Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Altermagnetism of ultrathin CrSb slabs

Brahim Marfoua1,*, Mohammad Amirabbasi2, and Marcus Ekholm1,†

  • *Contact author: brahim.marfoua@liu.se
  • †Contact author: marcus.ekholm@liu.se

Phys. Rev. B 113, 214439 – Published 16 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k9zm-2k1v

Abstract

Altermagnets exhibit momentum-dependent spin splitting without net magnetization, combining characteristics of both ferromagnets and antiferromagnets, making them highly interesting for spintronics applications. CrSb is a prime candidate with a high Néel temperature (∼700K) and a large exchange-driven splitting of ∼0.6–1eV. Using ab initio calculations, we consider slabs of various orientations in the ultrathin limit. In (0001)-oriented slabs, the exchange-driven altermagnetic spin splitting collapses, but including spin-orbit coupling restores a residual anisotropic splitting of ∼70meV. The (100)-oriented slabs become fully spin degenerate due to symmetry reduction. In contrast, the (110)-oriented slabs show a strong altermagnetic spin splitting of ∼400meV, and thus emerges as a robust candidate for realizing large, exchange-driven altermagnetism.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (34)

  1. I. Mazin and the PRX Editors, Editorial Altermagnetism—A new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022).
  2. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).
  3. S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024).
  4. J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. D'Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature (London) 626, 517 (2024).
  5. Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, and P. Qin, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022).
  6. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
  7. W. F. Brinkman, R. J. Elliott, and R. E. Peierls, Theory of spin-space groups, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 294, 343 (1966).
  8. O. Fedchenko, J. Minár, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D'Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kutnyakhov, and N. Wind, Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO2, Sci. Adv. 10, eadj4883 (2024).
  9. Y. Guo, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Jiang, L. Jiang, C. Wu, J. Dong, X. Xu, W. He, and B. He, Direct and inverse spin splitting effects in altermagnetic RuO2, Adv. Sci. 11, 2400967 (2024).
  10. T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115102 (2024).
  11. A. Hariki, A. Daldin, O. J. Amin, T. Yamaguchi, A. Badura, D. Kriegner, K. W. Edmonds, R. P. Campion, P. Wadley, D. Backes, L. S. I. Veiga, S. S. Dhesi, G. Springholz, L. Smejkal, K. Vyborny, T. Jungwirth, and J. Kunes, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism in altermagnetic α-MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176701 (2024).
  12. W. J. Takei, D. E. Cox, and G. Shirane, Magnetic structures in the MnSb-CrSb system, Phys. Rev. 129, 2008 (1963).
  13. G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, et al., Three-dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb, Nat. Commun. 16, 1442 (2025).
  14. C. Li, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, B. Thiagarajan, M. Leandersson, C. Polley, T. Kim, H. Liu, et al., Topological Weyl altermagnetism in CrSb, Commun. Phys. 8, 311 (2025).
  15. J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Jishan, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, et al., Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206401 (2024).
  16. W. Lu, S. Feng, Y. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Lin, X. Liang, S. Liu, W. Feng, K. Yamagami, J. Liu, et al., Signature of topological surface bands in altermagnetic Weyl semimetal CrSb, Nano Lett. 25, 7343 (2025).
  17. S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. Šmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, and A. Chakraborty, Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun. 15, 2116 (2024).
  18. B. Rai, K. Patra, S. Bera, S. Kalimuddin, K. Deb, M. Mondal, P. Mahadevan, and N. Kumar, Direction-dependent conduction polarity in altermagnetic CrSb, Adv. Sci. 12, 2502226 (2025).
  19. Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the altermagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature (London) 638, 645 (2025).
  20. Y. F. Zhang, X. S. Ni, K. Chen, and K. Cao, Chiral magnon splitting in altermagnetic CrSb from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174451 (2025).
  21. T. Yu, I. Shahid, P. Liu, D. Shao, X. Chen, and Y. Sun, Néel vector-dependent anomalous transport in altermagnetic metal CrSb, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 47 (2025).
  22. T. Urata, W. Hattori, and H. Ikuta, High mobility charge transport in a multicarrier altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 084412 (2024).
  23. M. Venkatraman and J. Neumann, The Cr-Sb (chromium-antimony) system, J. Phase Equilib. 11, 435 (1990).
  24. J. Sim, C. Kang, and S. Je, Leveraging strain-induced staggered Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction for altermagnetic Néel vector control, Phys. B (Amsterdam, Neth.) 714, 417475 (2025).
  25. S. Santhosh, P. Corbae, W. J. Yánez-Parreño, S. Ghosh, C. J. Jensen, A. V. Fedorov, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, J. A. Borchers, A. J. Grutter, et al., Altermagnetic band splitting in 10 nm epitaxial CrSb thin films, Adv. Mater. 37, 2508977 (2025).
  26. S. Aota and M. Tanaka, Epitaxial growth and transport properties of a metallic altermagnet CrSb on a GaAs (001) substrate, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 074410 (2025).
  27. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  28. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  29. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  30. G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Blügel, F. Freimuth, G. Géranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, et al., Wannier90 as a community code: New features and applications, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020).
  31. X. He, N. Helbig, M. Verstraete, and E. Bousquet, TB2J: A Python package for computing magnetic interaction parameters, Comput. Phys. Commun. 264, 107938 (2021).
  32. A. I. Snow, Neutron diffraction investigation of the atomic magnetic moment orientation in the antiferromagnetic compound CrSb, Phys. Rev. 85, 365 (1952).
  33. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/k9zm-2k1v for detailed thickness-dependent resolved spectral and electronic structure data for (0001) and (100) slabs.
  34. S. Cheong and F. Huang, Altermagnetism classification, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 38 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation