Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Defect engineering spin centers in interacting many-body Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains

Lin Wang* and Thomas Luu†

Ulf-G. Meißner‡

  • Helmholtz Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics; Universität Bonn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany; Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany; and Peng Huanwu Collaborative Center for Research and Education, International Institute for Interdisciplinary and Frontiers, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

  • *Contact author: l.wang@fz-juelich.de
  • †Contact author: t.luu@fz-juelich.de
  • ‡Contact author: meissner@hiskp.uni-bonn.de

Phys. Rev. B 113, 085111 – Published 6 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n1h1-4vtr

Abstract

The ability to engineer topologically distinct materials opens the possibility of enabling novel phenomena in low-dimensional nanosystems, as well as manufacturing novel quantum devices. One of the simplest examples, the SSH model with both even and odd number of sites, demonstrates the connection between localized edge states and the topology of the system. We show that the SSH model hosts localized spin centers due to the interplay between the localized edge states and the on-site Hubbard interaction. We further show how one can engineer any number of localized spin centers within the chain by careful addition of defects. These spin centers are paired in spin-singlet or spin-triplet channels within each block separated by the defects, and together they construct an array of spin singlet and/or triplet qubits. The effect of on-site disorder on spin centers is also addressed. As this system is realizable experimentally, our findings describe a way for manipulating and engineering spin qubits and therefore provide a platform for performing many-body quantum simulations on spin excitations like magnons and triplons.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
  2. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  3. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  4. L. Barbiero, L. Santos, and N. Goldman, Quenched dynamics and spin-charge separation in an interacting topological lattice, Phys. Rev. B 97, 201115(R) (2018).
  5. M. Bahari and M. V. Hosseini, Topological properties of a generalized spin–orbit-coupled Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model, Physica E 119, 113973 (2020).
  6. D. Sticlet, L. Seabra, F. Pollmann, and J. Cayssol, From fractionally charged solitons to Majorana bound states in a one-dimensional interacting model, Phys. Rev. B 89, 115430 (2014).
  7. L. Qi, G.-L. Wang, S. Liu, S. Zhang, and H.-F. Wang, Engineering the topological state transfer and topological beam splitter in an even-sized Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain, Phys. Rev. A 102, 022404 (2020).
  8. M. Scollon and M. P. Kennett, Persistence of chirality in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model in the presence of on-site disorder, Phys. Rev. B 101, 144204 (2020).
  9. E. G. Cinnirella, A. Nava, G. Campagnano, and D. Giuliano, Fate of high winding number topological phases in the disordered extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035114 (2024).
  10. M. P. Estarellas, I. D'Amico, and T. P. Spiller, Topologically protected localised states in spin chains, Sci. Rep. 7, 42904 (2017).
  11. S. Mandal and S. Kar, Topological solitons in a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain with periodic hopping modulation, domain wall, and disorder, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195124 (2024).
  12. K. Sone, M. Ezawa, Z. Gong, T. Sawada, N. Yoshioka, and T. Sagawa, Transition from the topological to the chaotic in the nonlinear Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model, Nat. Commun. 16, 422 (2025).
  13. W. Cai, J. Han, F. Mei, Y. Xu, Y. Ma, X. Li, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, Z.-Y. Xue, Z.-q. Yin, S. Jia, and L. Sun, Observation of topological magnon insulator states in a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 080501 (2019).
  14. E. Kim, X. Zhang, V. S. Ferreira, J. Banker, J. K. Iverson, A. Sipahigil, M. Bello, A. González-Tudela, M. Mirhosseini, and O. Painter, Quantum electrodynamics in a topological waveguide, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011015 (2021).
  15. E. J. Meier, F. A. An, and B. Gadway, Observation of the topological soliton state in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Nat. Commun. 7, 13986 (2016).
  16. P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lattice, Nat. Photon. 11, 651 (2017).
  17. S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. Büchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms, Science 365, 775 (2019).
  18. S. Kruk, A. Slobozhanyuk, D. Denkova, A. Poddubny, I. Kravchenko, A. Miroshnichenko, D. Neshev, and Y. Kivshar, Edge states and topological phase transitions in chains of dielectric nanoparticles, Small 13, 1603190 (2017).
  19. M. Kiczynski, S. K. Gorman, H. Geng, M. B. Donnelly, Y. Chung, Y. He, J. G. Keizer, and M. Y. Simmons, Engineering topological states in atom-based semiconductor quantum dots, Nature (London) 606, 694 (2022).
  20. R. A. M. Ligthart, M. A. J. Herrera, A. C. H. Visser, A. Vlasblom, D. Bercioux, and I. Swart, Wannier center spectroscopy to identify boundary-obstructed topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 012076 (2025).
  21. O. Katz, L. Feng, D. Porras, and C. Monroe, Floquet control of interactions and edge states in a programmable quantum simulator, Nat. Commun. 16, 8815 (2025).
  22. P. C. Fariña, D. Jirovec, X. Zhang, E. Morozova, S. D. Oosterhout, S. Reale, T.-K. Hsiao, G. Scappucci, M. Veldhorst, and L. M. Vandersypen, Site-resolved magnon and triplon dynamics on a programmable quantum dot spin ladder, arXiv:2506.08663.
  23. A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008).
  24. C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
  25. M. Sato, Y. Tanaka, K. Yada, and T. Yokoyama, Topology of Andreev bound states with flat dispersion, Phys. Rev. B 83, 224511 (2011).
  26. T. Luu and T. A. Lähde, Quantum Monte Carlo calculations for carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155106 (2016).
  27. J. Ostmeyer, E. Berkowitz, S. Krieg, T. A. Lähde, T. Luu, and C. Urbach, Semimetal–Mott insulator quantum phase transition of the Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245105 (2020).
  28. J. Ostmeyer, E. Berkowitz, S. Krieg, T. A. Lähde, T. Luu, and C. Urbach, Antiferromagnetic character of the quantum phase transition in the Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 104, 155142 (2021).
  29. T. Luu, U.-G. Meißner, and L. Razmadze, Localization of electronic states in hybrid nanoribbons in the nonperturbative regime, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195422 (2022).
  30. J. Ostmeyer, L. Razmadze, E. Berkowitz, T. Luu, and U.-G. Meißner, Effective theory for graphene nanoribbons with junctions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195135 (2024).
  31. U. Las Heras, A. Mezzacapo, L. Lamata, S. Filipp, A. Wallraff, and E. Solano, Digital quantum simulation of spin systems in superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 200501 (2014).
  32. K. De Greve, L. Yu, P. L. McMahon, J. S. Pelc, C. M. Natarajan, N. Y. Kim, E. Abe, S. Maier, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, R. H. Hadfield, M. M. Forchel, and Y. Yamamoto, Quantum-dot spin–photon entanglement via frequency downconversion to telecom wavelength, Nature (London) 491, 421 (2012).
  33. J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V. G. Dutt, E. Togan, A. S. Zibrov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond, Nature (London) 455, 644 (2008).
  34. L. Wang, K. Shen, B. Y. Sun, and M. W. Wu, Singlet-triplet relaxation in multivalley silicon single quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 81, 235326 (2010).
  35. L. Wang and M. W. Wu, Singlet-triplet relaxation in SiGe/Si/SiGe double quantum dots, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 043716 (2011).
  36. Z. Liu, L. Wang, and K. Shen, Energy spectra of three electrons in Si/SiGe single and vertically coupled double quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045311 (2012).
  37. Y. Ren, L. Wang, Z. Liu, and M. Wu, Energy spectra of three electrons in SiGe/Si/SiGe laterally coupled triple quantum dots, Physica E 63, 329 (2014).
  38. G. Hu, W. W. Huang, R. Cai, L. Wang, C. H. Yang, G. Cao, X. Xue, P. Huang, and Y. He, Single-electron spin qubits in silicon for quantum computing, Intell. Comput. 4, 0115 (2025).
  39. P. W. Anderson, New approach to the theory of superexchange interactions, Phys. Rev. 115, 2 (1959).
  40. Jülich Supercomputing Centre, JURECA: Data centric and booster modules implementing the modular supercomputing architecture at Jülich Supercomputing Centre, J. Large Scale Res. Facil. 7, A182 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation