Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Guidelines for band gap opening in graphene superlattices with periodic π-vacancy distribution

Diyan Unmu Dzujah1, Hongde Yu1, and Thomas Heine1,2,3,*

  • *Contact author: thomas.heine@tu-dresden.de

Phys. Rev. B 114, 285406 – Published 4 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nbm9-xhj9

Abstract

Periodic π-vacancies in graphene superlattices (GSLs) provide a symmetry-based route to band gap opening in graphene by modifying the π-band dispersion, yet the symmetry conditions that determine whether a vacancy motif can open a band gap remain unclear. Here, we investigate periodic π-vacancy GSLs using a nearest-neighbor tight-binding model with one pz orbital per carbon site to identify the symmetry requirements for band gap opening. Here, π vacancies, resembling functionalized, substituted, or missing carbon sites, are modeled as site deletions in the π basis, and the corresponding hopping matrix elements to and from the deleted sites are set to zero. We focus on π-vacancy motifs with C2 and C3 point groups. A 3n×3n GSL, where n=1,2,3,⋯ is the integer scaling factor multiplying the honeycomb primitive-cell vectors, is required to fold K and K′ to Γ, which is one of the requirements for opening a band gap. For C3-type vacancies, the Dirac cones are pinned at the high-symmetry points, thus remaining at Γ in the folded 3n GSLs. However, those C2-type vacancies, which reduce the global point group of the GSL to D2h by preserving a pair of perpendicular mirror symmetries (σv⊥σd), can constrain the positions of Dirac cones at Γ. The absence of the σv and σd planes allows the cones to shift around Γ (±Δq,±Δq) in the 3n superlattice. The C3-type vacancies open a relatively larger band gap than the C2-type vacancies due to twofold degeneracy at Γ, while the C2-type vacancies leave the GSL with nondegenerate bands. The energy contours near the Dirac cone for C3-symmetric vacancies remain isotropic, while the absence of C3 generates anisotropic cones. The band gap openings in 3n superlattices scale linearly with defect concentration for each vacancy motif, with the D6h motif yielding the largest gap, reaching 314 meV at only 3.7% defect concentration. Disorder of the superlattice by missing vacancies or by vacancy displacements of one or two primitive lattice vectors of graphene breaks the C3 symmetry, lifts the degeneracy, and reduces the gap toward the pristine graphene limit.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (45)

  1. P. R. Wallace, The band theory of graphite, Phys. Rev. 71, 622 (1947).
  2. A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).
  3. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Katsnelson, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov, Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene, Nature (London) 438, 197 (2005).
  4. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science 306, 666 (2004).
  5. F. Joucken, Y. Tison, J. Lagoute, J. Dumont, D. Cabosart, B. Zheng, V. Repain, C. Chacon, Y. Girard, A. R. Botello-Méndez, et al., Localized state and charge transfer in nitrogen-doped graphene, Phys. Rev. B 85, 161408(R) (2012).
  6. T. G. Pedersen and J. G. Pedersen, Self-consistent tight-binding model of B and N doping in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155433 (2013).
  7. J. Gebhardt, R. J. Koch, W. Zhao, O. Höfert, K. Gotterbarm, S. Mammadov, C. Papp, A. Görling, H.-P. Steinrück, and T. Seyller, Growth and electronic structure of boron-doped graphene, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155437 (2013).
  8. A. Lherbier, S. M.-M. Dubois, X. Declerck, Y.-M. Niquet, S. Roche, and J.-C. Charlier, Transport properties of graphene containing structural defects, Phys. Rev. B 86, 075402 (2012).
  9. T. G. Pedersen, C. Flindt, J. Pedersen, N. A. Mortensen, A.-P. Jauho, and K. Pedersen, Graphene antidot lattices: Designed defects and spin qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136804 (2008).
  10. F. Ouyang, S. Peng, Z. Liu, and Z. Liu, Bandgap opening in graphene antidot lattices: The missing half, ACS Nano 5, 4023 (2011).
  11. S. Lebègue, M. Klintenberg, O. Eriksson, and M. I. Katsnelson, Accurate electronic band gap of pure and functionalized graphane from GW calculations, Phys. Rev. B 79, 245117 (2009).
  12. R. Balog, B. Jørgensen, L. Nilsson, M. Andersen, E. Rienks, M. Bianchi, M. Fanetti, E. Laegsgaard, A. Baraldi, S. Lizzit, et al., Bandgap opening in graphene induced by patterned hydrogen adsorption, Nat. Mater. 9, 315 (2010).
  13. S. Ryu, M. Y. Han, J. Maultzsch, T. F. Heinz, P. Kim, M. L. Steigerwald, and L. E. Brus, Reversible basal plane hydrogenation of graphene, Nano Lett. 8, 4597 (2008).
  14. C. - Y. Hou, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Electron fractionalization in two-dimensional graphenelike structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 186809 (2007).
  15. J. Tuček, K. Holá, A. B. Bourlinos, P. Błoński, A. Bakandritsos, J. Ugolotti, M. Dubecký, F. Karlický, V. Ranc, K. Čépe, et al., Room temperature organic magnets derived from sp3 functionalized graphene, Nat. Commun. 8, 14525 (2017).
  16. E. A. Kolesov, M. S. Tivanov, O. V. Korolik, V. A. Skuratov, O. O. Kapitanova, and G. N. Panin, Ion irradiation of supported graphene: Defect formation and atmospheric doping, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 284, 115918 (2022).
  17. W. Li, X. Wang, X. Zhang, S. Zhao, H. Duan, and J. Xue, Mechanism of the defect formation in supported graphene by energetic heavy ion irradiation: The substrate effect, Sci. Rep. 5, 9935 (2015).
  18. A. J. M. Giesbers, E. C. Peters, M. Burghard, and K. Kern, Charge transport gap in graphene antidot lattices, Phys. Rev. B 86, 045445 (2012).
  19. J. Bai, X. Zhong, S. Jiang, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Graphene nanomesh, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 190 (2010).
  20. C. Moreno, M. Vilas-Varela, B. Kretz, A. Garcia-Lekue, M. V. Costache, M. Paradinas, M. Panighel, G. Ceballos, S. O. Valenzuela, D. Peña, et al., Bottom-up synthesis of multifunctional nanoporous graphene, Science 360, 199 (2018).
  21. M. Bieri, M. Treier, J. Cai, K. Aït-Mansour, P. Ruffieux, O. Gröning, P. Gröning, M. Kastler, R. Rieger, X. Feng, et al., Porous graphenes: Two-dimensional polymer synthesis with atomic precision, Chem. Commun. 45, 6919 (2009).
  22. T. Qin, T. Wang, and J. Zhu, Recent progress in on-surface synthesis of nanoporous graphene materials, Commun. Chem. 7, 154 (2024).
  23. D. Wang, X. Lu, M. Y. Arramel, J. Wu, and A. T. S. Wee, On-surface synthesis of variable bandgap nanoporous graphene, Small 17, e2102246 (2021).
  24. M. Wang, L. Fu, L. Gan, C. Zhang, M. Rümmeli, A. Bachmatiuk, K. Huang, Y. Fang, and Z. Liu, CVD growth of large area smooth-edged graphene nanomesh by nanosphere lithography, Sci. Rep. 3, 1238 (2013).
  25. L. Esaki and R. Tsu, Superlattice and negative differential conductivity in semiconductors, IBM J. Res. Dev. 14, 61 (1970).
  26. C.-H. Park, L. Yang, Y.-W. Son, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Anisotropic behaviours of massless Dirac fermions in graphene under periodic potentials, Nat. Phys. 4, 213 (2008).
  27. W. Oswald and Z. Wu, Energy gaps in graphene nanomeshes, Phys. Rev. B 85, 115431 (2012).
  28. M. Mieda and S. Okada, Energetics and electronic structures of polymeric all-benzene hollow-cages and planar networks, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, 015002 (2019).
  29. V. M. Pereira, J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, and A. H. Castro Neto, Modeling disorder in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115109 (2008).
  30. T.-T. Jia, M.-M. Zheng, X.-Y. Fan, Y. Su, S.-J. Li, H.-Y. Liu, G. Chen, and Y. Kawazoe, Dirac cone move and bandgap on/off switching of graphene superlattice, Sci. Rep. 6, 18869 (2016).
  31. T. Ochiai and M. Onoda, Photonic analog of graphene model and its extension: Dirac cone, symmetry, and edge states, Phys. Rev. B 80, 155103 (2009).
  32. J. Ding, Z. Qiao, W. Feng, Y. Yao, and Q. Niu, Engineering quantum anomalous/valley Hall states in graphene via metal-atom adsorption: An ab-initio study, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195444 (2011).
  33. V. V. Cheianov, V. I. Fal'ko, O. Syljuåsen, and B. L. Altshuler, Hidden Kekulé ordering of adatoms on graphene, Solid State Commun. 149, 1499 (2009).
  34. S. L. Xiu, L. Gong, V. Wang, Y. Y. Liang, G. Chen, and Y. Kawazoe, Degenerate perturbation in band-gap opening of graphene superlattice, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 8174 (2014).
  35. S. Coh, D. Vanderbilt, and T. Cole, Python Tight Binding (PythTB), Zenodo (2025) http://10.5281/zenodo.12721316.
  36. E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1201 (1989).
  37. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/nbm9-xhj9 for additional band structures, symmetry analyses, and energy contours of other vacancy motifs, together with the disorder configurations and corresponding regression analyses for displaced and missing vacancies.
  38. J. J. Palacios, J. Fernández-Rossier, and L. Brey, Vacancy-induced magnetism in graphene and graphene ribbons, Phys. Rev. B 77, 195428 (2008).
  39. M. M. Ugeda, I. Brihuega, F. Guinea, and J. M. Gómez-Rodríguez, Missing atom as a source of carbon magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 096804 (2010).
  40. T. Ando, Theory of electronic states and transport in carbon nanotubes, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 777 (2005).
  41. M. S. Dresselhaus and G. Dresselhaus, Intercalation compounds of graphite, Adv. Phys. 51, 1 (2002).
  42. E. McCann, Electronic Properties of Monolayer and Bilayer Graphene, in Graphene Nanoelectronics: Metrology, Synthesis, Properties and Applications, edited by H. Raza (Springer, Berlin, 2012), pp. 237–276.
  43. I. F. Herbut, Explanation for the isotropy of the Dirac cone in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 79, 193405 (2009).
  44. A. A. El-Barbary, R. H. Telling, C. P. Ewels, M. I. Heggie, and P. R. Briddon, Structure and energetics of the vacancy in graphite, Phys. Rev. B 68, 144107 (2003).
  45. G.-D. Lee, C. Z. Wang, E. Yoon, N.-M. Hwang, D.-Y. Kim, and K. M. Ho, Diffusion, coalescence, and reconstruction of vacancy defects in graphene layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 205501 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation