. Phys. 220, 88 (2025).
  11. D. F. Agterberg, Magnetoelectric effects, helical phases, and FFLO phases, in Non-Centrosymmetric Superconductors: Introduction and Overview, edited by E. Bauer and M. Sigrist (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), pp. 155–170.
  12. M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, and X. Wang, The superconducting diode effect, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 558 (2023).
  13. J. Hasan, D. Shaffer, M. Khodas, and A. Levchenko, Supercurrent diode effect in helical superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024508 (2024).
  14. V. M. Edelstein, Magnetoelectric effect in polar superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2004 (1995).
  15. V. M. Edelstein, Magnetoelectric effect in dirty superconductors with broken mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 72, 172501 (2005).
  16. O. Dimitrova and M. V. Feigel'man, Theory of a two-dimensional superconductor with broken inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 76, 014522 (2007).
  17. P. Virtanen, Magnetoelectric effects in diffusive two-dimensional superconductors studied by the nonlinear σ model, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024510 (2025).
  18. P. Virtanen, F. S. Bergeret, and I. V. Tokatly, Magnetoelectric effects in superconductors due to spin-orbit scattering: Nonlinear σ-model description, Phys. Rev. B 104, 064515 (2021).
  19. M. Tinkham, Ginzburg-Landau theory, in Introduction to Superconductivity (Dover, New York, 2004), pp. 110–146.
  20. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Phase transitions of the second kind, in Course of Theoretical Physics, Statistical Physics (Pergamon Press Ltd, Oxford, 1958), Vol. 5, pp. 424–454.
  21. C. Gorini, R. Raimondi, and P. Schwab, Onsager relations in a two-dimensional electron gas with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 246604 (2012).
  22. F. S. Bergeret and I. V. Tokatly, Spin-orbit coupling as a source of long-range triplet proximity effect in superconductor-ferromagnet hybrid structures, Phys. Rev. B 89, 134517 (2014).
  23. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/nsdg-sn1b for derivation of the rotary invariant from the microscopic nonlinear σ model; analytic derivation of the prefactors for the Lifshitz and rotary invariants; a brief discussion on the formation of a vortex due to the rotary invariant on a superconducting disk; additional plots highlighting the transition between vortices and antivortices as a function of α and system size; and additional plots showing the effect of finite phase bias.
  24. P. Virtanen, F. S. Bergeret, and I. V. Tokatly, Nonlinear σ model for disordered systems with intrinsic spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 105, 224517 (2022).
  25. T. Kokkeler, F. S. Bergeret, and I. V. Tokatly, Universal phenomenology of charge-spin interconversion and dynamics in diffusive systems with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 096001 (2025).
  26. T. T. Heikkilä, M. Silaev, P. Virtanen, and F. S. Bergeret, Thermal, electric and spin transport in superconductor/ferromagnetic-insulator structures, Prog. Surf. Sci. 94, 100540 (2019).
  27. F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Long-Range proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4096 (2001).
  28. M. A. Silaev, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Anomalous current in diffusive ferromagnetic Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 95, 184508 (2017).
  29. G. Schwiete, Nonlinear sigma model with particle-hole asymmetry for the disordered two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125422 (2021).
  30. S. Mironov and A. Buzdin, Spontaneous currents in superconducting systems with strong spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 077001 (2017).
  31. F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor-ferromagnet structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1321 (2005).
  32. “Antivortex pattern” refers here to the behavior of the charge current vector field, with a meaning similar to that used for magnetic textures. The meaning differs from antivortices in a scalar field, e.g., when discussing circulation of Abrikosov vortices, as it refers to the sign of the vector field Poincare index, P=+1 for vortex and P=−1 for antivortex, instead of the sign of the winding or circulation.
  33. V. Guillemin and A. Pollack, Oriented intersection theory, in Differential Topology (AMS Chelsea Publishing, Cambridge, 1974), pp. 141–149.
  34. Vector fields and the Euler number, in Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997), pp. 33–41.
  35. V. V. Dremov, S. Y. Grebenchuk, A. G. Shishkin, D. S. Baranov, R. A. Hovhannisyan, O. V. Skryabina, N. Lebedev, I. A. Golovchanskiy, V. I. Chichkov, C. Brun, T. Cren, V. M. Krasnov, A. A. Golubov, D. Roditchev, and V. S. Stolyarov, Local Josephson vortex generation and manipulation with a magnetic force microscope, Nat. Commun. 10, 4009 (2019).
  36. S. Y. Grebenchuk, R. A. Hovhannisyan, V. V. Dremov, A. G. Shishkin, V. I. Chichkov, A. A. Golubov, D. Roditchev, V. M. Krasnov, and V. S. Stolyarov, Observation of interacting Josephson vortex chains by magnetic force microscopy, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023105 (2020).
  37. J. Šoltýs, J. Feilhauer, I. Vetrova, J. Tóbik, K. Bublikov, T. Ščepka, J. Fedor, J. Dérer, and V. Cambel, Magnetic-field imaging using vortex-core MFM tip, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 242406 (2020).
  38. U. Kaiser, A. Schwarz, and R. Wiesendanger, Magnetic exchange force microscopy with atomic resolution, Nature (London) 446, 522 (2007).
  39. P. Welter, J. Rhensius, A. Morales, M. S. Wörnle, C.-H. Lambert, G. Puebla-Hellmann, P. Gambardella, and C. L. Degen, Scanning nitrogen-vacancy center magnetometry in large in-plane magnetic fields, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 074003 (2022).
  40. D. Vasyukov, Y. Anahory, L. Embon, D. Halbertal, J. Cuppens, L. Neeman, A. Finkler, Y. Segev, Y. Myasoedov, M. L. Rappaport, M. E. Huber, and E. Zeldov, A scanning superconducting quantum interference device with single electron spin sensitivity, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 639 (2013).
  41. S. Jayaram, M. Lenger, D. Zhao, L. Pupim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, R. Peng, M. Scheffler, R. Stöhr, M. S. Scheurer, J. Smet, and J. Wrachtrup, Probing vortex dynamics in 2D superconductors with scanning quantum microscope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 126001 (2025).
  42. S. M. Farzaneh, M. Hatefipour, W. F. Schiela, N. Lotfizadeh, P. Yu, B. H. Elfeky, W. M. Strickland, A. Matos-Abiague, and J. Shabani, Observing magnetoanisotropic weak antilocalization in near-surface quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013039 (2024).
  43. Z. Geng, A. Hijano, S. Ilić, M. Ilyn, I. Maasilta, A. Monfardini, M. Spies, E. Strambini, P. Virtanen, M. Calvo, C. González-Orellána, A. P. Helenius, S. Khorshidian, C. I. L. de Araujo, F. Levy-Bertrand, C. Rogero, F. Giazotto, F. S. Bergeret, and T. T. Heikkilä, Superconductor-ferromagnet hybrids for non-reciprocal electronics and detectors, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 36, 123001 (2023).
  44. H. Bai, J. Li, X. Deng, Q. Guo, X. Zhan, Y. Sun, S. Cheng, S. Xiao, P. Liu, D. Liu, J. Cai, and T. Zhu, Full-Scale field-free magnetization switching in Y3Fe5O12/Pt nanostructures for spin–orbit torque applications, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 8, 50 (2025).
  45. T. Kontos, M. Aprili, J. Lesueur, and X. Grison, Inhomogeneous superconductivity induced in a ferromagnet by proximity effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 304 (2001).
  46. V. V. Ryazanov, V. A. Oboznov, A. Yu. Rusanov, A. V. Veretennikov, A. A. Golubov, and J. Aarts, Coupling of two superconductors through a ferromagnet: Evidence for a π junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2427 (2001).
  47. B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature (London) 546, 270 (2017).
  48. Q. Shao, G. Yu, Y.-W. Lan, Y. Shi, M.-Y. Li, C. Zheng, X. Zhu, L.-J. Li, P. K. Amiri, and K. L. Wang, Strong Rashba-Edelstein effect-induced spin–orbit torques in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide/ferromagnet bilayers, Nano Lett. 16, 7514 (2016).
  49. D. Crawford, S. Ilić, P. Virtanen, and T. T. Heikkilä, Numerical modelling and computer algebra analysis for Josephson anomalous vortices (2025), doi: 10.17011/jyx/dataset/107259.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation