Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Magnetic vortex writing and local reversal seeding in artificial spin-vortex ice via all-optical and surface-probe control

Holly Holder1,*, Alexander J. Wright1, Alex Vanstone1, Troy Dion2,3,5, Xiaofei Xiao1, Kilian D. Stenning1,4, Tingjun Zheng1, Daniel Bromley1, Tobias Farchy1 et al.

Jack C. Gartside1,4,5,†, Rupert F. Oulton1, and Will R. Branford1,4

  • *Contact author: h.holder20@imperial.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: j.carter-gartside13@imperial.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. B 113, 184426 – Published 7 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ldgl-qbxb

Abstract

Artificial spin-vortex ice (ASVI) is a reconfigurable nanomagnetic metamaterial consisting of magnetic nanoislands tailored to support both Ising macrospin and vortex textures. ASVI has recently shown functional applications including reconfigurable magnonics and neuromorphic computing, where the introduction of vortex textures broadens functionality beyond conventional artificial spin ice, which only supports macrospin states. However, local control of writing vortex states in ASVI remains an open challenge. Here, we demonstrate techniques for field-free local magnetic vortex writing. We expand ASVI to support metastable macrospin, single-vortex, and double-vortex states. All-optical writing via focused laser illumination can write double-vortex textures, and surface-probe writing using an MFM tip can write single-vortex states. We leverage this writing to tailor and explore the reconfigurable energy landscape of ASVI, demonstrating programmable local seeding of avalanche-like reversal events. The writing techniques reported here expand the suite of nanomagnetic control techniques, with a host of future applications including fundamental studies of avalanche dynamics, physical memory, and direct writing of nanomagnetic ‘‘weights’’ in physical neuromorphic neural networks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (89)

  1. M. J. Harris, S. T. Bramwell, D. F. McMorrow, T. Zeiske, and K. W. Godfrey, Geometrical frustration in the ferromagnetic pyrochlore Ho2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2554 (1997).
  2. R. F. Wang, C. Nisoli, R. S. Freitas, J. Li, W. McConville, B. J. Cooley, M. S. Lund, N. Samarth, C. Leighton, V. H. Crespi, and P. Schiffer, Artificial ‘spin ice’ in a geometrically frustrated lattice of nanoscale ferromagnetic islands, Nature (London) 439, 303 (2006).
  3. S. H. Skjærvø, C. H. Marrows, R. L. Stamps, and L. J. Heyderman, Advances in artificial spin ice, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 13 (2020).
  4. R. Sultana, A. K. Mondal, V. S. Bhat, K. Stenning, Y. Li, D. M. Arroo, A. Vasdev, M. R. McCarter, L. E. De Long, J. T. Hastings, et al., Ice sculpting: An artificial spin ice tutorial on controlling microstate and geometry for magnonics and neuromorphic computing, J. Appl. Phys. 138, 061101 (2025).
  5. P. Schiffer and C. Nisoli, Artificial spin ice: Paths forward, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 110501 (2021).
  6. T. Dion, K. D. Stenning, A. Vanstone, H. H. Holder, R. Sultana, G. Alatteili, V. Martinez, M. T. Kaffash, T. Kimura, R. F. Oulton, et al., Ultrastrong magnon-magnon coupling and chiral spin-texture control in a dipolar 3D multilayered artificial spin-vortex ice, Nat. Commun. 15, 4077 (2024).
  7. J. de Rojas, D. Atkinson, and A. O. Adeyeye, Tuning magnon spectra via interlayer coupling in pseudo-3D nanostructured artificial spin ice arrays, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 232407 (2023).
  8. L. Berchialla, G. M. Macauley, and L. J. Heyderman, Focus on three-dimensional artificial spin ice, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 220501 (2024).
  9. A. May, M. Hunt, A. Van Den Berg, A. Hejazi, and S. Ladak, Realisation of a frustrated 3D magnetic nanowire lattice, Commun. Phys. 2, 13 (2019).
  10. M. Saccone, A. Van den Berg, E. Harding, S. Singh, S. R. Giblin, F. Flicker, and S. Ladak, Exploring the phase diagram of 3D artificial spin-ice, Commun. Phys. 6, 217 (2023).
  11. A. v. d. Berg, P. Rickhaus, F. Barrows, C. Nisoli, and S. Ladak, Direct visualization of the magnetic monopole field in a 3D artificial spin ice, arXiv:2511.04877.
  12. S. Ladak, D. E. Read, G. K. Perkins, L. F. Cohen, and W. R. Branford, Direct observation of magnetic monopole defects in an artificial spin-ice system, Nat. Phys. 6, 359 (2010).
  13. J. P. Morgan, A. Stein, S. Langridge, and C. H. Marrows, Thermal ground-state ordering and elementary excitations in artificial magnetic square ice, Nat. Phys. 7, 75 (2011).
  14. N. S. Bingham, S. Rooke, J. Park, A. Simon, W. Zhu, X. Zhang, J. Batley, J. D. Watts, C. Leighton, K. A. Dahmen, and P. Schiffer, Experimental realization of the 1D random field ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 207203 (2021).
  15. G.-W. Chern, C. Reichhardt, and C. J. O. Reichhardt, Avalanches and disorder-induced criticality in artificial spin ices, New J. Phys. 16, 063051 (2014).
  16. W. R. Branford, S. Ladak, D. E. Read, K. Zeissler, and L. F. Cohen, Emerging chirality in artificial spin ice, Science 335, 1597 (2012).
  17. S. D. Slöetjes, M. P. Grassi, and V. Kapaklis, Modelling nanomagnet vertex dynamics through Coulomb charges, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 405804 (2024).
  18. X. Zhang, G. Fitez, S. Subzwari, N. S. Bingham, I.-A. Chioar, H. Saglam, J. Ramberger, C. Leighton, C. Nisoli, and P. Schiffer, Topological kinetic crossover in a nanomagnet array, Science 380, 526 (2023).
  19. S. Zhang, I. Gilbert, C. Nisoli, G.-W. Chern, M. J. Erickson, L. O'Brien, C. Leighton, P. E. Lammert, V. H. Crespi, and P. Schiffer, Crystallites of magnetic charges in artificial spin ice, Nature (London) 500, 553 (2013).
  20. J. H. Jensen, A. Strømberg, I. Breivik, A. Penty, M. A. Niño, M. W. Khaliq, M. Foerster, G. Tufte, and E. Folven, Clocked dynamics in artificial spin ice, Nat. Commun. 15, 964 (2011).
  21. J. C. Gartside, D. M. Arroo, D. M. Burn, V. L. Bemmer, A. Moskalenko, L. F. Cohen, and W. R. Branford, Realization of ground state in artificial kagome spin ice via topological defect-driven magnetic writing, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 53 (2018).
  22. M. Saccone, F. Caravelli, K. Hofhuis, S. Dhuey, A. Scholl, C. Nisoli, and A. Farhan, Real-space observation of ergodicity transitions in artificial spin ice, Nat. Commun. 14, 5674 (2023).
  23. T. Dion, D. Arroo, K. Yamanoi, T. Kimura, J. Gartside, L. Cohen, H. Kurebayashi, and W. Branford, Tunable magnetization dynamics in artificial spin ice via shape anisotropy modification, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054433 (2019).
  24. D. M. Arroo, J. C. Gartside, and W. R. Branford, Sculpting the spin-wave response of artificial spin ice via microstate selection, Phys. Rev. B 100, 214425 (2019).
  25. M. T. Kaffash, S. Lendinez, and M. B. Jungfleisch, Nanomagnonics with artificial spin ice, Phys. Lett. A 402, 127364 (2021).
  26. S. Gliga, E. Iacocca, and O. G. Heinonen, Dynamics of reconfigurable artificial spin ice: Toward magnonic functional materials, APL Mater. 8, 040911 (2020).
  27. E. Iacocca, S. Gliga, and O. G. Heinonen, Tailoring spin-wave channels in a reconfigurable artificial spin ice, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 044047 (2020).
  28. S. Lendinez and M. Jungfleisch, Magnetization dynamics in artificial spin ice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 013001 (2020).
  29. V. Bhat, S. Watanabe, K. Baumgaertl, A. Kleibert, M. Schoen, C. Vaz, and D. Grundler, Magnon modes of microstates and microwave-induced avalanche in kagome artificial spin ice with topological defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 117208 (2020).
  30. J. C. Gartside, A. Vanstone, T. Dion, K. D. Stenning, D. M. Arroo, H. Kurebayashi, and W. R. Branford, Reconfigurable magnonic mode-hybridisation and spectral control in a bicomponent artificial spin ice, Nat. Commun. 12, 2488 (2021).
  31. T. Dion, J. Gartside, A. Vanstone, K. Stenning, D. Arroo, H. Kurebayashi, and W. Branford, Observation and control of collective spin-wave mode hybridization in chevron arrays and in square, staircase, and brickwork artificial spin ices, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013107 (2022).
  32. V. S. Bhat and M. B. Jungfleisch, Magnon signatures of multidimensional reconfigurations in multilayer square artificial spin ices, Appl. Phys. Lett. 126, 022406 (2025).
  33. H. Arava, N. Leo, D. Schildknecht, J. Cui, J. Vijayakumar, P. M. Derlet, A. Kleibert, and L. J. Heyderman, Engineering relaxation pathways in building blocks of artificial spin ice for computation, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 054086 (2019).
  34. J. H. Jensen, E. Folven, and G. Tufte, Computation in artificial spin ice, in The 2018 Conference on Artificial Life, Artificial Life Conference Proceedings, Vol. ALIFE 2018 (International Society for Artificial Life, 2018).
  35. K. Hon, Y. Kuwabiraki, M. Goto, R. Nakatani, Y. Suzuki, and H. Nomura, Numerical simulation of artificial spin ice for reservoir computing, Appl. Phys. Express 14, 033001 (2021).
  36. J. C. Gartside, K. D. Stenning, A. Vanstone, H. H. Holder, D. M. Arroo, T. Dion, F. Caravelli, H. Kurebayashi, and W. R. Branford, Reconfigurable training and reservoir computing in an artificial spin-vortex ice via spin-wave fingerprinting, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 460 (2022).
  37. K. D. Stenning, J. C. Gartside, L. Manneschi, C. T. Cheung, T. Chen, A. Vanstone, J. Love, H. Holder, F. Caravelli, H. Kurebayashi, et al., Neuromorphic overparameterisation and few-shot learning in multilayer physical neural networks, Nat. Commun. 15, 7377 (2024).
  38. W. Hu, Z. Zhang, Y. Liao, Q. Li, Y. Shi, H. Zhang, X. Zhang, C. Niu, Y. Wu, W. Yu, X. Zhou, H. Guo, W. Wang, J. Xiao, L. Yin, Q. Liu, and J. Shen, Distinguishing artificial spin ice states using magnetoresistance effect for neuromorphic computing, Nat. Commun. 14, 2562 (2023).
  39. Z. Liang, T. Bu, Z. Lyu, Z. Liu, A. Hrabec, L. Wang, Y. Dou, J. Ding, P. Ge, W. Yang, et al., Ultrafast probabilistic neuron in an artificial spin ice for robust deep neural networks, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2417334 (2024).
  40. E. Seynaeve, G. Rens, A. V. Volodin, K. Temst, C. Van Haesendonck, and Y. Bruynseraede, Transition from a single-domain to a multidomain state in mesoscopic ferromagnetic co structures, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 531 (2001).
  41. T. Shinjo, T. Okuno, R. Hassdorf, K. Shigeto, and T. Ono, Magnetic vortex core observation in circular dots of Permalloy, Science 289, 930 (2000).
  42. K. L. Metlov and K. Y. Guslienko, Stability of magnetic vortex in soft magnetic nano-sized circular cylinder, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 242-245, 1015 (2002).
  43. K. Y. Guslienko, Magnetic vortex state stability, reversal and dynamics in restricted geometries, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 8, 2745 (2008).
  44. K. S. Buchanan, P. E. Roy, M. Grimsditch, F. Y. Fradin, K. Y. Guslienko, S. D. Bader, and V. Novosad, Soliton-pair dynamics in patterned ferromagnetic ellipses, Nat. Phys. 1, 172 (2005).
  45. K. S. Buchanan, P. E. Roy, F. Y. Fradin, K. Y. Guslienko, M. Grimsditch, S. D. Bader, and V. Novosad, Vortex dynamics in patterned ferromagnetic ellipses, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08C707 (2006).
  46. H. Zhang, Y. Liu, M. Yan, and R. Hertel, Azimuthal spin wave modes excited in an elliptical nanomagnet with vortex pair states, IEEE Trans. Magn. 46, 1675 (2010).
  47. M. Saccone, J. C. Gartside, K. D. Stenning, W. R. Branford, and F. Caravelli, From vertices to vortices in magnetic nanoislands, Phys. Fluids 35, 017101 (2023).
  48. O. Tchernyshyov and G.-W. Chern, Fractional vortices and composite domain walls in flat nanomagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 197204 (2005).
  49. P. Vavassori, N. Zaluzec, V. Metlushko, V. Novosad, B. Ilic, and M. Grimsditch, Magnetization reversal via single and double vortex states in submicron permalloy ellipses, Phys. Rev. B 69, 214404 (2004).
  50. S. Jain, A. O. Adeyeye, and N. Singh, Spin re-orientation in magnetostatically coupled Ni80Fe20 ellipsoidal nanomagnets, Nanotechnology 21, 285702 (2010).
  51. D. Y. Sasaki, R. V. Chopdekar, S. T. Retterer, D. Y. Jiang, J. K. Mason, M. S. Lee, and Y. Takamura, Formation of complex spin textures in thermally demagnetized La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 artificial-spin-ice structures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 064057 (2022).
  52. K. D. Stenning, J. C. Gartside, T. Dion, A. Vanstone, D. M. Arroo, and W. R. Branford, Magnonic bending, phase shifting and interferometry in a 2D reconfigurable nanodisk crystal, ACS Nano 15, 674 (2021).
  53. A. Talapatra, N. Singh, and A. O. Adeyeye, Magnetic tunability of permalloy artificial spin ice structures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 014034 (2020).
  54. J. C. Gartside, D. M. Burn, L. F. Cohen, and W. R. Branford, A novel method for the injection and manipulation of magnetic charge states in nanostructures, Sci. Rep. 6, 32864 (2016).
  55. N. Romming, C. Hanneken, M. Menzel, J. E. Bickel, B. Wolter, K. von Bergmann, A. Kubetzka, and R. Wiesendanger, Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions, Science 341, 636 (2013).
  56. M. P. Magiera, A. Hucht, H. Hinrichsen, S. R. Dahmen, and D. E. Wolf, Magnetic vortices induced by a moving tip, Europhys. Lett. 100, 27004 (2012).
  57. M. P. Magiera and S. Schulz, Magnetic vortices induced by a monopole tip, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 1 (2014).
  58. M. Finazzi, M. Savoini, A. R. Khorsand, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, L. Duò, A. Kirilyuk, T. Rasing, and M. Ezawa, Laser-induced magnetic nanostructures with tunable topological properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 177205 (2013).
  59. T. Eggebrecht, M. Möller, J. G. Gatzmann, N. Rubiano da Silva, A. Feist, U. Martens, H. Ulrichs, M. Münzenberg, C. Ropers, and S. Schäfer, Light-induced metastable magnetic texture uncovered by in situ lorentz microscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 097203 (2017).
  60. K. Taguchi, J.-i. Ohe, and G. Tatara, Ultrafast magnetic vortex core switching driven by the topological inverse Faraday effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 127204 (2012).
  61. X. Fu, S. D. Pollard, B. Chen, B.-K. Yoo, H. Yang, and Y. Zhu, Optical manipulation of magnetic vortices visualized in situ by Lorentz electron microscopy, Sci. Adv. 4, eaat3077 (2018),.
  62. D. Louis, D. Lacour, M. Hehn, V. Lomakin, T. Hauet, and F. Montaigne, A tunable magnetic metamaterial based on the dipolar four-state potts model, Nat. Mater. 17, 1076 (2018).
  63. J. Sklenar, Y. Lao, A. Albrecht, J. D. Watts, C. Nisoli, G.-W. Chern, and P. Schiffer, Field-induced phase coexistence in an artificial spin ice, Nat. Phys. 15, 191 (2019).
  64. Y.-L. Wang, Z.-L. Xiao, A. Snezhko, J. Xu, L. E. Ocola, R. Divan, J. E. Pearson, G. W. Crabtree, and W.-K. Kwok, Rewritable artificial magnetic charge ice, Science 352, 962 (2016).
  65. J. Lehmann and J. Lehmann, Poling of artificial magneto-toroidal crystals, in Toroidal Order in Magnetic Metamaterials, Springer Theses (Springer, Cham, 2022), pp. 113–131.
  66. K. D. Stenning, X. Xiao, H. H. Holder, J. C. Gartside, A. Vanstone, O. W. Kennedy, R. F. Oulton, and W. R. Branford, Low-power continuous-wave all-optical magnetic switching in ferromagnetic nanoarrays, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 4, 101291 (2023).
  67. M. Pancaldi, N. Leo, and P. Vavassori, Selective and fast plasmon-assisted photo-heating of nanomagnets, Nanoscale 11, 7656 (2019).
  68. P. Gypens, N. Leo, M. Menniti, P. Vavassori, and J. Leliaert, Thermoplasmonic nanomagnetic logic gates, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024014 (2022).
  69. K. Baumgaertl and D. Grundler, Reversal of nanomagnets by propagating magnons in ferrimagnetic yttrium iron garnet enabling nonvolatile magnon memory, Nat. Commun. 14, 1490 (2023).
  70. A. Pac, G. Macauley, J. Brock, A. Hrabec, A. Kurenkov, V. Raposo, E. Martinez, and L. Heyderman, Current-induced magnetization control in dipolar-coupled nanomagnet pairs and artificial spin ice, arXiv:2601.16633.
  71. E. Mengotti, L. J. Heyderman, A. F. Rodríguez, F. Nolting, R. V. Hügli, and H.-B. Braun, Real-space observation of emergent magnetic monopoles and associated Dirac strings in artificial kagome spin ice, Nat. Phys. 7, 68 (2011).
  72. D. Y. Sasaki, R. V. Chopdekar, S. T. Retterer, M. S. Lee, and Y. Takamura, Energetics of ising-vortex interactions in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 brickwork artificial spin ices, Phys. Rev. B 113, 064416 (2026).
  73. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/ldgl-qbxb for additional experimental methods, supporting figures and tables, writing-fidelity statistics, micromagnetic, and optical simulation details, and extended switching data.
  74. A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014).
  75. A. V. Kimel and M. Li, Writing magnetic memory with ultrashort light pulses, Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 189 (2019).
  76. Z. Chai, X. Hu, F. Wang, X. Niu, J. Xie, and Q. Gong, Ultrafast all-optical switching, Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1600665 (2017).
  77. V. Sasikala and K. Chitra, All optical switching and associated technologies: A review, J. Opt. 47, 307 (2018).
  78. C. Hareau, X. Yang, M. Sanz-Paz, M. Sheldon, and M. Mivelle, Engineering magnetization with photons: Nanoscale advances in the inverse Faraday effect for metallic and plasmonic architectures, ACS Photonics 12, 6535 (2025).
  79. X. Yang, Y. Mou, R. Zapata, B. Reynier, B. Gallas, and M. Mivelle, An inverse Faraday effect generated by linearly polarized light through a plasmonic nano-antenna, Nanophotonics 12, 687 (2023).
  80. Lumerical inc. ansys inc, https://www.ansys.com/products/optics/fdtd.
  81. D. Nečas and P. Klapetek, Gwyddion: An open-source software for SPM data analysis, Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 10, 181 (2012).
  82. L. Exl, S. Bance, F. Reichel, T. Schrefl, H. Peter Stimming, and N. J. Mauser, LaBonte's method revisited: An effective steepest descent method for micromagnetic energy minimization, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 17D118 (2014).
  83. C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature (London) 451, 42 (2008).
  84. M. J. Donahue and D. G. Porter, Oommf User's Guide, version 2.1a1, https://math.nist.gov/oommf/doc/userguide21a1/userguide.pdf.
  85. T. M. Inc., Matlab version: R2023b, (2023), https://www.mathworks.com/products/new_products/release2023b.html.
  86. G. van Rossum and J. de Boer, Interactively testing remote servers using the python programming language, CWI Quarterly 4, 283 (1991).
  87. C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, et al., Array programming with NumPy, Nature (London) 585, 357 (2020).
  88. J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90 (2007).
  89. Imperial college research computing service, DOI:10.14469/hpc/2232.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation