Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Magnetic phase diagram of ErB4 as explored by neutron scattering

Simon Flury1,2,*, Wolfgang J. Simeth1,2, Danielle R. Yahne1,2, Manisha Islam1,2, Igor Plokhikh2, Daniel G. Mazzone2, Eric D. Bauer3, Priscila F. S. Rosa3, Romain Sibille2 et al.

Oksana Zaharko2, Dariusz J. Gawryluk2, and Marc Janoschek1,2,†

  • *Contact author: simon.flury@psi.ch
  • †Contact author: marc.janoschek@psi.ch

Phys. Rev. B 112, 224441 – Published 24 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/m3wx-4v6k

Abstract

The tetragonal 4f-electron intermetallic ErB4 is characterized by strong Ising anisotropy along the tetragonal c axis. The magnetic moments on the erbium sites can be mapped onto a Shastry-Sutherland lattice, resulting in geometrical frustration. At zero magnetic field ErB4 exhibits collinear columnar antiferromagnetic (CAFM) order below TN=15.4K. In the presence of a magnetic field parallel to the c axis, ErB4 exhibits a plateau at 1/2 of the saturation magnetization MS, which arises at a spin-flip transition at H1 = 1.9 T. Fractional magnetization plateaus and other exotic spin phases are a well-established characteristic feature of frustrated spin systems. Monte Carlo simulations propose that ErB4 is an ideal candidate to feature a spin supersolid phase in close vicinity of H1 between the CAFM and M/MS=1/2 plateau (HP) phase. Here, we combine single-crystal neutron diffraction and inelastic neutron scattering to study the magnetic phase diagram and the crystal electric-field (CEF) ground state of ErB4. Our measurements as a function of magnetic field find no signature of the spin supersolid phase but allow us to determine the magnetic structure of the HP phase to be of the up-up-up-down (uuud) type consistent with an Ising material. The magnetic moment μCEF = 8.96µB expected from the CEF configuration determined by our inelastic neutron-scattering measurements is also consistent with the ordered moment observed in neutron diffraction, showing that the moments are fully ordered and close to the Er3+ free ion moment (9.6 µB).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (57)

  1. K. Yoshida, Theory of Magnetism, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1996).
  2. H. T. Diep, Frustrated Spin Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2013).
  3. C. Lacroix, Frustrated metallic systems: A review of some peculiar behavior, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 011008 (2010).
  4. A. P. Ramirez, A. Hayashi, R. J. Cava, R. Siddharthan, and B. S. Shastry, Zero-point entropy in ‘spin ice', Nature (London) 399, 333 (1999).
  5. M. J. Harris, S. T. Bramwell, D. F. McMorrow, T. Zeiske, and K. W. Godfrey, Geometrical frustration in the ferromagnetic pyrochlore Ho2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2554 (1997).
  6. L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2017).
  7. A. Banerjee, C. A. Bridges, J.-Q. Yan, A. A. Aczel, L. Li, M. B. Stone, G. E. Granroth, M. D. Lumsden, Y. Yiu, J. Knolle, S. Bhattacharjee, D. L. Kovrizhin, R. Moessner, D. A. Tennant, D. G. Mandrus, and S. E. Nagler, Proximate Kitaev quantum spin liquid behavior in a honeycomb magnet, Nat. Mater. 15, 733 (2016).
  8. A. Kitaev, in Exact Methods in Low-dimensional Statistical Physics and Quantum Computing, edited by J. Jacobson, S. Ouphry, V. Pasquier, D. Serban, and L. Cugliandolo (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008).
  9. S. Julian and H.-Y. Kee, Frustrated metallic magnets, La Physique au Canada 68, 95 (2012).
  10. Q. Si and F. Steglich, Heavy fermions and quantum phase transitions, Science 329, 1161 (2010).
  11. P. Coleman and A. H. Nevidomskyy, Frustration and the Kondo effect in heavy fermion materials, J. Low Temp. Phys. 161, 182 (2010).
  12. P. Das, S.-Z. Lin, N.J. Ghimire, K. Huang, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, C. D Batista, G. Ehlers, and M. Janoschek, Magnitude of the magnetic exchange interaction in the heavy-fermion antiferromagnet CeRhIn5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 246403 (2014).
  13. D. M. Fobes, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, A. Sazonov, V. Hutanu, S. Zhang, F. Ronning, and M. Janoschek, Low temperature magnetic structure of CeRhIn5 by neutron diffraction on absorption-optimized samples, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 17LT01 (2017).
  14. S. Nakatsuji, Y. Machida, Y. Maeno, T. Tayama, T. Sakakibara, J. van Duijn, L. Balicas, J. N. Millican, R. T. Macaluso, and J. Y. Chan, Metallic spin-liquid behavior of the geometrically frustrated Kondo lattice Pr2Ir2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 087204 (2006).
  15. Y. Tokiwa, J. J. Ishikawa, S. Nakatsuji, and P. Gegenwart, Quantum criticality in a metallic spin liquid, Nat. Mater. 13, 356 (2014).
  16. T. Kurumaji, T. Nakajima, M. Hirschberger, A. Kikkawa, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y. Taguchi, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet, Science 365, 914 (2019).
  17. M. Hirschberger, T. Nakajima, S. Gao, L. Peng, A. Kikkawa, T. Kurumaji, M. Kriener, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, K. Ohishi, K. Kakurai, Y. Taguchi, X. Yu, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Skyrmion phase and competing magnetic orders on a breathing kagomé lattice, Nat. Commun. 10, 5831 (2019).
  18. R. Takagi, N. Matsuyama, V. Ukleev, L. Yu, J. S. White, S. Francoual, J. R. L. Mardegan, S. Hayami, H. Saito, K. Kaneko, K. Ohishi, Y. Ōnuki, T. Arima, Y. Tokura, T. Nakajima, and S. Seki, Square and rhombic lattices of magnetic skyrmions in a centrosymmetric binary compound, Nat. Commun. 13, 1472 (2022).
  19. H. Nakamura, N. Kim, M. Shiga, R. Kmiec, K. Tomala, E. Ressouche, J. P. Sanchez, and B. Malaman, The partially disordered state of the frustrated face-centred cubic antiferromagnet, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 1095 (1999).
  20. O. Stockert, J.-U. Hoffmann, M. Mühlbauer, A. Senyshyn, M. M. Koza, A. A. Tsirlin, F. M. Wolf, S. Bachus, P. Gegenwart, R. Movshovich, S. Bobev, and V. Fritsch, Magnetic frustration in a metallic fcc lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013183 (2020).
  21. R. Okuma, C. Ritter, G. J. Nilsen, and Y. Okada, Magnetic frustration in a van der Waals metal CeSiI, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, L121401 (2021).
  22. J. Etourneau and P. Hagenmuller, Structure and physical features of the rare-earth borides, Philos. Mag. B 52, 589 (1985).
  23. B. Sriram Shastry and B. Sutherland, Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet, Physica B+C 108, 1069 (1981).
  24. S. Miyahara and K. Ueda, Theory of the orthogonal dimer Heisenberg spin model for SrCu2(BO3)2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, R327 (2003).
  25. Z. Shi, S. Dissanayake, P. Corboz, W. Steinhardt, D. Graf, D. M. Silevitch, H. A. Dabkowska, T. F. Rosenbaum, F. Mila, and S. Haravifard, Discovery of quantum phases in the Shastry-Sutherland compound SrCu2(BO3)2 under extreme conditions of field and pressure, Nat. Commun. 13, 2301 (2022).
  26. H. Nojiri, H. Kageyama, K. Oniduka, Y. Ueda, and M. Motokawa, Study of spin gap excitations in SrCu2(BO3)2 by submillimeter wave ESR, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 284-288, 1450 (2000).
  27. W. Schaefer, G. Will, and K. H. J. Buschow, The magnetic structure of the rare earth tetraborides ErB4 and DyB4, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 1994 (1976).
  28. F. Pfeiffer, W. Schaefer, G. Will, J. Etourneau, and R. Georges, The magnetic phase diagram of ErB4, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 14, 306 (1979).
  29. L. Ye, T. Suzuki, and J. G. Checkelsky, Electronic transport on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice in Ising-type rare-earth tetraborides, Phys. Rev. B 95, 174405 (2017).
  30. D. Okuyama, T. Matsumura, T. Mouri, N. Ishikawa, K. Ohoyama, H. Hiraka, H. Nakao, K. Iwasa, and Y. Murakami, Competition of magnetic and quadrupolar order parameters in HoB4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 044709 (2008).
  31. N. Qureshi, F. Bourdarot, E. Ressouche, W. Knafo, F. Iga, S. Michimura, L.-P. Regnault, and F. Duc, Possible stripe phases in the multiple magnetization plateaus in TbB4 from single-crystal neutron diffraction under pulsed high magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094427 (2022).
  32. S. Yoshii, K. Ohoyama, K. Kurosawa, H. Nojiri, M. Matsuda, P. Frings, F. Duc, B. Vignolle, G. L. J. A. Rikken, L.-P. Regnault, S. Michimura, and F. Iga, Neutron diffraction study on the multiple magnetization plateaus in TbB4 under pulsed high magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 077203 (2009).
  33. S. Michimura, A. Shigekawa, F. Iga, T. Takabatake, and K. Ohoyama, Complex magnetic structures of a Shastry–Sutherland lattice TmB4 studied by powder neutron diffraction analysis, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 024707 (2009).
  34. K. Siemensmeyer, E. Wulf, H.-J. Mikeska, K. Flachbart, S. Gabani, S. Matas, P. Priputen, A. Efdokimova, and N. Shitsevalova, Fractional magnetization plateaus and magnetic order in the Shastry-Sutherland magnet TmB4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 177201 (2008).
  35. W. Schaefer, G. Will, and K. H. J. Buschow, The symmetries of magnetic structures in rare earth tetraborides, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 3, 61 (1976).
  36. Y. I. Dublenych, Ground states of an Ising model on an extended Shastry-Sutherland lattice and the 1 / 2 -magnetization plateau in some rare-earth-metal tetraborides, Phys. Rev. E 88, 022111 (2013).
  37. L. Huo, W. C. Huang, Z. B. Yan, X. T. Jia, X. S. Gao, M. H. Qin, and J.-M. Liu, The competing spin orders and fractional magnetization plateaus of the classical Heisenberg model on Shastry-Sutherland lattice: Consequence of long-range interactions, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 073908 (2013).
  38. M. Moliner, D. C. Cabra, A. Honecker, P. Pujol, and F. Stauffer, Magnetization process in the classical Heisenberg model on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice, Phys. Rev. B 79, 144401 (2009).
  39. S. Michimura, A. Shigekawa, F. Iga, M. Sera, T. Takabatake, K. Ohoyama, and Y. Okabe, Magnetic frustrations in the Shastry–Sutherland system ErB4, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 378-380, 596 (2006).
  40. K. Wierschem and P. Sengupta, Columnar antiferromagnetic order and spin supersolid phase on the extended Shastry-Sutherland lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 207207 (2013).
  41. D. Brunt, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, O. A. Petrenko, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrishnan, Single-crystal growth of metallic rare-earth tetraborides by the floating-zone technique, Crystals 9, 211 (2019).
  42. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/m3wx-4v6k for SC-XRD data, which includes Refs. [43, 44].
  43. X-Area Software Version 2.1, STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany, https://www.stoe.com/products/xarea/.
  44. V. Petříček, L. Palatinus, J. Plášil, and M. Dušek, Jana2020– a new version of the crystallographic computing system Jana, Z. Kristallogr. - Cryst. Mater. 238, 271 (2023).
  45. P. F. S. Rosa and Z. Fisk, Flux methods for growth of intermetallic single crystals, in Crystal Growth of Intermetallics, edited by P. Gille and Y. Grin (De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, 2019), pp. 49–60.
  46. N. Qureshi, mag2pol: A program for the analysis of spherical neutron polarimetry, flipping ratio and integrated intensity data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 52, 175 (2019).
  47. J. Lass, H. Jacobsen, K. M. L. Krighaar, D. Graf, F. Groitl, F. Herzog, M. Yamada, C. Kägi, R. A. Müller, R. Bürge, M. Schild, M. S. Lehmann, A. Bollhalder, P. Keller, M. Bartkowiak, U. Filges, U. Greuter, G. Theidel, H. M. Ronnow, C. Niedermayer, et al., Commissioning of the novel continuous angle multi-energy analysis spectrometer at the Paul Scherrer Institut, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94, 023302 (2023).
  48. J. Lass, H. Jacobsen, D. G. Mazzone, and K. Lefmann, MJOLNIR: A software package for multiplexing neutron spectrometers, SoftwareX 12, 100600 (2020).
  49. S. Janßen, J. Mesot, L. Holitzner, A. Furrer, and R. Hempelmann, FOCUS: A hybrid TOF-spectrometer at SINQ, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 234-236, 1174 (1997).
  50. A. Scheie, PyCrystalField: Software for calculation, analysis and fitting of crystal electric field Hamiltonians, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 54, 356 (2021).
  51. G. Will and W. Schafer, Neutron diffraction and the magnetic structures of some rare earth diborides and tetraborides, J. Less Common Met. 67, 31 (1979).
  52. G. Will, W. Schäfer, F. Pfeiffer, F. Elf, and J. Etourneau, Neutron diffraction studies of TbB4 and ErB4, J. Less-Common Met. 82, 349 (1981).
  53. M. Blume, A. J. Freeman, and R. E. Watson, Theory of spin-orbit coupling in atoms. III, Phys. Rev. 134, A320 (1964).
  54. K. W. H. Stevens, Matrix elements and operator equivalents connected with the magnetic properties of rare earth ions, Proc. Phys. Soc. A 65, 209 (1952).
  55. Magnetic form factors, https://www.ill.eu/sites/ccsl/ffacts/.
  56. L. Yadav, A. Rufino, R. Bag, C. d. Cruz, A. I. Kolesnikov, V. O. Garlea, D. Graf, F. Mila, and S. Haravifard, Observation of unprecedented fractional magnetization plateaus in a new Shastry-Sutherland Ising compound (2024), doi: 10.1103/9ynf-xx1t.
  57. M. S. Song, K. K. Cho, J. W. Lee, and B. K. Cho, Abnormal field-dependence of magnetocaloric effect in ErB4 and TmB4, AIP Adv. 10, 025219 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation