- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Proximity effect in gap-asymmetric superconducting bilayers and regularization of transition rates

Giampiero Marchegiani*

Gianluigi Catelani

  • *Contact author: giampiero.marchegiani@tii.ae
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 114, 144504 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k2d4-tpc4

Abstract

The standard mean-field treatment of low-temperature superconductors leads to a square-root divergent density of states at the gap value. This feature can lead to unphysical logarithmic divergences in various quantities, such as currents and qubit transition rates. We revisit their possible regularization based on the proximity effect between two superconducting films with different gaps. We derive analytical approximations for the density of states in each superconducting film. We find that the smearing of the density of states grows with the gap asymmetry. As a concrete example, we discuss the regularization of transition rates in qubits with frequency close to resonance with the gap asymmetry between the two films, and the consequent smoothening of the jump discontinuity in the qubit frequency shift. Our results could also aid the development of superconducting detectors and related devices based on superconducting bilayers.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).
  2. M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, New York, NY, 2004).
  3. G.-L. Ingold and Y. V. Nazarov, Charge tunneling rates in ultrasmall junctions, in Single Charge Tunneling: Coulomb Blockade Phenomena In Nanostructures, edited by H. Grabert and M. H. Devoret (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1992), pp. 21–107.
  4. S. Shapiro, P. H. Smith, J. Nicol, J. L. Miles, and P. F. Strong, Superconductivity and electron tunneling, IBM J. Res. & Dev. 6, 34 (1962).
  5. A. Barone and G. Paternò, Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect (Wiley, New York, NY, 1982).
  6. D. V. Averin, Gap resonance in the classical dynamics of the current-biased Josephson tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043218 (2021).
  7. B. Frank and W. Krech, Electronic cooling in superconducting tunnel junctions, Phys. Lett. A 235, 281 (1997).
  8. A. J. Manninen, J. K. Suoknuuti, M. M. Leivo, and J. P. Pekola, Cooling of a superconductor by quasiparticle tunneling, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3020 (1999).
  9. G. Marchegiani, A. Braggio, and F. Giazotto, Nonlinear thermoelectricity with electron-hole symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 106801 (2020).
  10. G. Marchegiani, A. Braggio, and F. Giazotto, Phase-tunable thermoelectricity in a Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043091 (2020).
  11. C. A. Hamilton and S. Shapiro, Experimental demonstration of the Riedel peak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 426 (1971).
  12. A. B. Zorin, I. O. Kulik, K. K. Likharev, and J. R. Schrieffer, The sign of the interference current component in superconducting tunnel junctions, in Selected Papers of J. Robert Schrieffer (World Scientific, Singapore, 1979), pp. 96–105.
  13. R. C. Dynes, V. Narayanamurti, and J. P. Garno, Direct measurement of quasiparticle-lifetime broadening in a strong-coupled superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1509 (1978).
  14. J. P. Pekola, V. F. Maisi, S. Kafanov, N. Chekurov, A. Kemppinen, Y. A. Pashkin, O.-P. Saira, M. Möttönen, and J. S. Tsai, Environment-assisted tunneling as an origin of the Dynes density of states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 026803 (2010).
  15. F. Herman and R. Hlubina, Microscopic interpretation of the Dynes formula for the tunneling density of states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 144508 (2016).
  16. F. Herman and R. Hlubina, Electromagnetic properties of impure superconductors with pair-breaking processes, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014509 (2017).
  17. F. Herman and R. Hlubina, Thermodynamic properties of Dynes superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 97, 014517 (2018).
  18. D. Kavický and R. Hlubina, Dynes-like superconductivity in thin Al films in parallel magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014508 (2020).
  19. S. Skalski, O. Betbeder-Matibet, and P. R. Weiss, Properties of superconducting alloys containing paramagnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. 136, A1500 (1964).
  20. L. E. Hasselberg, Renormalization of the expression for the superconducting tunnelling currents, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 4, 1433 (1974).
  21. J. C. Cuevas, A. Martín-Rodero, and A. Levy Yeyati, Hamiltonian approach to the transport properties of superconducting quantum point contacts, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7366 (1996).
  22. J. A. Sauls, Andreev bound states and their signatures, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20180140 (2018).
  23. F. Kos, S. E. Nigg, and L. I. Glazman, Frequency-dependent admittance of a short superconducting weak link, Phys. Rev. B 87, 174521 (2013).
  24. P. Fulde, Tunneling density of states for a superconductor carrying a current, Phys. Rev. 137, A783 (1965).
  25. K. Maki and P. Fulde, Equivalence of different pair-breaking mechanisms in superconductors, Phys. Rev. 140, A1586 (1965).
  26. W. L. McMillan, Tunneling model of the superconducting proximity effect, Phys. Rev. 175, 537 (1968).
  27. Y. V. Fominov and M. V. Feigel'man, Superconductive properties of thin dirty superconductor–normal-metal bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 63, 094518 (2001).
  28. A. A. Golubov, M. A. Gurvich, M. Y. Kupriyanov, and S. V. Polonskii, Josephson effect in SS'IS'S tunnel structures, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 103, 1851 (1993) [Sov. Phys. JETP 76, 915 (1993)].
  29. A. A. Golubov, E. P. Houwman, J. G. Gijsbertsen, V. M. Krasnov, J. Flokstra, H. Rogalla, and M. Y. Kupriyanov, Proximity effect in superconductor-insulator-superconductor Josephson tunnel junctions: Theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. B 51, 1073 (1995).
  30. G. Brammertz, A. Poelaert, A. A. Golubov, P. Verhoeve, A. Peacock, and H. Rogalla, Generalized proximity effect model in superconducting bi- and trilayer films, J. Appl. Phys. 90, 355 (2001).
  31. A. Hosseinkhani and G. Catelani, Proximity effect in normal-metal quasiparticle traps, Phys. Rev. B 97, 054513 (2018).
  32. We remark here that in the presence of proximity effect, the order parameters Δj generally differ from the gap in the density of states [35]. For concreteness, with a slight language abuse, below we refer to the difference of the order parameters δΔ=|Δ1−Δ2| as gap asymmetry.
  33. G. Marchegiani, L. Amico, and G. Catelani, Quasiparticles in superconducting qubits with asymmetric junctions, PRX Quantum 3, 040338 (2022).
  34. J. Rammer and H. Smith, Quantum field-theoretical methods in transport theory of metals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 323 (1986).
  35. W. Belzig, F. K. Wilhelm, C. Bruder, G. Schön, and A. D. Zaikin, Quasiclassical Green's function approach to mesoscopic superconductivity, Superlattices Microstruct. 25, 1251 (1999).
  36. K. D. Usadel, Generalized diffusion equation for superconducting alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 507 (1970).
  37. M. Y. Kupriyanov and V. F. Lukichev, Influence of boundary transparency on the critical current of “dirty” SS'S structures, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 94, 139 (1988) [Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 1163 (1988)].
  38. In the notation of Ref. [26], τj=1/Γj, cosθj(ε)=−iε/Δj2(ε)−ε2, sinθj=Δj(ε)/Δj2(ε)−ε2 and Δj=Δjph, where j=1,2 correspond to j=N,S in McMillan's work. The equivalence between the McMillan model and the quasiclassical description has also been extensively discussed in Refs. [28, 29].
  39. A. A. Golubov and M. Y. Kupriyanov, Josephson effect in SNINS and SNIS tunnel structures with finite transparency of the SN boundaries, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 96, 1420 (1989) [Sov. Phys. JETP 69, 805 (1989)].
  40. Recall also that the Matsubara Green's function can be obtained with the substitution ε→iωk, with ωk=2πT(k+1/2) and k∈N.
  41. This result is in agreement with the one reported for NS bilayers in Ref. [27], where the authors use a different variable, Z=exp(iθS).
  42. For Δ1=0, γ2=1/τ2 with no extra condition on the energy other than Eq. (11).
  43. This shift is valid for a generic Dynes-like expression when |γ|≪|ε|, see for instance Ref. [76].
  44. As discussed in Appendix pp2, it is also assumed that 1−δ2/δ≫1/(τ1Δ1), so the two gaps cannot be arbitrarily close.
  45. A. Mazanik and Y. Fominov, Peculiarities of the density of states in SN junctions, Ann. Phys. 449, 169199 (2023).
  46. G. Catelani, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, and L. I. Glazman, Relaxation and frequency shifts induced by quasiparticles in superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. B 84, 064517 (2011).
  47. L. I. Glazman and G. Catelani, Bogoliubov quasiparticles in superconducting qubits, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 31 (2021).
  48. J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
  49. S. Diamond, V. Fatemi, M. Hays, H. Nho, P. D. Kurilovich, T. Connolly, V. R. Joshi, K. Serniak, L. Frunzio, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, Distinguishing parity-switching mechanisms in a superconducting qubit, PRX Quantum 3, 040304 (2022).
  50. T. Connolly, P. D. Kurilovich, S. Diamond, H. Nho, Charlotte G. L. Bøttcher, L. I. Glazman, V. Fatemi, and M. H. Devoret, Coexistence of nonequilibrium density and equilibrium energy distribution of quasiparticles in a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 217001 (2024).
  51. J. Krause, G. Marchegiani, L. M. Janssen, G. Catelani, Y. Ando, and C. Dickel, Quasiparticle effects in magnetic-field-resilient three-dimensional transmons, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 044063 (2024).
  52. H. Nho, T. Connolly, P. D. Kurilovich, S. Diamond, Charlotte G. L. Bøttcher, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, Recovery dynamics of a gap-engineered transmon after a quasiparticle burst, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 050601 (2026).
  53. D. S. Antonenko, P. D. Kurilovich, F. J. Matute-Cañadas, and L. I. Glazman, Effect of quasiparticles on the parameters of a gap-engineered transmon, Phys. Rev. B 113, 054504 (2026).
  54. O. A. E. Cherney and J. Shewchun, Enhancement of superconductivity in thin aluminium films, Can. J. Phys. 47, 1101 (1969).
  55. P. N. Chubov, V. V. Eremenko, and Y. A. Pilipenko, Dependence of the critical temperature and energy gap on the thickness of superconducting aluminum films, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 55, 752 (1969) [Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 389 (1969)].
  56. R. Meservey and P. M. Tedrow, Properties of very thin aluminum films, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 51 (1971).
  57. N. A. Court, A. J. Ferguson, and R. G. Clark, Energy gap measurement of nanostructured aluminium thin films for single Cooper-pair devices, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21, 015013 (2008).
  58. G. Marchegiani and G. Catelani, Nonequilibrium regimes for quasiparticles in superconducting qubits with gap-asymmetric junctions, Commun. Phys. 8, 120 (2025).
  59. J. Leppäkangas and M. Marthaler, Fragility of flux qubits against quasiparticle tunneling, Phys. Rev. B 85, 144503 (2012).
  60. M. McEwen, K. C. Miao, J. Atalaya, A. Bilmes, A. Crook, J. Bovaird, J. M. Kreikebaum, N. Zobrist, E. Jeffrey, B. Ying, A. Bengtsson, H.-S. Chang, A. Dunsworth, J. Kelly, Y. Zhang, E. Forati, R. Acharya, J. Iveland, W. Liu, S. Kim, et al., Resisting high-energy impact events through gap engineering in superconducting qubit arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 240601 (2024).
  61. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1968), Vol. 55.
  62. V. D. Kurilovich, G. Roberts, L. S. Martin, M. McEwen, A. Eickbusch, L. Faoro, L. B. Ioffe, J. Atalaya, A. Bilmes, J. M. Kreikebaum, A. Bengtsson, P. Klimov, M. Neeley, W. Mruczkiewicz, K. Miao, I. L. Aleiner, J. Kelly, Y. Chen, K. Satzinger, and A. Opremcak, Correlated phase error bursts in a gap-engineered superconducting qubit array, Phys. Rev. X 16, 021025 (2026).
  63. F. W. King, Hilbert Transforms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009), Vol. 2.
  64. N. Ligato, G. Marchegiani, P. Virtanen, E. Strambini, and F. Giazotto, High operating temperature in V-based superconducting quantum interference proximity transistors, Sci. Rep. 7, 8810 (2017).
  65. S. Zhao, D. J. Goldie, S. Withington, and C. N. Thomas, Exploring the performance of thin-film superconducting multilayers as kinetic inductance detectors for low-frequency detection, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31, 015007 (2018).
  66. G. Wang, P. S. Barry, T. Cecil, C. L. Chang, J. Li, M. Lisovenko, V. Novosad, Z. Pan, V. G. Yefremenko, and J. Zhang, Electromagnetic properties of aluminum-based bilayers for kinetic inductance detectors, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 33, 1 (2023).
  67. L. Lolli, E. Taralli, C. Portesi, M. Rajteri, and E. Monticone, Aluminum-titanium bilayer for near-infrared transition edge sensors, Sensors 16, 953 (2016).
  68. L. Cardani, N. Casali, A. Cruciani, H. le Sueur, M. Martinez, F. Bellini, M. Calvo, M. G. Castellano, I. Colantoni, C. Cosmelli, A. D'Addabbo, S. Di Domizio, J. Goupy, L. Minutolo, A. Monfardini, and M. Vignati, Al/Ti/Al phonon-mediated KIDs for UV–vis light detection over large areas, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31, 075002 (2018).
  69. L. Pesce, A. L. De Santis, M. Calvo, M. Cappelli, U. Chowdhury, A. Cruciani, G. Del Castello, D. Delicato, M. Folcarelli, M. del Gallo Roccagiovine, A. Monfardini, D. Quaranta, and M. Vignati, Enhanced athermal phonon responsivity in a kinetic inductance detector with integrated phonon collectors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 128, 163504 (2026).
  70. G. Marchegiani and G. Catelani, Data for “Proximity effect in gap-asymmetric superconducting bilayers and regularization of transition rates” [Dataset], Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18669499.
  71. C. Bender and S. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory (Springer, New York, NY, 2013).
  72. A. P. Prudnikov, Y. A. Brychkov, and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Series: Special Functions (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Newark, NJ, 1986).
  73. DLMF, NIST digital library of mathematical functions, Release 1.2.5, edited by f. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain (2025), https://dlmf.nist.gov/19.7.
  74. A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Tunnel effect between superconductors in an alternating field, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 51, 1535 (1967) [Sov. Phys. JETP 24, 1035 (1967)].
  75. Note that ε̃0 diverges for β1−δβ2=0, i.e., τ1=τ2 or Δ1=0. In this case, the prefactor collected on the left-hand side regularizes the expression. This detail does not change our discussion, since the final result behaves well both for τ1=τ2 and Δ1=0.
  76. F. N. Womack, P. W. Adams, and G. Catelani, Spin-polarized tunneling in critically disordered Be-Al bilayers, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023141 (2021).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 114, 144504– Published 8 September, 2026
  • Received 18 February 2026
  • Accepted 11 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation