- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fragmented exceptional points and their bulk and edge realizations in lattice models

Subhajyoti Bid and Henning Schomerus

PDF

Phys. Rev. B 112, 195433 – Published 21 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jy2b-4hk5

Abstract

Exceptional points (EPs) are spectral defects displayed by non-Hermitian systems in which multiple degenerate eigenvalues share a single eigenvector. This distinctive feature makes systems exhibiting EPs more sensitive to external perturbations than their Hermitian counterparts, where degeneracies are nondefective diabolic points. In contrast to these widely studied cases, more complex non-Hermitian degeneracies in which the eigenvectors are only partially degenerate are poorly understood. Here, we characterize these fragmented exceptional points (FEPs) systematically from a physical perspective, and demonstrate how they can be induced into the bulk and edge spectrum of two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattice models, exemplified by non-Hermitian versions of a Lieb lattice and a higher-order topological Dirac semimetal. The design of the systems is facilitated by an efficient algebraic approach within which we provide precise conditions for FEPs that can be evaluated directly from a given model Hamiltonian. The free design of FEPs significantly opens up a new frontier for non-Hermitian physics and expands the scope for designing systems with unconventional response characteristics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (91)

  1. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  2. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  3. B. A. Bernevig and T. L. Hughes, Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2013).
  4. C. Beenakker, Search for Majorana fermions in superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 113 (2013).
  5. J. K. Asbóth, L. Oroszlány, and A. Pályi, A Short Course on Topological Insulators (Springer, Cham, 2016).
  6. M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017).
  7. S. Murakami, Phase transition between the quantum spin Hall and insulator phases in 3D: Emergence of a topological gapless phase, New J. Phys. 9, 356 (2007).
  8. A. A. Burkov, Topological semimetals, Nat. Mater. 15, 1145 (2016).
  9. N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
  10. B. Yan and C. Felser, Topological materials: Weyl semimetals, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 8, 337 (2017).
  11. W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science 357, 61 (2017).
  12. W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017).
  13. F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topological insulators, Sci. Adv. 4, eaat0346 (2018).
  14. S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and E. Rossi, Vortex and surface phase transitions in superconducting higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 037001 (2020).
  15. M. Lin and T. L. Hughes, Topological quadrupolar semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 98, 241103(R) (2018).
  16. B. J. Wieder, Z. Wang, J. Cano, X. Dai, L. M. Schoop, B. Bradlyn, and B. A. Bernevig, Strong and fragile topological Dirac semimetals with higher-order Fermi arcs, Nat. Commun. 11, 627 (2020).
  17. S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Higher-order Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 266804 (2020).
  18. H.-X. Wang, Z.-K. Lin, B. Jiang, G.-Y. Guo, and J.-H. Jiang, Higher-order Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 146401 (2020).
  19. Q. Wei, X. Zhang, W. Deng, J. Lu, X. Huang, M. Yan, G. Chen, Z. Liu, and S. Jia, Higher-order topological semimetal in acoustic crystals, Nat. Mater. 20, 812 (2021).
  20. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996).
  21. N. Moiseyev, Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011).
  22. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  23. H. Cao and J. Wiersig, Dielectric microcavities: Model systems for wave chaos and non-Hermitian physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 61 (2015).
  24. R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys. 14, 11 (2018).
  25. Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020).
  26. H. Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Opt. Lett. 38, 1912 (2013).
  27. S. Malzard, C. Poli, and H. Schomerus, Topologically protected defect states in open photonic systems with non-Hermitian charge-conjugation and parity-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 200402 (2015).
  28. S. Lieu, Topological phases in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045106 (2018).
  29. K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019).
  30. T. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, Q. Ai, Z. Gong, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, and F. Nori, Second-order topological phases in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076801 (2019).
  31. H. Xue, Q. Wang, B. Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, Non-Hermitian Dirac cones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 236403 (2020).
  32. M. M. Denner, A. Skurativska, F. Schindler, M. H. Fischer, R. Thomale, T. Bzdušek, and T. Neupert, Exceptional topological insulators, Nat. Commun. 12, 5681 (2021).
  33. S. Bid, G. K. Dash, and M. Thakurathi, Non-Hermitian higher-order Weyl semimetal with surface diabolic points, Phys. Rev. B 107, 165120 (2023).
  34. N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-Hermitian topological phenomena: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023).
  35. T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, New York, 1966).
  36. C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gräf, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Experimental observation of the topological structure of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 787 (2001).
  37. W. D. Heiss, Exceptional points of non-Hermitian operators, J. Phys. A 37, 2455 (2004).
  38. W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A 45, 444016 (2012).
  39. M. V. Berry, Physics of nonhermitian degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004).
  40. Y. Xu, S.-T. Wang, and L.-M. Duan, Weyl exceptional rings in a three-dimensional dissipative cold atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 045701 (2017).
  41. J. Carlström and E. J. Bergholtz, Exceptional links and twisted Fermi ribbons in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042114 (2018).
  42. T. Liu, J. J. He, Z. Yang, and F. Nori, Higher-order Weyl-exceptional-ring semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 196801 (2021).
  43. A. Cerjan, S. Huang, M. Wang, K. P. Chen, Y. Chong, and M. C. Rechtsman, Experimental realization of a Weyl exceptional ring, Nat. Photon. 13, 623 (2019).
  44. J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203901 (2014).
  45. W. Chen, Ş. Kaya Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature (London) 548, 192 (2017).
  46. Y.-H. Lai, Y.-K. Lu, M.-G. Suh, Z. Yuan, and K. Vahala, Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced Sagnac effect, Nature (London) 576, 65 (2019).
  47. J. Wiersig, Prospects and fundamental limits in exceptional point-based sensing, Nat. Commun. 11, 2454 (2020).
  48. G. Yoo, H.-S. Sim, and H. Schomerus, Quantum noise and mode nonorthogonality in non-Hermitian PT-symmetric optical resonators, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063833 (2011).
  49. H. Schomerus, Nonreciprocal response theory of non-Hermitian mechanical metamaterials: Response phase transition from the skin effect of zero modes, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013058 (2020).
  50. A. Hashemi, K. Busch, D. N. Christodoulides, S. K. Ozdemir, and R. El-Ganainy, Linear response theory of open systems with exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 13, 3281 (2022).
  51. J. Wiersig, Petermann factors and phase rigidities near exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033042 (2023).
  52. J. Wiersig, Response strengths of open systems at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023121 (2022).
  53. H. Schomerus, Eigenvalue sensitivity from eigenstate geometry near and beyond arbitrary-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013044 (2024).
  54. S. Bid and H. Schomerus, Uniform response theory of non-Hermitian systems: Non-Hermitian physics beyond the exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023062 (2025).
  55. G. Demange and E.-M. Graefe, Signatures of three coalescing eigenfunctions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 025303 (2012).
  56. J.-W. Ryu, S.-Y. Lee, and S. W. Kim, Analysis of multiple exceptional points related to three interacting eigenmodes in a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. A 85, 042101 (2012).
  57. Z. Lin, A. Pick, M. Lončar, and A. W. Rodriguez, Enhanced spontaneous emission at third-order Dirac exceptional points in inverse-designed photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 107402 (2016).
  58. I. Mandal and E. J. Bergholtz, Symmetry and higher-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 186601 (2021).
  59. H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature (London) 548, 187 (2017).
  60. Y. Wu, P. Zhou, T. Li, W. Wan, and Y. Zou, High-order exceptional point based optical sensor, Opt. Express 29, 6080 (2021).
  61. M. Yang, L. Zhu, Q. Zhong, R. El-Ganainy, and P.-Y. Chen, Spectral sensitivity near exceptional points as a resource for hardware encryption, Nat. Commun. 14, 1145 (2023).
  62. J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photon. Res. 8, 1457 (2020).
  63. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  64. S. Sayyad, M. Stålhammar, L. Rødland, and F. K. Kunst, Symmetry-protected exceptional and nodal points in non-Hermitian systems, SciPost Phys. 15, 200 (2023).
  65. K. Yang and I. Mandal, Enhanced eigenvector sensitivity and algebraic classification of sublattice-symmetric exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 107, 144304 (2023).
  66. J. L. K. König, F. Herber, and E. J. Bergholtz, Nodal phases in non-Hermitian wallpaper crystals, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 051109 (2024).
  67. J.-W. Ryu, J.-H. Han, C.-H. Yi, M. J. Park, and H. C. Park, Exceptional classifications of non-Hermitian systems, Commun. Phys. 7, 109 (2024).
  68. V. I. Arnold, On matrices depending on parameters, Russ. Math. Surv. 26, 29 (1971).
  69. L. N. Trefethen, Computation of pseudospectra, Acta Numerica 8, 247 (1999).
  70. M. Gerstenhaber, On dominance and varieties of commuting matrices, Ann. Math. 73, 324 (1961).
  71. D. H. Collingwood and W. M. McGovern, Nilpotent Orbits in Semisimple Lie Algebra: An Introduction (Routledge, New York, 1993).
  72. E. M. Graefe, U. Günther, H. J. Korsch, and A. E. Niederle, A non-Hermitian symmetric Bose–Hubbard model: Eigenvalue rings from unfolding higher-order exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 255206 (2008).
  73. F. R. Gantmakher, The Theory of Matrices(American Mathematical Soc., Providence, RI, 2000), Vol. 131.
  74. J. Gower, A modified Leverrier-Faddeev algorithm for matrices with multiple eigenvalues, Linear Algebra Appl. 31, 61 (1980).
  75. C. R. Givens, On the modified Leverrier-Faddeev algorithm, Linear Algebra Appl. 44, 161 (1982).
  76. E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1201 (1989).
  77. C. Weeks and M. Franz, Topological insulators on the Lieb and perovskite lattices, Phys. Rev. B 82, 085310 (2010).
  78. N. Goldman, D. F. Urban, and D. Bercioux, Topological phases for fermionic cold atoms on the Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. A 83, 063601 (2011).
  79. J. Arkinstall, M. H. Teimourpour, L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and H. Schomerus, Topological tight-binding models from nontrivial square roots, Phys. Rev. B 95, 165109 (2017).
  80. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  81. H. Schomerus, From scattering theory to complex wave dynamics in non-Hermitian PT-symmetric resonators, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20120194 (2013).
  82. S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, D. Choudhury, N. Goldman, P. Öhberg, E. Andersson, and R. R. Thomson, Observation of a localized flat-band state in a photonic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 245504 (2015).
  83. R. A. Vicencio, C. Cantillano, L. Morales-Inostroza, B. Real, C. Mejía-Cortés, S. Weimann, A. Szameit, and M. I. Molina, Observation of localized states in Lieb photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 245503 (2015).
  84. C. Poli, H. Schomerus, M. Bellec, U. Kuhl, and F. Mortessagne, Partial chiral symmetry-breaking as a route to spectrally isolated topological defect states in two-dimensional artificial materials, 2D Mater. 4, 025008 (2017).
  85. C. E. Whittaker, E. Cancellieri, P. M. Walker, D. R. Gulevich, H. Schomerus, D. Vaitiekus, B. Royall, D. M. Whittaker, E. Clarke, I. V. Iorsh, I. A. Shelykh, M. S. Skolnick, and D. N. Krizhanovskii, Exciton polaritons in a two-dimensional Lieb lattice with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 097401 (2018).
  86. A. Bhattacharya and B. Pal, Flat bands and nontrivial topological properties in an extended Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 100, 235145 (2019).
  87. X. Zhang, Y. Tian, J.-H. Jiang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Observation of higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 12, 5377 (2021).
  88. D. Zou, T. Chen, W. He, J. Bao, C. H. Lee, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Observation of hybrid higher-order skin-topological effect in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Commun. 12, 7201 (2021).
  89. J.-W. Ryu, J.-H. Han, and C.-H. Yi, Classification of multiple arbitrary-order non-Hermitian singularities, Phys. Rev. A 106, 012218 (2022).
  90. T. Yoshida, E. J. Bergholtz, and T. Bzdušek, Hopf exceptional points, arXiv:2504.13012.
  91. Research datasets at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16575522.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 112, 195433– Published 21 November, 2025
  • Received 6 August 2025
  • Revised 30 October 2025
  • Accepted 31 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation