Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nontrivial three-sublattice magnetization in the easy-axis spin-12 XXZ antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice

Masahiro Kadosawa1, Masaaki Nakamura2, Yukinori Ohta1, and Satoshi Nishimoto3,4,*

  • *Contact author: s.nishimoto@ifw-dresden.de

Phys. Rev. B 113, 224442 – Published 24 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lx93-brc2

Abstract

We investigate the ground-state magnetic structure of the spin-1/2 XXZ antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice in the easy-axis regime using the density-matrix renormalization group. By applying spiral boundary conditions, we exactly map finite L×L clusters onto one-dimensional chains while avoiding the spatial anisotropy inherent in cylindrical geometries. From symmetry-broken local magnetization profiles, we extract the three-sublattice moments and track their evolution with anisotropy. At the isotropic point, we obtain a positive sublattice moment of 0.217(3), consistent with previous numerical estimates. In the easy-axis regime (Δ=Jz/J⊥>1), the ordered moments remain close to a Y-like zero-magnetization three-sublattice state, whose z-component pattern is of the form (2m,−m,−m), over a broad range of Δ. Extrapolation in 1/Δ shows that the positive sublattice moment stays well below the classical saturation value 1/2, approaching 0.419(7) as Δ→∞, while the magnitude of the negative sublattice moment approaches 0.209(4). We further compare the energies of the Y state and the up-down-down state and find that the Y state is favored at zero field. Independent thermodynamic-limit energy calculations, performed without assuming any particular ordered pattern, yield an energy consistent with the Y-state solution. These results show that the easy-axis ground state does not simply cross over to a trivially saturated collinear Ising state, but instead remains a nontrivial three-sublattice ordered state selected from the macroscopically degenerate Ising manifold by quantum fluctuations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. A. P. Ramirez, Strongly geometrically frustrated magnets, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 24, 453 (1994).
  2. L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010).
  3. C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory (Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg, 2011).
  4. S. Miyashita and H. Kawamura, Phase transitions of anisotropic Heisenberg antiferromagnets on the triangular lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54, 3385 (1985).
  5. D. Sellmann, X.-F. Zhang, and S. Eggert, Phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic XXZ model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 91, 081104(R) (2015).
  6. S. Wessel and M. Troyer, Supersolid hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 127205 (2005).
  7. D. Heidarian and K. Damle, Persistent supersolid phase of hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 127206 (2005).
  8. M. Boninsegni and N. Prokof'ev, Supersolid phase of hard-core bosons on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237204 (2005).
  9. R. G. Melko, A. Paramekanti, A. A. Burkov, A. Vishwanath, D. N. Sheng, and L. Balents, Supersolid order from disorder: Hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 127207 (2005).
  10. D. A. Huse and V. Elser, Simple variational wave functions for two-dimensional Heisenberg spin-1/2 antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2531 (1988).
  11. B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Signature of Néel order in exact spectra of quantum antiferromagnets on finite lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2590 (1992).
  12. B. Bernu, P. Lecheminant, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Exact spectra, spin susceptibilities, and order parameter of the quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 50, 10048 (1994).
  13. L. Capriotti, A. E. Trumper, and S. Sorella, Long-range Néel order in the triangular Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3899 (1999).
  14. W. Zheng, J. O. Fjærestad, Rajiv R. P. Singh, R. H. McKenzie, and R. Coldea, Excitation spectra of the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 74, 224420 (2006).
  15. S. R. White and A. L. Chernyshev, Néel order in square and triangular lattice Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 127004 (2007).
  16. Q. Li, H. Li, J. Zhao, H.-G. Luo, and Z. Y. Xie, Magnetization of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 105, 184418 (2022).
  17. J. Huang, X. Qian, and M. Qin, On the magnetization of the 120∘ order of the spin-1/2 triangular lattice Heisenberg model: A DMRG revisit, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 185602 (2024).
  18. Y. Shirata, H. Tanaka, A. Matsuo, and K. Kindo, Experimental realization of a spin-1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 057205 (2012).
  19. Y. Gao, Y.-C. Fan, H. Li, F. Yang, X.-T. Zeng, X.-L. Sheng, R. Zhong, Y. Qi, Y. Wan, and W. Li, Spin supersolidity in nearly ideal easy-axis triangular quantum antiferromagnet Na2BaCo(PO4)2, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 89 (2022).
  20. J. Sheng, L. Wang, A. Candini, W. Jiang, L. Huang, B. Xi, J. Zhao, H. Ge, N. Zhao, Y. Fu, J. Ren, J. Yang, P. Miao, X. Tong, D. Yu, S. Wang, Q. Liu, M. Kofu, R. Mole, G. Biasiol, et al., Two-dimensional quantum universality in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice quantum antiferromagnet Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2211193119 (2022).
  21. M. Zhu, L. M. Chinellato, V. Romerio, N. Murai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, C. Balz, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, Y. Kato, C. D. Batista, and A. Zheludev, Wannier states and spin supersolid physics in the triangular antiferromagnet K2Co(SeO3)2, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 74 (2025).
  22. C. A. Gallegos, S. Jiang, S. R. White, and A. L. Chernyshev, Phase diagram of the easy-axis triangular-lattice J1−J2 model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 196702 (2025).
  23. P. W. Anderson, An approximate quantum theory of the antiferromagnetic ground state, Phys. Rev. 86, 694 (1952).
  24. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phases of Matter (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2023).
  25. M. Kadosawa, M. Nakamura, Y. Ohta, and S. Nishimoto, Study of staggered magnetization in the spin-S square-lattice Heisenberg model using spiral boundary conditions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 023701 (2023).
  26. M. Kadosawa, M. Nakamura, Y. Ohta, and S. Nishimoto, Comparing quantum fluctuations in the spin-12 and spin-1 XXZ Heisenberg models on the square and honeycomb lattices, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134418 (2024).
  27. G. H. Wannier, Antiferromagnetism. The triangular Ising net, Phys. Rev. 79, 357 (1950).
  28. J. Villain, R. Bidaux, J.-P. Carton, and R. Conte, Order as an effect of disorder, J. Phys. France 41, 1263 (1980).
  29. E. F. Shender, Antiferromagnetic garnets with fluctuationally interacting sublattices, Sov. Phys. JETP 56, 178 (1982).
  30. A. Sen, P. Dutt, K. Damle, and R. Moessner, Variational wave-function study of the triangular lattice supersolid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 147204 (2008).
  31. M. Nakamura, S. Masuda, and S. Nishimoto, Characterization of topological insulators based on the electronic polarization with spiral boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. B 104, L121114 (2021).
  32. M. Kadosawa, M. Nakamura, Y. Ohta, and S. Nishimoto, One-dimensional projection of two-dimensional systems using spiral boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. B 107, L081104 (2023).
  33. S. Pal, P. Sharma, H. J. Changlani, and S. Pujari, Colorful points in the XY regime of XXZ quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. B 103, 144414 (2021).
  34. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  35. T. Xiang, J. Lou, and Z. Su, Two-dimensional algorithm of the density-matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 64, 104414 (2001).
  36. Y. Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the Heisenberg J1−J2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144411 (2016).
  37. M. Ulaga, J. Kokalj, T. Tohyama, and P. Prelovšek, Easy-axis Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: From a supersolid to a gapped solid, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174442 (2025).
  38. A. V. Chubukov and D. I. Golosov, Quantum theory of an antiferromagnet on a triangular lattice in a magnetic field, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, 69 (1991).
  39. D. Yamamoto, G. Marmorini, and I. Danshita, Quantum phase diagram of the triangular-lattice XXZ model in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 127203 (2014).
  40. S. Miyashita, Magnetic properties of Ising-like Heisenberg antiferromagnets on the triangular lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55, 3605 (1986).
  41. B. Kleine, E. Müller-Hartmann, K. Frahm, and P. Fazekas, Spin-wave analysis of easy-axis quantum antiferromagnets on the triangular lattice, Z. Phys. B 87, 103 (1992).
  42. Q. Sheng and C. L. Henley, Ordering due to disorder in a triangular Heisenberg antiferromagnet with exchange anisotropy, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 4, 2937 (1992).
  43. M. Kadosawa, M. Nakamura, Y. Ohta, and S. Nishimoto, Dataset for “Nontrivial three-sublattice magnetization in the easy-axis spin-1/2 XXZ antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice” [Data set], Zenodo, 2026, doi:10.5281/zenodo.20672439.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation