Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Microscopic theory of strain-controlled split superconducting and time-reversal symmetry breaking transitions in s+id superconductors

Anton Talkachov1,* and Egor Babaev1,2

  • *Contact author: anton.talkachov@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. B 113, 144515 – Published 28 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n81x-kx54

Abstract

We study conditions of the appearance of U(1)×Z2 superconducting states that spontaneously break time-reversal symmetry (BTRS) on a square lattice as a function of applied strain. Calculations show that if critical temperatures coincide at zero strain, they exhibit a linear kink and no kink otherwise for uniaxial and isotropic strain. Linear kink is absent for shear strain. We find that in general, the microscopic calculations show a complex phase diagram, for example, nonmonotonic behavior of BTRS transition. Another beyond-Ginzburg-Landau theory result is that U(1) critical temperature can decrease under compressional [100] uniaxial strain for small Poisson ratio materials. In the second part of the paper, we consider the effects of boundaries and finiteness of the sample on the strain-induced splitting of TcU(1) and TcZ2 transitions. A finite sample has BTRS boundary states with persistent superconducting currents over a wide range of band filling. Overall, the BTRS dome occupies a larger band-filling-temperature phase space region for a mesoscopic sample with [110] surface compared to an infinite system. Hence, the presence of boundaries helps to stabilize the BTRS phase.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. V. Grinenko, S. Ghosh, R. Sarkar, J.-C. Orain, A. Nikitin, M. Elender, D. Das, Z. Guguchia, F. Brückner, M. E. Barber, et al., Split superconducting and time-reversal symmetry-breaking transitions in Sr2RuO4 under stress, Nat. Phys. 17, 748 (2021).
  2. S. Ikegaya, S.-I. Suzuki, Y. Tanaka, and D. Manske, Proposal for identifying possible even-parity superconducting states in Sr2RuO4 using planar tunneling spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L032062 (2021).
  3. H. S. Røising, G. Wagner, M. Roig, A. T. Rømer, and B. M. Andersen, Heat capacity double transitions in time-reversal symmetry broken superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174518 (2022).
  4. A. T. Rømer, A. Kreisel, M. A. Müller, P. J. Hirschfeld, I. M. Eremin, and B. M. Andersen, Theory of strain-induced magnetic order and splitting of Tc and TTRSB in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 102, 054506 (2020).
  5. V. Grinenko, P. Materne, R. Sarkar, H. Luetkens, K. Kihou, C. H. Lee, S. Akhmadaliev, D. V. Efremov, S.-L. Drechsler, and H.-H. Klauss, Superconductivity with broken time-reversal symmetry in ion-irradiated Ba0.27K0.73Fe2As2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 95, 214511 (2017).
  6. V. Grinenko, R. Sarkar, K. Kihou, C. Lee, I. Morozov, S. Aswartham, B. Büchner, P. Chekhonin, W. Skrotzki, K. Nenkov, et al., Superconductivity with broken time-reversal symmetry inside a superconducting s-wave state, Nat. Phys. 16, 789 (2020).
  7. V. Grinenko, D. Weston, F. Caglieris, C. Wuttke, C. Hess, T. Gottschall, I. Maccari, D. Gorbunov, S. Zherlitsyn, J. Wosnitza, et al., State with spontaneously broken time-reversal symmetry above the superconducting phase transition, Nat. Phys. 17, 1254 (2021).
  8. W.-C. Lee, S.-C. Zhang, and C. Wu, Pairing state with a time-reversal symmetry breaking in FeAs-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 217002 (2009).
  9. C. Platt, R. Thomale, C. Honerkamp, S.-C. Zhang, and W. Hanke, Mechanism for a pairing state with time-reversal symmetry breaking in iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 85, 180502(R) (2012).
  10. S. Ghosh, M. S. Ikeda, A. R. Chakraborty, T. Worasaran, F. Theuss, L. B. Peralta, P. Lozano, J.-W. Kim, P. Thompson, P. J. Ryan, et al., Elastocaloric evidence for a multicomponent superconductor stabilized within the nematic state in Ba(Fe1−xCox)2As2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2424833122 (2025).
  11. R. Liu, Q. Tang, C. Liu, W. Zhang, C. Li, K. Zhou, Q. Wang, and X. Lu, Evolution of pairing symmetry in FeSe1−xSx as probed by in-plane strain tuning of Tc, Phys. Rev. B 112, 094514 (2025).
  12. C. N. Breiø, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen, Supercurrents and spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking by nonmagnetic disorder in unconventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 105, 014504 (2022).
  13. B. M. Andersen, A. Kreisel, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking by disorder in superconductors, Front. Phys. 12, 1353425 (2024).
  14. A. Bobkov and I. V. Bobkova, Time-reversal symmetry breaking state near the surface of an s± superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 84, 134527 (2011).
  15. V. Stanev and A. E. Koshelev, Complex state induced by impurities in multiband superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 89, 100505(R) (2014).
  16. M. Silaev, J. Garaud, and E. Babaev, Phase diagram of dirty two-band superconductors and observability of impurity-induced s+is state, Phys. Rev. B 95, 024517 (2017).
  17. G. Mattoni, T. Johnson, A. Ikeda, S. Paul, J. Bobowski, M. Sigrist, and Y. Maeno, Direct evidence for the absence of coupling between shear strain and superconductivity in Sr2RuO4, Nat. Commun. 17, 700 (2026).
  18. Y.-S. Li, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, F. Jerzembeck, A. S. Gibbs, Y. Maeno, C. W. Hicks, J. Schmalian, M. Nicklas, and A. P. Mackenzie, High-sensitivity heat-capacity measurements on Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2020492118 (2021).
  19. M. E. Barber, F. Lechermann, S. V. Streltsov, S. L. Skornyakov, S. Ghosh, B. J. Ramshaw, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, et al., Role of correlations in determining the van Hove strain in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 100, 245139 (2019).
  20. Y.-S. Li, M. Garst, J. Schmalian, S. Ghosh, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, C. W. Hicks, F. Jerzembeck, M. S. Ikeda, Z. Hu, et al., Elastocaloric determination of the phase diagram of Sr2RuO4, Nature (London) 607, 276 (2022).
  21. M. E. Barber, A. S. Gibbs, Y. Maeno, A. P. Mackenzie, and C. W. Hicks, Resistivity in the vicinity of a van Hove singularity: Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 076602 (2018).
  22. A. Steppke, L. Zhao, M. E. Barber, T. Scaffidi, F. Jerzembeck, H. Rosner, A. S. Gibbs, Y. Maeno, S. H. Simon, A. P. Mackenzie, et al., Strong peak in Tc of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure, Science 355, eaaf9398 (2017).
  23. C. W. Hicks, D. O. Brodsky, E. A. Yelland, A. S. Gibbs, J. A. Bruin, M. E. Barber, S. D. Edkins, K. Nishimura, S. Yonezawa, Y. Maeno, et al., Strong increase of Tc of Sr2RuO4 under both tensile and compressive strain, Science 344, 283 (2014).
  24. M. H. Fischer and E. Berg, Fluctuation and strain effects in a chiral p-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 93, 054501 (2016).
  25. V. Grinenko, D. Das, R. Gupta, B. Zinkl, N. Kikugawa, Y. Maeno, C. W. Hicks, H.-H. Klauss, M. Sigrist, and R. Khasanov, Unsplit superconducting and time reversal symmetry breaking transitions in Sr2RuO4 under hydrostatic pressure and disorder, Nat. Commun. 12, 3920 (2021).
  26. F. Jerzembeck, Y.-S. Li, G. Palle, Z. Hu, M. Biderang, N. Kikugawa, D. A. Sokolov, S. Ghosh, B. J. Ramshaw, T. Scaffidi, et al., Tc and the elastocaloric effect of Sr2RuO4 under 〈110〉 uniaxial stress: No indications of transition splitting, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064514 (2024).
  27. Q. Li, B. E. C. Koltenbah, and R. Joynt, Mixed s-wave and d-wave superconductivity in high-Tc systems, Phys. Rev. B 48, 437 (1993).
  28. H. Shimahara, Stability of mixed-symmetry superconducting states with broken time-reversal symmetry against lattice distortions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 064711 (2021).
  29. C. O'Donovan and J. Carbotte, Mixed order parameter symmetry in the BCS model, Phys. C 252, 87 (1995).
  30. G. E. Volovik, Splitting of the superconducting transition in high-temperature superconductors due to small orthorhombicity, Pis. Z. Eksp.Theor. Fiz. 48, 39 (1988).
  31. D. W. Hess, T. A. Tokuyasu, and J. A. Sauls, Broken symmetry in an unconventional superconductor: a model for the double transition in UPt3, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1, 8135 (1989).
  32. A. C. Yuan, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, Strain-induced time reversal breaking and half quantum vortices near a putative superconducting tetracritical point in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054518 (2021).
  33. C. Jurecka and E. Schachinger, The phase diagram of an orthorhombic d-wave superconductor, Phys. C 312, 304 (1999).
  34. K. A. Musaelian, J. Betouras, A. Chubukov, and R. Joynt, Mixed-symmetry superconductivity in two-dimensional Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 53, 3598 (1996).
  35. C. O'Donovan and J. P. Carbotte, s-and d-wave mixing in high-Tc superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 52, 16208 (1995).
  36. A. Ghosh and S. K. Adhikari, Two phase transitions in (dx2−y2+is)-wave superconductors, Phys. C 322, 37 (1999).
  37. Y. Imai, F. Nabeshima, and A. Maeda, Comparative review on thin film growth of iron-based superconductors, Condens. Matter 2, 25 (2017).
  38. G. N. Phan, K. Nakayama, K. Sugawara, T. Sato, T. Urata, Y. Tanabe, K. Tanigaki, F. Nabeshima, Y. Imai, A. Maeda, et al., Effects of strain on the electronic structure, superconductivity, and nematicity in FeSe studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 95, 224507 (2017).
  39. P. N. Spathis, M. P. Sørensen, and N. Lazarides, Perturbed bifurcations in the BCS gap equation, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7360 (1992).
  40. V. Sunko, E. Abarca Morales, I. Marković, M. E. Barber, D. Milosavljević, F. Mazzola, D. A. Sokolov, N. Kikugawa, C. Cacho, P. Dudin, et al., Direct observation of a uniaxial stress-driven lifshitz transition in Sr2RuO4, npj Quantum Mater. 4, 46 (2019).
  41. M. Liu, D. Y. Xing, and Z. D. Wang, Mixed (s+id)-wave order parameters in the van Hove scenario, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3181 (1997).
  42. A. Talkachov, P. Leask, and E. Babaev, Multiple correlation lengths and type-1.5 superconductivity in U(1) superconductors due to hidden competition between irreducible representations of nonlocal pairing, arXiv:2511.11263.
  43. T. A. Bojesen, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø, Phase transitions and anomalous normal state in superconductors with broken time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 89, 104509 (2014).
  44. J. Xia, Y. Maeno, P. T. Beyersdorf, M. M. Fejer, and A. Kapitulnik, High resolution polar Kerr effect measurements of Sr2RuO4: Evidence for broken time-reversal symmetry in the superconducting state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167002 (2006).
  45. Y. Tanuma, Y. Tanaka, M. Ogata, and S. Kashiwaya, Quasiparticle states near surfaces of high-Tc superconductors based on the extended t−J model, Phys. Rev. B 60, 9817 (1999).
  46. M. Fogelström, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Tunneling into current-carrying surface states of high-Tc superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 281 (1997).
  47. C. Honerkamp and M. Sigrist, Time-reversal symmetry breaking states at [110] surfaces of dx2−y2 superconductors, Phys. C 317-318, 489 (1999).
  48. J. Wei, N.-C. Yeh, D. Garrigus, and M. Strasik, Directional tunneling and Andreev reflection on YBa2Cu3O7−δ single crystals: predominance of d-wave pairing symmetry verified with the generalized Blonder, Tinkham, and Klapwijk theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2542 (1998).
  49. Q. Han, Z. Wang, L. y. Zhang, and X.-G. Li, Electronic structure of the vortex lattice of d-, d+is-, and dx2−y2+idxy wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 65, 064527 (2002).
  50. Q. Han, A method of studying the Bogoliubov–de Gennes equations for the superconducting vortex lattice state, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 035702 (2010).
  51. A. Samoilenka and E. Babaev, Boundary states with elevated critical temperatures in Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134512 (2020).
  52. A. Samoilenka, M. Barkman, A. Benfenati, and E. Babaev, Pair-density-wave superconductivity of faces, edges, and vertices in systems with imbalanced fermions, Phys. Rev. B 101, 054506 (2020).
  53. A. Samoilenka, Novel phenomena in superconductors and superfluids: Boundary states, spiral magnetic fields, and solitons, Ph.D. thesis, KTH, Condensed Matter Theory, 2023.
  54. B. Roos and R. Seiringer, BCS critical temperature on half-spaces, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 249, 20 (2025).
  55. C. Hainzl, B. Roos, and R. Seiringer, Boundary superconductivity in the BCS model, J. Spectral Theory 12, 1507 (2023).
  56. C.-R. Hu, Midgap surface states as a novel signature for dxa2−xb2 wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1526 (1994).
  57. A. Benfenati and E. Babaev, Spontaneous edge and corner currents in s+is superconductors and time reversal symmetry breaking surface states, Phys. Rev. B 105, 134518 (2022).
  58. Y. Wang and L. Fu, Topological phase transitions in multicomponent superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 187003 (2017).
  59. J. Garaud, A. Corticelli, M. Silaev, and E. Babaev, Properties of dirty two-band superconductors with repulsive interband interaction: Normal modes, length scales, vortices, and magnetic response, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014520 (2018).
  60. D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced superconductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060508 (2024).
  61. H. Wu and J. Sauls, Weyl fermions and broken symmetry phases of laterally confined He3 films, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35, 495402 (2023).
  62. T. A. Bojesen, E. Babaev, and A. Sudbø, Time reversal symmetry breakdown in normal and superconducting states in frustrated three-band systems, Phys. Rev. B 88, 220511(R) (2013).
  63. I. Maccari, J. Carlström, and E. Babaev, Prediction of time-reversal-symmetry breaking fermionic quadrupling condensate in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, 064501 (2023).
  64. S. Steinhauer, S. Gyger, and V. Zwiller, Progress on large-scale superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 100501 (2021).
  65. L. Bauer, D. He, S. Bharadwaj, S. Liu, P. V. Balachandran, and Z. Jacob, Type-1.5 SNSPD: Interacting vortex theory of two bandgap superconducting single photon detectors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 127, 122603 (2025).
  66. D. L. Feder and C. Kallin, Microscopic derivation of the Ginzburg-Landau equations for a d-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 55, 559 (1997).
  67. J.-X. Zhu, Bogoliubov-de Gennes Method and its Applications (Springer, New York, 2016), Vol. 924.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation